You are flat out wrong about Einstein's motivation for introducing the cosmological constant. At that time, the Big Bang had not yet been conceived. Einstein's original equations actually indicated that a steady state universe would not be stable. That is why he introduced his cosmological constant into his theory; it was to compensate for the supposed instability.
(EDIT: Einstein's original equations indicated that the universe had to be either expanding or contracting. At the time, there was no evidence for either, and the assumption was that neither was occurring. That is why he introduced the cosmological constant. So your characterization of his motivation is a flat-out lie.)
When it was found out later that the universe was actually expanding, and the universe was not at a steady state, it turned out that his original equations were actually correct and predicted the expansion as one of the two possibilities. Einstein subsequently said that the introduction of the cosmological constant was his greatest blunder.
You should get your facts straight.
Your other arguments are just as invalid.
Added:
The Big Bang is not evidence of a creator. And it sure as hell isn't evidence of the mythical, primitive, abhorrent tribal god that the ancient Israelites believed in.
The view of the cosmos that is found in the Bible is flat out contrary to what we have found out about the actual cosmos.
According to Ecclesiastes 1:5 the sun actually goes around the earth--as, of course, it must, since, according to Ps 93:1, Ps 96:10, and 1 Chr 16:30, the earth does not move. And the earth cannot move because, according to 1 Samuel 2:8 and Ps 75:3, it is placed on pillars. And because it is placed on pillars, it has an underside and an upper side, as confirmed by Isaiah 40:22 which indicates that the earth is a flat disk.
(If earth were a sphere it would not have an under side and an upper side. The Hebrew word translated as "circle" in Isaiah 40:22 is chuwg, which means "circle" not "sphere." Strong's Concordance: "circle"..."describe a circle." Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament: "Circle...the earth conceived as a disc, Is 40:22." Hebrew-Aramaic and English Lexicon of the Old Testament: "draw round, make a circle." If a sphere were meant, the Hebrew word duwr would have been used.)
Since the biblical earth is flat, it has an underside and under the earth is the abyss, which is referred to several times in the Bible. That is also what is being referred to in Job 26:7 when it says that the earth hangs over nothing. Job 26:7 implies that the earth has an upper side and an underside, which the actual earth does not have. (The original Hebrew word translated as "upon" in that passage in the KJV also means "over.") The actual sphere of the earth in space is not "suspended' or "hanging" "over" or "upon" nothing. It is orbiting the sun at 66,700 miles per hour.
There are several other verses in the Bible indicating the earth is flat. Nebuchadnezzar's vision in Dan 4:10-11 clearly indicates the earth is flat (if it were not flat the tree could not be seen from all the earth), and Dan 2:28 states that the visions of Nebuchadnezzar are from God. If the biblical god says the biblical earth is flat, it must be flat.
The original Hebrew word translated as firmament is raqiya. That is a noun derived from the Hebrew word raqa, which is a verb meaning "to beat out." That term is used in the bible in reference to beating out metal into plates or expanses of the metal (as in Exodus 39:3). So raqiya, as a noun, would literally mean "that which is beaten out."
The idea is that the firmament, or sky, is a solid, beaten out expanse or vault set on the rim of the flat disk of the earth. The firmament holds back the waters that are above the firmament, as stated in Genesis. If the firmament were not solid, it could not hold back the waters.
This understanding is confirmed in Job 37:18, which states:
"Can you beat out the vault of the skies as he does,
hard as a mirror of cast metal?" (New English Bible. .)
There, the Hebrew word translated as "beat out" (or "spread out" in other versions) is, as noted above, raqa.
Also, the stars in the biblical cosmos are just lights set in the firmament. As mere lights in the sky, they will fall to the earth in the Last Days (Matt 24:29), something that is ridiculous considering the actual stars are other suns and many times larger than the earth.
Some might say that the language of such things is just poetic allusion. If that is so, how does one determine what is allusion and what is not? Even if it is poetry, that does not mean that it cannot reflect what the writers of the Bible actually believed. And if the Bible is the word of god and god does not lie, would he make statements that are not factual even if they are in the form of poetry? Moreover, the above descriptions provide a coherent, structurally consistent view of the biblical cosmos and that view is consistent throughout the whole Bible.
So, if god is not a liar, and the Bible is god's word, then the present, modern-day view of the cosmos is totally wrong.
On the other hand, if one fully accepts the modern, present-day view of the cosmos as factual, then one would have to conclude that either god is a liar or the Bible is not the word of god.
Added:
There are trillions of planets in the universe. The odds are therefore that a very large number of planets are capable of supporting life. We just happen to be on one of them.
Added:
What I said above is not off subject.
You are the one who introduced the idea of a creator. I was emphasizing that that creator could not be the god of the Bible, and it is that god that most of the answerers, including you, associate with the idea of a creator. It is therefore disingenuous of you to say that what I said is off subject, since your whole motivation, regardless of whether you voiced it or not, was to confirm the god of the Bible as that creator.
Added:
And you did not apologize for your reprehensible false characterization of Einstein.
Added:
I am still waiting for you to apologize for your false character assassination of Einstein.