Question:
Evolutionists, how come we have dinosaur bones, but no bones of transitional animals?
2007-09-05 11:12:17 UTC
hmm

the 2 or 3 proved fakes will not do, there should be millions of these tranistional animals in the fossil record.....jokers
28 answers:
Gawdless Heathen
2007-09-05 11:18:33 UTC
Please go do a little more reaserch. Where are your transitional bibles? There are like the first 350 years of your religion missing. Yet you claim evolution is false because we don't have a complete fossil record for 3.5 billion years or so? Do you not see the problem with your terrible logic?
Myth
2015-01-05 19:56:42 UTC
The reason we have more dinosaur fossils then transitional mammals and early human fossils is time. Dinosaurs were around for over 170 million years. Mammals a lot less then that, and humans around 2 million. That gave dinosaur more time and chances for their bones to end up fossilized.
2007-09-05 11:26:01 UTC
These morons use wikipedia. They are destined to believe a lie. Lucy is a human 9 year old girl. Not half ape-half human. There are no transitional fossils they are all just different species that God created. Evolutionists are morons. They use definitions of explanations of certain species from writings on websites. They never have even seen an actual transitional fossil with their own eyes. They think they are so smart yet, they are putting faith into something they can't see. They call both parents having black hair and their offspring having brown evolution. Oh yeah they say it happens over millions of years so that it makes sense. Meanwhile, even over millions of years, which no one is around that long to study, they still can't find a shred of evidence supporting actual transitional fossils.
THA
2007-09-05 11:25:33 UTC
***HOW MANY COFFINS, desks, billiard tables would be filled with the supposed number of transitional bones or fossils for humans?

------ANSWERS------

--Newsweek: “‘You could put all the fossils on the top of a SINGLE DESK (my caps),’ said Elwyn Simons of Duke University.”10

--The New York Times: “The known fossil remains of man’s ancestors would fit on A BILLIARD (my caps) table. That makes a poor platform from which to peer into the mists of the last few million years.”11

--Science Digest: “The remarkable fact is that all the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a SINGLE coffin! . . . Modern apes, for instance, seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern humans—of upright, naked, toolmaking, big-brained beings—is, if we are to be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter.”12

*** ce chap. 5 p. 59 par. 15 Letting the Fossil Record Speak ***

--SWEDISH BOTANIST Heribert Nilsson described the situation this way, after 40 years of his own research: “It is not even possible to make a caricature of an evolution out of palaeobiological facts. The fossil material is now so complete that . . . the lack of transitional series cannot be explained as due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real, they will never be filled.”15

--22 D. B. Gower to comment, as related in England’s Kentish Times: “The creation account in Genesis and the theory of evolution could not be reconciled. One must be right and the other wrong. The story of the fossils agreed with the account of Genesis. In the oldest rocks we did not find a series of fossils covering the gradual changes from the most primitive creatures to developed forms, but rather in the oldest rocks, developed species suddenly appeared. Between every species there was a COMPLETE ABCENSE (my caps) of intermediate fossils.”24

--29 New Scientist noted that evolution “predicts that a complete fossil record would consist of lineages of organisms showing gradual change continuously over long periods of time.” But it admitted: “Unfortunately, the fossil record does not meet this expectation, for individual species of fossils are rarely connected to one another by known intermediate forms. . . . known fossil species do indeed appear not to evolve even over millions of years.”31 And geneticist Stebbins writes: “No transitional forms are known between any of the major phyla of animals or plants.” He speaks of “the large gaps which exist between many major categories of organisms.”32



--AS FAR AS dinosaurs, there are no transitional bones, THEY APPEARED as the rest of creation did!

