Yes. If I am to accept God as omnipresent, then I must accept God as 'Maker', 'Made' and 'Making', which are fundamental to existence. God exists as The Trinity in the same way 'H2O' is still water, whether in the form of liquid, solid or vapor. The triune forms of Divinity represent the core aspects of the same 'Supreme Infinite Godhead'. Because man is often misled and confused by how we perceive form, people assume "different" means to imply "separate".
How is it possible to be "separate" and "apart" from an omnipresent God, expressed as 'everything', 'everywhere' at 'all times'? Hence, Jesus remarks, in John 10:30, "I and the Father are one". In John 14:11, Christ tells His follower, "Believe that I am in the Father and that the Father is in me, or at least believe in the works I am doing. Here Jesus acknowledges 'Maker, Made and Making', and offers three option is which tp place our faith, as if it makes no difference which is chosen.
Unaided, the mind and it's perception cannot distinguish "appearance" from 'essence'. The world of form is a "fancy distraction" to perception, that is transient and always subject to change. The world of form is expressed as "variety" and "diversity" which is suitable for the capacity to 'choose', hence 'freewill'. An 'Unlimited God' cannot be confined by the boundaries of a "this and that", "here and there", "now and then", and is universally found in all.
Although, it is a fact that Jesus inferred, on multiple occasions, that He is 'God Incarnate', it would be a fallacy for Him to say "I am God". God does not directly address Himself as 'Divinity', because it would imply "ego", which God/Christ are without. When Moses asked, "Who shall I tell them sent me?", God could had respond with anything, as He pleased. Yet He did not respond, "It is I...God!", but replied instead, "I am that which I am" (some interpret, "I shall be what I shall be").
God came as Christ to make the New Covenant with mankind, because how man often depicts God as "elsewhere", as in the Old Testament. Jesus did not come with the intent to challenge and contest the traditional orthodoxy of His time, only to "correct the record". The God Christ spoke of in the New Testament is described not only as a 'Transcendent Awareness', but an 'Immanent' one as well, confirming God's Divine Attribute of omnipresence. "The Kingdom of Heaven is within you."
Christ could not deny Himself as the Son of God, and taught that we are all God's children. Becoming manifest is the flesh is God's Way ('The Son') of relating to man, so that we may have 'faith' in Him. God does not interfere with our freewill to choose for ourselves without our consent, and cannot force us to see in the Way He does. All throughout the Bible, Jesus is telling us that the same 'Divine Essence' we recognize dwelling in Him, dwells in us all, thus God is always, 'there'.
(John 14:12) "Truly, I tell you, for whomever believe in Me will go on to do works greater than the one's I am doing, because I am going to the Father." In John 14, Jesus is explain to His disciples that they are too reliant on the "appearance" of form, and that His departure will be "superficial" only, and that His 'Essence' lives on within those who believe in Him as well as in the Father. Although, they accepted the 'Father' as God of Jesus, and Him the 'Son', their faith was still lacking within themselves.
Jesus did not teach to look for God outside of ourselves, initially, understanding the limitations in our observation of form, yet taught to believe in Him, Who will not lead us astray, if we must "rely on form". At times the disciples showed timidity in their faith, for instance, when Jesus invited them onto the water He stood upon, as if it were possible for The Lord to deceive them. As spiritually advanced as they were, they did not recognize the 'Father and Son' as the distinction between 'God Transcendent' and 'God Immanent'.