DONALD TRUMP MUSLIM BAN. do you agree with it or not?

Question

DONALD TRUMP MUSLIM BAN. do you agree with it or not?

Answer 1

No other religions go out and blow themselves up to kill innocent people in the name of allah

not all muslims are bad , but im sure they know who in there community is ... so if they want in

they have to do their part and be a part of the solution.

Answer 2

Obama did the same sort of thing, except liberal media will always praise people on their own side

Answer 3

What is this "MUSLIM BAN" about which you babble so ignorantly? Do you mean the ban on immigration from a few predominately Muslim countries until the "immigrants" can be properly vetted? I think it's a good thing. People from those countries need to be vetted carefully before being allowed into our country. Look what two of them did in San Bernardino during the obama reich. One of them claimed to be from a town that never even existed.

Answer 4

Not a Mulsim ban, as 96% of the world's Muslims can still come here

Answer 5

Yes dam straight

Answer 6

yes

Answer 7

I don't agree with your question. Mr. Trump is trying to keep terrorists out of the US.

Answer 8

it is NOT a ban, when will people understand this? There are over 40 Muslim majority countries, SIX are on the ban list, and it IS NOT a permanent ban, only to get a system in place to screen people coming in from the target countries because many of them sponsor terrorism or have no system themselves to screen out their own bad people. you have WOLVES amongst the sheep. You have to sort them out. just about every president since Jimmy Carter had some sort of ban on people entering the country. During the Iran Hostage crisis, Jimmy Carter (Democrat) had a COMPLETE ban on all Iranians coming in to the country and DEPORTED many Iranian students who were studying here. We didn't hear any whining about that. And if people go back a little further in History, FDR (democrat) interned EVERY Japanese American in the country until after the war was over. many lost their businesses and homes, and even though they were interned, some were still drafted in to the army. This political crap is really getting old. Hate Trump because you hate Trump. no reason, no logic. and please don't forget, he used to be a DEMOCRAT, and even Oprah and some other people interviewed him and loved his ideas so much they thought he should run for president, and that was in the 80s and 90s. So what is the big deal? Trump could care less about politics, but the COUNTRY, as it should be.

Answer 9

And you couldn't look at the zillions of other times this has been asked? Starved of attention much?

Answer 10

Who am I to judge Trump's decision

Answer 11

Not.

Answer 12

Yes. I do. Muslims are killers. If we don't ban them more people will die and die and die every single second we sit in our homes and let it happen. It's only gonna get worse from here I'd we didn't do something about them.

Answer 13

It's not all muslims, only those from half a dozen countries. Makes no sense, but Trump is retarded

Answer 14

muslims are enemies of god, trump must ban muslims all over the world.

Answer 15

No

Answer 16

no

Answer 17

Disagree with the muslim ban. It's would be like banning all italians because a small percentage of them are in the mafia.

Answer 18

But not with the Mexican one because they are different. Muslim Extremists are actually screaming "Death to America!" and backing it up with violence all over the world so to say the Muslims are a "religion" is like saying the Nazis believed in THEIR thing too at that time. Whereas we have encouraged Mexicans to come with the economic incentives by rich Republican orchard owners, farm owners, and building corporations for generations with laws that we ourselves were antiquating through disuse and we have had them cooking our food and raising our children in our homes for three generations so there is a De Facto policy historically of Mexicans immigrating without papers. But Muslims are more recent and not only not assimilating but actively trying to destroy US. So yes to the MUSLIM BAN but not to jackbooted Migras deporting our cooks, nannies, and fruit pickers.

Answer 19

all Muslim is not terrorist.

Answer 20

i absolutely agree

Answer 21

Not at all

Answer 22

both

Answer 23

I dont see it as the muslim ban politics

Answer 24

if they cant fly then his wife cant all so

she is not from the usa what give her the right too ? we have more rights

to fly any where we like , we will be happy when he is not in the white house any more

he needs to be booted tomorrow , and not only that but he is no where near making

the usa great again he is messing up the world and not many are seeing it they are to blind

Answer 25

For me this is both a Yes & a No.. Yes, because we need to control our borders & who comes into this country & we don't do a very good job of it yet..Also because we don't want to become a France or a Belgium or a Netherlands. No, because a blanket ban on Muslims from that part of the world is just plain wrong. A lot of truly innocent people are being & will be hurt. A lot of Muslims believe in America & the essential American ideals & are not a threat to us.

Answer 26

No.

Answer 27

I just find it hypocritical that conservatives always talk about how we shouldn't be too cautious and safety oriented, yet supposed this ban in the name of safety. Whatever happened to the "tomorrow isn't promised to you" attitude that they had?

Answer 28

No, I do not agree.

Answer 29

I completely disagree with banning Muslims! I think its wrong to generalise and say that all people who follow Islam are the exact same, because I can assure you, they're not. Many and I mean many Muslims are such great people! We are all God's children and He loves us all!

Answer 30

is there any other personal in the world other then trumpt??

Answer 31

NO, i do not support racism

Answer 32

no

Answer 33

Disagree. I agree with stronger security and being sure who we let in. But it's wrong to ban people from entire countries.

Answer 34

disagree

Answer 35

Importing centuries-old hatreds into cohesive societies was a mistake.



This plague of extreme Islamist KILLING is a recent development that

was not infesting the world 20 years ago .. So Trump's idea has more

merit than the CAUSE ~ a failed program of stupid "social engineers".

Answer 36

No.

Answer 37

No cause not all muslims are bad

Answer 38

Hell no

Answer 39

No I do not

Answer 40

It is not a muslim ban. If it were, the top five muslim populated countries would be on it. Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Nigeria. Only one of the top ten countries is on it. The executive order does not even possess the word "muslim". This is a lie perpetuated by the media.

To answer your question, yes. It is a temporary 120 day ban in order to set up an efficient vetting system.

Of course, most of the people from these countries are innocent, but some are not. And the number one job of the government is to protect its people, not others. These countries are internationally recognized as havens of terrorism.

The president has an enumerated power to set a ban for any reason "he shall deem necessary", whether he has a good reason or not (8 USC 1182).

And if any one tries to say there are zero acts of terrorism committed by people from these countries, I d like to just mention Ohio St and Kentucky.

Answer 41

No, all people should be aloud in america no madder there religion, everyone is equal

Answer 42

Yes/No

Mostly yes, after witnessing the horrifying blood bath that was imposed by a Muslim husband/ wife that teamed up to shoot down over 30 San Bernardino County Social workers-(they were just your everyday Muslim people that are allowed to come and go from the USA TO MUSLIM COUTRIES), whom were county employees at a holiday get together, in San Bernardino California USA, where 16 victims were kill...The history of the Isis tied in with planting the seed all in the name of Ala...And to find that the Obama Administration did nothing before, during, or after the U S Attorneys General, FBI, INS and CIA did nothing to warn people...well heck yes when need a national defense plan in place to actively watch these nations with ties to QA, Isis, Isis...and any other fundamental group that works out their anger in the world by killing people in Europa & The USA..And if removing the guide lines from a few well known nations with a history of terrorism, then I says yes, yes we should and do so without blinking an eye.

President Obama took an oath and then choose not to protect and defended the USA...in my book his whole administration were nothing less than cowards and should be punished or face release of duty/and banned from any other political office this includes long term senators and congressman that have done nothing to further protect the USA Sen. McCain, John Kelly, Biden. Maxine Waters.

The FBI claimed they knew about these terrorist and then told the public that they are too busy to have bothered to help prevent crimes, they said sorry not enough man power that’s not their job at this time.Sorry but what exactly is the job of the FBI, CIA, and INS.

So here is the no, when let these Muslim terrorist into the country and if they threaten anyone they be shoot on sight by the police or any citizen that has knowledge of their dirty deeds before they kill hundreds more...Seems like it is easier to close off the airports and ships coming from the 7 know countries that promote terrorist attacks.

Answer 43

I agree. If the Donald wants to make love to a goat then let him.

Answer 44

Yeah.

Answer 45

Yes. Ask any Iraq veteran, Muslims are not to be trusted. They will kill non Islamic followers, I'll never trust one as long as I live in earth.

Answer 46

AGREED!!!

Answer 47

Sometimes

Answer 48

Yes and no to be honest. I understand what he's tryna do, but i DON'T agree how it applies to greencard holders. that's screwed up.

Answer 49

disagree

Answer 50

Disagree. We haven't been attacked by foreign Muslims in over a decade. The ones we were attacked by recently where home grown, meaning they were us citizens. So it's not logical that a ban on foreign countries will fix an American problem. It's just creating more hostility where there doesn't need to be. And certainly bombing foreign countries won't change that either. We need to fight the terrorist here on American soil instead of worrying about what other Muslim countries might or might not do.

Answer 51

not fair to the the non-Muslim in the countries that are ban

Answer 52

No, when the Japanese were Banned, and even Compounded, in the United States of Israel AMERICA; they ended up Owning 80% of American Business's. Hell DUBAI can Afford to Buy the whole Kit and Caboodle; Read someone did in 2014, for 4 Trillion? that's enough for the Jews to pay the French back from 1940; the 1 trillion they left with, and Invest in Real Estate in Palestine. The Russians Finance ISIS, let Trump Rent them space in Ben Sepals Nevada; the Sand is already there. lol.. ...0322 / 2017

Answer 53

Damn right! Keep those cloth-head goat f**kers out of the greatest country in the history of the earth. Terrorist scum do not deserve to live under the same flag as us!

Answer 54

He tried to protect his country .If you had the power of presidency ,You would put a chastity belt covering rear ends without sexual exhibition professionals present

Answer 55

Your question is very misleading. The media tells only what they want you to think.