***IMPRESSIVE LISTING our resident evolutionists have, so was the "black listing" in the MaCarthey fiasco of falseness, besides where are the authorities behind those "amazing" facts?
Frenchghost
2007-09-05 11:20:02 UTC
Oh you mean like the bones that are in the smithsonian? Or the bones in the musuems of natural history all across the world? Or perhaps you're talking about the complete carcass of a wooly mammoth that is currently on display? Maybe the bones of fish would be good? Or how about the fact there are fish alive today that are the same as they were 100 million years ago, You sir are an idiot.
V
2007-09-05 11:19:08 UTC
first of all yes there are some othese bones but moste of the m have been destroyed by time and some haven't been, found, second of all no we should'nt have millions of them because not every bone is fossilized most of them are crushed and how many dinosaur bones do you think we have millions no! more like hundreds
Brutal Honesty
2007-09-05 11:40:55 UTC
LMAO!!! Don't go there kiddo, really not going to win you any points with the Evolutionists, of course the creationist guys are proubly like "Heck yea eat that!". Realize thou that we can only really search less the oooo lets say 1 percent of the avaliable area's that fossils can be find, not including the darn ocean... but I digress (thats not going to make sense to you anyways) this is splinting hairs on a issue that just peeves off peoples ignorant verison of what gods got plan for us... geeze you guys act like if there was EVOLUTION that means theres no god? WTF! Thats just ignorant, science doesn't disprove god, it just proves what we can. SO don't get your panties in a bind just because theres a POSSIBLITY of evolution out there, ooo god forgive us.... the point is that evolution DOES explain certian natural phomeana in a prodictable way. We need that because it does HELP us figure out how to better handle are environment, and our technology which weather your willing to except it or not, you have COMPLETE faith in (you never thought you computer was going to blow up and kill you did you?) but only have SOME faith in god, but that again is spliting hairs. What you need to realize is that fossils happen as a matter of phonema there not BONES!!! WE DON'T HAVE BONES!!!!! WE HAVE FOSSILS!! Whys that so important? BECAUSE MOST OF THE BONES ARE DISTROIED!!!!! Sometimes (very rarly) they get replaced during the destruction process causing what we call fossils to form, there not bones there rock! So you have to realize not every gosh darn bone is going to fall into a swamp and be there until one of us humans come across it...... besides you don't need to look at FOSSILS to see how there could be evolution.... geeze you people, you proubly still debating about weather we came from monkeies which is just another ignorant view of the theory...... of course it is a THEORY!!!! So always p's me to no end when you guys treat this like its all facts, its not, science doesn't pretend it is, thats why its called a THEORY and not a law.... we have very few laws in science, and lets see you dispute those, but I digress again.... This is just a person trying to continue the old creation/evalutionist debate because it keeps the bible-thumpers happy thinking that science is just a symptom of satan on earth, when weather you know it our not its a symptom of TECHNOLOGY which is why your even here..... shot I was a judice baby, I owe my life to science, weather its right or wrong doesn't matter it is an extention of our love for ourselves and our purpose here on earth, so don't fight it!!!!
2007-09-05 11:26:41 UTC
Because God didn't play the evolution game. My guess is you'll hear about the archaeopteryx, Neanderthal man, Nebraska man, and a bunch of other garbage that biology teachers shove down your throat in school. Or somebody will insist that we are the "transitional forms". I don't see how people can believe this nonsense, and then get in a hissy fit when somebody says the word God.
2007-09-05 11:21:47 UTC
WHY, indeed, do we have NO fossil record of your Christ?



Bones be Bones, and dinosaur bones have "lasted" for millions of years...

200-odd years should be, as you people say, "a piece of cake".
ZombieTrix 2012
2007-09-05 11:23:38 UTC
Do you know what a "transitional animal" is? Everything is transitional. Genetically, my mom is a transitional animal between me and my grandma. Evolution works with small genetic changes from generation to generation.
Pirate AM™
2007-09-05 11:20:06 UTC
Try doing a bit of research in real science and not creationist "pseudo science". There are over 30 "transitional" species identified, if not more.
JoJoBa
2007-09-05 11:19:23 UTC
All other species of animals are still existing today whereas the dinosaur are rare in existence.
bbmm
2007-09-05 11:18:32 UTC
Interesting
blueink
2007-09-05 11:22:25 UTC
Maybe we are the transitional animal....

