Question:
Atheists, is this what science teaches people by telling them they are nothing more than animals?
?
2011-06-21 07:33:06 UTC
News headlines -

NJ professor accused of running prostitution site

David Flory teaches physics at Fairleigh Dickinson University's campus in Teaneck, N.J.



Mom charged with murder of 5-year-old son beat child to death because he broke the TV


Manhunt underway for drug fiend who shot, killed four people at close range in Long Island pharmacy

Brooklyn man gunned down outside pizzeria in Lower East Side

Physics teacher, gang banger, pop culture mom and drug addict; none of them are Christians if that is what you were going to say.

Science teaches that there is no accountability for your actions. It teaches that we are all animals and once we die that is it. No judgment. Is science turning people to animalistic behavior? Is evolution teaching people survival of the fittest? You be the judge.
40 answers:
2011-06-21 07:37:25 UTC
Isn't it odd how you can't use facts to convince the atheist? This is why Jesus said to love them even when they do not deserve it.
2011-06-21 07:36:04 UTC
. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘". . . . . . . . . .``~.,

. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."-.,

. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ":,

. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,

. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}

. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}

. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:". . . ./

. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./

. . . . . . . /__.(. . ."~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./

. . . . . . /(_. . "~,_. . . .."~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/

. . . .. .{.._$;_. . ."=,_. . . ."-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~"; /. .. .}

. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . ."=-._. . .";,,./`. . /" . . . ./. .. ../

. . . .. . .\`~,. . .."~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../

. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-"

. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\

. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__

,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,

. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\

. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`\ c



"Science" has nothing to do with morality and ethics and laws.

"Theism" has nothing to do with morality and ethics and laws.



How we behave evolved over millions of years leading us to be a social/pack species. As our intelligence grew, we wrote down our instincts to make it easier for large numbers to live together.



If you want to talk about atrocities and human rights violations... Read your bible, torah, and quran.



☰ ☮ ♥ ☯♫ ☀ ∞ ≈ ☮ ♥ ☯♫ ☀ ∞ ≈☮ ♥ ☯♫ ≈ ☀ ∞ ☰

✖ Biblical Pornography

"Yet she multiplied her whoredoms, in calling to remembrance the days of her youth, wherein she had played the harlot in the land of Egypt. For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses." (Ezekiel 23: 19-21)



"and lusted after her paramours there, whose members were like those of donkeys, and whose emission was like that of stallions." (Ezekiel 23: 21, NRSV)



Comment: The story of the sister whores, Aholah and Aholibah gives a moral lesson against the sins of the flesh. But why does God have to describe their adventures in such pornographic detail? Does God love porn?



What parent would want their children reading verse 21 about comparing the size of men's penises to donkey genitals and the sperm flow to that of horse issues?



As any adult religious parent might believe, such lustful descriptions, if culled from secular sources, would corrupt children should they happen to read them. Should it not also corrupt children if read from the Bible?



✖ Happy To Kill Children

"Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." (Psalms 137:9, KJV)



"How blessed will be the one who seizes and dashes your little ones Against the rock." (Psalms 137:9, New American Bible)



"Happy the man who shall seize and smash your little ones against the rock!" (Psalms 137:9, New American Bible)



"a blessing on anyone who seizes your babies and shatters them against a rock!" (Psalms 137:9, Jerusalem Bible)



Comment: Ask a Christian friend whether he or she should feel happy to dash a child against the rocks. Your friend will most likely stare at you in horror, much less believe this idea exists in their sacred Bible.



Many Churches have found this verse quite embarrassing. It gives no wonder why priests, Jews, and Christians alike, who quote from Psalms 137, always leave out this last verse.

☰ ☮ ♥ ☯♫ ☀ ∞ ≈ ☮ ♥ ☯♫ ☀ ∞ ≈☮ ♥ ☯♫ ≈ ☀ ∞ ☰



You, as a human, are an

░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀ ░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█

░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█ ░░░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█

░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░░▀ ░░░▀░▀ ░▀ ░▀▀▀
?
2011-06-21 07:50:47 UTC
You have a couple false assumptions here.