Read the truth for yourself, below. Don't let anyone do your thinking for you.

Go right to the source. See the link,

.

Answer 56

I don't know

Answer 57

ban them all

Answer 58

i m muslim actually i would agree with it if the reason was really to avoid terrorism lol he is just showing off if he really wants to stop terrorism he ll have to ban the gulf states and saudi arabia the biggest financers of ISIS

but since its all bullshit no i dont agree with it he just banned the ppl who need help not a ban

Answer 59

no

Answer 60

Nope

Answer 61

I am Muslim and the people who killed millions of innocents are not Muslim. It's forbidden and you go to hell if you kill others and you kill yourselves.

Answer 62

No

Answer 63

YES!

Answer 64

no

Answer 65

It is unconstitutional, and I strongly disagree. Tighter security is a good thing. Bans are not.

Answer 66

First off its not a Muslim ban. If that was the case there would be a whole lot more countries on the list. I do agree with the travel ban from certain country's who have ties to terrorism an are not willing to help like Iraq has done an is reason they where removed fron list.

Answer 67

I am not a Muslim still banning a particular religion from entering the country is not the solution. No Human or Religion is worst . No Country is terrioirst . Every nation have good and bad people we cant distinguish. Banning may spoil the relations too more. Muslim countries will some day unite and act as a strong force against others

Answer 68

Of course, we need to keep those filthy animals out of the country!

Answer 69

I think that all muslims need to do everything against the Kurry.



Indian food is their enemy.



Let us rejoice in the creamy cess.

Answer 70

No, it's silly, we haven't had terrorist come from those banned countries, and there have been terrorists coming from Muslim countries that aren't banned. So what exactly is it he's trying to do here? It just makes no sense.

Answer 71

its highly illegal. THE US CANT REJECT MUSLIM REFUGEES AND treat them on unfair terms. but the us OWE ARAB AND MIDDLE EASTERN NATIONS A TON OF MONEY. if the arab world dump the us petro dollars and interfere with oil supply, the economic damage and adverse effects wil be bad for all. the us excuse is that it spent trillions on rebuilding and wars in the middle east. but opec nations will surely dump their dollars if they cut the muslim nations that supply so much CHEAP OIL NOW

Answer 72

disagree. it's not going to stop muslims from entering the country because 1) there's already muslims in america 2) muslims can pretend to be christian or some other religion 3) there's lots of muslims in countries like indonesia, saudi arabia, etc that aren't on the list of banned countries.



it seems like there's a lot of loopholes and sorta goes against freedom of religion

Answer 73

Agree. We don't need people who want to behead us.

Answer 74

I think it's hypocritical to say the least. He's not banning anyone from Saudi Arabia, which has funded ISIL.

Answer 75

no

Answer 76

No i am not agree with this

Answer 77

https://join.com//1123

Answer 78

I agree because a verse in the Quran tells all male Muslims to kill all who don't believe in Allah (specifically Christians and Jews, or what they can "infidels"). It is also normal to rape women who haven't even had their first period yet. In fact, Muslims can get married as newborns. And the Quran says to throw gay people off of buildings, cut off the hands of thieves, and that women have half the worth of men, half the brains, and cannot hold a position control. They can't even leave the house without a male chaperone!

Answer 79

You know what. I believe that president Trump will make America indeed great again. I think that people underestimate his power to transform the country. Kill all the Muslims. They are polluting our white society. I feel white guilt, but that doesn't mean I respect anyone outside of my race. Hope this helps!

Answer 80

Top 10 countries with most populated Muslim in order:

1. Indonesia

2. Pakistan

3. India

4. Bangladesh

5. Egypt

6. Nigeria

7. Iran (BANNED)

8. Turkey

9. Nigeria

10. Morocco



Oh yea only one country out of six is on this list, this is totally a Muslim ban. TRUST THE MEDIA THEY SAY, THEY ALWAYS SPEAK THE TRUTH THEY SAY; WHEN THEY SAY THIS IS A MUSLIM BAN WE MUST BELIEVE THEM BECAUSE MEDIA IS LOVE, MEDIA IS LIFE. Pfft **** that ****.

Answer 81

I disagree. It'd be very unfair. Trump is only doing this because he stereotypes and thinks all Muslims are terrorists.



Real Muslims don't kill, those so-called Muslims who go around killing people in the name of Allah are just crazy and are misinterpreting the Qu'ran.



If Trump is going to ban Islam then he might as well ban Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Taoism, Paganism, Scientology, Catholicism, Mormonism, Satanism and every other belief there is out there because as much as I disagree with some Islamic rules and despite me being an Anglo-saxon Catholic, I feel that taking something away that belongs to a lot of people's lifestyles is wrong. People should have every right to believe in whatever they want regardless of the constant stereotypes and bigotry.

Answer 82

Ban is not the operative word. Blocking Islamic Radical Terrorist

from flocking to this country is the operative term.

Answer 83

Why do people keep asking the same question over and over again?



It's not a Muslim ban as all Muslims are NOT banned from the USA it's only from some countries and it's not like he can actually do this, it won't go pass congress or something.



As for the ban, no I don't agree with it. Because the USA invaded those countries in the Middle East and caused the mother of all messes there.

Answer 84

You, like many other citizens, are merely misinformed or you misunderstand the purpose of Trump's proposed vetting process.



Muslims are not banned from the entering the USA. There are a few countries, where our enemies are present, that are to have their citizens who travel to the USA be vetted.



Unless you forget, ISIS vows to destroy America. This is no secret, as we have been sent videos of people being beheaded, dismembered, burned and drowned in cages. So, get your head out of your behind and realize that the attempt to keep America safe is quite important to our survival. When you have unreasonable enemies who are willing to blow themselves up to kill others, there are no rational ways to deal with them other than to create ways to slow them down until we can stop them.



The proposed ban is not about Muslim people, it is about all people who are traveling from countries known to train and harbor our enemies.



Please wake up, please.

Answer 85

no.

Answer 86

Disagree

Answer 87

Vetting is so important to keep Americans safe.If you disagree move to Saudi Arabia.

Answer 88

No, it's unconstitutional

Answer 89

I do not, B. Trump is off the grid.

Answer 90

The one who should be banned/ousted is the unwise Trumper.

Who really can take this man serious?

Answer 91

Not really, it needs to be stronger and include every nation which has illegal immigrants in the united states. We need shoot on sight orders for latino illegals and kurdish ones especially. They are like cock roaches and keep popping up even though we should be cracking down on it. They should focus on apologizing for attacking America in that war they lost instead.

Answer 92

YES!! They are terrorists and a threat to America's freedom! They refuse to conform to our laws, so they need to be banned!

Answer 93

How about we let all of the CULTS who wish and scream; "DEATH TO AMERICA" in? Then when the liberals see losses of life of their loved ones, friends and family here is America; what will they say?

Answer 94

You are a troll.

Answer 95

The Oklahoma City Bombing was carried out by a white man.



The majority of serial killers and child molesters are white.



So why are we banning musilms.



If were using the logic that because some musilms commit terror attacks that we should ban them, then we should apply that same logic to white people.

Answer 96

Absolutely I would like to see Islam banned entirely in the USA! Deport them all! Muslims are good for nothing except target practice!

Answer 97

Totally Agree does the USA realy want to Live with sharia and this Filth



This is My standard Answer to inform People with Children look after Your Children because Muslims Believe this is Halal ( LEGAL )



This is from a Muslim cults Priest MUHAMMAD, THE PROPHET OF ISLAM Said this



Thighing of children: Mohammed (51) married Ayesha when she was SIX, but as she was too small to consumate, he practised the sacred rite of Mufa’ Khathat (otherwise known as ‘thighing’) whereby he rubbed himself between the tops of her thighs, but did not enter. 



A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate her But. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). this says it all



If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."



“It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”



"Young boys or girls in full sexual effervescence are kept from getting married before they reach the legal age of majority. This is against the intention of divine laws. Why should the marriage of pubescent girls and boys be forbidden because they are still minors, when they are allowed to listen to the radio and to sexually arousing music?"



MUHAMMAD, THE PROPHET OF ISLAM



"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not



penetrate her But. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). this says it all



Muslim Males want Sharia for One reason their Male advantage 



if a Muslim males Kills a Non Muslim under sharia law and says he refused to Convert No Crime has been committed



If a Muslim Beats his wife Sharia 64.5 tells him How No Crime has been committed 



If a Muslim Male marries a baby under Sharia 65.4 No Crime has been committed 



and under sharia is is a Muslims Oath to convert everyone 



and Mohamed if the Infidel Unbeliever does not Convert he must Die 

Answer 98

Well it is not specifically an Islamic ban. The ban is towards various high-risk nations which have a number of terrorists and terrorist groups, which are simply Islamic groups.

Answer 99

Most people that agree with it simply have not been around the world enough and exposed to people of the Muslim religion. Simple as that. I'm a white American.

Answer 100

Why do you call it a 'Muslim ban' when President Trump currently allows Muslims in, UN-vetted, from 33 Muslim majority countries? At present, he has placed a three month temporary hold on only 7, the ones with the most ISIS and 'Death to America' threats are commonly voiced in crowds of many thousands. Trump isn't letting in very many Syrians now, and my heart breaks to block them but it is necessary for our own protection. Note the President of Syria himself admitted there are Isis terrorists hiding among the refugees, using our kindness and pity as a Trojan horse to enter America where they will attack us from within, by doing the same sort of raping and murdering to us as they now do to Christians in those 7 Muslim countries Trump is banning right now, as you read this.

If you knew there were murderers on the loose pretending to be needy would you open your door to everyone who knocks? When there is a reasonable possibility you, your spouse and children will be rapped and their heads cut off because you just left your door open? Our borders are our doors, and we need to secure them to remain safe as we sleep, believing no one would dare harm us or steal our homes.

