To be "Christian" is a cultural designation these days, as to say one is Muslim or Hindu. That is, a Christian can be part of a cultural milieu, a church goer (often) and one who says "Jesus!" in a moment of agony or stress.
"Christian" once signified a believer, but in our immediate global community, belief is not needed in order to be a "Christian".
If you take away the quotation marks, there is no actual difference.
To be "saved" is to be kept away from condemnation. "Therefore, there can be no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus". To be "in" Christ, as, to be in the "same place" [spiritually and genuinely] is to be "saved". All who are saved by this positioning are Christian, but not all who are "Christian" are saved, as not all Christians are convinced of the genuine nature of Jesus Christ.
No Christian who believes that Jesus Christ is no more than a prophet or the expression of some cosmic metaphor is actually saved. Salvation results from acceptance that He was/is God in human flesh. Simple as that. Not many Christians accept this. Thus, the question you pose.
Some Christians accept the Jesus [person] was/is God, and are saved by their belief. Some Christians do not believe this, and are not saved. Such is the teaching of the bible.
To be good is not to be saved. To accept childhood of the Creator is to be saved. When the man with the gun puts it to your head and asks you if Jesus Christ is the person of God on earth, your answer will determine your salvation.
Going to church and praying and supporting Christian values is not salvation, as has been well demonstrated by the Ku Klux Klan, among others. Saying your rosary is not salvation, as demonstrated by the Crusaders. Pounding the bible is not salvation, as demonstrated by the inquisition. Claiming ascendancy and prominence is not salvation, as the descendant of any person once the property of a white Christian slave owner will attest.
Salvation lies in childhood, being a child of the Creator. Christianity lies elsewhere.