A: Science is not a moral philosophy, it is a process by which information is obtained, examined, and proven. Science is what explains electricity, physics, as well as evolution.



B: Science does not teach there is no accountability for your actions. If anything "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" which is a law of physics AKA science is a very direct version of accountability.



C: I don't know of much science into afterlife, but our being physically animals, doesn't make our value any different. Some animals have claws for weapons, some have teeth, some have poisons and venom and all manner of strange adaptations which allows them to survive. Humans have one too, society and intellect. We bond together and share what we know. These are our Animalistic behaviors. Murder is not acceptable in any society.



D: Survival of the fittest, isn't a metaphor for some kind of evolutionary Thunder-dome scenario as you seem to be implying. It means the creature best adapted to its surroundings will thrive. Any person who understood evolution, and even moderate understanding of basic human conduct, would know that killing people does not put one in a position of best adapted to society. These actions are the actions of rogue, random killers.



E: You are making large assumptions as well that any of these people believed, and the reason for their killing. Two of them are completely unidentified, one of them is a psychotic mother, and the other is a sleazy professor. Still not sure being a pimp is the moral equivalent of murdering 4 people while tripping.
A Nonny Mouse
2011-06-21 07:46:33 UTC
Interesting one sided argument you have there. Firstly you fail to make a connection between the headlines you give and religion or, specifically, the lack thereof. Secondly you fail to mention all the paedophile priests, the "honour killings" as decreed by Islam, the genocide caused by religious fanaticism, the sectarian violence in Northern Ireland, across Africa and Europe. All this done in the name of one god or another.



You religious types conveniently forget that a child brought up in a secular household is at least as likely to be as moral, if not more moral than a child brought up in religious household. Japan is a Buddhist nation. Buddhism is a non-theist religion. Are Japanese people more or less moral and accountable for their actions than, for example, Americans, from a "christian " country.
2011-06-21 07:37:54 UTC
Ok what about accountability exactly. In the bible when the tribe took over a pagan village they were told to keep the women as slaves and throw the children off a cliff. Does that sound like a good story to teach in school. Or that if someone believes other than you we should stone them to death how about that one? Or God takes down the walls of jericho and the hebrew slaughter all the people inside men women and children. If you are gonna teach don't cherry pick like you are so use to! Teach them all of the attrocities likre the death of davids son for counting his troops the baby was crushed beneath a horse. yeah nothing in comparison. And you say accountability! All they have to do is get clean while they are in jail and repent and convert and magically nothing happened and you wanna teach them this? Yeah why don't we just teach them to all be hypocrites that hate others destroy society throw us back into the dark ages if we don't kill each other first, bomb some abortion clinics stone children for being disruptive. Kill all the handicapped for not pulling their wieght while we are at it and show no love towards one another. Yeah attrocities and accountability time for you to take some you retard.
2011-06-21 07:40:19 UTC
"Science teaches that there is no accountability for your actions."



No, it doesn't. Science makes no comment whatsoever on "accountability." Your statement is either woefully ignorant or intentionally dishonest, I can't tell which.



It is a *fact* that we are animals. That fact does not mean anything other than that we are animals. Your rather silly attempt at an incorrect appeal to consequences fallacy doesn't change the facts.



You should also keep in mind that it's christianity whose fundamental principle is an escape from accountability -- you're the ones who desperately believe somebody else took the accountability for your bad acts from you, by having himself offered up as a blood sacrifice. Rational people understand that they're responsible for the consequences of their own actions, and that an imagined blood sacrifice doesn't take that away from them. Christians are the ones trying to desperately avoid accountability, not others.



Oh, and one more thing: no "animals" but humans kill members of their own species out of greed or jealousy. You could learn a lot from "animals."



Peace.
?
2011-06-21 07:49:56 UTC
I suggest that you not put forth Christianity or your Bible as good moral bases.



The Bible teaches that people can do almost anything (except blaspheme a holy ghost), and then telepathically tell a magic man in the sky that they are really sorry and won't do it again, and they are forgiven!



The idea of blood sacrifice for atonement (i.e. Jesus dying for other people's sins) is immoral -- punishing the innocent to free the guilty.