Trump just had a Saudi prince or King as a guest at the white house like 2 days ago. Unlike Obama, who bowed to the Saudi King when he twice visited that country during his presidency., Trump does not bow but treats the man as his equal instead of his superior. Is that a problem for you? It's not me.

Why would you sleep with your front door wide open when mad rapist-murderers who your neighbor's let into their homes felt sorry for them & let them in, then pretenders raped their families repeatedly before torturing and murdering them?

Trump is absolutely right in that we need to take time to vet people from countries where the most terrorist activity is committed. Even refugees from those 7 countries who are not ISIS affiliated agree with him because they will be the first victims of ISIS terrorists who sneak in. They have lost their hoes and loved ones back home already.

Its not a Muslim ban because Trump is temporarily banning only 7 out of 40 majority Muslim countries, the ones where the most terrorist attacks are taking place. ABC News are so full of B. S. they actually edited to misconstrue the opinion of a Syrian refugee who actually said Trump is doing the right thing to vet and protect Americans and non radical Muslims from attack by ISIS sympathizing radical Islamists who are using immigration as a Trojan Horse to sneak into America and destroy from within..

Answer 101

It's NOT a ban---as the Democrat supported LIBERAL SOCIALIST propaganda media TRY to condition us into believing.....



Trump simply wants these people to undergo BACKGROUND CHECKS PRIOR to entering the U.S; they pass clear, they're welcomed in the U.S......however, if they're found to have al-Qaida and/or ISIS ties......



And the arrogance of these LIBERAL LEFTIST FEDERAL JUDGES opposing Trump is going to cause the second 9/11 terror like strike in the U.S.



Be ever mindful: That open invitation on Liberty's statue was made WELL BEFORE modern terrorist warfare. If America's Founding Fathers could return to today--and see how deadly these terrorists are--they would support Trump's Executive Order regarding Immigration Entry into the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.



For the like it or not---it's wise and best IF we take a real good look at WHO is seeking entry into OUR country.

Answer 102

Yes, I do, For a lot of Muslims come to America believing that they can destroy America by being on the inside of America Social Structure..........

Answer 103

Of course, we want to maintain the ones filthy animals out of the country!

Answer 104

People are not understanding that he banned countries that had known terrorist activity from entering the US. Now I am all for higher security for keeping our country safe however, I do not think it was right for him to ban people from a certain country due to their religious views.

Answer 105

For the ban to be fair, it should ban everyone. All foreigners have to stay home. All Americans have to stay home too. And the FBI needs to investigate everyone in depth. Nobody should have any secrets from the government.

Answer 106

He's not doing it for safety. He's doing it to pick on people. So, no.

Answer 107

There is no ' Muslim ban '. Yer an idiot or a shill

Answer 108

If it were up to me I would disallow the practising of islam from any country in the west. They have their own countries, and they vote in their own leaders, and they have shariya law.



I don't want ANY of that in my country!

Answer 109

yes indeed, THERE IS FEW TO NO REASONS WHY MUSLIMS NEED TO come to us or anywhere in the americas. islam is nearly non existent in the americas. also, we dont need to see the americas change from christian to muslim. a muslim ban is excessive though. but there are very few reason why muslims need to come here. except rich, well educated, political representatives, business elites, and investors, the general muslims of other nation should stay away from the us. the culture is 100% incompatible

Answer 110

It's not a Muslim ban. If it was, the president would not have just open hotels in the Middle East.

Answer 111

Check out what is preached in some mosques, in Montreal Canada a mosque recently had an Imam from Jordan preach about the evil Jews and they should be slain. Hate speech from a peaceful religion.?

Answer 112

no

Answer 113

I don't agree with anything. I just think people should all be able to have free food and healthcare or at least money should be different, but idk I just want there to not be starving children on the planet when murderers are being fed.

Answer 114

It's not a Muslim ban - if so several other countries would be included. It is delay on entering they USA from several know terrorist supporting countries. Doesn't any pay attention to the facts?

Answer 115

Yes I do agree with it. It's not really banning all muslims just the people who could be dangerous to our country. Donald Trump is doing more good in a few months than any other recent president has in their full term(s).

Answer 116

Yes

Answer 117

No

Answer 118

No

Answer 119

The real question is, what are we going to do about the Christian terrorists living right here in America?

Answer 120

Yes, I do.

Answer 121

No I do not

Answer 122

no

Answer 123

How can you target extremist radical Islamist without sounding like a bigot? For republicans and especially Trump no matter how it is worded it will be characterized as discriminatory anyway.

Answer 124

Not a Muslim ban. By country ban regardless of religious majority.

Answer 125

zede

Answer 126

all are the human.......so why the trump are divided the human ...as in the religious.........so stop the ******* like this.........i request..........

Answer 127

no

Answer 128

NO

Answer 129

We have been doing this since 9/11. Trump is playing to his followers fear of terrorists.maybe he should ban guns and automobiles too. Since 9/11 and including 9/11 approximately 3000 people have been killed by terrorists. During that same time frame almost 1 million people have been killed by guns and automobiles.So Trumps bogus "national security issue" is superfluous.Trump is a master at convincing his followers that things are critical, but the facts don't bear that out. So no, I do not agree with his ban.

Answer 130

it seems the us is becoming very anti muslim, we simply dont want them here anymore

Answer 131

Yes they breed like rabbits and quickly over populate area with their children and mosques and before you know you have an army of religious fanatics who want to rule you and take over your country.

Answer 132

I haven't seen a Muslim ban yet.



I've seen a ban on a few countries proven to have poor vetting procedures. I think a temporary halt on travel is probably not necessary; though certainly not the offensive tragedy it's being made out to be.



No one from outside of those countries are being banned, even if they are Muslim. So it's dishonest to call it a Muslim ban.

Answer 133

Those listening to the media understand neither the substance of the temporary travel ban, nor who is affected.



To be clear: THERE IS NO MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN! There IS a temporary ban on travelers, regardless of religion, originating from the six terrorist countries that pose a threat to the people of the United States. The ban applies to travelers from: Libya, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Yemen, and Somalia.



The United States is at war. During WWII, the federal government banned immigration travel from three countries: Germany, Japan, and Italy.



In addition, those German, Japanese, and Italians already in the US were required to register, their mobility restricted, and they were prohibited from owning items that might be used for sabotage, such as cameras, explosives, and shortwave radios. Those found to be a potential threat were detained until vetted. These restrictions were also placed on many Bulgarians, Czechs, Hungarians and Romanians.



Non-US citizens do not have a "right" to emigrate to the United States. That is a policy of the federal government who may place restrictions on the privilege, and has changed many times in the history of the US. An application may be denied because:



A.) the consular officer does not have all of the information required to determine if the applicant is eligible to receive a visa,

B.) the applicant does not qualify for the visa category for which he or she applied, or

C.) the information reviewed indicates the applicant falls within the scope of one of the inadmissibility or ineligibility grounds of the law, as specified in The Immigration and Nationality Act.



For example, an applicant’s current and/or past actions, such as drug or criminal activities may make the applicant ineligible for a visa. Other reasons may include, health, insufficient or inaccurate documentation, warrants in country of origin, contraband, failure to meet federal requirements for immigration, purpose of visit, security, expiration of visa, or other violations of the Act.



The temporary travel ban is at the discretion of the President of the United States and no other federal authority. The current temporary ban is reasonable under the present circumstances.

Answer 134

Yes.

Answer 135

I completely agree. Collectivist cultural relativism is not worth your individual life and freedom.

Answer 136

That's not exactly his plan, read further into the ban.

Answer 137

Yes. The Muslim ban was to be temporary until the government learns how to properly vet. The Muslims responsible for the San Bernardino massacre could have been caught up front only if their emails had been read. The same goes for the Boston Marathon bombers. So, instead of a ban they will have their privacy invaded. My guess is this won't please you snowflakes, either.

Answer 138

I Don't want to judge Trump's decision But i must they the people who lived there are not responsible for what actually happened in past somewhere their Goverment are also responsible for that so he can not blam on only muslims

Answer 139

I agree.

Answer 140

Not at all.

Answer 141

Agree

Answer 142

ANY group of fanatics are destructive to democracy, be they Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist or Hindu. There are presently about one and a half billion Muslims in the world. One of their main prophets is a man named Jesus. Perhaps it might be a good idea to engage the mind before putting the mouth in gear.

Answer 143

The reason trump ban on Muslims because he is a disbeliever. Don't give me that nonsense about terrorists. Its ALL lies. How many of these attacks did america go through. Only a handful. You guys have a bigger problem with gangs, and drugs, and other sins. Why doesn't trump focus on the bloods and crips. I know it sounds funny but its actually a much bigger problem than "terrorists". You guys talk like muslims randomly just blow up every 3 seconds. If you are reading this, i am 99% sure you've never experienced a "terrorist" attack. So stop the nonsense, america currently has the world stage, and they're just like, dumb as can be... duuuhhh.

Answer 144

no

Answer 145

no

Answer 146

I do not, and thank you, frankly, for calling it what it is. A Muslim Ban.

It is perfectly normal, and indeed a daily practice, to interpret a law based o context as well as the text itself, and Trump made it clear multiple times throughout the campaign what his intended goal was, as "a total and complete shut down of all Muslims entering the US..."

And no, I am in complete disagreement with the entire concept of a Muslim Ban, or a border wall.

Answer 147

NOT Muslims might not be his problem "Twittering" is his main problem

Answer 148

Muslims are not the problem...the individuals who become terrorist are the problem....ban them.

