Question:
All Christians.. ALL.. nonbelievers too if you like.. But it wouldn't be intresting?
2008-09-15 15:55:38 UTC
Did you know this.......
There is a guy, and he has an Ancient Aramaic Bible that has been passed down his family for generations. He translated it to English. And its being sold: http://www.amazon.com/Holy-Bible-Ancient-Translation-Peshitta/dp/0060649232/ref=si3_rdr_bb_product
It is a much reliable translation in the NT and probably OT.
For example: In a verse it says 'Eli, Eli, lama shabakthani' which means 'My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?'
But in his translation it says 'Eli, Eli, lemana shabakthani' which means 'My God, My God, for this I was spared' In other words 'My God, My God, for this was my destiny'.
Did you know that? It's amazing isn't it. Instead of 'lama' it was actually 'lemana' which changes the whole meaning of that scripture. Anyway, my question is "Who has seen, or heard of this before?".
Thanks..
Twenty answers:
Virginia B (John 16:33)
2008-09-15 21:54:36 UTC
I checked out the website, and I certainly would NOT order anything translated by this man! He is changing the whole meaning of what Jesus cried out on the cross, and he'll answer to God for doing that. God bless!!!
cheir
2008-09-15 23:14:38 UTC
Your reference is to the 1933 translation of the Peshitta into English, edited by George M. Lamsa, is known as the Lamsa Bible.

The Peshitta is the authoritative biblical text for today's Syrian Orthodox, Church of the East, and Maronite churches. Its New Testament canon includes 22 of the books currently in the Roman and Protestant canons but does not have 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, Jude, and the Book of Revelation. In addition, this Syriac New Testament does not include Luke 22:17-18 and John 7:53-8:11.

It's not generally accepted as a definitive text.
godskid24
2008-09-15 23:07:40 UTC
What proof is there that this so called bible is legitimate?

There is older Scripture that shows the King James version is the same as ancient Scriptures.

Don't believe every thing you see or hear. If there is any possibility that it can be proved a true copy it will be scientifically checked out.

Yes I said scientifically proved as science is not bad. That does not mean all scientific conclusions are good though.
Moondoggy
2008-09-15 23:02:00 UTC
That's called the Peshita. It has been around for a long time, but the differences, in most cases, are due to corruptions in the text of the Peshita, and not vice verse. Take, for example, the passage you mention. Jesus was quoting the Septuagint Psalm. The Peshita version, while interesting, is not the original reading.
Lin Li
2008-09-15 23:07:04 UTC
Well it's hardly surprising, the majority of Christians accept the flaws within the bible, it's only a few out-of-touch with reality walled in Evangelical morons that don't, but then they are the ones who give Christianity a bad name with their self righteous indignation and literal outflow of hatred towards others, yet the fools claim to be saved despite the fact they themselves and their actions are a total sin and against Jesus and God's word.
2008-09-15 23:04:27 UTC
And did you know that in ancient Aramaic there was only one word for "earth, world, land, and property." Meaning that it is not clear whether the flood in Noah's story meant "earth, world, land, or property"? And did you know that translators used it to their advantage as a scare tactic to control the masses? No? Well, you are welcome ^_^
Sarah
2008-09-15 23:01:13 UTC
I heard of that before, from my pastor in his sermon concerning the importance of faith. And yes I find it very interesting. It leaves me wondering what else in the bible we've misinterpreted...
Ol' Doc
2008-09-15 23:01:41 UTC
I know of Lamsa. It is a bogus translation
2008-09-15 23:00:11 UTC
This simply cements the case that religious texts were poorly translated over the millennia, rendering them unreliable, even as parable.
Im only half evil
2008-09-15 23:01:25 UTC
interesting, funny how they jump so fast saying its fake and theirs is true isn't it, and the man who did this one is just a man like the men who changed their bibles from one language to the next.
No Chance Without Jesus
2008-09-15 22:59:50 UTC
Jesus being forsaken of God because of the sin He carried on the cross for us is KEY. So no I don't think so.
2008-09-15 23:08:06 UTC
you realize the bible was put together in LATIN right, in the 4th century?



Go ahead and spend your money on it if you want, its undoubtedly a forgery. Good for him though for making money off your gullibility.
joker
2008-09-15 23:02:19 UTC
then shouldn't be worth more than 24 bucks?
ღkonataღ
2008-09-15 23:17:52 UTC
wow sounds cool

but i have never heard of this before
Jade | My Brain is My Shepherd
2008-09-15 22:59:11 UTC
I find it interesting. I may buy it to compare to the other versions.
Finite Mind
2008-09-15 22:59:27 UTC
I've got a pair of sandals that Jesus wore. How much are you willing to pay for them?
Shlomo
2008-09-15 23:03:21 UTC
It sounds like another Christian counterfeit.
2008-09-15 23:35:34 UTC
i've never heard of it. very interesting indeed. i would love to hear more.
gutbucket
2008-09-15 22:59:32 UTC
I haven't, but nonsense is still nonsense no matter what language it was translated from.
2008-09-15 22:59:01 UTC
an obvious counterfeit



where is your faith in GODS word?


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...