The Bible is full of doctrines and examples that civilized people reject:

* Slavery

* Genocide

* Rape and Incest

* Male domination

* Female subjugation

* Blood sacrifice (including that of the mythical Jesus)

* Death penalty for minor infractions (over 50 verses -- see 1st link)

* Ancient myths about the origins of the world



Humans are just another animal species. Get over it. See the 2nd link for explicit evidence.

-
Ranger
2011-06-21 07:41:00 UTC
How about these Christian Headlines.

Christians capture Jerusalem and murder every man, woman and child who believed in the one true God, but didn't worship him in the same manner as Christians.

Christians hold Inquisition in Spain, thousands burned alive for belonging to a different church.

Christians murder Thousands of European Christians who thought the earth was round, the sun did not circle the earth and they could read and write, by ripping their intestines from the victims body while still alive and burned in front of them while the disemboweled were forced to watch until they died.



History shows that when Religion commits murder, it is done on massive scales.
lhvinny
2011-06-21 07:46:40 UTC
Humans are animals. Are you not a tetrapod? Are you not a placental mammal? Care you not a carbon-based RNA/DNA coded organism? Humans fit every definition of animal.

"Science teaches that there is no accountability for your actions." Where? What science book says there is no accountability? On the contrary, science is based on the idea that certain actions have certain predictable results and consequences.

"It teaches that we are all animals and once we die that is it." So? How is that relevant? Do you have evidence indicating that it is false?
2011-06-21 07:47:43 UTC
You're a very angry person directing your anger at atheist. You show no connection between atheism and any of these items in your question. For example, atheism has no connection to David Flory teaches physics. You're seeing connections that just don't exist. Something is not right with your thinking.
Kelly + Eternal Universal Energy
2011-06-21 07:45:45 UTC
Where did you read that those people believed humans are nothing more than animals?



Also I don't see any information about the upbringing of those people nor what may have happened to them to shape them into what they became.



You should know that most people who abuse others were abused themselves and that is where they learned it from.. absolutely nothing to do with science or religion.



Hate, viciousness, cruelty.. are all learned behaviors.



We are all animals, no less or more than any other.. and just like any other we live what we learn. The religious are just as prone to learning bad behaviors as anyone else, they just have divine excuses.
Purple Monkey Dishwasher
2011-06-21 07:48:46 UTC
how do you know none of them are christians? Do you have a link to any of these articles? or are you just making things up?



actually science teaches us that we are a animal that lives in a society. this means we live best when we work together. religion teaches that you kill those that believe differently from you. or at the least make them outcasts. its in direct contradiction to us being a social creature.



im willing to bet 3 of the 4 you listed were christian.
2011-06-21 07:48:40 UTC
Science teaches that there is no "accountability" for your actions? REALLY?



Admit it ... you don't know a goddamn thing about "science."



If you did, you'd know that "for every action, there is a reaction" (ie, a consequence).



Are you trying to tell us ... that, without the fear of punishment by your god ... that YOU would run wild in the streets, without fear of judgement, committing crimes and murders? How many Christians are in the nation's prisons, as opposed to atheists?



You have so much to learn, but your head is so full of nonsense that you have no more room left for REAL knowledge.
torpex2002
2011-06-21 07:40:25 UTC
As opposed to your doctrine which means you can commit absolutely any crime or sin and confess your sins so as to believe you will still go to heaven?



Yours is the biggest get out clause ever - no matter what you've done, just repent because your maker is infinitely merciful.



At least we are in touch with the reality of the situation, our actions have consequences that we are responsible for, not some divine rule maker to please to be rewarded.



Science tells us how it IS, not how things OUGHT to be.



Please try not to confuse the two in future.
Dragon Master
2011-06-21 07:51:56 UTC
Quote: "Science teaches that there is no accountability for your actions."



Don't be ridiculous. THE LAW holds you accountable for your actions. Your conscience holds you accountable for your actions.



Only people who cannot mentally grasp either of the above need a sky daddy to keep them from doing bad stuff lol.
2011-06-21 07:50:32 UTC
What? Why are none of them christians? Where is it written?

Humans are animals, and religious people are the ones who ruin humanity, making people rush through this life to reach the afterlife.

