2009-04-22 11:19:06 UTC
you know, despite the controversy of gay marriage, i think here it was a witch hunt, and while it is fairly obvious that the contest was rigged,
(there is NO way that a woman from california is beating out a woman from new york),
people are crapping on her for having the backbone to state her beliefs in the face of a gay judge costing her the contest in the face of an obvious bias.
quite frankly- she was asked what she believes, not what the law is or should be-
she even acknowledged about choice, part of choice is being able to disagree even if it is unpopular.
time and again i've said its wrong to not allow gay marriage, but its also wrong to disallow someone's beliefs even if those beliefs are foolish-
isn't this is an example of what a christian should be, separating her beliefs, from what is right? separating them from politics- they asked her the question and then tell her to keep her "politics" out of the contest?
if they didnt' want her opinion, they shouldnt' have asked her.
she might be a delusional religious whackjob, but so long as she is not pushing legislation (which she is not), doesn't she have the right to her opinion?
she also takes carefull note (CHRISTIANS PAY ATTENTION HERE- THIS IS WHY I GIVE HER RESPECT AND NOT Y/A CHRISTIANS),
that she QUALIFIES her statements as "for me" and "my BELIEFS".
and how screwed up is a "beauty" contest that focuses on more than her breasts and butt.
no one cares what these women have to say and no one wants to see how they can play violin. beauty contests are about how good they look. maybe when america and the world regained sight of that then these things would actually have some legitimacy again.