During the industrial revolution white moths where easy to spot due to smokey air, soot coated trees etc.



A black moth (defect) was born. The black moth had black offspring. These moths were less visible hence they survived.



It was 1 black moth that changed the species...they didn't gradually go to grey then to black. It was a one shot mass change.
2007-09-05 11:24:14 UTC
Fish to Amphibians

Tiktaalik roseae

Osteolepis

Eusthenopteron

Panderichthys

Elginerpeton

Obruchevichthys

Hynerpeton

Tulerpeton

Acanthostega

Ichthyostega

Pederpes finneyae

Eryops

Amphibians to Amniotes (early reptiles)

Proterogyrinus

Limnoscelis

Tseajaia

Solenodonsaurus

Hylonomus

Paleothyris

Synapsid (mammal-like "reptiles") to mammals

Protoclepsydrops

Clepsydrops

Dimetrodon

Procynosuchus

Thrinaxodon

Yanoconodon

Diapsid reptiles to birds

Yixianosaurus

Pedopenna

Archaeopteryx

Changchengornis

Confuciusornis

Ichthyornis

Evolution of whales

Pakicetus

Ambulocetus

Kutchicetus

Artiocetus

Dorudon

Basilosaurus

Eurhinodelphis

Mammalodon

Evolution of the horse

Hyracotherium

Mesohippus

Parahippus

Merychippus

Pliohippus

Equus

Non-human apes to modern humans

Pierolapithecus catalaunicus

Ardipithecus

Australopithecus

Homo rudolfensis

Homo habilis

Homo erectus
PaulCyp
2007-09-05 11:26:03 UTC
There are hundreds of transitional fossil species known! Do a little reading!
2007-09-05 11:56:56 UTC
Scientist's cases are full of bones that are too ape-like to be classed as human, and too human-like to be classed as apes. There should be millions of these transistional animals - - - and there are .
2007-09-05 11:17:28 UTC
As if you would know the bones of a transitional animal if they bit you on the ahss.
Free Radical
2007-09-05 11:17:55 UTC
think Lucy, the most famous common human and ape ancestor.



there are also numerous fossils of homo habilis, homo erectus, Neanderthal, Cro Magnon and Australopithecus, all of which could be considered to be "transitional" proto-human/ape critters.
Kris G
2007-09-05 11:30:09 UTC
We do. Look it up.



Edit:

Actually now you don't have to because some of the people above posted a bunch of them.
2007-09-05 11:18:40 UTC
Perhaps, I don't know, there maybe, heaven forbid, fossils yet undiscovered? Blasphemy, I know.
vérité
2007-09-05 11:24:02 UTC
You need to learn about evolution from science books, not your church or handy christian-science website.
Dionysus
2007-09-05 11:19:17 UTC
Lack of discovery is not proof of a failed hypothesis/theory



D
2007-09-05 11:16:46 UTC
huh?



transitional what?



back to the books- you have no idea what you're talking about.
2007-09-05 11:16:37 UTC
We're all "transitional animals".
The Return Of Sexy Thor
2007-09-05 11:19:54 UTC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils



Happy reading (assuming you can)
Recreant- father of fairies
2007-09-05 11:29:30 UTC
*drink*
2007-09-05 11:18:25 UTC
Transition from primitive jawless fish to sharks, skates, and rays:

o Cladoselachians (e.g., Cladoselache).

o Hybodonts (e.g. Hybodus)

o Heterodonts (e.g. Heterodontus)

o Hexanchids (e.g. Chlamydoselache)

Transition from primitive bony fish to holostean fish:

o Palaeoniscoids (e.g. Cheirolepis); living chondrosteans such as Polypterus and Calamoichthys, and also the living acipenseroid chondrosteans such as sturgeons and paddlefishes.

o Primitive holosteans such as Semionotus.