Science studies reality. Religion teaches mythology.
dethmiayr
2011-06-21 08:14:05 UTC
I think I learned in science that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. So accountability would be the reaction to these actions.
2011-06-21 07:37:37 UTC
Science teaches that there is no accountability for your actions.



Lie.



You may feel that people are incapable of being good or moral without a belief in the christian god. Luckily there are millions of people all over the world proving that wrong every minute of every day.
2011-06-21 07:37:55 UTC
Actually, science indicates morality exists on a species level as a way of ensuring offspring (and therefore the species) survives.



And what about the priest who sexually abuses a child? Or who is caught stealing? What about the conservative Christian politician caught in an airport bathroom having homosexual sex (decrying it only days before)? What are their excuses?
nyphdinmd
2011-06-21 07:38:20 UTC
Very selective sampling I must say. What about adding your TV preachers, you know, the ones who cheated on their wives, did drugs and had homosexual intercourse. Oh, and let's not leave out the catholic pristhood. And what about all the women your good christian ancestors burned because some little girls accused them of being witches? And I could waste my time finding acts of violence and debauchery committed by "good christians" but why bother? You all have as many bumps and warts as rest of us.
?
2011-06-21 07:36:56 UTC
Common sense teaches us that we do not have to wait for death to suffer the consequences of our misdeeds, that no "god" judges us.



We are in fact animals, however, most of us have attained a higher level of intelligence.



Taoist/Atheist (socially moral)



Edit: Man, you really are clueless, aren't you? See what happens when you come to a gunfight wearing pantyhose and carrying a short stick?
2011-06-21 07:47:59 UTC
We are animals. Society gives us accountability and judgment for our actions. I find it very hard to believe that you think religion has never been the cause of violence and cruelty.
Barking Toad
2011-06-21 07:40:57 UTC
"Science teaches that there is no accountability for your actions."



Why do you lie? I thought there was some text or other you guys were supposed to read that said something about the whole "bearing false witness" thing?
Martin T
2011-06-21 07:39:03 UTC
So why is the crime rate in the US so high?

There are very few countries with a higher proportion of creationists than the US.
Grillparzer
2011-06-21 07:46:18 UTC
How would you know what religion these people practice? It seems to be an assumption, a very big assumption, on your part that it isn't Christianity.
?
2011-06-21 07:38:55 UTC
I think you need to check the meaning of the expression 'gang banger'.
2011-06-21 07:41:15 UTC
I saw the word prostitution in there somewhere.
pmc123
2011-06-21 07:39:55 UTC
You confuse ethics and morality with religion. I expect that many of these perpetrators believe in a deity - that doesn't stop them.
2011-06-21 07:34:30 UTC
The News does, not science.
?
2011-06-21 07:37:15 UTC
And you think religion is the solution?Religion is one of the main causes of there cases,directly or indirectly.

Deal with it.Science helps mankind.
2011-06-21 07:35:32 UTC
Well, no, but science does teach that humans are animals and that is fact.
Zombieguysuspended
2011-06-21 07:42:33 UTC
"Something happened! Let's blame it on SCIENCE!"



I think those words sum up your idiotic mind perfectly.
2011-06-21 07:35:47 UTC
"Science teaches that there is no accountability for your actions"

That is completely absurd!

And so is your incredible lack of understanding of what Science is.
Robert Abuse
2011-06-21 07:36:20 UTC
Science investigates evidence and we are all animals are we not?

Or are you a vegetable or a mineral?
dude
2011-06-21 07:35:38 UTC
What about Andrea Yeats who thought her kids were the devil and killed them, etc etc. ?
?
2011-06-21 07:35:18 UTC
I'm not an Atheist, but I can't understand what the real question is. How do you expect an Atheist to understand it and even try to give a realistic response?
QUEST?
2011-06-21 07:37:06 UTC
the people mentioned are probably christians. so what is new?
2011-06-21 07:34:16 UTC
No, only an ignorant would believe that.
Tomemoth
2011-06-21 07:50:18 UTC
What else would we be?
2011-06-21 07:34:00 UTC
not again...


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...