Question:
Lazarus & the rich man. Is it a picture of a real hell or only a parable?
?
2009-03-29 06:21:36 UTC
Many people believe that the story of Lazarus and the rich man is just a parable of Jesus and does not teach a literal hell. Do you think that and if so, what would be the moral of it?

Luk 16:22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;


Luk 16:23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
Fifteen answers:
oldguy63
2009-03-29 06:40:47 UTC
There is nothing in the text to suggest that it was a parable. Parables never give a person's name.
jen
2009-03-29 06:39:55 UTC
It reveals the truth that the disciples only will know, it is not taught

in the law and the prophets Luke 16:29,31, there is no such thing as the living dead, these rich religious leaders have no mercy on a beggar

as Lazarus, he is blessed also by Abraham's seed, Gal.3:16-26, which

is Christ, so Christ does not show these covetous leaders in the bosom of Abraham, but he puts Lazarus there, they are not the same kind of rich as Abraham, Gen.13:2, Jesus is able to read the thoughts and the intents of the hearts, Heb.4:12; and minds of the rich religious Pharisee's that are called a generation of serpents and vipers. They

would not believe the truth if one came back from the dead to tell it to

them, of the 31 times hell as in Acts 2:27-35, is given in O. T. it is

hell or pit, cave or sepulchre, grave of tomb, a dark abode of the dead

or a burial plot, for Pharisee's a white washed grave on the outside,

but with dead bones on the inside.
Big Guy 360
2009-03-29 07:17:15 UTC
It is a parable. However, as we read and look at all the parables that Jesus taught with, they all were based on truths or on real life. He used real truths in parables so that men could understand. I truly believe that Jesus gave us a glimpse of what hell is like. If you believe that man has an immortal soul, then you must believe that once a person dies the souls does something until Judgment day. Some believe that the souls sleeps in the grave while others believe it goes to hades (hell) with the righteous on one side and the unrighteous on the other until the day when the Resurrection of the righteous and unrighteous. But of course there are those who believe that the soul dies upon death and that they are but a memory of God. I can't even fathom that thought as a person will not be resurrected but instead be recreated. At the beginning of Creation, hell was not made. It was made after the fall of Satan and his Angels and was made for them and all the evil ones, Satan's followers.
djmantx
2009-03-29 06:37:36 UTC
It is without a doubt a parable. No man is in the lake of fire until the false prophet and the antichrist. The interesting thing about this parable is the way the two represent one man. flesh and spirit.

Note the description of their deaths the beggar was carried by the angels and the rich man buried in the ground.
2009-03-29 06:37:42 UTC
If the parable of Lazarus & the rich man were literal, then almost everything else the Bible says about hell is untrue or NOT literal. Since almost all of Jesus' parables were hypothetical situations to illustrate a point, then it is logical to conclude that since this parable gives contradictory information about hell than the rest of the Bible, then it is not to be taken as a literal picture of hell.
Precisely
2009-03-29 07:40:15 UTC
I think that correct interpretation of Luke 16:19-31 depends more on how much to take as parabolic and how much to interpret grammatically.



Your quotation, Yeshua Crazy, of Luke 16:22-23 focuses on the reality of comfort in Abraham's bosom versus pain in hell, but Yeshua unites at least three themes in this story. Eternal rewards and punishments follow from the conduct of our earthly lives, our positions in eternity may be reversed in this earthly life, and even if one were to return from the grave, some who in this life earn eternal punishment will not believe the testimony.



The structure of the afterlife is debated in Christian circles, with this passage being cited for the "great gulf" between Paradise and Hades and the literalism of the imagery being doubted by those who doubt the actuality of the implied structure. In the absence of contrary evidence from Scripture, I employ Yeshua's imagery in my own imagination and believe that those who have been indifferent to the Gospel suffer in some way even before the "final judgement." I doubt that the suffering takes form of the grammatical thirst for even a single drop of water. The great gulf is fixed by our inability to freely reorient our love or hatred toward virtue and God in the afterlife.



