Question:
How many of you have read the Book of Mormon from cover to cover?
Dale
2010-04-25 05:15:25 UTC
It is also scripture, completely in harmony with the Bible and adds many truths of Jesus to our spiritual knowledge. It came to us by a series of heaven-sent events. In the Book of Mormon, Jesus himself, after his resurrection, appeared to his people in the Americas and shows them the wounds in his hands, feet and side.
35 answers:
MK6
2010-04-25 05:17:50 UTC
Book of Mormon is fiction.



Ask about the Pearl of great price book. That's where the real heresy occurs.
sink
2016-12-30 17:03:50 UTC
sure, greater cases than i will count type. I learn it on an familiar basis. i'm not disagreeing that folk would desire to learn their faith and the historic previous of their faith, yet isn't it a splash illogical to assume that Mark Twain is a technique or the different an authority on the e book of Mormon or the LDS faith? i don't even understand that he study the great e book via, yet despite if he did, that's not comparable to he spent any great volume of time examining the doctrines. He probably glanced via it as quickly as and then thoroughly omitted it. via quoting him, all you're doing is sharing one guy's opinion. that's his appropriate to type that opinion, for sure, and it is your appropriate to share it, although that's nevertheless basically an opinion.
?
2010-04-27 22:34:58 UTC
I have never read such a lot of hate and bigotry as all the answers to this question. We Mormons know we are better than the rest of you because we have prayed and we know. Your spitefulness and jealousy of us will not hurt us.



One day I will be a maker of worlds as I am promised by my faith. And one of the worlds that I will make will be for people like you and there will be no grass on it. Only great big lizards and all of you people who wrote bad things about the BOM. How do you like being lizard food! I'll bet all of you will taste good to the lizards. Later, snacks.
Caveman
2010-04-25 21:17:37 UTC
I gladly raise my hand with those who have read the Book of Mormon and believe it to be the word of God. Such belief comes not from my own understanding, but it comes from a witness from God. What greater witness can a man have than from God, the Father of us all. It IS true and we will all, one day, give on accounting of what we have done with it.



As for the comment made by Beavis, that he doesn't believe the bible, so "it would be kind of pointless to study the BOM" - quite the contrary is true. Both books testify of each other and the Book of Mormon is another witness to the world that Jesus IS the Christ - the promised Messiah.



As for Sandra's claim that "we do not have the gold plates for the World to examine" - we do not have the tablets upon which the Ten commandments were written either, but it makes them no less valid and binding upon us.



I could go on, but the important thing is that millions have read, believe, and have received a witness from God that the Book of Mormon is true. God Himself has born witness that the Book of Mormon is true. Some day we will all be brought to stand before God to answer to your question. At that time all excuses and rationalization will be set aside.



The Book of Mormon is truly the word of God and we can draw closer to Him and our Savior by reading it and abiding by the precepts taught therein.
lightgiver
2010-04-25 14:17:53 UTC
I have read it many times and find that every time I read it I gain a greater understanding of religious subjects.

I don't think that a person could read it cover to cover without feeling its power to draw the reader to Jesus Christ and to know that he is the Christ. I don't think that anyone could read it and not know that it is a book of scripture if they approached the reading of it with a sincere heart and and open mind.



If you have not read it all the way through and with a sincere desire to find out for yourself if it is a book of scripture you owe it to yourself to do it. Imagine if it really was a book of scripture and you did not know it! I don't understand why some people are so afraid to read a book. Silly isn't it? They have a brain, and can use it. Why not be open minded enough to read it without prejudice and judge for yourself!



