Question:
For those who don't accept Evolution?
2011-09-08 07:16:17 UTC
This question is for those who don't accept the fact that the world is 4.54B years old and that Evolution happens. If fossils aren't evidence that there was life on Earth millions and millions of years ago where did scientists get the idea that the T-Rex looks the way it does in Jurassic Park? How do we know it didn't look like a chicken? Or a mouse?
Ten answers:
† Covered Glory †
2011-09-08 07:31:16 UTC
I don't understand your argument... It seems to be missing a few things...



I do not believe that the Earth is billions of years old, I believe it to be around 6000 or so. I believe this because the Bible is very clear on this. The Hebrew word for day in the OT is "yom." This is a literal 24 hour day just as we have now. God is not the author of confusion and it is very plain what He means.



Let think of a fossil. I think all scientists, regardless of what they believe, would agree that certain conditions have to be right before a fossil can form. The animal needs to be buried in sediment very quickly so that decomposition does not take place as it normally would and those layers will eventually turn to rock. To me this is explained by Noah's flood. Most people seem to think that this was just a little drizzle or something but if you read closely it was not. Both the heavens and the earth gave up water in one cataclysmic event. There were huge earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and sheets and sheets of rain. It was not pleasant one bit! This is what created fossils.



Lets also think of this. A fish dies in the water, what happens to it? It begins to sink, but as it does it is picked at by other fish eating it, scattering some remains, once it settles on the bottom it is further eaten by creatures that live on the bottom of the lake/ocean which also scatter the remains and finally bacteria in and around the fish finish the job. No fossil happened, it simply was eaten. Yet how can you explain thousands of fossils (especially fish) that still have imprints of scales! Some even have evidence of movement as if they were still alive when they were buried in sediment.



The Tyrannosaurus Rex really did exist, we have evidence of that. I don't think anyone would say that a skull almost 5 feet long belonged to a chicken or mouse. Bones and fossils are proof that a creature existed, I just disagree with how long ago that creature lived and died.



I would also like to ask for evolution's "proof" that it happens. I think we also need to define the difference between "Evolution" and the process of "natural selection." I do believe in natural selection. Such as in the canine family. A wolf and a terrier are both canines though very different. Just as a tiger and house cat are felines but very different. Through selective breeding (whether natural or on purpose) can creative different offspring. However this does not change the genetic material into something totally different as with evolution. Evolution cannot add genetic material to the out come. That has never been proven and has actually been proven just the opposite, that you loose genetic information with each successive pairing.



Just like if you breed two house cats together you will never get a lion. Yet given enough time, enough interbreeding with different felines you can get something bigger. Yet the result will still be feline.
Prism
2011-09-08 07:44:10 UTC
"The fact that the world is 4.54 B years old" is certainly what we are indoctrinated to believe by TV experts and even museums and films but, as the other answers have suggested fossils have no bearing on earth age whatsoever. Many creatures today that were contemporaneous with the beasts you mention were discovered in the same strata. In other words the mass burial of living things occurred in very short timescales indeed. Even a miners axe of early Victorian vintage has been recovered as a fossil !



So I think your viewpoint needs to take in much wider scholarship rather than just imbibing the popular science of Joe public and Richard Dawkin
crete
2016-11-30 13:20:37 UTC
a million) in accordance to evolutionists, people advanced from apes? people are apes by skill of definition. Linnaeus categorized us as such and he replaced right into a creationist. 2) there are multiple shown information in technological understanding, yet evolution is only a theory. fake because of a false impression of the be conscious theory. A reality, in technological understanding, is a discrete aspect of tips. Theories connect information and clarify them. there is not any larger type than theory. 3) A transitional style is a fossil of an animal it extremely is a element one species and area yet another. fake. All organisms are transitional. 4) The age of the earth is determined by skill of scientists completely by skill of the radioactive courting of fossils ? The age of the Earth replaced into determined by skill of courting a meteor on the concept that the image voltaic equipment replaced into all an similar age. All different calculations extra healthful the age got here upon. 5) The medical approach starts with a prediction and then seems for information to help that prediction? It starts with commentary. Then a hypothesis is formed from that commentary. After the hypothesis is formed, scientists seek for information to help or falsify the hypothesis. 6) the conception of evolution incorporates the large Bang? fake. 7) To trust in evolution is to trust that existence and be counted got here from not something? fake.
Basic Sense
2011-09-08 16:36:27 UTC
4.5 Billion years is not enough time for evolution to occur. You need 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 etc etc years



