Question:
Do Christians deserve the right to call a scripture in the Bible just symbolic?
Devious
2012-05-09 16:38:24 UTC
Once they pick a version do they have to decide what parts of it are real and literal. You know like the lady being transformed into the pillar of salt, Genesis, Noah's Ark, Slavery... etc. And what parts are merely symbolic.

"Well It's pretty much all literal...although if you corner me I reserve the right to declare that any given passage is just symbolic. "

It just seems to me that anything seems stupid or that has been proven to be false in the bible. They just say it wasn't meant to be taken literally.

Who is then to say that one interpretation of the Bible is more true then the next?
Seven answers:
Linda
2012-05-12 04:08:46 UTC
To decide if a scripture is literal or symbolic you have to read the context of the scripture and also refer to other scripture to help understand certain verses. So yes they have the right and all of Revelations is not symbolic and some are literal so again you have to read the context to understand the scripture, ex white horses etc is symbolic but 144000 and great crowd are literal. You can learn more about the Bible and what it really teaches by excepting a Bible Study that is one on one using a publication What Does The Bible Really Teach? www.watchtower.org
Badger
2012-05-09 17:01:42 UTC
First of all, it's clear that at least some passages, or even entire books, of Scripture were intended to be symbolic. There is no other way to take a book like the Song of Solomon, or Revelation.



Second, of course they have the right to decide which parts to take literally, and which to regard as symbolic. Who else is supposed to decide for them? You? Why can't they arrange their spiritual and moral lives to suit themselves, without having to justify themselves to every non-believer with an axe to grind?



I remember a few years ago, some packaged food company announced that they had developed a new kind of pork that was actually kosher. Rabbis and kosher certification agencies issued statements that the meat was definitely not kosher. That should have been the end of it; but the company insisted on arguing that the rabbis were wrong, that the food really was kosher, and challenging their methods of determining which foods were kosher.



Basically, this is the same kind of thing. Even if you find kosher laws silly, or the way they are applied inconsistent, you have to simply step back and accept that rabbis and practicing Jews are the ones who get to decide how these laws are implemented in their own lives. When it comes to Christians, they get to decide how to interpret and apply their own scriptures. There's no reason for you to concern yourself with it.
OPsaltis
2012-05-12 12:18:09 UTC
The Bible has many different kinds of literature: history, law, poetry, allegory, prophecy, etc. The trick is to interpret each reading in the way that it was intended.



The Christian Church from the earliest times has had a method of interpretation. And that is how it should be; after all, it is the book that the church compiled for its own use. It's best to consult the teachings of the church through the ages than to try to interpret on your own.



Blessings.

/Orthodox

About Orthodox Christianity: http://www.goarch.org/ourfaith/introduction

http://www.antiochian.org/discover http://saintnicholas.ucoz.com/index/intro_to_orthodoxy/0-14
ManofEcstasy
2012-05-09 16:41:44 UTC
Yes since it's not true.



1)It is open for interpretation (people with the same background, education, and iq will believe different passages or believe the same passages differently)

2)It is not the infallible word of God. (it is the word of man/if god wanted to he could've wrote it himself, but he didn't care enough did he?)

3)Most don't read the entire Bible or even if they do (point 1)

4)They choose not to believe the entire Bible.

5)Some believe you should uphold the OT as well: Luke 16:17 Matthew 5:17-20

6)They pick and choose passages they agree with.

7)The Bible is full of ambiguities, discrepancies, inconsistencies, and outright contradictions.

8)Interpretations are influenced by the time, culture and geography

9)The several translations, re translations & re translations of the translations.
Tatty Tails
2012-05-09 17:11:16 UTC
The Greek word used in the Bible for “parable” can be translated “illustration and sometimes symbolism.” It is said of Jesus: “Indeed, without an illustration [pa·ra·bo·le′] he would not speak to them [the crowds], but privately to his disciples he would explain all things.”—Mark 4:34; Matt. 13:34.

The Bible’s prophecies are often symbolic and stated in the bible as such. Of the prophetic book of Revelation the opening verse explains: “He [Jesus Christ] sent forth his angel and presented it in signs through him to his slave John.” (Rev. 1:1) Either by direct statements such as this, or by the context, it can easily be determined which statements are literal and which ones are symbolic.



Another related term is “allegory” (Gr., al·le·go·ri′a), which is a prolonged metaphor in which a series of actions are symbolic of other actions, while the characters often are types or personifications. Paul uses the Greek verb al·le·go·re′o (allegorize) at Galatians 4:24, concerning Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar. It is translated ‘be an allegory’ (KJ), ‘be an allegorical utterance’ (AT), and “stand as a symbolic drama” (NW).

The apostle John also used a distinct term (pa·roi·mi′a) that denotes “comparison” (Joh 10:6; 16:25, 29); it is variously translated “figure,” “figurative language,” “parable,” “proverb,” and “comparison” (AT, KJ, NW). Peter employed the same term with regard to the “proverb” of the dog returning to its vomit and the sow to rolling in the mire.—2Pe 2:22.



A perfect example of symbolism is used with the translation of HELL. Many religions through the years have used this term to scare people into submission however, carefully reviewing the symbolism can alleviate much anxiety for any bible reader.

For example: Ask yourself~ How does a person literally burn alive forever? how can death be burned or spirit creatures?

This article answers and shows how the symbolism of hell (along with exposing some cleaver mistranslating of religions to instil fear into people) can logically on be just that, symbolism.



What Really Is Hell?

http://www.watchtower.org/e/20020715/article_02.htm
Light and Truth
2012-05-09 16:42:02 UTC
A Prophet
BrokenEye
2012-05-09 16:41:02 UTC
Well how else are they supposed to claim that plainly false and/or contradictory passages are "absolute infallible truth"?


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...