Johnny was baptized as an infant. He gets re-baptized after the age of reason, "just in case" ...?

Question

Should he have his baby baptized too -- just in case that's the correct procedure?

Answer 1

baptism of those who are before the age of accountability is an abomination before God and denies the pure mercies of Christ.

read about it here:

Answer 2

It all depends which church you go to.



I was baptized at 13, I know people who are christians today, that were baptized as infants and i believe and truly know them as saved.



Baptism is not a requisite to salvation, but is symbolic of the grace you will recieve or the grace you have recieved.



i wouldnt get so legalistic to declare an infant baptism as incorrect. The church has done this since the beginning.

At the same time, i do not believe that a dead infant will go to hell for not recieving baptism in time.



Jesus told us to not deny the children. He said that to deny one of these children would be like jumping in the sea with a millstone around your neck.



Paul baptized Lydia and her HOUSEHOLD.

The centurian and his HOUSEHOLD was baptized.



The story of Philip and the Eunuch has been proven to be an interpolation and has anabaptist beginnings.

Answer 3

I believe the Infant Baptism became the norm during a time of High infant mortality rates and People wanted to protect 'little Johnny' just in case the whooping cough got him. and i think its a good practice, if not for Johnny, but for his Parents and God-Parents reaffirming themselves in the faith in which Johnny will be raised. and depending on your specific faith a Reaffirmation of those Tenets for someone over the age of reason is in order, whether its Confirmation in the teens in the Catholic faith or a dip in the tub or a River for another denomination as an Adult.



About a year ago I toured some local churches and sat in on services of several faiths, and I think it was the Pentecostals who do an annual/semi-annual trip to the river, and the Baptists who have a tub/pool built into their 'stage' for the use in submersion Baptism for new members.



some of the Submersion Faiths claim that if you were 'Dripped and not Dipped' that it doesn't count and you'd need to be re-baptised via submersion to make it count





So really, it all depends on which Flavor of Jesus you consume

Answer 4

being baptized is a spiritual thing between you and God, when you have come to the age to accept him and know what you are getting baptized for.



Baby's who get baptized- some parents do it because its cute to see, other parents do it and a symbol to God that they will raise that child according to the word of God.



Some people claim that you HAVE TO BE BAPTIZED TO GO TO HEAVEN..... NOT TRUE. Its a symbol and its about your personal relationship with God. If you think about it, God took all our sins away, and washed us white and snow.... He was punctured in the side when he was on the cross... and what came out of it? WATER AND BLOOD. Its a great thing to do don't get me wrong... but won't get you salvation. Being baptized is a spiritual thing between you and God- get it when your child KNOWS WHAT IT MEANS!

Answer 5

First what's the meaning of baptism in the 1st place? Is it to get to heaven? No. you will be "stored" to get to heaven. the point of baptism is the profession of your faith to others. once you are attempting this, you're appearing out your faith to others so as that others might have faith. how are you able to profess your faith to others while you're "sprinkled" as a newborn? you will not be able to. And your loved ones will not be able to do it for you. you may do it. it relatively is why Paul mocks the "baptism of the ineffective" in 1st Corinthians. To be on the "precise" area of your baptism, the suggestions-blowing thank you to try this, is to have faith that Jesus is Lord, then profess your faith to others throughout baptism. that's what baptism is all approximately. Going with the aid of Jesus's occasion and letting human beings be responsive to you're a follower of Christ. on your occasion you pronounced Johnny gets stored two times. If Johnny became into stored the 1st time and meant it, then baptized, he became into nonetheless stored while he walked faraway from God. bear in mind, he walked faraway from God, God did not walk faraway from him. the 2d time, it relatively is greater suggestions-blowing to declare that he rededicated his existence returned to Christ the 2d time.

Answer 6

Baptism at birth is not the baptisim we read about in the Bible. Children have no knowledge of sin, although they are born with it by the act of Adam (and Eve). I still believe that God has provided a special dispensation for those not of the age of knowledge, but that is just a personal opinion. Baptism by "sprinkling" is non-scriptural, and of no consequence. The proper method is by "immersion", as practised by John at the Jordan River, and supported by the Greek and Hebrew. In fact, baptism, in the larger view, is almost insignificant when compared to the atributes of Faith. Baptism is a public confession of Faith in God and the person of Jesus as Savior, and takes a back seat to baptism in the Holy Spirit. My intention is not to reduce the importance of baptism, because it is important, but it needs to be in its proper place. We are not saved by baptism, nor will baptism get you saved. We are saved by the work of Christ Jesus on the Cross, through the Grace and Mercy of God, and that is the bottom line. All else, compared to this, could be seen as window dressing. Be well, and be blessed.

Answer 7

The Bible is abundantly clear of what baptism is, who it is for, and what it accomplishes. In the Bible, only believers who had placed their faith in Christ were baptized - as a public testimony of their faith and identification with Him (Acts 2:38; Romans 6:3-4). Water baptism by immersion is a step of obedience after faith in Christ. It is a proclamation of faith in Christ, a statement of submission to Him, and an identification with His death, burial, and resurrection.



With this in view, infant baptism is not a Biblical practice. An infant cannot place his or her faith in Christ. An infant cannot make a conscious decision to obey Christ. An infant cannot understand what water baptism symbolizes. The Bible does not record any infants being baptized. Infant baptism is the origin of the sprinkling and pouring methods of baptism - as it is unwise and unsafe to immerse an infant under water. Even the method of infant baptism fails to agree with the Bible. How does pouring or sprinkling illustrate the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ?



Many Christians who practice infant baptism do so because they understand infant baptism as the new covenant equivalent of circumcision. In this view, just as circumcision joined a Hebrew to the Abrahamic and Mosaic covenants, so baptism joined a person to the New Covenant of salvation through Jesus Christ. This view is unbiblical. The New Testament nowhere describes baptism as the New Covenant replacement for Old Covenant circumcision. The New Testament nowhere describes baptism as a sign of the New Covenant. It is faith in Jesus Christ that enables a person to enjoy the blessings of the New Covenant (1 Corinthians 11:25; 2 Corinthians 3:6; Hebrews 9:15).



Baptism does not save a person. It does not matter if you were baptized by immersion, pouring, or sprinkling - if you have not first trusted in Christ for salvation, baptism (no matter the method) is meaningless and useless. Water baptism by immersion is a step of obedience to be done after salvation as a public profession of faith in Christ and identification with Him. Infant baptism does not fit the Biblical definition of baptism or the Biblical method of baptism. If Christian parents wish to dedicate their child to Christ, then a baby dedication service is entirely appropriate. However, even if infants are dedicated to the Lord, when they grow up they will still have to make a personal decision to believe in Jesus Christ in order to be saved.

Answer 8

I never had Johnny baptized as an infant. I am a Baptist and we don't believe one has to be baptized to be saved, but would desire it after we are saved.

Answer 9

Infant baptism has been practiced by God's church since its founding 2,000 years ago. Therefore it is the form taught by the apostles, and the form desired by God. Restricting baptism to adults is a modern tradition of men that no Christian on earth ever heard of until a few hundred years ago, that contradicts the teaching and practice of the original Christian Church.

Answer 10

No it is not the correct procedure.

Answer 11

Baptism doesn't save you, Jesus' sacrifice for our sins does.

Answer 12

you should only get baptised only when you accept christ as your savior