Question:
Young Earth Creationists . Where is your evidence that the earth is only 6000 years old!?
anonymous
2014-05-13 14:49:09 UTC
I mean there is so much evidence that the Earth is Old like billions of years old . So where is you're evidence for a 6000 year old earth.

God bless you .
Eleven answers:
anonymous
2014-05-13 14:53:36 UTC
The age of the earth is really not that important is it. I cannot prove 6000 any more than you can prove 4.5 million... do I think the world is 6000 years old? I really dont know or care. what we really need to focus on is Jesus, that He is who He said He was and that He is our eternal salvation..
?
2014-05-13 14:52:49 UTC
There is no evidence; I think if humans lived with dinosaurs they would have been mentioned in the bible ; right
anonymous
2014-05-13 14:50:32 UTC
They have no evidence of anything, they always seem to carry an empty bag.
Sheltie Lover
2014-05-13 16:01:55 UTC
.



Even the Bible doesn't say that the Earth is only 6,000 years old.



It simply says that HUMANS have only been on the Earth for 6,000 years.





.



.
?
2014-05-13 15:44:50 UTC
The evidence that proves it to me?



1. I know the Creator.

2. I have been reconciled to the Creator through faith in Jesus Christ,

3. I asked Him.
Waldo
2014-05-13 15:02:32 UTC
They take an intelligently deigned approach to determining evidence for their claims. If you don't understand their reasoning it's because you are reading the bible wrong and you're a bad christian.
Someone Else
2014-05-13 15:00:56 UTC
Your question is kind of funny. It reflects you have failed to differentiate the meaning of "evidence" verses "speculation."



All we can do is look at what is, and then develop ideas or theories as to the what, when, how, why questions.



As it turns out, the earth really is about 6,000 years old.



And NO ONE HERE CAN PROVE OTHERWISE!



There was no one else around at the time the earth was created. No eye witnesses, so we can only guess. And the other responses to this question illustrates how BRAINWASHED most people are.



When God created the world, how do we know that God did not create it just the way it is? I mean, when God created a tree, did the tree have rings? (Like when you cut the tree down and count one ring for each year.) We don't know, but I am guessing that when God created the trees they looked like mature trees. And no one looking at any of these trees would have known God created them the day before.



And the same applies to our earth. Whatever we think we see (like signs of age) does not mean anything if God created it that way. For example, if we look at a mountain we may conclude that the mountain was formed by a volcano, and then shaped by millions of years of wind erosion, etc. Who says God did not create that mountain just the way it is? And yet, someone who did not know that God created the mountain just that way may think that mountain is millions of years old. But he would be wrong.



The same applies to stars created that are thousands of light-years away. God doesn't have to wait for the beam of light to reach the earth. If he can create the star, he can also create the light beam. Instantly. From nothing.



True born-again Christians believe the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that the earth is millions of years old. And yet, we can study the genealogies in the Bible, and piece together the time frames going all the way back to Adam and Eve. If we count the years, and count the generations, we do not find millions of years between Adam and Eve and today.



============= (Added)



In some ways, what does it matter? Or does it matter?



It only matters if someone is trying to figure out a way to discredit God's account of creation. If God did not create the world, and if God did not make Adam and Eve, and if Adam and Eve did not sin, then there is no "curse of sin." And there is no need to "get saved" from the consequences of sin.



So it does matter. It speaks to the beginning, and without this foundation, who needs God?



Thus, Satan's plan is to make sure everyone believes in the theory of evolution so that he can keep people away from God's saving grace.



So, how is Satan doing so far on this objective? Did Satan fool you?



Let’s take a poll. Please VOTE accordingly.



If Satan has fooled you, and you believe in the theory of evolution, please indicate with a “thumbs down” vote.



If you have rejected the theory of evolution, and plan to join us in heaven when you die, please indicate with the “thumbs up” vote.



Thanks for participating in our poll.



