Question:
If the US "Founding Fathers" wanted to create a "Christian Nation", why didn't they write that down anywhere?
WWTSD?
2007-05-12 21:06:28 UTC
If the US "Founding Fathers" wanted to create a "Christian Nation", why didn't they write that down anywhere?
27 answers:
I WALK FUNNY
2007-05-12 21:11:08 UTC
Just because they didn't write it down, that doesn't mean that they didn't mean Christian! Is the word 'squirrel' in the Constitution? No. But there are lots of squirrels, and that's why they get all the food from the bird feeders!





DUH!!
wagaboodles
2007-05-12 21:16:01 UTC
The Founding Fathers didn't want to created a Christian Nation. America was founded from people primarily seeking religious freedom (sadly, they were all Christians seeking freedom from other Christians). The Founding Fathers knew better to impose a religion on the nation--a nation where all could worship freely was their desire. However, because many came from Christian backgrounds (whether or not they practiced or adhered to said beliefs is another post), the US constitution and other founding documents were heavily influenced by biblical values. But putting in specific Christian desires would go against their foundation of a free nation.
trebor namyl hcaeb
2007-05-12 21:55:33 UTC
The writings of our Founding Fathers makes it clear that they considered the United States to be a Christian nation, founded on Biblical principles.



An unexpurgated history of the beginning of the United States makes it clear that, with few exceptions, the founders were Christians and believed that they were under God's special protection.



The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation of the First Continental Congress and the U. S. Constitution drafted by the Second Continental Congress make it clear that they felt that we were "One Nation, Under God".



Why do you think the Ten Commandments are still engraved on the wall behind the bench where our U. S. Supreme Court Justices sit?
Calista
2007-05-12 21:12:28 UTC
Because America was founded on the idea of religious freedom. The Founding Fathers didn't want an official national religion since that's why pilgrims left England to begin with, most everyone at the time was Christian anyway.
?
2017-01-09 23:14:00 UTC
i think of it is likewise exciting that they have the form because of the fact the final regulation of the land and not the bible. The bible isn't even pronounced interior the form. in fact, the form especially prohibits our united states of america being ruled by making use of a faith or a faith being widespread by making use of the regulations. The founding fathers created a rustic the place human beings's rights have been significant. a rustic the place human beings are secure against having faith imposed upon them. some human beings as we talk are disenchanted at that. they think of that consistent with probability they could discover a thank you to undo the form in the event that they could make anybody have self assurance that the US is meant to be a "christian united states of america". possibly then they could get their regulations exceeded to impose christianity on others.
kind
2007-05-12 21:18:35 UTC
Many of the "Founding Fathers", their families and parents had fled to America from religious persecution in Europe. They realized that freedom of religion and other human rights could never be achieved if the Governement was officially a specific religious one. I think that's the reason, and I'm thankful for that. The day the US would start making religious laws the freedom of religion and the freedom of thought would disappear. So I think this is very important (to have no religious legislation).

Read the history of Europe and you would understand.
Mtacobell
2007-05-12 21:09:28 UTC
Hmm I didn't know that they wanted to creat a Christian Nation. Maybe they didn't write it down because they wrote on the amendments of any religion and stuff.
NHBaritone
2007-05-12 21:19:00 UTC
In the Treaty of Tripoli the flat out denied that the US was in any way a Christian Nation.
Izen G
2007-05-12 21:13:55 UTC
What they wanted to create and what they DID create was a nation which had "Freedom of religion"..... NOT a "Chirstian nation". Free to choose, practice, believe in ANY religion one desires.
Alien51
2007-05-12 21:11:42 UTC
I don't know much on this topic. But it is part of Christianity to not force its religion on anyone. That's everyone's choice, to follow Christianity or not. So "freedom of religion" would be in there, and a theocracy would be contradictary.
Bobby
2007-05-12 21:10:53 UTC
In the treaty of Tripoli (and one of our founding fathers Signed it too!!!)



It says



The USA is in no way shape or form a christian nation!



I re worded it a bit because they take to long to get to the point ^_^
ez123ed
2007-05-12 21:19:48 UTC
Smart politicians never write anything down. It's called plausible deniabiliity,
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:12:28 UTC
I think in their eagerness to create a better world in which to live, they never thought it would head south like it has in the last several years.
The Doctor
2007-05-12 21:27:55 UTC
You mean they didn't? The fact that they mentioned God doesn't prove it? I know they don't mention Jesus, but I thought "God" automatically equalled "Christianity". I didn't know you couldn't believe in God and not be a Christian.



Note: I am being sarcastic if you didn't figure it out already!
Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze
2007-05-12 21:18:45 UTC
They certainly didn't want a theocracy, given the Establishment Clause. But Christianity was so deeply woven into the cultural fabric, the term "religion" itself might as well have been understood as "any kind of Christian you want to be, even Catholic."
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:10:33 UTC
Funny thing is, I've read and heard that a lot of the "Founding Fathers" were Diests (sp?) and Freemasons.
Patty
2007-05-12 21:14:48 UTC
If you would read ALL their writings,instead of a select few paragraphs, you would see that the majority of them DID believe in God. Contrary to popular belief,Christians DO know their history very well.
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:10:56 UTC
They didn't want to create a "Christian Nation". They were atheists or deists.
AngelsFan
2007-05-12 21:13:46 UTC
99% of the people were Christians(except the Injuns).They talked about God in all they did.Geo. Washington even thanked Jesus in his retirement speech.They just figured it went without saying.I doubt if they thought 200 years later a bunch of Socialist Communist Secular Humanists were going to pervert all they sacrificed "Life ,home and estates " for.

(Sorry about that Injun crack,It amuses me )
kentrahen
2007-05-12 21:23:40 UTC
Simply, they did write it down. On most government documents, even today, it reads very plainly, "In the year of our Lord."
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:15:03 UTC
The answer is obvious... since they provided for religion without specifying one they were showing tolerance, but private intercourse and documented written communications between key framers of the constitution were very clear about their dislike of belief based thinking and they expressed their private desires that the country would eventually be finished with rigors of dogmatic religious ideas.



Just to amuse yourself, (and to learn a tad of truth,) look up the letters of Jefferson and I think you'll be surprised.



[][][] r u randy? [][][]

.
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:10:33 UTC
“We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal...”
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:11:07 UTC
Yep. It's obvious they didn't. I mean, they were ESCAPING a theocracy. Why don't people get that?
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:17:41 UTC
They didn't. It was defeated. Too many carpetbaggers.
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:09:47 UTC
Maybe it was because they were practicing Christians and they saw no reason to state the obvious.
anonymous
2007-05-12 21:10:16 UTC
don't believe everything you read.
robert p
2007-05-12 21:22:53 UTC
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America



hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.



We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.



He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.



He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.



He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.



He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.



He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.



He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.



He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.



He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.



He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.



He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.



He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.



He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.



He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:



For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:



For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:



For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:



For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:



For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:



For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:



For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies



For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:



For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.



He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.



He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.



He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.



He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.



He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.



In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.



Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred. to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.



We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...