Question:
If evolution can not accrue Why is it that different species of animal can interbred?
GODZILLA CHICKEN
2007-02-07 13:54:19 UTC
Dog and Wolf interbred. Dog is known to have evolved from the wolf. House cat and bob cat interbreed. thought to have had a common ancestor. Horse and Donkey interbreed a sigh of a common ancestor. Lion and tiger have been interbread others with common ancestors. I would imagine there are hundreds of different species with common ancestors which could interbread and produce live viable offspring. You notice I have carefully avoided mentioning man and monkey but who knows?
28 answers:
kingstubborn
2007-02-07 13:58:17 UTC
But man eating a monkey produces AIDS.



Notice, too, how many of those interbreedings, such as the mule, result in sterile offspring incapable of reproducing themselves. Apparently they have the right connections and genes to reproduce living offspring, just not naturally occurring offspring capable of perpetuating themselves.
LabGrrl
2007-02-07 14:11:03 UTC
The problem is in your definition.

Horses and Donkeys produce sterile offspring. The general definition of a species consists of animals that can breed together and produce fertile offspring. (Lions and Tigers also produce sterile offspring)

There are a few species that were called species in the past (before DNA testing) that we still call species because we biologists are lazy. The canids are a big one. Wolves share more DNA with some breeds of domestic dog than some domestic dog breeds share with other domestic god breeds. Honest biologists probably can be forced to admit that wolves are basically another variety of plain old dog.

Housecats are the same way. There is a species of wildcat called felis silvestris silvestris which can breed freely with felis silvestris domesticus, which is cute little Fluffy over there.

There are a few distinct differences between the two in patterns and behaviors, but they are *really* just subspecies, not distinct species...

In short, if it can interbreed and produce fertile offspring, it's not a different species....





A more rigorous question for those that find evolution to be spurious might be why we can witness it over time....

http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/060713_darwin_finch.html

We can even manipulate it. Most people who have taken a college genetics course have probably done so in the lab with things like yeast and fruitflies, who can have thousands of generations in the time it takes for a human to carry a child to full term.





By the way...I think you meant "Occur" (Happen) not accrue (build up, like interest)
Michelle_My_Belle
2007-02-07 14:07:21 UTC
Everything you have mentioned Betty are interspecies, they are within the Family-- and the dog, wolf, etc are subspecies of said Family (breed)



A different species interbreeding is said dog and a cat. That can not occur because they are not within the same Family genus.



I think your question is an excellent question and took some thought. Sorry to say that the misunderstanding of what the term 'species' is.



Not to gross you out, but since you made a point of NOT mentioning human/monkey interbreeding ;) I will state that there is scientific evidence of sexual relations between these two species. Not the greatest thought I know. However what has occurred is illnesses from primate to human, and that is what we call 'jumped the barrier' --the species barrier. Known 'jumpers' are Ebola virus, (only type II), swine flu, and the now dreaded avian flu is making it's rounds (not to say that swine and bird 'relations' occurred...just giving examples).



Have a terrific day! And again thank you for taking the time to ask an intelligent question, so nice to see around here in Y!A.

Have a great day!



edited to clarify.
anonymous
2007-02-07 14:03:43 UTC
It should be pointed out that in the example of the horse and donkey, the result is a mule, which is sterile. I am not aware if the result of a lion and tiger would be fertile.



The farther apart they are the less likely it will be that the offspring is fertile.



You are correct, the fact that breeding is possible at all is the result of a close common ancestor.



It has often been wondered if the Neanderthals (Homo Sapien Neanderthalis) simply merged with Homo Sapiens, but many have also stated that their offspring would probably be sterile.



I can't believe Yahoo xxxx out the H word lol
anonymous
2007-02-07 14:02:03 UTC
Men and monkeys actually can't. Nor can men and the Great Apes.



It's to do with how far apart they are within the clade. Dogs and wolves are actually "ring species" in other words, the separation is physical rather than genetic. Cats are similar, indicating a fairly recent separation.



Horses and donkeys can interbreed, producig viable young, but the young are sterile. Correct, the common ancestor is probbly further back.
anonymous
2016-05-24 08:07:31 UTC
Do you even understand evolution? At least when I troll against Christians I have the decency to read and understand the bible. Edit: Since this question seems legit, I will honestly answer it. Evolution is the process of selective forces choosing the most fit types of species to survive. Evolution is three parts: A.) a mutation occurs B.) The mutation causes a change in the species which ultimately gives it the advantage in surviving. C.) This new species survives and passes along it's genes. One selective force is environment; eg; hot/cold. Species that live in these environments will adapt to better survive in these environments, thus leading to diverse species. (There are many more reasons other then climate, it is just the easiest to explain).
anonymous
2007-02-07 14:03:51 UTC
Man and monkey cannot interbreed. The evolutionists never said man came from monkeys! They say that we evolved from 'ape like animals' Forget the monkeys thing - it is just a story invented by religions to discredit and lie about what evolution is all about. I know that monkeys also evolved from "ape like animals" but that does not mean it was from the same ape like animal that man evolved from (no one knows). And even if it was, their evolution took an obviously different course.
anonymous
2007-02-07 13:57:48 UTC
you should do more research. this is a stupid question. When a horse and donkey interbreed, the offspring is sterile...its called a mule and it is good for nothing except working to death. Dog is not "Known" to evolve from wolf. If a dog evolved from wolf, how come wolves still exist. in fact, if anything involved from anything, how come the original still exists. to suggest that something has evolve is to suggest that the original is no longer around and has been replaced by a better or more adapted species.