-
anonymous
2014-05-13 14:58:03 UTC
same data Atheists use

different results
anonymous
2014-05-13 14:53:33 UTC
They got 6,000 by doing a rough calculation based on the genealogy recorded in the Bible. But rather than recognizing that for the gaping plot hole that it is, they took it as absolute truth and decided all the physical evidence must be wrong.
anonymous
2014-05-13 14:51:04 UTC
It's actually in the bibble - according to the genealogies and the successions in Kings and Judges.



Hold on:



Ah!



http://bridavis.chickenfactory.net/timeline.htm



Utter junk of course.
Lighting the Way to Reality
2014-05-13 15:01:45 UTC
@Just a messenger: "do I think the world is 6000 years old? I really dont know or care. what we really need to focus on is Jesus, that He is who He said He was and that He is our eternal salvation..



In other words:



"I am a robot for Jesus."

"I am a robot for Jesus."

"I am a robot for Jesus."

"I am a robot for Jesus."

"I am a robot for Jesus."



"And I have no mind of my own."

"And I have no mind of my own."

"And I have no mind of my own."

"And I have no mind of my own."





Added



@Someone else, since you are so sure that the Bible has the absolutely correct description of the creation, then you must also believe this from the Bible.



According to Ecclesiastes 1:5 the sun goes (hasteth) around the earth



"The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose"



--as, of course, it must, since, according to Ps 93:1, Ps 96:10, and 1 Chr 16:30, the earth does not move. And the earth cannot move because, according to 1 Samuel 2:8 and Ps 75:3, it is placed on pillars. And because it is placed on pillars, it has an underside and an upper side, as confirmed by Isaiah 40:22 which indicates that the earth is a circle--i.e., a flat disk.



That is also confirmed by Proverbs 8:27, which describes god as beginning the creation of the world when he "drew a circle on the face of the deep" (ESV), (the Hebrew word translated as “circle,” "compass, “ and “horizon” in the different Bibles is the same word used for circle in Isaiah 40:22).



(The Hebrew word translated as "circle" in Isaiah 40:22 is chuwg, which means "circle" not "sphere." Strong's Concordance: "circle"..."describe a circle." Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament: "Circle...the earth conceived as a disc, Is 40:22." Hebrew-Aramaic and English Lexicon of the Old Testament: "draw round, make a circle." The ancient Hebrews would have gotten the idea of a circular earth by viewing the horizon from the top of a mountain.)



Underneath the flat disk of the earth is the abyss, the bottomless pit, which is referred to several times in the Bible (ex. Rev. 9:1,2).



That is also what is being referred to in Job 26:7 when it says that the earth hangs over nothing. (The Hebrew word translated "upon" in the KJV also means "over.") The actual sphere of the earth in space is not "suspended' or "hanging" "over" or "upon" nothing. It is orbiting the sun at 66,700 miles per hour. If the earth can be considered "hanging" over anything, it is the sun, which certainly is NOT nothing.



Several other verses in the Bible also indicate the earth is flat, such as Nebuchadnezzar's vision in Dan 4:10-11 (the tree could not be seen from all the earth if it were not flat). Dan 2:28 states that the visions of Nebuchadnezzar are from God. If the biblical god says the biblical earth is flat, it must be flat.



The original Hebrew word translated as firmament is raqiya, which is a noun derived from the Hebrew word raqa. That word is a verb meaning "to beat out," and is used in the bible in reference to beating out metal into plates or expanses of the metal (as in Exodus 39:3). So raqiya, as a noun, would literally mean "that which is beaten out."



The biblical firmament, or sky, is therefore a solid, beaten out expanse or vault set on the rim of the flat disk of the earth. That is confirmed in Job 37:18, which states:



"Can you beat out the vault of the skies as he does,

hard as a mirror of cast metal?" (New English Bible).



There, the Hebrew word translated as "beat out" (or "spread out" in other versions) is, as noted above, raqa.