Transition from holostean fish to advanced teleost fish:

o Leptolepidomorphs, esp. Leptolepis, an excellent holostean-teleost intermediate

o Elopomorphs, both fossil and living (tarpons, eels)

o Clupeomorphs (e.g. Diplomystus)

o Osteoglossomorphs (e.g. Portheus)

o Protacanthopterygians

Transition from primitive bony fish to amphibians:

o Paleoniscoids again (e.g. Cheirolepis)

o Osteolepis -- one of the earliest crossopterygian lobe-finned fishes, still sharing some characters with the lungfish (the other group of lobe-finned fish). Had paired fins with a leg-like arrangement of bones, and had an early-amphibian-like skull and teeth.

o Eusthenopteron (and other rhipidistian crossopterygian fish) -- intermediate between early crossopterygian fish and the earliest amphibians. Skull very amphibian-like. Strong amphibian-like backbone. Fins very like early amphibian feet.

o Icthyostegids (such as Icthyostega and Icthyostegopsis) -- Terrestrial amphibians with many of Eusthenopteron's fish features (e.g., the fin rays of the tail were retained). Some debate about whether Icthyostega should be considered a fish or an amphibian; it is an excellent transitional fossil.

o Labyrinthodonts (e.g., Pholidogaster, Pteroplax) -- still have some icthyostegid features, but have lost many of the fish features (e.g., the fin rays are gone, vertebrae are stronger and interlocking, the nasal passage for air intake is well defined.)

Transition from amphibians to reptiles:

o Seymouriamorph labyrinthodonts (e.g. Seymouria) -- classic labyrinthodont skull and teeth, with reptilian vertebrae, pelvis, humerus, and digits; amphibian ankle.

o Cotylosaurs (e.g. Hylonomus, Limnoscelis) -- slightly amphibian skull (e.g. with amphibian-type pineal opening), with rest of skeleton classically reptilian.

o The cotylosaurs gave rise to many reptile groups of tremendous variety. I won't go into the transitions from cotylosaurs to the advanced anapsid reptiles (turtles and possibly mesosaurs), to the euryapsid reptiles (icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, and others), or to the lepidosaurs (eosuchians, lizards, snakes, and the tuatara), or to most of the dinosaurs, since I don't have infinite time. Instead I'll concentrate on the synapsid reptiles (which gave rise to mammals) and the archosaur reptiles (which gave rise to birds).

Transition from reptiles to mammals:

o Pelycosaur synapsids -- classic reptilian skeleton, intermediate between the cotylosaurs (the earliest reptiles) and the therapsids (see next)

o Therapsids (e.g. Dimetrodon) -- the numerous therapsid fossils show gradual transitions from reptilian features to mammalian features. For example: the hard palate forms, the teeth differentiate, the occipital condyle on the base of the skull doubles, the ribs become restricted to the chest instead of extending down the whole body, the legs become "pulled in" instead of sprawled out, the ilium (major bone of the hip) expands forward.

o Cynodont theriodonts (e.g. Cynognathus) -- very mammal-like reptiles. Or is that reptile-like mammals? Highly differentiated teeth (a classic mammalian feature), with accessory cusps on cheek teeth; strongly differentiated vertebral column (with distinct types of vertebrae for the neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and tail -- very mammalian), mammalian scapula, mammalian limbs, mammalian digits (e.g. reduction of number of bones in the first digit). But, still has unmistakably reptilian jaw joint.

o Tritilodont theriodonts (e.g. Tritylodon, Bienotherium) -- skull even more mammalian (e.g. advanced zygomatic arches). Still has reptilian jaw joint.

o Ictidosaur theriodonts (e.g. Diarthrognathus) -- has all the mammalian features of the tritilodonts, and has a double jaw joint; both the reptilian jaw joint and the mammalian jaw joint were present, side-by-side, in Diarthrognathus's skull. A really stunning transitional fossil.

