Question:
Why do Christians use terms like "evidence" and "proof" when it's obvious they don't care to apply the relevant concepts in their own lives?
?
2015-09-23 06:10:16 UTC
Perhaps they are just trying to use those words because they presume that it makes them appear somewhat intelligent?

Isn't it about time they give up trying to appear as rational?
Twelve answers:
Ricardo
2015-09-23 08:00:15 UTC
Why do Christians use terms like "evidence" and "proof" when it's obvious they don't care to apply the relevant concepts in their own lives?



- Fundies make up anything that is convenient. They make up words and their own meanings to words and use or not use them as convenient.
Old Man Dirt
2015-09-23 08:01:27 UTC
I shouldn't waste my time on this one!

Those that claim the Christians are with out evidence or proof do not understand the actual meanings of the words!

As stated in a widely read publication- they consider themselves a law unto themselves. They ignore published definitions such as "Webster's" and invent their own meanings to suit their over inflated egos!
Nous
2015-09-23 06:31:54 UTC
to try and hide the truth!



The only way primitive religion exists today is through the child abuse of forcing it into very, very young children but thanks to better education and growing intellects so many teens are able to discover the truth, throw off the indoctrination and step into the real world!



So atheism is not a conscious decision or a belief but a realisation!



The first person to produce a single tiny little piece of verifiable evidence for any god will become world famous and mega rich!



Academia states that in the absence of any sort of evidence of the existence of something it must be deemed not to exist until verifiable evidence is found - thus god is held not to exist pending some sort of verifiable evidence.



The bible is what is called "Faction” A fictional story set in a factual time and place. Thus the time, place and real historical characters are all correct but the fictional characters and stories are not!



There is not one single mention of Jesus in the entire Roman record - that is right - not one! At the same time as he was supposed to have been around there were a number of Jews claiming to be the messiah - all of whom are well recorded!



There is not a single contemporary record from any source and even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!



He was supposed to have been a huge problem to the Romans and produced wonderful miracles but still not one contemporary record?



Even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!



Pilate is recorded in the Roman record as a somewhat lack luster man but no mention of a Jesus, a trial or crucifixion that would surely have been used to make him look brighter!



At best he was an amalgam of those others but almost certainly never existed!



Not one word of it is contemporary with the period and was not written until several hundred years after the period the story is set in!! How did the apostles write their books more than a hundred years after they would have been dead?



Christianity is an invention of the Italians and that is why it came from the Holy ROMAN Catholic church!



Please realize that those claims for the Old historians are worthless since they were not even born until long after everyone in the stories would have been so long dead!



Josephus AD 37 – AD 100

Tacitus AD 56 – AD 120

Suetonius - 69 – 130 AD

Pliny the Younger, 61 AD – 112 AD

Justin Martyr (Saint Justin) AD103–165 AD

Lucian - AD 120 -180 AD but he was hostile to Christianity and openly mocked it.

Pamphilius AD 240-309 AD

Eusebius AD 263 – 339 AD

Photius AD 877 – 886 AD



Thallus - But there are no actual record of him except a fragment of writing which mentions the sack of Troy [109 BC] Showing that he was clearly not alive in biblical times.



Some even try to use Seneca. 4 BCE – 65 CE but as a Stoic Philosopher he opposed religion yet made not a single mention of a Jesus or Christianity!



Even funnier is trying to claim Celsus AD ? – 177 AD Who said that Jesus was a Jew who’se mother was a poor Jewish girl whose husband, who was a carpenter, drove her away because of her adultery with a Roman soldier named Panthera. She gave birth to an illegitimate child named Jesus. In Egypt, Jesus became learned in sorcery and upon his return presented himself as a god.
Christian Sinner
2015-09-23 06:21:10 UTC
Isn't it somewhat intelligent to refer to evidence and proof as those things any individual can accept as evidence, and evidence sufficient to form a judgment of proof? What's proof to you isn't necessarily going to prove it to me. And vice versa. So what is it are you complaining about? They you don't accept anything as proof from Christians, and that should mean no one can accept anything as evidence?



You don't give anyone a choice beyond your own. I don't think that is intelligent.
Ruth
2015-09-23 06:13:45 UTC
No I use terms like "evidence" and "proof " because I have my evidence. I'm sure the same can be said of millions, perhaps billions of others.
G C
2015-09-23 06:48:04 UTC
When I go into my yard and see droppings, trees rubbed, vegetation eaten down to nubs, and footprints, I do not have to actually see the deer to know they are there. The evidence speaks for itself.



The evidence in nature is so overwhelming that there is a Supreme Being in charge that man is without excuse.
2015-09-23 06:17:18 UTC
They just twist the meaning of those words to suit their ends. I wouldn't worry about it. If they were to try it in any court of law, any half decent lawyer would tear their argument to shreds in seconds (then they would redefine the word "guilty" to mean "you still can't prove there's not a god, nah nah nah nah nah").
?
2015-09-23 06:27:28 UTC
You talk of "Christians" and point fingers regarding "proof", yet did you even ask for proof of their claim to be Christian? Hypocritical, no.
2015-09-23 06:13:02 UTC
Evidence is the bane of christianity. All evidence indicates they are wrong.

So they misrepresent it like they do everything else.
b@dger the awful
2015-09-23 06:15:02 UTC
When it comes to religion people will see what they want to see.
mt75689
2015-09-23 06:18:40 UTC
You choose to believe only in what you can see and touch, and we choose to believe in that which we have experienced for ourselves.
Disciple of Truth
2015-09-23 08:02:38 UTC
Maybe, and maybe their perspective is just from a different vantage point.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...