The solid, or firm, nature of the biblical firmament is also indicated by Proverbs 8:27-28:



27. When he established the heavens...

28. When he made firm the skies above... [ASV, ESV, NRSV, NASV, NAB]



The Hebrew word translated as "firm" there is amats, which has a meaning of "be hard".



The solid vault of heaven is also implied in verses such as Deut 4:32:



"Ask now about the former days, long before your time, from the day God created man on the earth; ask from one end of the heavens to the other. Has anything so great as this ever happened, or has anything like it ever been heard of?"



The "ends of heaven" would be the base of the vault of heaven where it rests on the rim of the disk of the earth.



See also Ps 19:1-6, Isaiah 13:4-5, and, particularly, Matt 24:31, which states Jesus as saying:



"And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other."



The elect are those on the earth who will be saved in the last days. Jesus is saying there that the angels would gather the elect from all over the earth, from one side, or end, of the base of the vault of heaven to the other side or end, from the east, west, north, and south, which is what the reference to the four winds means.



The solid vault of heaven has a specific purpose in the Bible. As Genesis chapter one indicates, the whole cosmos consisted of water before the creation process began. Before god created the earth on the fourth day, he created the firmament of heaven on the second day.



6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so.



So that passage clearly indicates that the purpose of the solid firmament was to hold back the waters above the heaven. Furthermore, those waters continued to exist in the biblical cosmos, as indicated by Psalm 104:1-3 and Psalm 148:4. Also, the firmament of heaven has windows that are opened to let the water above the firmament fall as rain, as indicated by Genesis 7:11 and 8:2,



The stars in the biblical cosmos are just lights set in the firmament. As mere lights in the sky, they will fall to the earth in the Last Days (Matt 24:29), which conflicts with finding that the actual stars are other suns and many times larger than the earth.



So, according to the Bible the earth is a flat, immovable disk, supported by pillars and covered with a solid vault of heaven, the rim of which is is resting on the perimeter of the disk of the earth, and the stars are just lights set in the vault of heaven.



http://wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs/peterenns/files/2011/10/ANE-cosmos.jpeg



That this is the correct view of the biblical cosmos is shown by the fact that it describes a structure with parts that are fully consistent with each other. That structural consistency indicates that it accurately represents the cosmos as conceived by the ancient Hebrews and as its writers incorporated that view in the Bible.



In addition, according to the Bible, earth is the centerpiece of creation and in the Last Days god will destroy the earth and the heavens as part of his plan for mankind. (2 Peter 3:10)



Is that really realistic considering the vastness of the universe and the enormous number of galaxies? In the actual universe that science has uncovered, the earth is an insignificant mote, even more insignificant than the size of an atom is with respect to the size of the earth.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyS1rs_OsxA



It is the height of geocentric idiocy to think that the whole universe was created merely for the sake of the earth and its inhabitants. All of which goes to show that the cosmos of the Bible does not exist, and therefore the god who created it does not exist.



http://www.google.com/search?q=biblical+cosmos&nomo=1&biw=320&bih=504



So, if one fully accepts the modern, present-day view of the universe as factual, then one would have to conclude that the Bible reflects the ignorant, myth-based beliefs of its writers and is not the word of god.



By the way, the ancient Greek scientists knew that the earth is a sphere at the same time the writers of the Bible believed it to be as described above.



In the fourth century B.C. Aristotle presented several scientific arguments for a spherical earth, and Heraclides provided rational arguments to show that the earth is spinning on its axis. And in the third century B.C. Aristarchus even proposed a view of the solar system essentially the same as our modern view. He also measured the distance to the moon and its size with remarkable accuracy. Also in the third century B.C. Eratosthenes measured the circumference of the earth with remarkable accuracy.



Where in the Bible is anything comparable to that to be found?





In addition, there is further evidence from the Bible that it is just a conglomeration of myth, superstition, embellished histories, phony and false prophecies, and fabrications.



See my answers to these questions for examples.



https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20131124091540AAjZin3


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...