What archaeology backs up the Bible?

Question

I'm always seeing fundies claim that the Bible is history backed up by archaeology. What archaeology is this?

Answer 1

The Bible was written by those who lived in or knew about the places they wrote about. As for the events they wrote about, some of them were historical, but, being myth-oriented and superstitious, they interpreted and embellished their stories about those events accordingly.



Finding archaeological sites mentioned in the Bible is therefore not surprising, but they are hardly proof that the supernatural embellishments by the writers are true.



I doubt very much that Bible believers would conclude that the gods of the ancient Greeks exist simply because archaeologists found the city of Troy exactly as it was described in the Iliad.

Answer 2

whether all the platforms and cities defined interior the Bible have been got here across with the aid of archaeology, that does no longer recommend the Bible is the information of god. like the peoples of different cultures of the time, the Israelites could have written approximately cities, etc., that have been a element of their lives, yet, additionally like the different peoples of the time, they interpreted activities in words of their superstitions and myths, and that they wrote their bills hence. If archaeology proves the Bible god exists, then it additionally proves that the Greek gods exist by way of fact the city of Troy became into got here across precisely because it somewhat is defined interior the Iliad. extra: after all, the data shows that lots of the bills given interior the Bible have been written long as quickly as they supposedly occurred, and the writers have been offering an adorned, and infrequently fictional, view of activities so as to glorify the previous history of their u . s .. And, in actuality, opposite to what others have pronounced in answer to the question, various analyze have got here across that archaeology has disproved a great number of what the Bible says. case in point, lots of the cities supposedly conquered with the aid of the Israelites did no longer have the city partitions that the Bible says that they had, and many different cities did no longer even exist on the time they have been meant to have been conquered. See William Stiebling, Jr., Out of the wilderness? Archaelogy and the Exodus/Conquest Narratives; and The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New imaginative and prescient of historical Israel and the inspiration of Its Sacred Texts, with the aid of Neil Silberman and Israel Finkelstein.

Answer 3

None except that that "backs up" information that was also received from other more trustworthy sources. Such as the location of certain cities and the like. If your asking if anything backs up some of the major stories, such as Jesus' existence, the exodus, God's punishing of Sodom and Gomorrah, etc, there is NONE.



Edit: The "unearthing" of additional, fictional stories is NOT evidence that "supports" the bible. In fact, some of those fictional stories contradict and/or compete with the bible.

Answer 4

I seem to recall skeptics asserting the Bible was hogwash because there was never such a think as the Hittite empire - until evidence of the Hittite empire surfaced in th 18th century.



In 1993, archeologists digging at Tel Dan in the Galilee in northern Israel found a fragment of a stone inscription that clearly refers to the "house of David" and identifies David as the "king of Israel."



A stone inscription from Egypt confirms that Israel was established as a nation in Canaan centuries before the reign of King David



The Ebla tablets found by archaeologists in 1975 provide solid evidence about life in the ancient world.Fragments mentioned the names of David (Da-u-dum), Abraham (Ab-ra-mu) and Ishmael (Ish-ma-il). The unearthing of the Ebla tablets in northern Syria in the 1970s, uncovered names of biblical patriarchs, and the discovery of ancient regions such as ‘Canaan,’ all legitimize the patriarchal accounts, proving them to be viable and genuine



Ruins in Cyprus, Galatia, Philippi, Thessalonica, Berea, Athens, Corinth, Ephesus, Rome and surrounding areas, have many references about Paul of the New Testament.



There are many other examples but many details including various kings of both Israel and Judah are recorded in the historical writings of other nations.



Is every single details validated - no but more than enough to assert the historical statements in the Bible are likely accurate.



Jake: Since science is limited to the exploration of the natural world nobody with a brain would expect any scientific backing for supernatural events, or historical events in general because without a time machine, you can't go back to observe things.

Answer 5

Christian specuology and Jesuit assumption are their normal sources, fact wise the nearest it comes to history is mention of existing places. This in the absence of any dating is taken as verification, when in fact the dates of events simply dont tally. Example, the traceless Exodus the battle of Jerico is another, teh origin of teh Israelites wasnt exodus it was Canaan, in the hills, as teh tribe multiplied they migrated to the area of Palestine. Difficult to wade through the cr ap on the web. if you want to check out Israel Finklstein Professor of Archeology at Tel Aviv university

Answer 6

The Noah's Ark found in Turkey

Answer 7

http://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-exodus-route.htm



one example is coins that were minted during Antonius Felix's commission

Answer 8

looks like your in a little bit of a pickle there

Answer 9

Dead Sea scrolls. Thousands more.