Answer 149

Yes he wants to make our country safer

Answer 150

Until we can vet them we need to put a temporary hold on Muslims coming in and everyone else. It's not like they're going to start kicking down doors to get every single Muslim out.

Answer 151

hoi

Answer 152

I'm Shia Muslim and I'm happy with Trump if he would put ban on all muslim. Not only on seven or eight 3rd class countries.Because I have already tell you that every religions have some good and bad people, every Home have some good thougts and bad thoughts, every countries have some good and bad people. So MUSLIM is a peacefull, kindness religion.

And last,

I'm Asian and we don't care about Trump ban because we Peacefull Muslims will never every go to America. We will visit europe and other good nation for holiday and vacation but not in America.

Remember we will complain every evil act to your GOD Jesus!.

Love you all bye!

Answer 153

no

Answer 154

No

Answer 155

They need to be banned, and those who are on the lose in our country using an expired visa. Where was the outcry by the Muslims when 9/11 occurred, the Boston Bomber, San Bernadino, not to mention the ones that were spoil by our intelligence? Anyone who enters the country with a Visa or without, and if they commit a crime against an American Citizen, they need to be declared as "undesirable aliens," and deported post haste. President Trump is about the only Washington insider now, who as the balls to do it. Let's help him finish cleaning the swap by kicking the rest of the cry babies out of District of Combia,

Answer 156

No One step away from havin the holocaust all over again

Answer 157

Just let it ride --- Liberals will be Sorry & calm when another 911 happens again.

Answer 158

it is just amazing that everyone in this Nation sees these people as having more rights than the USA citizens.Muslims are bound by Jihad and that is to destroy the infidel. Get it? And if there are good ones the answer there is 'the strong will control the weak'!!!! Wake up.A MIND IS A TERRIBLE THING TO WASTE..

Answer 159

The correct answer is NO.



Yes is the wrong answer, always has been, always will be.



I remember a Facebook post saying that Islamic extremists only represent a small percentage of Muslims. Then lie about it was the same with Nazis and the Germans.



If we have to follow that then Christianity would have to end because of only a small percentage was responsible for the Salem trials, the Spanish Inquisition, and so forth.



If anything if we have to compare this situation with the Nazis, then it's Trump going after the Muslims like how Hitler went after the Jews.



It's another hate crime where those who support this must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Answer 160

YES I TOTALLY AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 161

All I know is that we know nothing. But obviously banning muslims is a bogus idea. While it may seem logical for the paranoid idiot, the pure simple fact that these people have experienced terror beyond our simplest beliefs. The way North America lives is NOT the norm for the world. While it isn't easy, we must understand that we should welcome these people with open arms. It's the least we can do.



I understand where the bonehead is coming from. I really do. I mean it's naturally scary if you think that a foreign group of individuals would want to destroy our way of life. But the guy has no empathy, which is what makes him an idiot, an unable to not generalize a group of people ( this probably has to do with lack of education).



All I can say is, as a Canadian, with a keen interest in exploring the natural beauty of the USA, I have decided to not bother exploring the county at least until the end of the next four years. This is just my opinion!

Answer 162

Disagree we are all human. We are all the same just different personalities and behavior

Answer 163

it's not a muslim ban, the countries banned don't even represent the majority of muslims.

Answer 164

yes and beacuse it's not a ban he is doing this for a reason 1 to make sure they don't have ak47s in those clothes they wear 2 and to prevent terrorism

Answer 165

Yes, since Muslims just add fuel to the fire.

Answer 166

no but if the ban did or does pass I wouldn't really care.



Besides, the U.S isn't the only other country in the world. Why can't they go elsewhere?

Answer 167

Totally disagree.It has dwarfed down the position of US.

Answer 168

disagree

Answer 169

Catholic? Cat Holic? basically doesn't matter what I agree or don't agree with when its a presidential decision lol.

Answer 170

I believe in keeping people out of our country that have the attitude they want to destroy us, we put the Japanese in internment camps because they were of the ethnic basis of our enemy, albeit very misbegotten but at the time fear was a big concern to all Americans

Answer 171

Richard Reid from the UK, a Muslim convert, tried to blow up a plane traveling from Amsterdam to Detroit.



Mohammed Emwazi (a British passport holder) became famous for beheading infidels in Syria before the US (under President Obama) took him out with a drone.



Sally Jones, a housewife and former punk rocker from the UK, actively recruits European women to join ISIS.



Maxime Hauchard, a French national, was last seen in Syria also beheading people.



The Kouachi brothers, raised in France and French passport holders, murdered several cartoonists at the Charlie Hebdo building in the name of Islam.



The UK and France are not on this list? By Trump's logic they ought to be!

Answer 172

It's a trial and error

Answer 173

definitely not.

Answer 174

No

Answer 175

No, it's not efficient.

Answer 176

hell no

Answer 177

NO its unconstitutional and promotes intolerance

Answer 178

Yes, partly, although I think that innocent refugees who are at risk of being murdered should be allowed to live here. On the other side, I think that the ones who are not are taking up space that other refugees deserve and they should return home.

Answer 179

Muslim Extremists are actually screaming "Death to America!" and backing it up with violence all over the world so to say the Muslims are a "religion" is like saying the Nazis believed in THEIR thing too at that time. Whereas we have encouraged Mexicans to come with the economic incentives by rich Republican orchard owners, farm owners, and building corporations for generations with laws that we ourselves were antiquating through disuse and we have had them cooking our food and raising our children in our homes for three generations so there is a De Facto policy historically of Mexicans immigrating without papers. But Muslims are more recent and not only not assimilating but actively trying to destroy US. So yes to the MUSLIM BAN but not to jackbooted Migras deporting our cooks, nannies, and fruit pickers.

Answer 180

No

Answer 181

Islam is not a threat, but all fanatic-radical religious movements are threat. He should realize this. All Muslim are not same while all christians are not same. And it is an irony that the country which weaponed ISIS and Al Qeda says that "all muslims are terrorists"

Answer 182

Doesn't go far enough.

Answer 183

I'm a registered California democrat and I'm VERY tired of the LIES about a "muslim ban" - that's nothing but disinformation - it's NOT a "muslim ban" - it's a ban of unvetted potential TERRORISTS from hostile countries.



Prediction: If the democrats keep coddling terrorists they WILL turn on us in the end. Wait and see.

Answer 184

No

Answer 185

If you are an American then first of all you just learned how twisted this country is regarding the election process and how millions of people (the popular vote) did not vote for this man to be the president of this country but it did not matter because of the way the voting system is set up and we the people have no say in this at all.

As for what Trump is doing and whether or not we agree with him or not it doesn't matter because there is nothing we (American's) can do about what he's doing So really its pointless even ask the people of American what we think about what he's doing because our opinions don't matter he'll do whatever the h'ell he wants

Answer 186

Yes white america only white america will prevail?

Answer 187

He is not BANNING MUSLIM people he is banning all people ...

That means JEWS / CRISTAINS /AND ANY OTHER RELIGIONS that come from these countrys

That means men / women / children it does not matter ..

YES I AGREE

Answer 188

Disagree

Answer 189

I just hate trump because prices are rising on everything that we need. To pay for this B****** lavish vacation every single weekend. And not one word or outrage from right wingers. If this was Obama PROTEST in front of the White House and utter chaos.

Answer 190

It's not a "Muslim" ban..

Answer 191

Love your neighbor as yourself love your enemies forgive and you will be forgiven

Answer 192

definitely not its is an influence in hatred and segregation

Answer 193

Don't know don't care.

Answer 194

When immigrants WANT to come to America, with PEACEFUL intentions.....that's wonderful. Otherwise, they can stay the Hell at home.

Answer 195

I totally disagree. This is something above racism. Worse than Hitler and the Nazis. May Donald Duck be thrown into the garbage bin and rot there.

Answer 196

Yes. I agree with the ban.



And should anything happen between now and the evaluation of immigrant vetting, Damocrats must be held responsible for throwing fouls into the process.



They might not care if their family members are killed, raped or blown up, but I care about me and mine.

Answer 197

Overboard

Answer 198

No.

Answer 199

yes

Answer 200

Disagree under the Neutrality Immigration Act of 1967 . the government can not hold a person's nationality or religion as a reason(s) for not letting them enter the country. The government must prove that the individual person is a threat to the country, not groups of persons from certain countries are a threat to the nation.

#45 EO has used the prior Neutrality of 1937, as case law. You can not use a prior Act as case law when it has been amended in any way, as this was in 1967. the Neutrality Act of 1937, did allow to bar entrance of persons due to their nationality and religion, by the Government.

People who do come to the US as refugees are more vetted than most Americans have ever been or will be. You cannot pick and choice from which areas of the world to accept refugees. As the judges decision has pointed out.

I was vetted yearly at my position at Louisville Metro Department of Corrections.

Answer 201

It's more of a Travel Ban than a Muslim Ban. However, it is problematic.

Out of all the nations on the Ban, none of them as a nation supports ISIS. Actually Syria and Iran are fighting ISIS.

Ya know who funds ISIS? America, her allies, her Pimp Israel and her secret lover Saudi Arabia.

Israel and Saudi Arabia aren't on that ban, even though they've both been found funding ISIS and played a large role (or left fingerprints all over) 9/11. 15/19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. The others were also from nations not on the travel ban. Trump just gave weapons and money to KSA. It's pointless.

Answer 202

H

Answer 203

I think it depends really. I don't think you can target people without a legitimate reason, though. So, I hope he isn't just targeting them with nothing against them. Anyways, Trump is our president for the next 4-8 years. He's not changing anytime soon, so does our opinion really matter?

Answer 204

I'm glad he is doing his job, by looking out for americans in possible danger.......apparently lots of folks here have that mental disorder they are so proud of..........

