Not that you really care but people do not believe in your brand of superstition because Neo-Darwinism make predictions, and those predictions are confirmed with every archaeological discovery. All life on Earth is derived from common ancestors, and finding organisms without DNA would disprove that. Yet all lifeforms on Earth have DNA. All life on Earth is hierarchical, and both the morphological and molecular hierarchies converge. Our discovery of transitional forms follow this hierarchy : we have plenty of transitions between reptiles and birds and reptiles and mammals.We can even explain why vestigial organs exist in a given species, by looking at the past of its genome. If whales were fishes instead of mammals, it would be rather bad for Darwinism. Or to take a previous example, we should not find mammals with vestigial feathers. There are millions of ways by which Neo-Darwinism could be falsified, and yet all the data we find confirm its obvious truth.rd to explain why they have vestigial legs. Indeed, those vestigial legs could be called the "smoking gun" of Neo-Darwinism
and..
I'm sorry ...which god hypothesis where you eluding too.....with thousands of hypothetical's to currently choose from and thousands of ancient hypothetical gods to choose from I have literally hundreds of thousands to choose from....and since I can make up any gods I want and start telling you to believe them I actually have an unlimited supply of gods to choose from....including some favorites.....ganesh, zues, the unicorn king, the easter rabbit, thor, Athena ,pan, the goblin king, Horus, krishna, buddah, allah, santa , the tooth fairy or the ONE TRUE GOD OSIRIS