Question:
Dinosaur and Human footprints?
TBaT
2007-12-13 11:41:16 UTC
I am an atheist, and I don't know how to explain this. Can an athiest who knows fill me in on how this is possible. The only thing I can think of is the layers have been shifted over time so they overlap or something. Maybe similar to N transforms in archaeology. Anyway does anyone have the scientific reason behind these footprints. I would like to know incase a christian brings it up in an argument against me haha!
Twenty answers:
Dendronbat Crocoduck
2007-12-13 11:43:49 UTC
The ones in Texas are a proven fraud. You should be able to find lots of information on the web.



Here's a good link

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html
A.Mercer
2007-12-13 11:47:50 UTC
I am thinking you are referring to the prints found along the Paluxy River in Texas. There is a print that seems to look like a human print. However, paleontologists say that it is a dinosaur footprint that is just a bit deformed. Even a lot of creationists do not believe it is a human footprint. There are still some that try to make the claim.



I took a geology class from a guy who went there and looked at the print when it was first discovered (or at least when it hit the news back then). He studied it and said that it was a dinosaur footprint because it was missing a couple of digits in the print. Later when he looked at it again, those missing digits were now there. It seems that the fossil print magically grew over night.
FUNdie
2007-12-13 11:49:51 UTC
Atheists cannot explain it. The layers are not disrupted; the footprints are in the exact same layer and are not "washed in" from somewhere else.

They also cannot explain the fact that these footprints are those of giants. The footprints are those of 12-foot-tall humans, with a stride of 3 feet. Some of the prints are barefeet, while others are shod. Some of the human footprints are actually IN the dinosaur prints, which show that the humans and the dinosaurs were running in the same direction, with the humans behind. They were probably running from rapidly rising floodwaters. We know that before the Flood, there were giants. The atmosphere was such that gigantism among humans and animals was common.
upside
2007-12-13 11:50:41 UTC
the dinosaur print next to human print has been studied by mainstream and alternative historians.The prints have been said to be from the same period of time,it is very controversial right now because history is turning more and more evidence pushing the age of man back millions of years earlier than what we are taught to believe.The dating of the prints are said to go back more than 60 million years at a time when man was not supposed to be around but people are uncovering more information to support a older history for humans.If you want you could read a book called forbidden archeology.It has evidence in it concerning the hidden history of man,or you could look up some websites dealing with ooparts(out of place artifacts).There's some pretty interesting things that might make you question what we think we know
Bajingo
2007-12-13 11:50:04 UTC
Oh they'll bring it up in an argument. What they won't do is back down, even though it is proven to be a false claim. (Dishonesty is tenacious when necessary for an agenda...)



They were dinosaur tracks.



You'll probably also encounter more blatant BS such as the 'fossilised foot' found in situ in a cowboy boot.



I don't see how they claim to be so moral and religious when they lie so blatantly. I sometimes feel like we are travelling back in time to the days of PT Barnum and travelling 'freakshows', where people are eager to believe in quack claims, fake mummies, dried monkeyfish and '9th Wonders Of The World', as long as it is in opposition to 'science'.
Pirate AM™
2007-12-13 11:46:51 UTC
This has been proven to be a fraud. First the footprint were not human or even remotely human and second the land owner actually modified several to make them more human like.



There are several other claims that have been discredited: There is a claim that human footprints have been found with trilobites in them and that a hammer was found in Cretaceous deposits (London Texas Hammer). These have been proven to be untrue as well.
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:47:29 UTC
There were no human footprints in, next to or near dinosaur prints. Here's a site that might help.
sjpatejak
2007-12-13 12:01:48 UTC
Eve sitting in a very sexy frock next to an over sized velociraptor





Genesis 2:25 says of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden:

"And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed."



There were no frocks, sexy or otherwise, before the fall! Whoever organized this exhibit is guilty of heresy!! BURN HIM!!!
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:43:45 UTC
Link? Article?
dbmcbain
2007-12-13 11:45:23 UTC
If you are talking about the so-called human footprints near Glen Rose, TX, they are simply not human footprints. Look at the website below.



http://paleo.cc/paluxy/paluxy.htm
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:48:34 UTC
I believe in God, and i believe god created everyhitn g, and every animal..It would make sense to have dinos and men walking the earth the same time when science has insisted that we were all barely coming out of the caves, covered in hair like our monkey relatives..lol..anyways..a cute little joke is that if eveolution has turned monkeys into humans, why then do we still have monkeys..I dont see any other wildlife that has supposedly evolved around do you..where are the giant creatures of yesteryear that has supposedly turned into all the furry little creatures we have today..why are monkeys the only animal that hasnt changed, aside from alligators and such
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:48:22 UTC
Remember the TV series about the army medics in Korea?





...I think the name was...





...H*O*A*X...





...or something like that...





...no wait! THAT was the name for the dino and human footprints "discovery".





hyuk, hyuk
tahoe02_4me62
2007-12-13 11:52:38 UTC
Dinosaurs As an archaeologist and geologist, I quite enjoyed the Awake! articles on dinosaurs. (February 8, 1990) With regard to the time of their disappearance, the articles stated that human fossils occur in rock layers well above those containing dinosaur fossils and that there are rock layers in between. In many parts of the world, these intervening rock layers, or strata, also contain fossils. Many new varieties, or kinds, of animals appear in these layers, such as elephants, saber-toothed cats, and several varieties of flightless running birds. This would strongly suggest that God was still creating new animals after the dinosaurs were gone and that the dinosaurs disappeared during the sixth creative epoch.