While on a plane I once met a lady who was from the Baptist faith. We began talking about religion. When I offered to let her look at my Book of Mormon she refused to even touch it because she thought it was evil. How close minded and narrow can you get? I am not saying that all Baptists feel this way, but if a Pastor, Priest or other religious leader is telling you that the book is evil and that you should not even touch it I think you better be asking yourself why he would say such things and have enough common sense and open mindedness to think and judge for yourself by reading it.
Michael V
2010-04-26 11:00:01 UTC
I have, half a dozen or so times, and every time I wonder why so many people can be against this wonderful book of sacred scripture. Reading and praying about the book itself is sufficient to gain a testimony of its truthfulness from God. That is all the promise of God in Moroni 10:3-5 asks in order to receive that blessing of personal revelation by the power of the Holy Ghost. People cheat themselves when they think they can judge the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon by weighing in what others say either for or against Joseph Smith or the history or doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; the book and the promise stand independent of others' opinions. When the Spirit bears unmistakable witness that the Book of Mormon is the word of God, that changes a whole lot of opinions! That would apply to "Galactic Officer of the Day" and such; if anyone here is bugged by their homework against the Book of Mormon, Joseph Smith, and the Church,

they could sort most of it out at http://www.fairlds.org/ but it is better to learn directly from God in His appointed way that the Book of Mormon, the Prophet Joseph Smith, and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are given to the world by none other than Jesus Christ. Who else has even claimed to see or hear from Jesus Christ for the past nearly two thousand years? We have, and it is our witness to all the world that He lives and directs The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints today, and that reading, praying about, and receiving your testimony from God that the Book of Mormon is true is key to knowing the truthfulness of everything else.
?
2010-04-25 17:14:09 UTC
I personally have a testimony of the reality of my savior jesus christ and that he loves me and dies for me, and that he was resurrected and that he did appear to the people in the americas and i Know that Joseph Smith is a prophet of god. Yes I have Read the book of mormon about 7 times. and to all of you who have answered this question saying its false and mocking us for our faith, "Judge not that ye not be judged" And it says in The Bible in St. Matthew 5:10-12

10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.

12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

And to the persone that said that there is no archaeological evidence, there is genetic evidence. some i think it was swedish gentisists, were track the travelings of the Jews, and found they had a special genome or something, and they found this same gene EVERY where on the east coast of the united states among Native Americans. so again, "Judge not that ye not be judged!"
qman31500
2010-04-26 17:09:10 UTC
Dale, stop the evangelizing and ask a legitimate question. I've read the B of M over 30 times cover to cover, and I believe it's a work of 19th century fiction. Joseph lied just like he lied about the Book of Abraham, kinderhook plates, polygamy, priesthood restoration, first vision and a host of other Smith claims that have been clearly refuted from the evidence.
Ender
2010-04-28 02:18:13 UTC
Guilty.
slcbtf
2010-04-26 13:27:12 UTC
I've read it.



and wow... this chapter

http://scriptures.lds.org/en/1_ne/8

hit the nail on the head in regards to this question. All the groups can be found in these answers. Those who didn't grasp the rod, those who did and let go, and those "heeded them not" when they were mocked by others.
ElGuapo
2010-04-25 14:33:48 UTC
Dale, the Bible isn't even "completely in harmony" with itself. You know that as well as I do. It's a collection of Bronze Age mythology attached to a history of Jesus written decades after his supposed death. You may as well talk about the "truths of Santa Claus." Anyway, yes, I've read the Book of Mormon cover to cover, four times I think. Ever notice how many verses reuse phrases from the King James Bible? Strange, huh? Or how many stories seem remarkably similar to Bible stories but with different names? Sorry, despite what your lesson manuals tell you, there are lots of people out here in the real world who've studied your faith's origins more than you have and found it lacking. Do some research, or go back to only talking with Mormons and stop embarrassing yourself in public.
?
2010-04-25 05:34:19 UTC
Yes i have read it and it and i found it contradicts the bible,it makes many scientifically false statements.None of the specific historical content of the Book of Mormon has been verified through archaeological finds.We do not have the gold plates for the World to examine.The plates that were translated were supposedly buried in the ground from the year 420 ad and not found until 1823,the BOM contains extensive quotations from the KJV,but the KJV was not translated until 1611.The BOM contains modern phrases and ideas that could not have been known to its supposed Auther in 421 ad.It speaks of people using compasses but they were not invented until AD 1100.How can it describe something that did not exist at the time?It mentions horses and elephants but these were not native to America.There is no room for the BOM because the bible itself claims to be all-sufficient and incorruptable.The Book of Mormon is an obvious fake,a false gospel written by a false prophet,the very thing the bible warns against.
anonymous
2010-04-26 14:16:26 UTC
I've read the whole thing twice.
?
2010-04-25 15:36:15 UTC
I have read the book cover to cover many times. I attended seminary class everyday when I was in seminary. I taught many lessons on the Book of Mormon when I was a member. And now I believe that it is nothing but pure fiction. It was created by a con-man, and it is not AT ALL in harmony with the Bible or with the actually archaeological history of the Americas.
strplng warrior mom
2010-04-25 12:05:53 UTC
(raises hand)



