Question:
Do you need an example that there is a Creator?
2014-02-06 10:08:01 UTC
For more than a decade, Frédéric Dumoulin has worked in the field of pharmaceutical research at Ghent University in Belgium. At one time he was an atheist.

I’ve studied the effects of medications and toxins on living creatures. A design that impresses me is how our brain is protected from dangerous substances and from bacteria. There is a barrier that keeps our blood separate from our brain cells.

What is remarkable about that?

Over a hundred years ago, researchers noticed that substances introduced into the bloodstream enter every area of the body—except the brain and spinal cord. That fact is astonishing to me, because an immense network of tiny capillary vessels takes blood to every cell in the brain. All brain cells are cleaned, fed, and oxygenated by blood. So, how can our blood be kept separate from our brain cells? For many years it was a mystery.

How does the barrier work?

Microscopic blood vessels are not like plastic tubes that keep what’s inside separate from what’s outside. The walls of blood vessels are made of cells. These cells allow substances and microbes to pass through them and between them. However, the cells making up the blood vessels in our brain are different. They’re tightly connected to each other. These cells and the tight junctions between them are amazing. A vast array of complex mechanisms ensure that some things—such as oxygen, carbon dioxide, and glucose—pass between the bloodstream and the brain in a regulated way. But other compounds, proteins, and cells are kept out. So the blood-brain barrier operates at a molecular level to produce physical, chemical, and electrical barriers. For me, such design simply could not have evolved.
22 answers:
2014-02-06 10:17:12 UTC
By Simply looking around us - creation is evidence there is a creator :)
Paul
2014-02-06 10:55:41 UTC
No, but before I'll accept claims there is such a thing, I'll need evidence.

And you didn't offer any.



All you did was offer up somebody else's fallacious arguments from personal incredulity -- which are fallacies, and not "evidence" at all. And that YOU offered them up as being "true" because the person making them is some sort of "authority," then YOU compounded the issue by adding on a fallacious appeal to authority.



Still no evidence of any "creator." Nor any need for one. Any honest neurologist, by the way, knows that evolution by natural selection accounts for the brain's properties quite nicely, without having to be incredulous or pretend it's magic.
Mr.Longrove
2014-02-06 11:05:46 UTC
Thank God your eyes are open soonit. It actually takes more effort to disbelieve in God's Creation than to believe in it. Common sense alone tells a person that creation needs a creator



[Biological complexity doesn't prove creation]

Common sense tells me that nothing can 'evolve' those complexities. Same thing goes for animal instincts and animal defense mechanisms like the electric eel and the bombadier beetle, which sprays hot liquid from its tail section. How about whales and their sonar? How did that 'evolve'? Who or what made anything supposedly 'evolve' in the first place?



"I don't know how this could happen" = "God"

The same can be said about you evolutionists who are giving credit to your false god, evolution, which you all say is a coincidence anyway. You refuse to acknowledge that it was an intelligent Almighty God who made all things. The Bible foretold there would be people like you, and the results of your lies. Read the book of Romans, chapter 1, verses 18-32. The truth is that God left so much evidence of His existence that you're all without excuse.



Please watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onVj4BmfgEs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed5m9c_A32o
marsel_duchamp
2014-02-06 11:07:48 UTC
So? A pharmacist doesn't understand evolution. Big deal.

That blood brain barrier is not unique to humans. Reptiles have it too. It evolved, probably along with encephalization of the CNS.
James K
2014-02-06 10:09:42 UTC
"I can't imagine how that could have evolved" does not translate to "therefore Kali" (that is the god he was speaking of, right?



An argument from ignorance is still ignorance, even when the fellow is making a hundred year old argument though he is allegedly educated.



The evidence required to show a creator is to bring forth the creator, either directly or by detection. Sophistry is not evidence.
?
2014-02-06 10:23:02 UTC
Do you need an example that there is a Creator?

Still waiting



Since when has one man's ignorant opinion been ample justification for the believe in god, scientist or not?
?
2014-02-06 10:26:52 UTC
Biological complexity doesn't prove creation. I've got a novel idea. Why not invent a new ridiculous argument proving god instead of using the same tired old arguments that have been falling flat on their a$$e$ for the last 150 years or more. At least that would have a chance of being more or less entertaining. Seriously repeating the same tired old joke over and over and over and over and over again doesn't make it any more funny.
Mordent
2014-02-06 10:10:22 UTC
Of course it could. It was obviously beneficial to have this, so those creatures which did out-competed those which did not. No supernatural explanation required.



Fail.
2014-02-06 10:56:42 UTC
Variant CJD takes you barrier up a dark-alley, and kicks it's head in. Along with any number of other unspeakably horrible diseases, prions, virii, cancers and assorted afflictions and syndromes.
?
2014-02-06 10:10:47 UTC
nope. i have the testimony of the witness of jesus. thanx

however, the bible is very plain truth when it records the idea of a house being built always has a builder. usually a carpenter. if we know the house has a builder than its easy to see that the earth and sun have a creator.
?
2014-02-06 10:09:58 UTC
So, the idea is that since he doesn't know how this particular complexity evolved, then "God did it"?

That's a lousy excuse for proof.
2014-02-06 10:16:43 UTC
>For me, such design simply could not have evolved.



Ego - I don't understand evolution so Goddidit.





Why did you not just say that instead of writing one huge "affirming the consequent" fallacy.
2014-02-06 10:10:55 UTC
The fact that the system does not work perfectly with every chemical or in every situation would indicate the Creator was far from perfect if your little notion is correct, right?
2014-02-06 10:29:43 UTC
No, I have already one that takes all possible doubts. One based purely on the Logic that the universe could not have caused itself to exist. It means that something that preceded it did that job. Since anything else we could think is impossible, the Primal Cause has become obvious.
2014-02-06 10:12:30 UTC
so then..after all that..you couldn't provide a Valid example that there is a creator...





what a waste of time...
2014-02-06 10:08:42 UTC
Do you need an example that there is a Creator?





STILL WAITING



XTIAN LIE:

WitnessofJesus answered 4 secs ago

nope. i have the testimony of the witness of jesus. thanx
2014-02-06 10:09:36 UTC
Where do you people come up with this? How about meningitis? Sheesh.

How about encephalitis?

http://umm.edu/health/medical/altmed/condition/viral-encephalitis
Astaroth
2014-02-06 10:28:17 UTC
Mercury. Mercury! MERCURY!



Sorry, have you never studied mercury?
?
2014-02-06 10:09:26 UTC
A single man's account is not an example.
Gallivanting Galactic Gadfly
2014-02-06 10:09:27 UTC
parading your ignorance is an example of the ignorance required to believe in the need for a creator
?
2014-02-06 10:10:32 UTC
In other words:



"I don't know how this could happen" = "God"
panda
2014-02-06 10:12:39 UTC
what are you yammering on about? shouldn't you be busy worshipping ALL 1500 gods.....just in case one of them might be "the" god.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...