Bernard Jean-Pierre
2009-07-14 20:01:37 UTC
But, if this was meant to be THE symbol of Christ - Why did Jesus Christ himself not introduce the Cross?? Afterall he taught his disciples MANY things. Would this not be considered as important as well?? But yet, Jesus never mentioned anything about the Cross as a symbol or 'object' of worship representing him.
The Bible also shows that Jesus died on a Torture Stake, not an actual 'cross'. The words used in the Bible are 'stauros' and 'xylon', even the latin word 'crux' does not imply an actual 'cross' but rather an upright piece of wood.
Furthermore, the very person who introduced the Cross was Constantine, a pagan worshipper of the Sun god! It is of no suprise that in his 'vision' (as if) he looked up at the 'Sun' and saw the symbol for the 'cross', because the 'X' with a imposed 'P' is VERY closely related to the symbol of the Sun god!
History clearly shows that the Cross goes back to not only pagan Romans, but even further back to the times of the Egyptians! If it was meant to be the symbol for Christianity, Would not Jesus himself introduced it, instead of a pagan ruler??
What logical, or Biblical explanation could you conjure up to show the 'direct' connection between Jesus, the Cross and Christianity? What justification is there for using the Cross considering its direct link to false worship, and the Bible's command against Idolatry? (Exodus 20:4,5)
Why would a pagan ruler be the one to 'establish' the Cross' connection to the 'Church? Would that not be akin to a Computer Hacker giving someone a 'free' computer?? Would that not be atleast a little 'questionable' or 'concerning'?? What do you think??