So you admit to making a statement disguised as a question? That would be an abuse of forum format and anyone can eject you withe the Report Abuse button by your silly false statement/question.
If you understood logic, you would recognize how stupid you sound. Are you completely ignorant of scientific method and burden of proof?
You can have any opinion you want, believe anything you want, but if you come here and make a claim, that claim, by your statement, REQUIRES, DEMANDS support by the burden of proof of any known method of engagement, process or method. Support for your claim is required, not an option, or you dismiss yourself as a fool, ignorant of anything about the subject. Not my problem, you've automatically failed before you sat down, yet you actually think you "know" something. How delusional is that? Or show us what you "know" and provide the support REQUIRED.
When you don't provide support, the truth can be whatever you want it to be in your mythical little world. Reality doesn't work that way. Truth in fact requires support.
Atheists say that since there is no direct evidence of God, then God doesn't exist. But this is just one example of silly atheist logic.
Nobody has ever found the silver dollar George Washington threw across the Delaware, or the Hatchet he used to chop down the cherry tree... I guess that proves George Washington Never existed.
By atheist circular reasoning, neither would Darwinian evolution, abiogenesis, or the Big Bang. Since their presuppositions are false then their conclusions are equally dubious.
All the atheists require for belief is their trusty circular reasoning to cook up a dandy tale concocted specifically to preclude the obvious. Voila -- POSSIBLE, therefore it is. Who needs God? You so easily jump to all kinds of delusional conclusions from a false positive and delude yourself. Atheists are delusional by their own choice.
It’s easy to be an atheist if you evade, ignore and deny operational science.
You don't need to disprove what has never been proven, and what is needed to assert it is proven empirical evidence; another signature of your stupidity.
Fact is a truth that is ascertained by direct experience or observation. i.e., that which can be empirically established. If you knew anything at all about the subject or science, you would know that science can say nothing about the supernatural. “Origins science” is beyond the realm of observable science since hypotheses cannot be subjected to repeatable tests.
The scientific/philosophical reality is that you do not need to present an argument against an assertion (God does not exist) that cannot produce any evidence or logic in its defense! Since it cannot sustain what it brings to the board, not anything need be said in refutation. Its own lack of evidence/logic is sufficient to scuttle the 'argument' before it even begins!
The fact that you end up with an absurdity whether the objection is aimed at atheism or theism demonstrates the objection itself is absurd, which shows you to be an ignorant fool.
It is very sad that your teachers were more concerned teaching you what to think (interpreting the facts/evidence for you) than teaching you how to think (how to evaluate the facts and interpret them for yourself).
Evolutionists believe that life (at least once) spontaneously formed from nonliving chemicals. But this is inconsistent with the natural law of biogenesis. Real science confirms the Bible.
The study of origins is foundational to any belief system. You don’t have a belief system.
If you can't answer how life came to be don't blame my belief, deal with it.