?
2014-10-02 03:05:16 UTC
1. Nothing = a state in which nothing exists. e.g. "There is nothing inside this box"
2. Nothing = not anything. e.g. "Nothing is greater than God"
They criticise Lawrence Krauss for calling a vacuum "nothing", but if a vacuum isn't nothing then what is? If there's no space or time for the potential for things to exist in, then saying there's "nothing" is incoherent. We're no longer talking about a state of nothingness, since it's impossible for there to be any state at all. We could only be talking about nothing defined as "not anything".
In the same way we could say "nothing is greater than infinity" or "nothing can travel faster than light". We do not mean "nothing" as an actual object or state of affairs, but are simply negating all things. For this reason, saying the universe came from nothing would be saying the universe didn't come from anything. i.e. the universe never came into existence at all (it always existed).
By this reasoning it would be perfectly valid to say God came from nothing, meaning God didn't come from anything.