Question:
Atheists - If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
Barnabas
2017-02-01 22:25:26 UTC
Account for missing land sharks. According to your theory the predate us.
Thirteen answers:
FishmarketStew
2017-02-02 04:02:31 UTC
*Long, dreadful sigh*
pugjw9896
2017-02-02 02:46:34 UTC
Land sharks???Oh ! you mean estate agents.
Tommy
2017-02-02 02:36:08 UTC
You might be confused about what an Atheist is and what a Scientist is. I am godless and not a scientist.
2017-02-01 23:03:34 UTC
Evolution is a lie.
Pyriform
2017-02-01 22:42:39 UTC
Sharks are very well adapted to living in the water. Most of their adaptations for that environment would not work very well on land, and their descendants would have to compete with animals which have the advantage of millions of years of evolution on land.
Mercuri
2017-02-01 22:30:56 UTC
Because you don't understand how evolution works. Do you know how when Europeans came to colonize the Americans there were still Europeans. Guess what, when one animal evolves into another, there are still versions of the original animal running around. Because science.
Randy the Atheist
2017-02-01 22:30:24 UTC
In a nutshell, evolution is caused by a malfunction in the DNA processes due to its error-prone replication system which causes small or large mutations in the new copies of itself. These mutated copies are then thrown at Natural Selection where it tries to exterminate them into oblivion through a wide variety of tools such as miscarriage, starvation, disease or sexual avoidance.



Successful evolution occurs when a species generates an accidental mutation that just so happens to evade the Natural Selection Blender of Death. It doesn't have to be the fittest. It just has to have the right mutation at the right moment.



Most of these evolutionary mutations come about when a species is being pulverized by something - be it the weather or a new invasive predator. The smaller populations make inbreeding corruption rates significantly higher which makes mutation rates skyrocket. This high rate of mutation causes better chances for evolutionary adaptation at the expense of death, debilitation and disease which Natural Selection happily destroys into oblivion. These failed lines of genetic experimentation are what we see on the charts as extinction. The lines that continue are what we see as transitionals - random genetic accidents that shuffled the right amount of DNA into the right places.



Our own human lineage evolved from such an accident - the accidental fusion of chromosomes 12 and 13 in the offspring of an ancient primate that is now extinct.



And theres also a flip side to erroneous fusions. Human males are being born with an extra Y chromosome - called XYY syndrome. Its not fatal and causes no diseases. It only causes increased growth velocity in boys and an enhanced stature. It is living proof that added complexity can arise from random errors in DNA transcriptions. XYY males have an extra 50 million base pairs in their DNA compared to the rest of us which makes them a potentially new macroevolutionary genesis for humans - provided our population dwindles down to a few thousand people.



Among the many misconceptions, Evolution does not mean "development" or "improvement". Evolution is only about "change". Whether it is change for better or change for worse, it doesnt matter because Evolution is random. Sometimes a species evolves a certain trait that later causes its extinction like the desert chamelion that evolved a bright red spot which attracted more sexual partners thus overtaking the population - an evolutionary success. However, it later attracted the eyes of something else - the desert falcon - and now they are all extinct.



Evolution became a discovered fact of nature when we uncovered DNA's error-prone replication system and continues to yield expected results such as this: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/01/evolution-of-multicellularity/
2017-02-01 22:30:16 UTC
Doesn't work like that



@keye that's an outright lie, it's not a "pathological desire." You're one to talk, god kills an awful lot of babies in the Bible and he lets babies die every day.
broeklien
2017-02-01 22:29:07 UTC
You are some messed up christian

But then again

This must me your first try to have a genuine thought.



Maybe read a book. NO NOT THAT BOOK!!!! A book about evolution.
Mutations Killed Darwin Fish
2017-02-01 22:27:59 UTC
Don't take evolution too seriously. It has not been observed in nature.
robin_lionheart
2017-02-02 08:00:37 UTC
"Atheists" isn't a synonym for "scientists". Atheism has nothing to do with evolution.



Evolution has no goal of producing "land sharks" or anything in particular. Occasionally an advantageous mutation will spread and thrive, while disadvantageous ones tend to die off.



Some fish evolved into land animals, Some fish evolved into mighty undersea hunters, like sharks. Some fish evolved into fearsome predators on both water and land, like alligators.
Archer
2017-02-02 00:01:39 UTC
You seem to have very little knowledge about much!
2017-02-01 22:29:23 UTC
why would they evolve to live on the land when their evolution has been so successful in the sea you test tube. Most of Earths life lives in the sea. 80% of life lives in the sea. thick as sh*t


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...