I do not believe that earthly poverty guarantees eternal bliss, but don't forget that Luke 6:20 reads (ASV), "And he lifted up his eyes on his disciples, and said, Blessed [are] ye poor: for yours is the kingdom of God." Matthew 19:23-24 and James 2:5 support the teaching of what Roman Catholics style "God's option for the poor."



After his crucifixion, death, and burial, Jesus was seen alive by more then 500 people. Yet many who use Yahoo! Answers disbelieve the fact of his resurrection. And in Religion & Spirituality some disbelievers like to claim that it is their intellectual splendor and/or moral sufficiency which make them superior to Christian believers. Such calumnies did not start with the Enlightenment. "For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He that taketh the wise in their craftiness: and again, The Lord knoweth the reasonings of the wise that they are vain." (1 Corinthians 3:19-20 ASV, quoting Job 5:13 and Psalms 94:11).
Barney
2009-03-29 06:47:32 UTC
Only a parable. Abraham was not in heaven because Jesus himself said in John 3:13 that "no man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man."

The "gulf" was the seperation of the hypocritical religious leaders from the common people. The death of each refers to the change from having God's favor. The religious leaders felt they had God's favor and looked down of the common people. But Jesus was showing them that they did not have God's favor and so were spiritually dead but the common people who accepted Jesus were living spiritually in God's eyes.

Compare these words at Ephesians 2:1, "Furthermore, [it is] YOU [God made alive] though YOU were dead in YOUR trespasses and sins,"
Fisherman
2009-03-29 10:52:13 UTC
Another common objection raised as to the dead being actually dead, unconscious, is the account of the rich man and Lazarus. It tells that the rich man died and went to Hades and that in Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment. (Luke 16:19-31) Seemingly this teaches life after death, but is this account historical? Did it actually happen or is it merely an allegory? It was written that Jesus “never spoke to them without a parable.” (Matt. 13:34) As A New Testament Commentary (1969) well notes, to consider it historical “ignores the element of symbolism that is quite apparent in the story,” such as “Abraham’s bosom, the great Chasm fixed and this flame.” It is also significant that Jesus said nothing about the rich man as being wicked or the poor man as being good. Considered as a parable, it cannot be used to prove life after death.



(Luke 16:19-31) “But a certain man was rich, and he used to deck himself with purple and linen, enjoying himself from day to day with magnificence. 20 But a certain beggar named Laz′a·rus used to be put at his gate, full of ulcers 21 and desiring to be filled with the things dropping from the table of the rich man. Yes, too, the dogs would come and lick his ulcers. 22 Now in course of time the beggar died and he was carried off by the angels to the bosom [position] of Abraham. “Also, the rich man died and was buried. 23 And in Ha′des he lifted up his eyes, he existing in torments, and he saw Abraham afar off and Laz′a·rus in the bosom [position] with him. 24 So he called and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me and send Laz′a·rus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in anguish in this blazing fire.’ 25 But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that you received in full your good things in your lifetime, but Laz′a·rus correspondingly the injurious things. Now, however, he is having comfort here but you are in anguish. 26 And besides all these things, a great chasm has been fixed between us and YOU people, so that those wanting to go over from here to YOU people cannot, neither may people cross over from there to us.’ 27 Then he said, ‘In that event I ask you, father, to send him to the house of my father, 28 for I have five brothers, in order that he may give them a thorough witness, that they also should not get into this place of torment.’ 29 But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.’ 30 Then he said, ‘No, indeed, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them they will repent.’ 31 But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.’”



(Matthew 13:34) All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds by illustrations. Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them;
2009-03-29 06:27:56 UTC
Well from what I can tell that isn't snow spewing out of volcanoes which indicates there is at least a 90% chance of hell being an actual place and therefore I would say a real picture. ♥ † ♥ ☺
2009-03-29 06:27:14 UTC
Parable.
Drop short and duck
2009-03-29 06:25:58 UTC
Throw away your riches to the poor and go out on the streets and beg for a living and preach the name of the Lord.
Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ butterfly affect not effect ( : ) ) ®
2009-03-29 06:30:39 UTC
its the greedy conservatives that say that but when it comes to homosexuals they say its an abomination,



however the only abomination jesus mentions is what is highly esteemed among man is an abomination to the lord,



