Creationists, since there are no transitional fossils?

Question

what do you have to say about


JAWLESS FISH TO SHARKS:
Cladoselach
Tristychius
Ctenacanthus
Paleospinax
Spathobatis
Protospinax
JAWLESS TO BONY FISH:
Acanthodians
Cheirolepis
Mimia
Canobius
Aeduella
Parasemionotus
Oreochima
Leptolepis
BONY FISH TO AMPHIBIANS:
Osteolepis
Eusthenopteron
Sterropterygion
Tiktaalik
Panderichthys
Elpistostege
Obruchevichthys
Hynerpeton
Acanthostega
Ichthyostega
Pholidogaster
Pteroplax
EARLY TO MODERN AMPHIBIANS:
Pholidogaster
Dendrerpeton acadianum
Archegosaurus decheni
Eryops megacephalus
Trematops
Amphibamus Lyelli
Doleserpeton annectens
AMPHIBIAN TO FROG:
Vieraella
AMPHIBIAN TO EARLY REPTILE:
Proterogyrinus
Limnoscelis
Tseajaia
Solenodonsaurus
Hylonomus
Paleothyris
Captorhinus
Hylonomus
Paleothyris
EARLY TO MODERN REPTILES:
Petrolacosaurus
Araeoscelis
Apsisaurus
Claudiosaurus
Planocephalosaurus
Protorosaurus
Prolacerta
Proterosuchus
Hyperodapedon
Trilophosaurus
REPTILE TO BIRD:
Coelophysis
Deinonychus
Oviraptor
Lisboasaurus
Protoavis
Archeopteryx
Sinornis
Ambiortus
Hesperornis
Ichthyornis
EARLY REPTILE TO MAMMAL:
Paleothyris
Protoclepsydrops
Clepsydrops
Archaeothrys
Varanops
Haptodus
Dimetrodon
Sphenacodon
Biarmosuchia
Procynosuchus
Dvinia
Thrinaxcodon
Cynognathus
Diademodon
Probelesodon
Probainognathus
Exaeretodon
Oligokyphus
Kayentatherium
Pachygenelus
Diarthrognathus
Adelobasileus
Sinoconodon
Kuehneotherium
Eozostrodon
Morganucodon
Haldanodon
Peramus
Endotherium
Kielantherium
Aegialodon
Steropodon
Vincelestes
Pariadens
Kennalestes
Cimolestes
Procerberus
Gypsonictops
EARLY MAMMAL TO PRIMATE:
Palaechthon
Purgarotius
Cantius
Pelycodus
Amphipithecus
Pondaungia
Parapithecus
Propliopithecus
Aegyptopithecus
Proconsul
Limnopithecus
Dryopithecus
LAND MAMMAL TO WHALE:
Pakicetus
Nalacetus
Ichthyolestes
Gandakasia
Ambulocetus
Himalayacetus
Attockicetus
Remingtonocetus
Dalanistes
Kutchicetus
Andrewsiphius
Indocetus
Qaisracetus
Takracetus
Artiocetus
Babiacetus
Protocetus
Pappocetus
Eocetus
Georgiacetus
Natchitochia
Dorudon
Ancalacetus
Zygorhiza
Saghacetus
Chrysocetus
Gaviacetus
Pontogeneus
Basilosaurus
Basiloterus
PRIMATE TO HUMAN:
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Orrorin tugenensis
Ardipithecus ramidus
Ardipithecus kadabba
Australopithecus afarensis
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus garhi
Australopithecus bahrelghazali
Homo habilis
Homo Erectus

This is only a brief list and you can easily look up any of these on Google. Since creationists seem to deem my question not worthy of answering because I misspelled fossils on accident, why don't they answer now? They are even categorized.

BQ: Why do creationists have to no problem answering other questions with tons of spelling mistakes, but deem mine unworthy because of one mistake in the title?

fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils

Answer 1

What about the gaps between each of those. 0:)

Answer 2

Your first errors would perhaps be your assumption. it quite is quite a valid argument although, instruct me the billions of transitional fossils that would require to be in info. it quite is a valid argument via fact there are no. ultimately, i'm not sure what YOU propose by utilising the term "evolution". maximum persons are not confident of what it quite is. some think of mutation and version are examples of "evolution". There are literally volumes of evidences for advent. have you ever taken time to examine the info? And definite, the Bible IS info, as chronicled by utilising many secular historians, besides as extra modern people who've regarded on the info in gentle of scripture. (some very in demand criminal scholars besides) in case you may desire to have self belief that some thing comes from no longer something, it quite is quite your selection. in case you could additionally desire to purpose to illustrate your criticism of Christianity, it is likewise your selection. yet you have no longer finished something extra advantageous than proportion your opinion. you may attempt reading. there is extra info than you may think of, the two technical and nontechnical, that even you may understand.

Answer 3

No point in listing them by name, it just looks like science jargon that means nothing in the real world..



A missing link should be more like a lizard that evolved into a crocodile or the other way around, not a bird that evolved into a bird..



Or an apelike animal that evolved into an ape, that's not a missing link its basically the same animal..

Answer 4

They say: [sticking fingers in ears and closing eyes] "La la la la la -- no transitional fossils -- la la la la la -- Bible -- la la la la --- irreducible complexity or something -- la la la la...".



The ones with more spare time will go surf some creationist websites and say "No, that fossil was completely [insert "kind" here], not some transitional form!"

Answer 5

Would it help if I said Periophthalmus?



etc.

Answer 6

They can't answer this question - in fact most of them will not even attempt to do so. You and I know why they can't.

Answer 7

What did the Christian say when they skipped the chapter on evolution and failed the test?



"My dogma ate my homework."

Answer 8

Why didn't you list any fossils?

Answer 9

"This list is not in the bible. Therefore, it can't be true."

Answer 10

They were put there to "test our faith".

Answer 11

Wow, the pseudo-intelligence and virginity is strong with this one.