Answer 205

First off there is NO MUSLIM BAN. The travel ban is on countries. So, any Christians, agnostics, Jews, Hindus, etc. from those countries can't come here either. Did you even think about that for a minute or simply assume that everyone from those countries are muslim? Second, if protecting our country means that we temporarily-which is what his order asks for- prevents people from certain areas from coming to the US while we double and/or triple check our vetting system then what's wrong with that?



So, do I agree with the muslim ban? No, I don't agree with banning it; however, since it's a TEMPORARY ban on all people from certain countries that are experiencing significant issues with their central governments while we ensure that our country is safe I'm perfectly fine with it.



Duke

Answer 206

Disagreee

Answer 207

There is no Muslim Ban.

Trump wants to place a temporary hold on immigration from countries that are problematic (in the sense that it is difficult to confirm the person's identity, and also they are countries with rampant terrorism at work).

The idea is to give some time to allow some improved vetting procedures to be worked out.

However, unelected activist judges keep getting in the way.

Answer 208

It's a travel ban. Not a Muslim ban. I do agree with the travel ban. Former president, Barack Obama did a travel ban. I don't get why you guys are so arrogant and naive to say that Trump is a terrible person because he did a travel ban. The main reason why I, as a proud American, support the travel ban, that President Trump started, is because it is to protect the true American people from strangers that we might mistaken them as innocent people. Who would like to take "their" country back and kill dozens, yet millions of innocent Americans.

Answer 209

Even he was banning all Muslims, I wouldn't agree with it, but that's moot.



Instead, his banning ONLY those Muslims who are not potential terrorists (such as refugees) and is NOT banning any potential terrorists (such as Saudi Arabians). So that makes it very easy to oppose.

Answer 210

Its not a Muslim ban they said its not racist they said...

Answer 211

The U.S. Constitution was constructed for the U.S.A. not the world. The U.S. Constitution apply to U.S. Citizens. Every Sovereign in the world has the right to prevent unfriendly foreigners, criminals, smugglers, & even those without sponsorship or invitation, taking advantage of economic opportunity away from a Sovereigns citizens from entering their country.



FDR (D) Suspended Immigration from the Axis powers during WWII.



Malaysia, Morocco, Dominican Republic, Jordan, Dubai, Japan, ... Regularly Mass deport Illegal Immigrants.

Answer 212

I'm black and I agree 💯

Answer 213

1st of all

ITS NOT A MUSLIM BAN.

Most of these "refugees " that have flooded the US in the last ten years is because of all the wars the US has brought to many Muslim countries. These countries citizens have decided to leave the war zone for safer countries. BUT these are NOT refugees! According to definition and human rights definition of refugee is "a refugee is a citizen who flees from conflict to the NEXT SAFE NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES" these so called " refugees have not done this and so therefore are not refugees!

2ndly

I'll post second part coz I have text limit

Answer 214

I know a few Muslim and I even dated one and muslims are not harM. Just because there Muslim doesn't mean there a criminal ! I'm not a Muslim and I'm an American .



I disagree that muslims should be ban from the USA!

Answer 215

Yes.

Answer 216

dont ask dumb fukn questions

Answer 217

Agree

Answer 218

No because he's an idiot

Answer 219

I completely agree. They let refugees in Eurpoe such as France and Sweden, and now Sweden is the rape capital of the world. Just days after they let in fresh refugees a few weeks ago, not days later a woman had a group of men break in to her home and gang rape her for hours, them putting it all live on facebook. I don't want them here, period.

Answer 220

I disagree because it looks like a pure and simply a Religious bias.

Answer 221

not

Answer 222

Strongly disagree. It is emphatically un-American to ban or discriminate against a group based on religion.

Answer 223

No

Answer 224

False premise or statement it's like temperary but the truth is muslims want sharia wherever they go & Wake up

Answer 225

The greater threat to the West is the Saudi Arabian brand of Islam yet it's not included in the ban.

Answer 226

yes, it will make America much safer

Answer 227

no

Answer 228

No, this is not good.

Answer 229

I think it's a gross attempt of ethnic cleansing which may escalate to ax handles.

Answer 230

Who wants or needs more of Ismael's pigshitters? Why are libtards so fixated on such a worthless cause? Go eff yourselves for being against something just because Trump is for it!

Answer 231

It is NOT a 'Muslim ban'.



The six countries that the temporary halt on travel affects is for people of ALL religions in those countries because known terrorists are flooding out of those countries.



Many countries known as Muslim majorities have no such temporary travel ban on them.



You make yourself out to be quite ignorant about the matter. If you want to discuss it, get correct information.

Answer 232

You sound like a foreigner. Keep out of our politics.

Answer 233

No, it's primitive and discriminatory

Answer 234

It's unconstitutional. If history is still taught in school, they would tell you that one of America's most important founding principles was freedom of religion. The first amendment guarantees that freedom. If we ban peole based on religion we are destroying our democracy.



For some background on why we have freedom of religion, look up "huguenot" or "Spanish inquisition" and learn what people came to America to escape. People were literally being murdered in Europe because of their religious beliefs. America stands against such discrimination.

Answer 235

what Trump did was horrible. no religion deserves to be disgraced like this. how would you feel if this was done to christians? Jews? Hindus? or any religion? it's unfair and everyone's has the right to practice their beliefs and religion in a free way. nobody should take that right away from them especially Trump here

Answer 236

YES.

Answer 237

It's not a Muslim ban. It's a suspension of predominantly Muslim countries with terror links. Again, terror links are the reason for this, not for their religion. The Trump administration didn't design it, but the Obama admins did, and no one bats an eye. Quite the double standard. Finally, the top Muslim-majority country in the world (Indonesia) isn't even on the block list.

Answer 238

If you agree there is something deficient about you. No matter if you are a judge or a president. Only people whether they are Muslim or not from about 6 or so countries are banned while there are 40 or more Muslim majority countries. All Muslims are not banned. Therefor it is not a Muslim ban.

Answer 239

Disagree. It's un-Constitutional.

Answer 240

Yes and no

Answer 241

i dont care but i do agree with him

Answer 242

Hell yes it is authorized by the Constitution. Arrest those pissant judges under the Patriot Act and send them to Gitmo and all those in the 9th Circus Court of Apples are sent with them, the wacko in Haywhatya, and the ****** in MD. The next day announce anyone else cares to try to change the Constitution without a Convention of such may join them. Then disband the NSA, FBI, CIA, NIA, and jail anyone who objects under the Patriot Act! See how quick that would be ruled Unconstitutional.

Answer 243

I dont agree at all, it is discrimintaory, insulting and very prejudiced towards all muslims.

Answer 244

Agree. Those sand n*ggers would love nothing more than to blow up American and kill as many people as possible.

Answer 245

Yes

Answer 246

I really don't agree because I do understand that some Muslims are terrorist. That doesn't mean that every single Muslim is a terrorist. They are Muslim, not terrorists.

Answer 247

No

Answer 248

Fake News. There is no Muslim ban.



It was a Muslim Band, but you liberals are too stupid to understand.

Answer 249

Show me the word Muslim in it.

Answer 250

No I do not, but I understand where the president is coming from. The U.S. has had terrorist attacks for past 2 decades, especially last year, and yes, those countries do have areas where terrorism is prevelant.



But if you think of it, the Sn. Cloud stabbings in Minnesota, the Orlando shootings, and many other attacks that have happened were committed by natural born U.S. citizens possibly radicalized through the internet. So there could of been many ways to screen refugees from those countries and allow them in safefly rather than just ordering a travel ban.

Answer 251

no...

Answer 252

Temporarily yes. Unfortunately it hurts the good Muslims. There needs to be a thourough investigation, physically, psychologically, and backround checks. It could take awhile to do all that so we'd have to have internment housing until we know they are wholesome.

Answer 253

Absolutely Not!!!

It is a hideous act.

It is a inhumane act.

It is a senseless act.



You should not discriminate against Muslim people, they are kind, gracious, family orientated, peaceful-loving people. Based on the acts of what is a handful of extremists.

We are All praying to the same God.



Do do so means that you agree with War. And War at any cost. Resulting in unnecessary, barbaric and inhumane loss of innocent lives.



Peace At ALL Times.

Answer 254

as england didnt did it and had another extra explosions and terror deads done by muslims :D

statistically for now he looks like did the right thing :D

Answer 255

I agree with it but I wish it was a permanent ban .

Answer 256

Not

Answer 257

No, because not every Muslim is a terrorist, and Trump didn't even ban Muslim nations that actually attacked the U.S., like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

Answer 258

yes and no

Answer 259

No

Answer 260

No

Answer 261

It's not a Muslim ban, only a select list of Muslim-majority nations. Yes I agree with ban (not a Muslim ban).

Answer 262

No

Answer 263

No. We have had no terrorist shoot up or bomb anyone from said countries. It's a scare tactic

Answer 264

Hell No

Answer 265

there is no muslim ban, and there never was.



more fake news from cnn

Answer 266

Very strongly agree. It's about national security.

Answer 267

SAD

Answer 268

Agree

Answer 269

i didnt agree with the original ban, but the new one is more to my taste, so for right now, i'm content

Answer 270

It's not a real ban on Islam, so no I don't agree with it. If they were banning Islam as a whole in our country, than I would agree with it. #KillAllMuslims.

Answer 271

yep

Answer 272

Yes, i agree. It's not a ban on Muslims it is a ban from certain countries and only for a limited amount of time. Something the liberal media wants to hide. Presidents have banned people from coming to our country before it's nothing new. Again something the liberal media wants to hide. If you stop getting your news from CNN you might learn something

Answer 273

There is no evidence to support any such ban.

None of the 911 terrorists were from those countries.

