Why are creationists under the illusion that this is a good argument against evolution?

Question

"Science is not imaginary but evolutionary theory is.

Charles Darwin said, “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ [organism] existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”

All I want the evolutionists to do is, fill in the names in the blank spaces. No mythical common ancestors or non-existent ancestors are allowed. If you say that the ancestors became extinct then the question is Were they not naturally selected to survive better than their ancestors who are still around? ‘You can’t have your cake and eat it too’!
………………………………….
(Organism 1)
|
|
V
…………………………….
(Organism 2)
|
|
V
…………………………….
(Organism 3)
|
|
V
(Humans)"

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

It seems that some creationists are under the illusion that our evolutionary ancestors went extinct, strange, I don't think I would be alive if I went extinct.

Answer 1

Mickey GG: "A lie told enough times becomes the truth." How true, my believing friend, how true.

Answer 2

Then let us see which human ancestor is still alive.



Complete the link, please.



Edit - A lie like the evolution theory?



Edit2 - The evolutionists came out with the Neanderthals and all the supposed human ancestors who THEY claim are extinct, not the creationists.



Ask/tell them.



Edit3 - You're making me laugh now! My ancestors were very much human. Tell me which animal is the LIVING (non-human) ancestor of humans since there are only extinct (close) human ancestors like Ardi and others?

Answer 3

Why are evolutionists under the illusion that they can prove something without God? Even if they have tons of evidence, we have one little book that's supposed to prove God! Beat that! Oh wait, you did.

Answer 4

Some creationist leader told them that it was a good argument and they don't know enough about science to see that it isn't. All they can do is parrot the argument.

Answer 5

Because they love straw men and other fallacies.

Answer 6

Homo erectus -> Homo heidelbergensis -> Homo neanderthalensis ->

Homo sapiens