o Morganucodonts (e.g. Morganucodon) -- early mammals. Double jaw joint, but now the mammalian joint is dominant (the reptilian joint bones are beginning to move inward; in modern mammals these are the bones of the middle ear).

o Eupantotheres (e.g. Amphitherium) -- these mammals begin to show the complex molar cusp patterns characteristic of modern marsupials and eutherians (placental mammals). Mammalian jaw joint.

o Proteutherians (e.g. Zalambdalestes) -- small, early insectivores with molars intermediate between eupantothere molars and modern eutherian molars.

o Those wondering how egg-laying reptiles could make the transition to placental mammals may wish to study the reproductive biology of the monotremes (egg-laying mammals) and the marsupials. The monotremes in particular could almost be considered "living transitional fossils". [see Peter Lamb's suggested marsupial references at end]

Transition from reptiles to birds:

o Lisboasaurus estesi and other "troodontid dinosaur-birds" -- a bird-like reptile with very bird-like teeth (that is, teeth very like those of early toothed birds [modern birds have no teeth]). May not have been a direct ancestor; may have been a "cousin" of the birds instead.

o Protoavis -- this is a highly controversial fossil that may or may not be an extremely early bird. Not enough of the fossil was recovered to determine if it is definitely related to the birds, or not. I mention it in case people have heard about it recently.

o Archeopteryx -- reptilian vertebrae, pelvis, tail, skull, teeth, digits, claws, sternum. Avian furcula (wishbone, for attachment of flight muscles), forelimbs, and lift-producing flight feathers. Archeopteryx could probably fly from tree to tree, but couldn't take off from the ground, since it lacked a keeled breastbone (for attachment of large flight muscles) and had a weak shoulder (relative to modern birds).

o "Chinese bird" [I don't know what name was given to this fossil] -- A fossil dating from 10-15 million years after Archeopteryx. Bird-like claws on the toes, flight-specialized shoulders, fair-sized sternal keel (modern birds usually have large sternal keel); also has reptilian stomach ribs, reptilian unfused hand bones, & reptilian pelvis. This bird has a fused tail ("pygostyle"), but I don't know how long it was, or if it was all fused or just part of it was fused.

o "Las Hoyas bird" [I don't know what name was given to this fossil] -- This fossil dates from 20-30 m.y. after Archeopteryx. It still has reptilian pelvis & legs, with bird-like shoulder. Tail is medium-length with a fused tip (Archeopteryx had long, unfused tail; modern birds have short, fused tail). Fossil down feather was found with the Las Hoyas bird.

o Toothed Cretaceous birds, e.g. Hesperornis and Ichthyornis. Skeleton further modified for flight (fusion of pelvis bones, fusion of hand bones, short & fused tail). Still had true socketed teeth, which are missing in modern birds.

o [note: a classic study of chicken embryos showed that chicken bills can be induced to develop teeth, indicating that chickens (and perhaps other modern birds) still retain the genes for making teeth.]



Now, on to some of the classes of mammals.



Transitional fossils from early eutherian mammals to primates:

o Early primates -- paromomyids, carpolestids, plesiadapids. Lemur-like clawed primates with generalized nails.

o Notharctus, an early Eocene lemur

o Parapithecus, a small Old World monkey (Oligocene)

o Propliopithecus, a small primate intermediate between Parapithecus and the more recent O.W. monkeys. Has several ape-like characters.

o Aegyptopithecus, an early ape.

o Limnopithecus, a later ape showing similarities to the modern gibbons.

o Dryopithecus, a later ape showing similarities to the non-gibbon apes.

o Ramapithecus, a dryopithecine-like ape showing similarities to the hominids but now thought to be an orang ancestor.

o Australopithecus spp., early hominids. Bipedal.

o Homo habilis.

o Homo erectus. Numerous fossils across the Old World.

o Homo sapiens sapiens. This is us. (NB: "Cro-magnon man" belongs here too. Cro-magnons were a specific population of modern humans.)

o Homo sapiens neanderthalensis (not on the direct line to H. sapiens sapiens, but worth mentioning).

o [I haven't described these fossils in detail because they're fairly well covered in any intro biology text, or in any of several good general- interest books on human evolution.]