Of course dogs and wolves can interbreed......same as chinese and americans can interbreed.....just because there are slight differences in their DNA doesn't make them different species alltogether.

Basically what you are saying is that we all evolved from something else....so I guess the monkeys that are around today are going to be humans in 2000 years...so what will that make the humans?

You have obviously asked this question without having done your research.
Chrissy
2007-02-07 14:02:12 UTC
Call me insane, but I think that it is possible that some person has tried to breed with a monkey. It's just that -- there are crazy people in this world, and I would not be surprised. What's it called? Bestiality? or something like that. So, I think it could have possibly happened.



But yes, also, like someone else said, the mule cannot usually reproduce itself.



However, I am not even sure as to what your question is... So, I just gave you some thoughts.
Gaspode
2007-02-07 13:59:18 UTC
All the pairings you mentioned are between members of the same genus. Not all produce viable offspring.



If you want to mate with a monkey, go ahead. Just don't tells us about it.
Jarrett D
2007-02-07 14:02:09 UTC
They all fall under the same species.Not through evolution but more through natural selection do any of these animals exist today.even though they can successfully breed together,their offspring are all genetically flawed and can have no offspring of their own.The common ancestor of man is man
Plato
2007-02-07 14:13:49 UTC
You also carefully avoided reading your own question to correct typos or misspellings ... unless you just don't know better.



.. must be a 'sigh' of a common ancestor, eh?



The examples you cited are between members of the same genus.
anonymous
2007-02-07 13:56:52 UTC
I believe most species of ape have a different number of pairs of chromosomes from us. I'll have to check, on paper not by experiment of course.



Oh I just checked. I guess the consensus is that we have 1 fewer pair of chromosomes.
Ron H
2007-02-07 13:58:37 UTC
I think the definition of species is that they cannot breed with fertile offspring.
FUNdie
2007-02-07 13:59:18 UTC
What you are describing is actually mentioned in the Bible! God said that each "kind" of animal will only bring forth after its "kind". Dogs will produce some kind of dog. Cats will produce some kind of cat. Horses will produce some kind of horse. There is never ANY reproduction outside of this "kind". It simply doesn't occur, but evolutionists want you to believe that it does, despite evidence to the contrary. All Darwin ever proved was that pigeons produce pigeons and finches produce finches. He was actually proving the Bible correct, not evolution!
TULSA
2007-02-07 13:57:26 UTC
Some of the examples are Fallacy because the offspring is sterile, and they have different mating habits.
lilith
2007-02-07 13:58:59 UTC
That's very funny, my mom says stuff like "...it's the cousin of the ____" without her even realizing what she's admitting (She's Christian).



One time I got her to make a compromise, I got her to say evolution was possible, but god did it.

At least she's not an evolution denier, now : )
anonymous
2007-02-07 13:59:00 UTC
I don't recall that premise in the evolution theory
anonymous
2007-02-07 13:58:36 UTC
has any man tried to interbreed with a monkey?? um... ew?
anonymous
2007-02-07 13:59:07 UTC
it's science, dogs and wolves are similar enough genetically. but if the species are too different, then they can't.
anonymous
2007-02-07 13:57:28 UTC
dog was domesticated over hundreds maybe thousands of years by selective breeding by man genius ...
robtheman
2007-02-07 13:57:14 UTC
I offer my services if anyone wants to test the man/monkey hypothesis.
Kitty Lucy
2007-02-07 13:59:20 UTC
Humans can be primates, probably with less amount of hair.
anonymous
2007-02-07 14:00:01 UTC
that is how evoltion works being intered its make the next one better stronger and it goes on and on and on
therernonameleft
2007-02-07 13:57:01 UTC
yes
hot carl sagan: ninja for hire
2007-02-07 13:57:23 UTC
What are you asking? I'm confused.
anonymous
2007-02-07 13:58:15 UTC
Easy, because the one and only God let it happen.
anonymous
2007-02-07 13:57:07 UTC
a bob-cat and cat lol how'd they do that. Please go discuss this in the biology section.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...