Answer 274

Yes, but I do understand why others don't. Maybe instead of a ban a more stringent process for entering the states if you are coming from one of those countries. But I am not sure how that would have to be implemented.

Answer 275

he is infringing human rights of muslim the brethren

Answer 276

I'm kind of on the fence about this one, since not all Muslims are bad; and I'm not against innocent people traveling back and forth to visit family or go on vacation as long as they're legal, but we have to keep the bad ones out of our country for our safety. I think a background check should be enforced before anyone tries to gain citizenship in this country, no matter where they're from if anything though. I'm not the president, but that's what I think.

Answer 277

It's a difficult to answer this questions. I'd say no because many muslims i know are very nice and welcoming people and many contribute to science, math, technology etc. While there are many throughout the world who wouldn't think twice about killing a man for being gay or stoning his wife, etc. I understand that some Christians act this way as well but the overwhelming majority around the world come from Islam. It's also bothering to think that they come from a country with very islamic ideals so the cultural tension and friction of two opposing ideologies, western and islamic, is very dangerous. We should ban dangerous ideas from our country and encourage those who are opposing these bad ideas to rise up and move towards a more moderate view of the world, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

Answer 278

YES Absolutely. In 2008 we veterans had to start a communications system, because Obama stripped the freedom of speech away from all Major networks & newspapers of anything about him & he was attacking Americans using out laws in wrong ways. Later on his boss decided to send 100,000 muslims each year until he was ready to murder all who are not muslim born. Trump is stopping muslims to protect Americans, since obama & Clinton has been trying to strip our weapons away & then our Ammunition so it would be easier to murder us. This is why I agree. Mike

Answer 279

Not at all. It is very disrespectful of him to do that just because a few of them are bad.

Answer 280

I think it's half a55ed. When dealing with a problem you have to go for the root, not the leaves. The reality is that people are not born jihadists and regular Muslims are being radicalized, brainwashed to some degree into committing unspeakable atrocities that are against their religion.

Islam has some fault in this because it needs reforming. It has violent, violent parts that are prone to being misinterpreted and used against Muslims themselves. I think banning certain citizens while licking the boots of the Saudis tell you all you need to know about Trump's determination to tackle terrorism. Also, punishment for terrorists or those complicit needs to be harsher.

Answer 281

no.

Answer 282

Totally agree!! We are facing a muslim invasion and it has to be controlled now! It's their goal to conquer America, Europe and major western territories. Those who have not yet realize it, better get it done soon!! The situation is serious!

Answer 283

It's the best idea. It's the Islamic extremists that are to blame yet no one seems to think that. The extremists have made it so its impossible to know the intentions of Muslims and made it vital to know the background of all who wish to live in the non Islamic nation of America. If they are not terrorists they have nothing to worry about, if they are or sympathise with them then **** them to Hell. Far too many cowards and traitors is the problem. Ignorant clueless twats with no knowledge of the bigger world, especially that of Islamic nations that are completely incompatible with Western lifestyles. It's vital to not just allow Muslims to move to whatever countries they want because they all want Islam to be what everyone lives following. Some, many are radical and do not value the lives of different Muslims nevermind those of non Muslims.

Answer 284

Trump is crazy but I like it .. sort of

Answer 285

Trump Muslim Ban is not really bad, so humanity will be reminded that a bad Religion can only bring trouble to a country and community.

Answer 286

It's Obama's ban. These are the countries Obama highlighted as terrorist threats.

Answer 287

He has no Muslim ban. He has a ban on ALL people of all religions from certain countries from entering where there is a major problem with terrorists.

Answer 288

Agree

Answer 289

No

Answer 290

agree. muslims are very anti west and dont assimilate. they will bring terrorism and instability. in europe, they let all those muslim come in. now, look at all the rape of women and all the muslim ghettos that have come up

Answer 291

No

Answer 292

Why?

Answer 293

No

Answer 294

It's not a Muslim ban so this question is stupid to begin with

Answer 295

It's not even a Muslim ban.. These countries still state-sponsor terror

Answer 296

I'm from Canada I support whatever it takes to protect both our countries and keep our people safe weather it's banning electronics on planes from the middle east stripping away passports and citizenships from people who fight for terrorists from coming back.

Answer 297

You betcha!

Answer 298

yes

Answer 299

i don't agree with it

Answer 300

Regardless of the issue with Sociopath Darnold Rump,

here is the answer that will fix everything.

And it will be beautiful.

Believe me.

Answer 301

One day you and your familly and a few friends go into some nice restaurant when a wild terrorist appear, detonates and kill everyone you love. Who you gona blame then? Goverment for not protecting you? You mad? If you host a dinner at your house, and you have 10 guests and you know one of them wants to kill you at dinner tonight but you don't know who exectly, would you still allow them to come? I have seen "refugees" on trains when the were passing thru my country, you know what I saw? Lets say there were 100 of them, around 80 of them were males in their 20-40s.Now im not saying that because of that they are terrorist, but why should you offer them your country when they wont fight for theirs? Now all of this stands assuming Ammerica isn't suplying Isis and what not, if thats the case, ignore all above and nuke them, lets start WW3, only the best and smart will survive. Good luck Commanders!

Answer 302

In the last 25 years no US citizen has been killed in the US by any citizen from the banned nations. The risk is none existent. The current checks are working!

The Bowling Green massacre never happened.

Perhaps make the US safer and ban US citizens?

Answer 303

It's not a Muslim ban. Many Muslim dominant countries were not banned such as Indonesia or Pakistan. It is a way to slow down the process so they can find a better alternative to tracing who is with terrorist organizations and who is not as the middle east is a hotbed for it currently.

That said, I am pro the intent, and anti Muslim ban. People can believe what they want as long as it does not cause physical issues. Mainstream Islam is not the best value system, considering it prevents women from driving, and tells one to throw guys off buildings. Westernized Islam is fine as it is much more tolerant.

Answer 304

no

Answer 305

No

Answer 306

HEY!!!!!! FOCK!!!! DONALD TRUMP, you understand me?! FOCK ALL LIBERALS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS AS WELL!!!!

Answer 307

I don't think it's only the business & political elite who see Islam as a threat. In fact, I think some of the elites are probably more tolerant of different religions than the majority of ordinary people are.



That said, I strongly DISAGREE with any proposal to ban Muslims from the US on the basis of religion. This goes completely against the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which states that Congress (ie the US government) can make "NO LAW" with respect to the establishment of religion. Any religion.



Some conservative Christians hate the First Amendment, but in fact, keeping the government out of religious life has been good for religion in the USA. It's allowed dozens of different religions to flourish here and has allowed people from most of them -- Catholic & Protestant Christians, Orthodox Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and many others -- to worship whatever God we believe in in the ways we choose.



We need to keep the First Amendment and its ban on the government interfering with religious choice. Trump's rhetoric about banning Muslims totally goes against the First Amendment. Everyone in the USA who cares about religious freedom and religious rights -- liberals and conservatives, secular humanists and religious people -- should oppose the Trump ban and defend the Constitution.



-- democratic socialist

Answer 308

I concur with President Trump on this.

Answer 309

Explain how only Muslims are banned. Then I will answer the question.

Answer 310

Yes, I agree with the ban.

Answer 311

The CIA are French Colonists.

Answer 312

yes i agree

Answer 313

agree

Answer 314

ddfdfff

Answer 315

It's not a Muslim ban!!! He banned citizens of those countries no matter their religion. I know reading comprehwnsion is tough, but try it out. Also, ask Sweden how thwy are doing.

Answer 316

Trump made no mulism ban. He made a terrorist ban

Answer 317

When the World Trade Center bombings were announced Muslims in this country took to the streets en masse in celebration. This is definitely in conflict with their common assertions that they are just good friends and neighbors like everyone else. After this event it seemed that ironically immigration laws became less defensive and Islamic people immigrated to the USA in droves. I find that rather than showing the least bit of humility in respect of recent history and very justified distrust, Islamic immigrants are very often aggressive, rude and even hostile towards Americans. I have worked overseas in Islamic countries and have Muslim friends. One would not be able to make an easy case of my being xenophobic. Still there are things that I cannot get past. I feel that regardless of who gets hurt including their own loved ones, people of this faith can be convinced that heinous actions must nonetheless be perpetrated because it is a test from their deity.



I do not particularly care for Trump and his current "Muslim ban" may or may not be correct but I strongly believe that a closer scrutiny of Muslim immigration is called for.

Answer 318

There's no such thing as a "Muslim Ban" passed by Trump. There is a temporary travel ban in effect meant to give time for security agencies to come up with an effective means of properly vetting people coming into the US from the countries specifically listed in the document.



No, I do not think that it is a good thing, but to be perfectly honest, the previous administration practically opened the doors for criminals, terrorists, and other radicals to just enter the country and somehow become a protected group. The ban is a necessary even though unsavory way to repair that breach.

Answer 319

What Muslim ban?



It would be the most ineffectual Muslim ban ever tried, as it has no impact on 90% of the world's Muslim population.

Answer 320

No. We do not ban people based solely on religion. That is NOT what America stands for.

Answer 321

yes

Answer 322

Trump should be withdrawing support from the sharia law Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Stop selling them weapons, recall all American Troops and let them drink their own oil. Once it's clear we won't support a sharia law kingdom and wahabism ISIS moral will tumble. The fight because they think if they can do enough damage we will recognize them like Saudi Arabia. Going after Muslim cab drivers and the so called extreme voting is BS. Fifteen of the 9/11 hijackers had Saudi Passports.