Transitional fossils from early eutherian mammals to rodents:

o Paramyids, e.g. Paramys -- early "primitive" rodent

o Paleocastor -- transitional from paramyids to beavers

o [yick. I was going to summarize rodent fossils but Paramys and its friends gave rise to 5 enormous and very diverse groups of rodents, with about ten zillion fossils. Never mind.]

Transitional fossils among the cetaceans (whales & dolphins):

o Pakicetus -- the oldest fossil whale known. Only the skull was found. It is a distinct whale skull, but with nostrils in the position of a land animal (tip of snout). The ears were partially modified for hearing under water. This fossil was found in association with fossils of land mammals, suggesting this early whale maybe could walk on land.

o Basilosaurus isis -- a recently discovered "legged" whale from the Eocene (after Pakicetus). Had hind feet with 3 toes and a tiny remnant of the 2nd toe (the big toe is totally missing). The legs were small and must have been useless for locomotion, but were specialized for swinging forward into a locked straddle position -- probably an aid to copulation for this long-bodied, serpentine whale.

o Archaeocetes (e.g. Protocetus, Eocetus) -- have lost hind legs entirely, but retain "primitive whale" skull and teeth, with forward nostrils.

o Squalodonts (e.g. Prosqualodon) -- whale-like skull with dorsal nostrils (blowhole), still with un-whale-like teeth.

o Kentriodon, an early toothed whale with whale-like teeth.

o Mesocetus, an early whalebone whale

o [note: very rarely a modern whale is found with tiny hind legs, showing that some whales still retain the genes for making hind legs.]

Transitional fossils from early eutherian mammals to the carnivores:

o Miacids (e.g. Viverravus and Miacis) -- small weasel-like animals with very carnivore-like teeth, esp. the carnassial teeth.

o Arctoids (e.g. Cynodictis, Hesperocyon) -- intermediate between miacids and dogs. Limbs have elongated, carnassials are more specialized, braincase is larger.

o Cynodesmus, Tomarctus -- transitional fossils between arctoids and the modern dog genus Canis.

o Hemicyon, Ursavus -- heavy doglike fossils between the arctoids and the bears.

o Indarctos -- early bear. Carnassial teeth have no shearing action, molars are square, short tail, heavy limbs. Transitional to the modern genus Ursus.

o Phlaocyon -- a climbing carnivore with non-shearing carnassials, transitional from the arctoids to the procyonids (raccoons et al.)

Meanwhile back at the ranch,

o Plesictis, transitional between miacids (see above) and mustelids (weasels et al.)

o Stenoplesictis and Palaeoprionodon, early civets related to the miacids (see above)

o Tunguricits, transitional between early civets and modern civets

o Ictitherium, transitional between early civets to hyenas

o Proailurus, transitional from early civets to early cats

o Dinictis, transitional from early cats to modern "feline" cats

o Hoplophoneus, transitional from early cats to "saber-tooth" cats

Transitional fossils from early eutherians to hoofed animals:

o Arctocyonid condylarths -- insectivore-like small mammals with classic mammalian teeth and clawed feet.

o Mesonychid condylarths -- similar to the arctocyonids, but with blunt crushing-type cheek teeth, and flattened nails instead of claws.

o Late condylarths, e.g. Phenocodus -- a fair-sized animal with hoofs on each toe (all toes were present), a continuous series of crushing-type cheek teeth with herbivore-type cusps, and no collarbone (like modern hoofed animals).

o Transitional fossils from early hoofed animals to perissodactyls:

o [Perissodactyls are animals with an odd number of toes; most of the weight is borne by the central 3rd toe. Horses, rhinos, tapirs.]

