would there be religion if science provided an answer to life after death?

Question

is there life after death?

religion: yes.

science: no.

if science could provide a positive answer would religion disappear?

Answer 1

When you die your brain dies. Hello?



Anyway, science is not concerned with debunking superstition, that is the responsibility of individuals, each one to himself/herself.



Moreover there are motivations in religion are separate from logic and rational thinking.

.

Answer 2

A positive answer, as in "yes there is a life after death"?



I think that would rather confirm religion, wouldnt it? Thats the big beef. Atheists are going on about how when we die our bodies just rot and thats it.



Here's the thing. Even if science could prove there is an existence after death, it has no way to know WHY there is, or HOW we progress though it.....WHO is our creator or leader in that stage of our existence.

Answer 3

Not in the way most people believe that life after death will be. And no religion will not disappear, science will though

Answer 4

Of course there would still be religion. Religion has very little, if anything, to do with "life after death". BTW, science doesn't say there isn't some kind of existence after the event we call death. It says "I don't know". Of course, "science" doesn't say anything since it is not anthropomorphic.

Answer 5

I agree particularly with what you're saying. faith could nicely be a concept device meanwhile technological wisdom is an evidence of ways issues bodily artwork. I do ask your self how can issues exist, even the artwork of technological wisdom, with no writer of a few kind? Do i be conscious of whether its a stern Father up in heaven or probable a duality of parents or per threat a genderless stress? No, yet i be conscious of there's a stress unexplained and not in any respect must be fathomed by utilising human beings which operates our cosmic cycle and issues artwork as a universe as an entire. placed it this type: You get a extreme high quality new pair of footwear (or the different article of outfits/toy you elect). you're happy. the youngster in an underdeveloped third worldwide us of a whose making those footwear are not. somebody else gets employed over you. good for that person as a results of fact she or he's definitely perfect for the interest. Your indignant now yet weeks later you have yet another interest as a results of fact this is your calling. in case you get what I propose, issues artwork and ensue for a reason. that's distinctly much politically incorrect to assert this, yet God (particular i'm asserting the G-word), works in mysterious procedures. extremely, He/She does. yet differently to place this is definite the great bang could have got here approximately yet what's in the back of it. What made THIS? Our actual fact? technological wisdom can clarify oxygen, carbon, and what MAKES us stay, yet what created the debris and potential mandatory? food for concept. Starred, fantastic question.

Answer 6

We need not to speculate on the unlikely things.



There are quite a lot of things of this regarding this life that science is not able to handle. Like death.



If science can remove death, yes, religion will be zero. But do you see such a probability?

Answer 7

There always will be. Religious people are weak and always need something to believe in to live a happy life. They need to follow a book written thousands of years ago rather than their own morals. They would come up with some bullshit reason that "proves" the scientific discovery wrong.

Answer 8

It's Religion that needs to back up evidence behind their claims of life after death.



There is no evidence of life after death, therefore science believes there is no life after death.



Simple.

Answer 9

It depends how you look at conflicts between religion and science. I've heard the explanation that when religion tries to explain scientific facts (evolution, creation), it is overstepping its boundaries (and at these points in the Torah, it should be taken figuratively). And when science tries to explain morals, it is overstepping ITS boundaries.

Answer 10

You know....science has been senselessly and unsuccessfully attempting to disprove GOD for ions. You think that just because modern man & modern science APPEAR to be taking such leaps and advances that they will somehow come upon something NEW? Come now....



What will prove the ultimate success is when man wises up and recognizes that in-spite of all their knowledge and learning that God has more knowledge, more learning, more power and more eternal know as well as understands ALL science, all physical & natural laws of the universe perfectly and completely and THEN Man will acknowledge Him and humbly see the error of his ways.....



One day man will know all truths that God already knows and then spirituality and science will come together in perfect harmony.

Answer 11

If you mean can science prove a negative? According to science, it can't be done.

Answer 12

I doubt that (for a lot of people) cause science shows proof of things on earth. Afterlife isn't earth and even if it could I think a lot of people wouldn't anyway.

Answer 13

If science said yes, it would strengthen religion.

Answer 14

Religion is endless dogma. If you proved beyond all doubt that god didn't exist, they'd call you the devil and keep going. Religion will never end. Unfortunately.

Answer 15

Science cant touch afterlife issues.

Answer 16

science can't provide an answer because science only goes by facts,no one has facts on what happens when you die.religion has an answer because they speculate and make stuff up

Answer 17

yes there would still be religion. science can't make people whole.

Answer 18

There will always be 'religion'.

Answer 19

no - like always they would blame the proof on the devil and keep on going.

Answer 20

I believe there still would be.