Answer 323

honestly who cares i mean i understand that its hard for muslims and other immigrants to come to america

and

i do disagree with a lot of trumps decisions n ideals

but now that he is our president i mean we did elected him we just have to hope that nothing bad happens until next election maybe the future voters might oppose trump and get someone who will care for americans not

just certain people,race or religions

whether we agree or disagree with trump doesnt matter we just need to know that the constitution states

"we the people"

not i the president

so if thing do go out of hand or if there is injustice we as a whole could stand for freedom

yours, mine, ours

Answer 324

I completely disagree with!, trump is doing nothing except try to make it seem like he is doing something..I'll explain I..if he were serious about extreme vetting then Saudi Arabia would without doubt have to be on that list.the san bernadino female attacker had a Saudi passport while the other was American.and then there is 9-11 and then again there was the other World Trade Center attack .and then there is also the fact that our current vetting system is the most extreme that we have ever had..thank you president Obama...i expect that what will change in our vetting process is NOTHING..and in six months trump will say look at what a good job I did..again he will not change a thing except to Piss some people off ..cause great inconvenience to the thousands of professionals that america employs from those countries...I.e. Doctors by the thousands will not be allowed to come here ...most of whom work in rural areas affecting tens of thousands of Americans .most of wich voted for trump ..guess that's what they get for voting for him......

Answer 325

No!

Answer 326

I disagree, because the country isn't owned by his father.



Regards..

Answer 327

What would we have done if Karl Marx had declared Communism a religion?

Muslim clerics make children shout Death to America repeatedly every day.

Muslim Imams call for Jihads against the US.

One Jihad calls for infiltrating the US and conducting Jihad from within.

Most Muslims don't speak out against this and still contribute $ to the Mosques

The silent majority provide safety and cover for the military components of Islam

Another Jihad is to drive Muslims out of Muslim countries and destroy the cities so they won't return

This is how Mohammed instructs Muslims to convert the world. Those who refuse will be killed or enslaved.

The penalty for leaving Islam is death. Once they take over, Sharia will be imposed. Lying and cheating is acceptable if it advances the cause, such as the Iran treaty.

They don't come to mow your yard and clean your house. They come to take your house, your schools, your businesses, shut down Hollywood, stop the music, outlaw alcohol, chop off hands of thieves, enslave the women, ....... See what happens to lands conquered by ISIS. That is the future they envision for the US.

It is better to stand up to this now than it will be after millions more have entered the US, right?

Answer 328

Disagree, a man doesn't enhance nation security. It's been proven time and time again.

Answer 329

NOOOOOO

Answer 330

Conservatives hate freedom of religion

Answer 331

It is not a ban on Muslims.



It is a ban on travel from 6 countries that have both a great deal of radicalism and poor screening.



I wish we could ban the stupidity that is the liberal left these days.

Answer 332

It's a load of crap. Not all Muslims are terrorists and not all terrorists are Muslim. It is appealing to the idiots who voted for Trump. Note that Trump does not have business interests in the countries he applied the ban to. He excluded Saudi Arabia, a country where he does have business interests - and also the country where the majority of the 9/11 terrorists came from...



Republicans hate reality....



Trump is making Dubya look competent...

Answer 333

I think Americans should pack up and leave from the Middle East and other places they've put their boot on, with a big fat apology to those people and with a big fat cheque to UN (or some neutral agent) for rebuilding all you have destroyed there.

Do what you're telling the Arabs to do - GO HOME! And then see what happens.

You brought all of this craziness upon yourselves, you should be the first to withdraw from it, not escalate. Because of American and imperialist stupidity and meddling, now the whole world is in a real danger of a terrible all-inclusive war.



BTW, this is coming from an European atheist. Islam and Christianity are equally ridiculous to me.

Answer 334

How did religion, muslim or not benefit mankind? If history is any proof..only Christianity did! Christianity is not,never has been,will never be a religion~!|

Answer 335

I'm not American but I agree. I'm sick and tired of seeing violence caused by Muslims in countries that were otherwise peaceful.

Answer 336

Totally agree. In fact the ban needs to be much, much STRONGER.

Answer 337

The religion as a whole should not be held accountable for the actions of some extremists.

Answer 338

Should have done it 8 years ago ..... then deported Obama as an example.

Answer 339

Hell yes!! We need to focus on the safety of our country and stop being worried about "hurting" everyone's feelings.

Answer 340

YES. Libtards are just freaking out. They don't have a clue about what's going on. Seriously.



I grew up in Detroit suburbs and there are tons of Muslims and Christians from the Middle East here. Most Christians will admit, yeah, the Muslims in the Middle East ruined my home country and killed most of my distant relatives from the Middle East. The Chaldean population has been obliterated in Iraq. The Moslems (not the Christians) are so f**king barbaric and crazy in the Middle East...I don't know why people cannot wake up. One Muslim called Chaldeans "trash, lowlifes of the Middle East." I wanted to say yeah no **** you think that you're ******* murdering them!! Well actually he was a Muslim from Israel (lol actually he was from Palestine but that doesn't really exist 😂) he probably would murder them if he could.

Answer 341

No because I hate little lying pigs who point fingers at others when they are in trouble

Answer 342

Not quite: and ps: look at all the ban on electronics being banned from planes coming from some muslim countries.....rich ones not even on Trump's ban..........

Answer 343

No, it's not fair.

Answer 344

I think Christianity should be banned if religion is the factor because who kill People in Afghanistan.iraq and Syria? who droped nuclear bombs on Japan? who killed jews and who was Hitler?

I think US Policy makers using islam as a religon to sell the weapons.that's all.

Answer 345

Yes

Answer 346

For sure

Answer 347

Agree

Answer 348

Trump is actually enforcing current immigration law. You people don't seem to understand or maybe you don't want to understand but the President actually has broad legal authority on this matter, he can ban anybody he deems necessary, and/or place any restrictions/requirements for entry into the country. as for it being a muslim ban how can it be a muslim ban when muslims in Indonesian for example are not banned? Do you realize there are 52 countries in the world where the majority of their population is muslim and you people are crying over a mere 6 countries.

Answer 349

Whole-heartedly

Answer 350

For one it is not a "Muslim" ban, nor is it even a ban, nor was it ever.



First we have the context of Trump's infamous "Muslim ban". On Dec 14, 2015 we had the infamous Paris mass killing (137 dead, 368 wounded). On Dec 2, 2015 we had the San Bernardino shooting (14 dead, 22 wounded).



On December 15, 2015 candidate Trump called for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on".



On December 31, 2015 Cologne and Hamburg, Germany experienced a mass sexual assault event involving as many as 1,200 female victims and over 2,000 Muslim (mostly refugee) perpetrators.



On January 27, 2017 President Trump signed Executive Order 13769 restricting travel from seven countries leaving some exemptions for 'persecuted religious minorities' including MUSLIM minorities such as the Kurds.



This in the context of the largest influx of refugees in Europe since WW2.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4K4okVa7dU



TRUMP is RIGHT

Answer 351

Of course it's wrong. Replace "muslim" with a racial or ethnic group and you get a racist idea.

Answer 352

I just have a few words for everyone, CHILD BRIDES. Is one good reason to allow only Muslim woman and children in America.if you do not agree then you are on the same level as the terrorists. They're just trying to live a normal life like you and I. No one asks for this, you don't like he Muslim MEN who r really the ones we should worry about ok I understand. But did you forget the children that are given away at age 9 who end up consemating their marriage while holding their dolls. Their intestines crushed by 80 year old men whom their parents think will protect them. I know these little girls didn't ask for this. Please Donald trump if u have an ounce of humanity you will consider the women and children.

Answer 353

YES. They cannot be trusted.... Islam is a very deceptive religion…Escape if you can



Muslims are a captive people in need of being rescued, because they are trapped by Islam.

Islam is oppressive and uses sharia law and deception to control the people by force.

It only benefits the few at the top and the people are trapped or killed if they try to escape.



Escaping Islam www.nabeelqureshi.com ‘Seeking Allah and finding Jesus’

Answer 354

Agree.

America has enough trouble helping It's needy & homeless without having to support muslims that emigrate from countries that hold America's values & beliefs In contempt

Answer 355

Disagree, I don't think it was going to ban anything.

Answer 356

no. he shouldn't generalize because of bad extremists who doesn't represent islam in a good light

Answer 357

No

Answer 358

no

Answer 359

Yes. Obama did the same thing. Stupid liberals

Answer 360

I do believe we need to know better who is entering our country. There does need to be better security.

Answer 361

Noooo

Answer 362

It's a tough question because most of the Muslims coming in to the US are not causing any problems but the bad ones are really bad. Just like the guy above said, they scream, "Death to America" and they do have assimilation issues. Wish there was a ban just for the bad ones.

Answer 363

NO!!!! 99.99% of Muslims are peaceful. The word "islam" translates to peace. The idea is radical and bigoted, plus violation of the first amendment.

Answer 364

agree

Answer 365

I disagree this action by Trump.

Answer 366

Yes

Answer 367

I agree with stricter immigration laws, proper vetting processes and better security. It's not a 'blanket' ban meaning that not all Muslims all over the world were banned. It's a temporary ban on Muslims from certain countries until those muslims were properly vetted. Liberals disagrees with this only because it will negatively affect their public image. They want to sacrifice the safety of their loved ones and their own just to maintain the moral high ground and look like 'good' people.

Answer 368

Agree, but he shouldn't have taken Iraq off the list. That would've been the country of my most concern.

Answer 369

yes

Answer 370

He ha sbeen misguided as he thinks all refugees are terrorists.

Answer 371

No. Not all Muslims are. Majority aren't. I'm sad to say those people call themselves Muslim. One of the biggest sins you can commit is to murder. Those Terrorists are mental and unstable. All the Muslims and people I know disagree with this.