The basic theory of evolution is that genes undergo random changes called mutations that produce new and different genes. These new, different genes may produce functional proteins that undergo natural selection to give the organism a distinct survival advantage in its particular environment. The combination of these changes eventually, over time, lead to the development of new species.



Let us examine, mathematically, the time required for the development of a single gene that codes for a functional protein, which is the first step, in order for the evolution process to be considered a viable theory. Let us assume that this gene contains 150 codons each coding for an amino acid thus forming a small protein of 150 amino acids for a bacterial species (bacterial genes usually code for proteins over 330 amino acids). Since each codon on the gene could code for 1 of the 20 different amino acids, the amount of possible proteins that could be formed is 20 150 (1.4 x 10 195).



Current scientific findings have shown that 1 in every 10 77 proteins formed from a 150 amino acid protein molecule is functional (Douglas Axe - Cambridge Biochemist). This would mean that for every 1 x 10 77 mutations, a potential functional 150 amino acid protein could be formed which could then undergo natural selection.



Let us now calculate the total number of mutations that could occur in a dense bacterial colony similar to your intestinal colon environment, (4 x 10 11 bacteria per mm 3) which covers the entire surface of the earth (5 x 10 20 mm 2) and extends 100 kilometers (1 x 10 8 mm) upwards to the point where it is considered that the atmosphere meets outer space (Karman's Line). Let us also say that this colony of bacteria has been around since the beginning of the earth 4.5 billion years ago (4.5 x 10 9 years) and actively multiplying and mutating since. We will also assume that the maximum mutation rate of 150 codons for this gene is occurring with every bacterial division. Bacteria usually divide every 9.8 minutes which is equivalent to 5.37 x 10 4 division per year.



The total number of mutations therefore would be:



4 x 10 11 x 5 x 10 20 x 1 x 10 8 x 4.5 x 10 9 x 150 x 5.37 x 10 4 = 7.2 x 10 56 mutations



Based on our calculation we would still require considerably more time to cover the period necessary to form one functional small protein despite the extremely generous and improbable hypothesis in favor of mutation and evolution.



i.e. 4.5 x 10 9 x 1 x 10 77 / 7.2 x 10 56 = 625 x 10 27 years or 625 billion, billion, billion years.



This process would need to be repeated at least 3200 times for the average bacterial cell to account for its total gene pool. In the case of humans with over 25,000 genes with an average amino acids count per protein of over 1000, the number of years to evolve would be unimaginable.



In my view with this type of data, evolution should not even be referred to as a theory but a myth derived from intellectual pursuit.
?
2011-09-08 07:20:58 UTC
Fossils are evidence of life but they are not evidence of age. I have yet to read where all scientists agree to the age of the earth. They keep moving the date. The truth is there is no evidence for evolution, even Darwin came to the conclusion that there had to be a creator.
2011-09-08 07:17:49 UTC
Not a great argument, but your heart is in the right place



DNA phylogeny and endogenous retroviruses are uncontroversial evidence of evolution
2011-09-08 07:22:33 UTC
The fossil record isn't large enough to constitute evidence, and even if it were, every time we find a new fossil, the fossil itself is defined within the theory of evolution and is never used to challenge the validity of the theory.



Therefore evolution isn't even a real science.
Yo Dawg
2011-09-08 07:22:32 UTC
Gods, people like you sicken me. And those who resist epic truth along with fact.



A snake had sex with a Dove's egg... Which hatched Ancient Greece. How could you deny that? Pitiful.
?
2011-09-08 07:18:17 UTC
What if i believe in God, but i do accept evolution
Rockadayjohnny
2011-09-08 07:18:42 UTC
From earlier films.



Note: a question well posed.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...