What if God designed the evolutionary process?
Then the biblical version of creation could be the "age appropriate" metaphoric version of a basic truth, yes?
Or, what if, yes, evolution applied to all other species, and God then invented Man and put him on the planet - and we're all the bastard children of the begetting of Noah and his kin?
I'm not advocating for such ideas - just offering that beliefs can vary - and that they don't necessarily have to be in conflict where "being right" isn't all that relevant to now.
The problem with religion vs science - especially in this issue - is that both groups value "being right" more highly than they value practical application and use of their respective ideas.
And, it's truly idiotic to argue over an unprovable issue the "rightness" of which isn't even relevant in and of itself to any practical application. The only use of "rightness" in this context relates to artificial power (of state or church or school) - and all of those are antagonistic to the free-thinking and success of the constituients in question.
Evolution - as the unquestioned ource of Man isn't relevant to understanding that we can watch it and manipulate it in flies and seagulls and microbes.
And, the idea of God as the origin of man isn't antagonistic to the observable evolution of microbes as necessary to build better antibiotics - in and of itself - until some wack-job preacher can't find the definition of 'METAPHOR' in the dictionary because losing that definition is practical to hoodwink the middle class of their savings for his new suit.
"Being right" and arguing unprovables - is useful mostly for various varieties politicians - whether they're dressed as politicians, priests, or teachers.
Others occupy themselves with learning how things observably work and finding better ways to work them...