o Tetraclaeonodon -- a Paleocene condylarth showing perissodactyl-like teeth

o Hyracotherium -- the famous "dawn horse", an early perissodactyl, with more elongated digits and interlocking ankle bones, and slightly different tooth cusps, compared to to Tetraclaeonodon. A small, doggish animal with an arched back, short neck, and short snout; had 4 toes in front and 3 behind. Omnivore teeth.

o [The rest of horse evolution will be covered in an upcoming "horse fossils" post in a few weeks. To whet your appetite:]

o Orohippus -- small, 4/3 toed, developing browser tooth crests

o Epihippus -- small, 4/3 toed, good tooth crests, browser

o Epihippus (Duchesnehippus) -- a subgenus with Mesohippus-like teeth

o Mesohippus -- 3 toed on all feet, browser, slightly larger

o Miohippus -- 3 toed browser, slightly larger [gave rise to lots of successful three-toed browsers]

o Parahippus -- 3 toed browser/grazer, developing "spring foot"

o 'Parahippus' leonensis -- a Merychippus-like species of Parahippus

o 'Merychippus' gunteri -- a Parahippus-like species of Merychippus

o 'Merychippus' primus -- a more typical Merychippus, but still very like Parahippus.

o Merychippus -- 3 toed grazer, spring-footed, size of small pony (gave rise to tons of successful three-toed grazers)

o Merychippus (Protohippus) -- a subgenus of Merychippus developing Pliohippus-like teeth.

o Pliohippus & Dinohippus -- one-toed grazers, spring-footed

o Equus (Plesippus) -- like modern equines but teeth slightly simpler.

o Equus (Hippotigris), the modern 1-toed spring-footed grazing zebras.

o Equus (Equus), the modern 1-toed spring-footed grazing horses & donkeys. [note: very rarely a horse is born with small visible side toes, indicating that some horses retain the genes for side toes.]

o Hyrachyids -- transitional from perissodactyl-like condylarths to tapirs

o Heptodonts, e.g. Lophiodont -- a small horse-like tapir, transitional to modern tapirs

o Protapirus -- a probable descendent of Lophiodont, much like modern tapirs but without the flexible snout.

o Miotapirus -- an almost-modern tapir with a flexible snout, transitional between Protapirus and the modern Tapirus.

o Hyracodonts -- early "running rhinoceroses", transitional to modern rhinos

o Caenopus, a large, hornless, generalized rhino transitional between the hyracodonts and the various later groups of modern & extinct rhinos.

o Transitional fossils from early hoofed animals to some of the artiodactyls (cloven-hoofed animals):

o Dichobunoids, e.g. Diacodexis, transitional between condylarths and all the artiodactyls (cloven-hoofed animals). Very condylarth-like but with a notably artiodactyl-like ankle.

o Propalaeochoerus, an early pig, transitional between Diacodexis and modern pigs.

o Protylopus, a small, short-necked, four-toed animal, transitional between dichobunoids and early camels. From here the camel lineage goes through Protomeryx, Procamelus, Pleauchenia, Lama (which are still alive; these are the llamas) and finally Camelus, the modern camels.

o Archeomeryx, a rabbit-sized, four-toed animal, transitional between the dichobunoids and the early deer. From here the deer lineage goes through Eumeryx, Paleomeryx and Blastomeryx, Dicrocerus (with antlers) and then a shmoo of successful groups that survive today as modern deer -- muntjacs, cervines, white-tail relatives, moose, reindeer, etc., etc.

o Palaeotragus, transitional between early artiodactyls and the okapi & giraffe. Actually the okapi hasn't changed much since Palaeotragus and is essentially a living Miocene giraffe. After Palaeotragus came Giraffa, with elongated legs & neck, and Sivatherium, large ox-like giraffes that almost survived to the present.



That is a partial list. EXACTLY what are you looking for?


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...