"17 pieces of evidence against evolution"?

Question

Posted earlier in a list:
1. Moon Dust
2. Magnetic Field
3. Fossil Record
4. Embryonic Recapitulation
5. Probability
6. Second Law of Thermodynamics
7. Vestigial Organs
8. Fossil and Fossil Fuel Formation
9. Punctuated Equilibria
10. Homology/Molecular Biology
11. Dating Methods
12. Dinosaurs
13. Sun's Diameter
14. Nile River's Overflow*
15. Earth's Rotation
16. Written Record
17. The Bible

Of these (aside from 14, for which I found no source), which of these arguments has NOT been debunked?

Note: http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

Answer 1

23 pieces of evidence for evolution:



1. Gene flow

2. Genetic drift

3. Mutation

4. Allele frequency changes

5. DNA between human and chimp

6. Fossil record

7. Biodiversity

8. Adaption

9. Abiogenesis

10. Homologous traits and sequences

11. Universal common ancestor

12. Genetic hitchhicking

13. Proteins

15. RNA

16. Natural selection

18. Speciation

19. Microevolution

20. Co-operation

21. Selective sweep

22. Mutagenesis

23. Crosslinking

24. Spontaneous hydrolysis

Answer 2

The claim for 14 is that measurements of the sediments deposited annually by the Nile suggest the earth is younger than 30,000 years old. Apparently Creationists haven't considered that the Nile river may not have been in existence since the beginning of the earth and may, itself, be only about 30,000 years old.

Answer 3

Do you mean debunked as arguments against the theory of evolution?



Those are not arguments against evolution to begin with. They do not need to be debunked, only dismissed out of hand.



The ONLY way to alter the current thinking in science is for new scientific discoveries to be made. So far, all scientific discoveries SUPPORT the theory of evolution. ALL of them.



Non-scientists can not possibly have any effect on it.



.

Answer 4

There are a number of issues that disprove Evolution. a million. "No Genetic suggestion Being extra" even as scientists look less than the microscope they see no observable evidence of any new genetic code (or DNA) slowly being extra via the years for a species. in reality, we do not see one type of residing animal forming into yet another type of residing animal (i.e. a reptile forming right into a chook). that is purely via the translation of bones and wager paintings that such loopy assumptions are made. 2. "existence does not Come From Non-existence" Evolution proposes that existence originated from non existence. besides the undeniable fact that, we do not see rocks, lava, stars, or nebulas coming up any unmarried celled oganisms. there is not any observable evidence by any skill that even remotely exhibits this ridiculous theory. 3. "wager words in Secular technology" the subsequent time you examine an earthly technology article or mag get entry to, please get your highlighter out and start up highlighting the "wager words" interior them. in case you do, you'll locate such words as "might want to correctly be", "might want to correctly be", "exhibits", "Is a chance", ECT. In different words, once you examine the highlighted words in attitude of the technology they're claiming, you'll locate the they don't look to be positive about the technology they're pushing. Why? because there is not any observable technology to diminish back up Macro-Evolution. 4. "Micro-Evolution isn't Macro-Evolution" Macro-Evolution is the large leap of one animal style forming into yet another animal style in spite of any residing observable examples. Micro-Evolution is the small micro-transformations interior the DNA of animal that it already has. So after we see caterpillars forming into butterflies, we are not seeing a clean animal style forming besides the undeniable fact that an identical animal style. In different words, that caterpillar with wings gained't variety into something yet something that is an insect. it gained't benefit any new DNA magically via the years purely because we wish it to be real. Micro-Evolution is an observable reality. Macro-Evolution has no observable technology to diminish back it up. organic and easy. besides the undeniable fact that, many scientists element to Micro-Evolution as evidence of Macro-Evolution. besides the undeniable fact that, they're thoroughly 2 different recommendations and may not be wondered to be an identical ingredient as secular scientists wish it to be. ....

Answer 5

That's evidence? I would have to see (and probably laugh at) the details.



Seriously, the person who made the list clearly does not understand what evolution is about. (Change in biological entities from generation to generation, not the creation of the earth/universe/life).

Answer 6

More like 17 examples of an idiot's thoughts.

Answer 7

Looks like EPIC FAIL to the 17th power to me.

Answer 8

You sem to have that backwards.

You've listed 16 pieces of evidence against creationism.

Answer 9

Well 17 has definitely been debunked.

Answer 10

It's funny because most of those are evidence for evolution. Also the bible is invalid evidence

Answer 11

Actually all of these have been proven correct and solved, all of them but one, the Bible

you've never been to school a day in your life have you?

Answer 12

How my Dinosaur spiky penis of 3.24ft Disprove evolution???

Answer 13

None

Answer 14

Well, I'm so glad that you are here to point these things out to us. *rolls eyes*

Answer 15

Even if evolution wasn't true, it doesn't mean God exists. Calm down.



But this list is bullshit, and evolution is real.

Answer 16

We all spring from apes, but you didn't spring far enough.

Answer 17

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

Answer 18

Good, now we can all relax.

Answer 19

Don't tell me!....God did it, right?