Question:
Would the world truly be better off without religion?
setsunaandkurai
2007-10-08 09:45:28 UTC
I want you to seriously think about this. The first knee-jerk reaction I had was that there would be a fewer wars but I doubt that. There'd be a reduction for a while but its Human nature to fight over such things as money, land, oil and beliefs (like democracy or communism). So on a Global scale I think itd be much the same.
Where i think we would suffer is all the humanitarium work that relgions do such as helping the homeless and providing education and those who take religion into their hearts tend to be nicer, happier people more willing to help their fellow man.

So overall I would say we'd be worse off without religion, but that's just my opinion, what's yours?
35 answers:
Gaspode
2007-10-08 10:03:20 UTC
Organized religion? Certainly. But you will never eliminate religion. The Communists tried and failed.



So long as people believe in a higher power than humankind, there will be religions. Religious leadership is a form of organized crime in large religions and a crime of opportunity where none exist (ala Lord of the Flies).



Like its bedfellow, politics, it attracts people who want to exercise control over their fellows into its leadership.



Politics at least started out with the toughest dude around being in charge if you didn't want your skull busted, and that same person was expected to provide some protection to you. It took very little time for the same sort of opportunists that start religions to get into politics through control over big dumb tough duds. That's why so many cultures have suffered and still suffer under theocracies.



As to the humanitarian work done by organized religions, I have to wonder how very much of it stems from them to begin with. They can sort of self-perpetuate in that regard.
budding author
2007-10-08 12:36:43 UTC
I was very interested in your answer from 'rocky_ Cardiff' !!

Also in your question.

If I can firstly try to reply to the Cardiff reply?

I do of course respect that point of view , because we 'atheists' are atheists doesn't mean we have no values or standards.

The conclusion is not the same as mine!

Which brings us nicely back to your question!

My conclusion (once again) is not the same as yours!

Religion (to my mind ) is one of the main

causes of strife on this planet, ( although maybe not the main one ) it has been and still is a very good excuse for a war.

We don't really want to get to the details , do we? Like the difference in the religious groups in Iraq?

No of course not!

The allies went there to dispose of a dictator, they did that didnt they?

Why are they still there? Is there not a little bit of religion bother on going??

So in my (humble opinion) the world would be a better place (truly) without relgiion.
atheist jesus
2007-10-08 10:03:21 UTC
Religion is killing our civilization. Look at what happens when religion is dominant - you get the Dark Ages, where there was zero progress, people were killed for being witches, and many other atrocities. Would you rather pray really hard for a cure for cancer, or have some dedicated scientists working on a cure?



For every dollar you donate to a church, only a small percentage actually goes to some humanitarian cause. The rest is spent just supporting the church. I would rather donate to an organization where 80-90% of the money went to the cause.



Religion has to go, it's time has come. I am tired of religion messing up the world. We all need to start acting rationally or we are all doomed.
2007-10-08 10:40:13 UTC
I know of many people who are Atheist who are kind generous respectful and have good morals, I am one. I don't believe the world would be safer without religion, without the fear of god for a huge amount of people there would be nothing from holding them back to murder rape etc..

The only thing that would make this world safer is for people to bring there children up to have a higher regard for life have more respect for others and set a good example by practising what you preach.
9_ladydi
2007-10-08 10:01:42 UTC
A lot of the wars from the past were not over religion (Christianity/Jewish etc.). Egypt had many gods but they would attack other country's just to enslave the people and take the nations wealth. Babylon attacked other countries just to acquire their wealth and property. Then the Greeks took over and then the Romans. Most wars are started by someone who wants something that is not his and then the other nation has to defend itself. Granted there were some wars that were about religion like the crusades.
Demetri w
2007-10-08 09:55:07 UTC
I would say no for some of the reasons you give. However I fully believe just as many people would help the poor and sick. I just think religion keeps some people sane. They seem to need to believe they're being watched to not go a little crazy.



I would modify the 'wish' to be. I wish that we lived in a world where people didn't need the crutch of religion and baseless beliefs. I wish humans had moved beyond the desire for all superstition and irrationality. I wish people could channel their difficulty with ambiguity and unanswered questions into finding answers for those questions instead of making up faerietales.
2007-10-08 09:56:44 UTC
Lets put it this way: There would be one less excuse for war, intolerance, racism and a hoard of other terrible things. You can't deny that religion is used as an excuse for these things.