G. S., Canada



The Bible does not specify the time of either the creation or the disappearance of dinosaurs. Nevertheless, the comments of G. S. are of interest.—ED.



The Dating of Dinosaurs



Dinosaur bones are regularly found in lower earth layers than are human bones, leading many to conclude that they belong to an earlier time period. Geologists call this time the Mesozoic period and subdivide it into the Cretaceous, Jurassic, and Triassic periods. The time frames used for these periods are on the order of tens of millions of years. But has this been established with any certainty?



One method being used to measure the age of fossils is called radiocarbon dating. This dating system measures the rate of decay of radioactive carbon from the point of death of the organism. “Once an organism dies, it no longer absorbs new carbon dioxide from its environment, and the proportion of the isotope falls off over time as it undergoes radioactive decay,” states Science and Technology Illustrated.



However, there are severe problems with the system. First, when the fossil is considered to be about 50,000 years old, its level of radioactivity has fallen so low that it can be detected only with great difficulty. Second, even in more recent specimens, this level has fallen so low that it is still extremely difficult to measure accurately. Third, scientists can measure the present-day rate of radioactive carbon formation but have no way of measuring carbon concentrations in the distant past.



So whether they use the radiocarbon method for dating fossils or other methods, such as employing radioactive potassium, uranium, or thorium, for dating rocks, scientists are unable to establish the original levels of those elements through ages of time. Thus, professor of metallurgy Melvin A. Cook observes: “One may only guess these concentrations [of radioactive materials], and the age results thus obtained can be no better than this guess.” That would especially be so when we consider that the Flood of Noah’s day over 4,300 years ago brought enormous changes in the atmosphere and on earth.



Dartmouth College geologists Charles Officer and Charles Drake further add doubt to the accuracy of radioactive dating. They state: “We conclude that iridium and other associated elements were not deposited instantaneously . . . but rather that there was an intense and variable influx of these constituents during a relatively short geologic time interval on the order of 10,000 to 100,000 years.” They argue that the breakup and movement of the continents disrupted the entire globe, causing volcanic eruptions, blocking sunlight and fouling the atmosphere. Certainly, such disruptive events could change radioactivity levels, thus distorting results from modern-day radioactive clocks.



The Genesis Account and Dinosaurs



While the radioactive dating method is innovative, it is still based on speculation and assumption. In contrast, the Bible account in the first chapter of Genesis simply states the general order of creation. It allows for possibly thousands of millions of years for the formation of the earth and many millenniums in six creative eras, or “days,” to prepare the earth for human habitation.



Some dinosaurs (and pterosaurs) may indeed have been created in the fifth era listed in Genesis, when the Bible says that God made “flying creatures” and “great sea monsters.” Perhaps other types of dinosaurs were created in the sixth epoch. The vast array of dinosaurs with their huge appetites would have been appropriate considering the abundant vegetation that evidently existed in their time.—Genesis 1:20-24.



When the dinosaurs had fulfilled their purpose, God ended their life. But the Bible is silent on how he did that or when. We can be sure that dinosaurs were created by Jehovah for a purpose, even if we do not fully understand that purpose at this time. They were no mistake, no product of evolution. That they suddenly appear in the fossil record unconnected to any fossil ancestors, and also disappear without leaving connecting fossil links, is evidence against the view that such animals gradually evolved over millions of years of time. Thus, the fossil record does not support the evolution theory. Instead, it harmonizes with the Bible’s view of creative acts of God.



The fossil record of the dinosaurs supports not evolution but creation.
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:43:38 UTC
I bet you could find them here. Check out this lovely diorama (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CreationMuseum15.png ) in the Creation Museum (http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/ars-takes-a-field-trip-the-creation-museum.ars ) showing Eve sitting in a very sexy frock next to an over sized velociraptor.



I also love the photo of a parent hoisting his child onto a saddled tricertops (http://media.arstechnica.com/news.media/400/526893292_e95eb57c10.jpg ).
?
2007-12-13 11:46:58 UTC
The ancient drawings of dinosaurs is more problematic for you.
Shawn B
2007-12-13 12:02:22 UTC
They were elongated metapod tracks.



http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy/tsite.html
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:53:32 UTC
yeah, it's not human footprints.
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:45:50 UTC
It is simply more proof that men and dinosaurs are NOT that old...they lived together...even as Genesis said....



Why try to explain away the obvious...God is the Creator...get over it.



Your attitude is typical of evolutionist wanna bees when confronted with evidence that conflicts with their evolution philosophy ...simply look for a way to expaain it away.....Ha, ha, lol Real scientific methodology....ha, ha lol...thanks for revealing you hypocricy for all to see.



Dinosaur and human footprints found TOGETHER......http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks.htm
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:43:40 UTC
My first reaction is. It's faked.
anonymous
2007-12-13 11:44:06 UTC
it would be a hoax...good luck...


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...