I have. It is another witness to the divinity of Jesus Christ and details the dealings of God with some peoples upon the American continent. It is filled with plain and precious teachings which have not only brought me closer to God, but unlocked greater understanding into other scripture.



best wishes
anonymous
2010-04-25 11:51:58 UTC
multiple times.
Frank
2010-04-25 05:25:22 UTC
If you think that it adds many truths to what we have already been told you, obviously don't believe the bible is God's Word or you are unaware of God's Word at the end of Revelation where He says that we must not ADD to His Word. It is followed by a warning of what will happen to those who do that. I suggest you read it for yourself.
freedoma586
2010-04-25 06:11:26 UTC
I have read it cover to cover and still continue to read. I know that the book is true. There is a lots of great information in it and every time i read it I have found something new in it.
Peppers_Ghost
2010-04-25 05:22:43 UTC
a few dozen times



'and it came to pass' is forever imprinted on my brain (for anyone who doesn't know, this phrase is used a bazillion times in the book of Mormon)





the book is the worst example of literature..... a poorly executed fraud from an indicted con-man



and it plagiarizes the bible heavily...... not just any bible, but (word-for-word in places) it plagiarizes the KJV version of the bible which was translated in 17th century England, using the idioms and language of the time

(the Book of Mormon was supposed to have been finished being written by 404 AD)
anonymous
2010-04-25 11:44:55 UTC
answer: I did. It was a task to get through the bad wannabe King James English Bible rip off.



The ridiculousness of it was frustrating: tribes of unknown Jews jump in a boat and sail to the New World when boats could barely get to England? Iron swords? Indians cursed to darker skin because of their "sins"? Immortal apostles?



Then there's the ridiculous beliefs of the religion itself - women giving birth to souls to populate planets that the men rule over for eternity?



Not my idea of a good time
MCSHughes
2010-04-25 08:31:00 UTC
I don't like fiction, so no, I haven't read it completely through.



I have read and quoted parts of it for a book on Mormonism I wrote some years ago.
anonymous
2010-04-25 05:19:03 UTC
Sorry But Jesus DID NOT come to the America's as you stated, He appeared to the people in the middle east, Israel. I have kin folks that was mormons.
The Doctor
2010-04-25 05:16:26 UTC
I've read it. I believed it even less after I did so.



Where are the remains of the vast civilization built in the Americas by the Nephites? Why are the Native Americans genetically and linguistically related to eastern Asians if the Nephites were descended from Jews?
anonymous
2010-04-25 05:19:56 UTC
Since I don't believe in the Bible. It would be kind of pointless to study the BOM.
?
2010-04-25 05:18:40 UTC
And like that bible book, there's not a hint of independent confirmation from outside of that mormon book's own pages. The science of DNA proves it wrong.
anonymous
2010-04-25 05:18:32 UTC
Since I find the bible to be a load of bull, I have never bothered with the book of Momon.
Eliza
2010-04-28 17:53:20 UTC
I have, and I agree with you.
mormon_4_jesus
2010-04-25 11:41:31 UTC
I have.
anonymous
2010-04-25 05:21:19 UTC
I have read the 1830 version, and was actually quite appalled by it.
anonymous
2010-04-25 05:17:51 UTC
O ya if it's so authentic why did Joseph Smith a 19th century guy write it in 17th century english hummmm?
Brother Dave
2010-04-25 05:17:12 UTC
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Fly on the wall
2010-04-25 09:09:32 UTC
I've read it. It's an obvious fraud.
Galactic Officer of the Day
2010-04-25 05:21:16 UTC
I have read it cover to cover. I found it to be unconvincing concerning the claims made for it by its believers. Anyone who believes that it represents a true history of ancient America is a few neurons short in the brain.