I find it insulting that you think charity work would suffer without religion. That is simply not true, and you are also avoiding the fact that many natural disasters and famines have been written off as the will of God by many religions.
Super Atheist
2007-10-08 09:52:56 UTC
Yes. It's bad for society. Read this:



'Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies'



http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html



CD
?
2016-05-19 03:59:18 UTC
I will have to say No. I think that it serves as a moral compass for many ppl and maybe things would be much worse w/out it.. Personally, i would rather live my life believing there is a God and then later finding out that there isn't rather then living my life not believing there is a God and then later finding out there is.
nipper
2007-10-08 10:03:50 UTC
Would religion be better off without the world? Answers on a postcard to yahoo.com
Freethinking Liberal
2007-10-08 09:51:01 UTC
Not necessarily. (and thats hard coming from an atheist) What the world would be better off without is religions pushing themselves on others, by war, by pressure or subdefuge.
2007-10-08 09:54:43 UTC
Religion yes:

No one has ever been against people who follow the example of Jesus. He is the one person whom left us an example to follow.

Muhammad was a child molester who married a 6 year old and started having sex with her at nine years old. Had sex will all 11 wives at once and then wrote a false book to bring others into his ways.

Buddha although a seeker after truth did not go far enough nor is there accurate historical records to know what he was like.

Who is left?

NO one as good as Jesus.
?
2007-10-08 10:06:50 UTC
I really think that the answer is in sociology 101. Cultures tend to degenerate into cannibalism and destructive behaviour.
2007-10-08 09:51:31 UTC
When religion becomes an institution possessed with the need for power and influence, that is when it becomes a huge problem.



When a religion seeks to fulfill the commission of Christ, then it is beneficial to society. So it depends.



Good question.
dontworrybehappy
2007-10-08 09:52:14 UTC
If there was no religion, we'd still start wars over skin color, borders, money, other beliefs, power. Religion for 90% of people makes them a better person, its the other 10% that give it a bad name.
2007-10-08 09:53:27 UTC
I think people would come together more as humans and learn to live together better if we knew that in our roots we're just animals. I have no problem with personal beliefs, as in you keep them to yourself, don't dictate them to others and just believe whatever you want to believe. It's organised religions that to me are wrong and that are bringing our society down.
lipgloss
2007-10-08 09:51:39 UTC
Rather than organized religion, each person has their own personal belief. Brought up by good parents guides and teaches you that helping others and being kind is good. Harming, bad. We don't need religion for that. The world would be better off without religion. It does more harm than good.
Furqaan
2007-10-08 09:56:39 UTC
With religion
sistermoon
2007-10-08 09:54:20 UTC
I was in a religion and I learned valuable lessons from it and that I now know it was not for me. I can look back and see that it was helping me know what is true inside of me and that religion is not what I needed.

It is there for us to experience it, learn from it, grow.

Hopefully everyone can learn their truth from religion and move on to know what is right for them.
PROBLEM
2007-10-08 09:53:27 UTC
Are atheistic countries havens of peace, freedoms and ideas? No...You can't blame religion, for the failings of man. Man is deeply cruel by nature. No group has immunity from mans depravity.
?
2007-10-08 09:49:38 UTC
Not religion, in and of itself, but definitely organized religion.
Doll
2007-10-08 09:50:48 UTC
No, when some people are depressed the only thing stopping them from hurting themselves in some cases is religion.
blooz
2007-10-08 09:49:04 UTC
Today? Without question I believe we'd be better off.



I wonder where humanity would be if we used all of that energy and resources for more practical and peaceful purposes.
2007-10-08 09:51:23 UTC
Religion is the "pawn" of politics. No religion would mean less power to manipulate...
dawnUSA
2007-10-08 09:54:45 UTC
'Religions' that don't accept Jesus is Lord maybe, but we cannot and will not survive if we do not have God as our leader. I really can't understand why atheists do not see how corrupt our world is when people do not follow Christ! If we ALL united in prayer, we would have our world peace-no doubt about it.
?
2007-10-08 09:51:58 UTC
their already is little good in the world once religion is banned the end times have truly begun.
Open Heart Searchery
2007-10-08 09:50:22 UTC
The world would be lost without true religion.
Stereotypical Canadian, Eh?
2007-10-08 09:50:47 UTC
the world started with religion, how cna we live without it? God only made one religion, we came up with the other ones that desrtoyed the plannet.
2007-10-08 09:49:57 UTC
I think we would be better off only if religion were replaced by an ethical philosophy like humanism.
2007-10-08 09:53:01 UTC
Absolutely, positively, unequivocally, YES!
mega_mover
2007-10-08 09:48:40 UTC
don't know really, it's rather complicated



but at least it'll get rid of most of the unwanted hatred, cursing and bloodshed
2007-10-08 09:50:49 UTC
seriously the world would be the same only the people telling us what to do morally wont be wearing dresses.
Doc
2007-10-08 10:04:34 UTC
yeshh
ignoramus_the_great
2007-10-08 09:49:39 UTC
Thank you for realizing that wars are about power, control, money, resources, land. Thanks again.
2007-10-08 10:01:25 UTC
Can Religion Satisfy Mankind’s Needs?