FOR MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL AND THE RICH GREEDY MAN BURNS IN HELL.
2009-03-29 06:39:52 UTC
It seems to me there is a consistent theme that we should focus our mind on spiritual reality and our heart on our creator and we should not take the world we experience as our ultimate reality.
19jay63
2009-03-29 06:42:43 UTC
The Rich Man and Lazarus



Much argument has taken place over whether the words of Jesus in Luke 16:19-31 were intended to be understood literally or as a parable. Some Christians feel that in this story, Jesus was offering His hearers a glimpse of what existence in the afterlife is like. Others, citing numerous passages of Scripture that seem to contradict the portrayal of heaven and hell contained in this passage, feel that Jesus was teaching an altogether different kind of lesson. Unfortunately, many modern religious teachers have isolated the story from its original context and used it as a device for scaring people. Religious “conversions” resulting from a fear of hell as it is depicted in this passage have indeed occurred, but are based on a foundation sorely in need of the strength that comes only from a genuine appreciation of God’s character and a proper understanding of Scripture. To begin this study, we’ll take a closer look at just what a parable really is, and then examine the setting in which Jesus told this story. Perhaps then we will better understand what lessons there are for us in the story of the rich man and Lazarus.

The Random House College Dictionary describes a parable as “a short, allegorical story designed to convey a truth or moral lesson.” Cruden’s Complete Concordance further expands this concept, saying that parables in the Bible were used “more generally than elsewhere.” We know that the Bible writers used situations both imaginary—as in the trees asking the bramble to be king over them (Judges 9:8-15)—and realistic in parables. Whatever form the parable took, it was only a vehicle for the moral lesson being taught.

Jesus recognized the value of parables in teaching the people. He desired to stimulate their deepest thought and contemplation, and He knew that if He spoke too literally, certain of His hearers would quickly forget His words. Not only that, but others, for whom certain of His parables contained stern rebuke, would be so angered by straight speaking that they would attempt to silence Him by violence. Wise as a serpent but harmless as a dove, Jesus recalled the words of Isaiah 6:9 and told His disciples, “Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.” Luke 8:10. Cruden’s Concordance explains: “Our Saviour in the gospels often speaks to the people in parables. He made use of them to veil the truth from those who were not willing to see it. Those who really desired to know would not rest till they had found out the meaning.”

It is appropriate here to ask to whom Jesus was speaking in Luke 16:19-31. Which category of people was He dealing with? The last verse before Jesus’ voice begins in this passage tells us. Verse 14 says, “And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.” Jesus was speaking to the Pharisees, a class of men who were notorious all through the Gospels for their refusal to deal honestly with Him and the truths He taught.

We can be sure that of all the people Jesus taught, none were handled more guardedly than the wily Pharisees. They dealt in deception and subterfuge, but Jesus dealt with them wisely and truthfully. The safest way for Him to do this was by parable and allegory. Evidence that they did not understand many of His teachings can be found in Jesus’ prayer in Luke 10:21, “I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hath revealed them unto babes.” Mark 4:33, 34 clearly shows that Jesus’ lessons were almost invariably couched in parables: “And with many such parables spake he the word unto them: as they were able to hear it. But without a parable spake he not unto them; and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples.”

Now we are ready to examine the story of the rich man and Lazarus itself, and try to ascertain the real message Jesus was seeking to convey through it.

“There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day: And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.” Luke 16:19-21.

Who was the symbolic rich man? The Jews had been blessed above measure by a knowledge of God and his plan of salvation for all mankind. They had received “the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises.” Romans 9:4. Only a Jew would pray to “Father Abraham,” as we find the rich man doing later in the story. The Jewish nation was clearly represented by this character.

By contrast, Lazarus symbolized all those people in spiritual poverty—the Gentiles—with whom the Israelites were to sha
Betta breeder
2009-03-29 06:25:57 UTC
Does it matter? Heaven and hell are a reality. That is what is important.



Cheers


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...