I have also read some other books relating to its credibility and that of its author, Joseph Smith.



The fact is that Joseph Smith was a con man who, before he brought out the Book of Mormon, pretended to be a seer who could find treasures hidden in the ground. Farmers and other gullible people paid him money to find the treasures. He had a peepstone that he used like a crystal ball to locate the supposed treasures and direct the suckers where to dig. His excuse for not finding the treasures was that they were guarded by spirits who moved the treasure through the ground to keep the suckers from getting it.



He was finally tripped up when the relatives of one of his suckers had him arrested as a "juggler," which at that time was the term used to mean "con man." He was brought before a justice of the peace in a preliminary hearing, or examination, to determine if he should be brought to trial. The judge ascertained that there was enough evidence to try him, but he let Smith know that Smith could take "leg bail" and get out of town, but that he was not to return. This took place in Bainbridge, N.Y., in 1826, and the name of the judge was Albert Neely. Several documents relating to the examination have been found, including the judge's bill for the examination. (The initial assumption about the finding about the court appearance was that it was an actual trial and the Mormons made issues about some discrepancies that violated trial procedures. But those procedures and the judge's bill make it clear that it was actually an "examination" and not an actual trial. Smith was labeled a "glass looker" in the bill.) The evidence against Smith was sufficient that, if Smith had not taken "leg bail" and left town, he would certainly have been judged guilty in the resultant trial.



http://www.irr.org/mit/neely.html



Smith then went on and fabricated the Book of Mormon as another confidence scheme. He got his idea for the book from Ethan Smith's View of the Hebrews, or The Tribes of Israel in America, which was published in Poultney, Vt., when Oliver Cowdery, who became one of Smith's scribes, lived there.



Though he supposedly used a pair of phony spectacles to "translate" the plates for the Book of Mormon, his friends and relatives said he used his seer stone to do so. It was the same stone he used in his former money digging confidence scheme.



Continuing his calling as a con man, when he first started his church he required his converts to turn over all of their property to him. But that caused some problems, so he instituted tithing.



The gold plates never physically existed according to Martin Harris, one of the witnesses and the financial backer for the publication of the Book of Mormon. The printer of the book asked Harris if he saw the plates. Harris replied, "No, I saw them with a spiritual eye."



Stephen Burnett, an early Mormon convert, lost his faith when he heard Harris say something similar. Burnett said "I came to hear Harris state in public that he never saw the plates with his natural eye only in vision or imagination, neither Oliver nor David & also that the eight witnesses never saw them & hesitated to sign that instrument for that reason, but were persuaded to do it."



In an interview with Harris, Anthony Metcalf reported that Harris said, "I never saw the golden plates, only in a visionary or entranced state."



Details about the above information, particularly about the use of View of the Hebrews as the source for the Book of Mormon, can be found in Joseph Smith and the Origins of the Book of Mormon, by David Persuitte. Persuitte presents a very significant number of parallels between the two books.



On top of that, there has not been found one single piece of archaeological evidence to convincingly support the story of ancient America found in the Book of Mormon. In fact, in the 1950s, the LDS church financed "the largest and most ambitious archaeological project ever funded by a religious institution" in an attempt to uncover evidence for the Book of Mormon. It was successful in that it uncovered an enormous amount of archaeological information about ancient America, but as far as providing any evidence for the Book of Mormon, it was a dismal failure. That has not been changed by any subsequent archaeological findings.



That research project is described in Quest for the Gold Plates, by Stan Larson.



In addition, in his book, Losing a Lost Tribe: Native Americans, DNA, and the Mormon Church, Simon G. Southerton shows that the American natives show no evidence of Israelite descent, which contradicts what the Book of Mormon says.



One other thing. Joseph Smith had an eye for women, so he used his position to institute plural marriage and he took over 50 wives, some of them the wives of other men.
anonymous
2010-04-25 05:17:47 UTC
There are millions of works of fiction to choose from,I can't read them all.
anonymous
2010-04-25 05:19:21 UTC
I don't have any confidence in it.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...