THE major religions in the world have vast numbers of followers and many magnificent churches, cathedrals, synagogues, and temples. Despite all of this, have these religions taught the truth about God? Have they helped people to lead happier and more meaningful lives? Do they practice what they preach?



2 History clearly shows that the Western religions have proved disappointing in these areas. For example, some of the most horrible conflicts and massacres in history took place in lands professing to be Christian. Among them were the Crusades, launched by the churches of Christendom from the 11th to the 13th century. The wars during this period took innocent lives by the thousands.



3 In the early 19th century, the churches openly supported many Western powers in the expansion of their spheres of influence in less-developed lands and the wanton exploitation of the resources of their colonial territories. Church and State acted in collusion. Hand in hand, they brought distress and misery to people in many lands.



4 In the two world wars of the 20th century, most of the belligerent powers on the opposing sides were Catholic or Protestant nations. Thus, with the approval of their religious leaders, Catholics killed Catholics and Protestants killed Protestants. In more recent times, the conflict between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland has resulted in heavy casualties. Leaders of these religions love to talk about peace and brotherhood, and all of them profess to serve the same God. But in view of the facts, we must ask: Do they really have a genuine love for peace? Do they truly love their neighbors as themselves?



5 Additionally, are the religious leaders and their flocks known for their adherence to high moral standards? Has not the media repeatedly exposed and reported on cases of child molestation and other corrupt practices among the clergy of Christendom? Some of the clergy openly support homosexuality and premarital and extramarital sex. Others with radical views advocate the violent overthrow of what they consider to be unjust systems, some clerics even taking part in guerrilla warfare and riots.



6 As regards helping people to gain an accurate knowledge of God, all major religions of the West have failed miserably. Their doctrines are mainly based on traditional beliefs rather than on the teachings of the Bible. For example, they believe that the soul is immortal and that those who do not serve God will be tormented in a fiery hell forever. Just think! If God were really so cruel and hardhearted, would you want to worship him?—See box on page 25.



7 Clearly, the religions of the West have not brought lasting peace and happiness for mankind, nor have they provided the right spiritual guidance. What, then, about the religions of the East? In China, for example, the three major religions are Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism. Have these religions brought lasting peace and happiness for the Chinese?



8 In its early stages, Taoism was more a philosophy than a religion. Its founder, Lao-tzu, was dissatisfied with the chaos and turmoil of the times and sought relief by shunning society and returning to nature. However, as time wore on, Taoism became a system of idolatry and superstition, venerating a pantheon of many gods and goddesses. Taoists are steeped in divination. They attach great importance to omens and fêng shui (the reading of the forces of wind and water) as well as to sundry other rituals. It is clear that Taoism, with its mythical and superstitious practices, falls short in providing satisfactory answers regarding the meaning of life or in fulfilling the people’s spiritual needs.



9 At the outset, Confucianism was a school of ethics and morality based on the teachings of its founder, Confucius. Through the centuries Confucian concepts have wielded a strong hold on Chinese culture and way of thinking. Still, being a philosophy of life, Confucianism has neither helped the Chinese to learn about the Creator nor encouraged them to cultivate a close relationship with him. Although adopting its precepts as rules of conduct brings certain benefits, Confucianism fails to satisfy one’s spiritual needs; nor has it brought lasting peace and happiness.



10 Buddhism first came into China from India. This religion advocates compassion and tolerance, and it has fascinated many by its complicated philosophy. But has Buddhism helped people to learn about the Sovereign of the universe? Have the teachings of Buddha satisfied the spiritual needs of mankind? The publication The Message of Buddhism states: “Buddhism teaches the way to perfect goodness and wisdom without a personal God; . . . a salvation in which everyone is his own saviour.” Buddhism has inspired, not faith in God, but reliance on self.



11 If a person’s faith is misplaced, how could he ever find the truth that brings real satisfaction? Down through the ages, the Chinese have followed the tradition of worshiping their ancestors, idols, and the spirits in nature, engrossed in the multitudes of rites and rituals connected with them. As a result, the concept of a personal God, or Creator, is something completely foreign to the Chinese. Yet, as discussed earlier, to satisfy our spiritual needs, we must come to know not only who the Most High God is but also what his purpose for mankind is. By so doing, we will be able to act in harmony with that purpose and gain lasting happiness.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...