Answer 372

People need to stop targeting Muslims and causing bad vibrations and I think Ismael would be crying right now if he were alive because God made him a promise

Answer 373

If he stopped claiming it was for security/safety reasons, I think it would pass a court challenge. But if he claims it is for safety, the court, any court, is gong to want to see proof of claim, and there isn't any. But if he simply says he just wants to ban them, for no reason, I think he, as president, has that authority

Answer 374

Firstly I am catholic and for those who state that all muslims are screaming death to America is completely under the influence of the media. If you haven't noticed all religions focus on peace and tranquility but people like to change that. The point is a Muslim ban isn't going to stop attacks in America. There are so many other threats we must face as human beings like poverty even here in the US and the effects of our current climate. If Trump is only looking to block out people of race and religion. Then he really isn't American at all. Remember it's the white man that came and took over the.native land and changed their religion. It's christianity that caused many deaths of blacks. And it's Christianity that caused the deaths of many Filipinos. Yet I am catholic and I'm not afraid to admit my religion has faults. So stop blaming everything on Muslim religion or on Muslim people. The Muslim ban doesn't solve anything it'll just cause more chaos

Answer 375

I do, and It's not a muslim ban, it doesn't impact over 90% of muslims in the world

Answer 376

Only extreme Muslims.

Answer 377

not Muslim ban just ban on 6 countries and yes

Answer 378

I don't know. What I do know is that there are MANY other enemies of Americans that live here. Not all Muslims hate Americans. Not all Muslims are Terroist. Not all other immigrants are supportive of Americans.

Answer 379

First of all, there's no effing Muslim ban!



Stop swallowing leftist lies whole! FOOL!

Answer 380

It's total tripe, it labels all Muslims as extremists , it will radicalise those it has major impact on and is not going to stop and determined terrorist anyway

Answer 381

Banaaaaaaasikdbekfasascgvagcasfcvbascvabsvxansdvaegdvansdbvsmdnabelndalkeifbakecnbalsckanldinaelcinaskcieboeinalksalsknclaknlirn,asnlasklsknlaklaksnclknltknlaknsldknienalilqknpqiksn,amsbfkubalskdnalknlkn,kmivebeenalays

tryingtosaythsatbutinevbervcouldmsangoddammit

Answer 382

I agree with my US Constitution, my Bill of Rights,

and my Nation as made of immigrants.

Answer 383

when I comes to national security yes keep them out.

Answer 384

Of course!

Answer 385

Ban? No. But vetting to extreme vetting? Most definitely.

Answer 386

I don't agree with it. It's not look like serious problem but it's just an event.

Answer 387

Professional Internet troll asks: " DONALD TRUMP MUSLIM BAN. do you agree with it or not?"



Its premise:

Donald Trump has ordered a Muslim ban after being elected.



Its evidence:

No more details on what the alleged ban on Muslims may be.



Its conclusion:

Donald Trump has ordered a Muslim ban after being elected.



Professional Internet troll demonstrates its current level of English grammar skills:



"Update: POLITICS- IT WOULD SEEM THE US really dont have freedom of religion. we already have separation of church and state, political correctness, and secular policies. BUT US POLITICAL AND BUSINESS ELITES SEE ISLAM AS A THREAT. they really dont want large scale muslim immigration or presence in the us. most attempts have blocked donald trump travel ban. BUT DONALD TRUMP is trying to re craft immigration policies to make it far harder for muslim to even visit the us much less work and stay"



I have not checked demographics of the countries named on the alleged "Muslim ban" so I am not sure it includes the. I know Sudan is one of them, a country dominated by a Muslim de facto dictator who has carried out a war on non-Muslims for decades now and is an international criminal:



"Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir (Arabic: عمر حسن أحمد البشير‎‎; born 1 January 1944) is a Sudanese politician, the president of Sudan and head of the National Congress Party. He came to power in 1989 when, as a brigadier in the Sudanese Army, he led a group of officers in a military coup that ousted the democratically elected government of prime minister Sadiq al-Mahdi after it began negotiations with rebels in the south. Since then, he has been elected three times as President in elections that have been under scrutiny for corruption. In March 2009, al-Bashir became the first sitting president to be indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC), for allegedly directing a campaign of mass killing, rape, and pillage against civilians in Darfur."

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_al-Bashir



Countries under the temporary ban in admission are as follows:



"(i) Among other actions, Executive Order 13769 suspended for 90 days the entry of certain aliens from seven countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. These are countries that had already been identified as presenting heightened concerns about terrorism and travel to the United States."

• https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/03/06/executive-order-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states



Demographics --

(Region -- % population that are Muslim)

Central Asia -- 80.0

South Asia -- 31.4

Southeast-East Asia -- 12.0

Middle East-North Africa -- 91.2

Sub-Saharan Africa -- 29.6

Europe -- 6.0

Americas -- 0.6

World Total -- 23.4

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_by_country



Muslim-majority countries are alleged to be as follows:

Afghanistan

Albania

Algeria

Azerbaijan

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Brunei

Burkina Faso

Chad

Comoros

Djibouti

Egypt

Guinea

Indonesia

Iran

Iraq

Jordan

Kazakhstan

Kosovo

Kuwait

Kyrgyzstan

Lebanon

Libya

Malaysia

Maldives

Mali

Mauritania

Mayotte

Morocco

Niger

Nigeria

Oman

Pakistan

Palestine

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

Senegal

Sierra Leone

Somalia

Sudan

Syria

Tajikistan

The Gambia

Tunisia

Turkey

Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

Turkmenistan

United Arab Emirates

Uzbekistan

Western Sahara

Yemen

• http://www.cew.umich.edu/muslim_majority



The inclusion of Iran on the travel ban is based on (among other things) the fact that since 1979 the Islamic Republic of Iran has consistently held the policy that America is the Great Satan and that it must be destroyed. To wit:



"Tehran (AFP) - The Iranian foreign minister’s reported handshake with US President Barack Obama triggered chants of "Death to America" in Tehran’s parliament... Despite the July 14 nuclear accord between Tehran and world powers led by the United States, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said Washington remains Tehran’s ‘number one enemy’."

Agence France-Presse (AFP), 30 September 2015

• http://news.yahoo.com/obama-handshake-triggers-anger-iran-parliament-130533543.html



That is in stark contrast to the previous administration's view of reality:



"... no faith teaches people to massacre innocents. No just God would stand for what they did yesterday, and for what they do every single day... Today, the American people will all say a prayer for those who loved Jim [James Foley, beheaded by Muslims].... We keep in our prayers those other Americans who are separated from their families... May God bless and keep Jim’s memory, and may God bless the United States of America." – Barack Obama, August 20, 2014

• http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2014/08/20/president-obama-delivers-statement-murder-james-foley#transcript



Previous administrations were for one reason or the other on the side of Iran -- not just the Obama administration, but others before for decades now:



“President Reagan, backing away from his own previous statements on what he called ‘the Iran-contra so-called affair,’ said today that it was not a scandal, ‘and never at any time did we view this as trading weapons for hostages’... Everybody has misunderstood and ‘misconstrued’ his actions, he said today. ‘We weren’t dealing at all with the Ayatollah’ but others in the Iranian Government who ‘asked for that token shipment of arms to verify - and so forth - our credentials,’ he said. Thousands of Missiles... Actually, over a year’s time the United States shipped Iran 2,004 TOW anti-tank missiles, 120 Hawk anti-aircraft missiles and various missile spare parts."

by JOEL BRINKLEY, 4 December 1987, The New York Times

• http://www.nytimes.com/1987/12/04/world/arms-to-iran-weren-t-for-hostages-reagan-says.html#h[EhmToM,1]



"On the surface, selling arms to a country that state-sponsors terrorism, of course, clearly, you’d have to argue it’s wrong... But it’s the exception sometimes that proves the rule…. I think history has to prove whether it’s wrong... I think it is debatable, and I think on the surface, you can make the case that it’s wrong... I think we could argue that it was right.” – George H.W. Bush, 1987, in regard to illegal sales of weapons to the Islamic Republic of Iran

by Matthew Purdy, Inquirer Washington Bureau, 29 January 1987

• http://articles.philly.com/1987-01-29/news/26189602_1_grand-jury-arms-sales-special-prosecutor



The reason why is related to the connection between political hacks and the corporations that sponsor their careers. Here is an example:



"Boeing Co (BA.N), the world’s biggest airplane maker, and engine maker General Electric Co (GE.N) said on Friday they had received licenses from the U.S. Treasury Department to export certain spare parts for commercial aircraft to Iran under a temporary sanctions relief deal that began in January." April 4, 2014, Reuters

• http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/04/us-boeing-iran-parts-idUSBREA331P120140404

Answer 388

Whether one agrees with this non-existent ban of which you speak or not is really irrelevant ... unless you are so pathetically ignorant that you actually believe that there really are only six ... 6 ... nations in the world that have Muslim majority populations. If you are stupid enough to believe that, well, no amount of factual discussion as to what the order actually contains will make any difference whatsoever

Answer 389

disagree. The countries where 9/11 terrorists were from are not even in the ban; Saudi Arabia and UAE.

Answer 390

Of course not.



To respond to a few people:

By keeping innocent Muslims out too? They are victims just as must as these terrorists. It looks to me as someone who has no idea how to counter terrorism so he chooses an extreme. Is that what a president should do?

I'm also going to try not to get into a debate on YA, very ignorant people on here.

Answer 391

It's a outrageous ban. Americans are so fond of the animal world...so why shouldn't they let animals come to the US?

Answer 392

It's not a Muslim ban, it;s a terrorist ban.

Answer 393

In todays reality the people who come to america just want the social benefits, they want to keep their beliefs and their politics. Do you know how they treat their women. I can only respect another persons national culture when they practice them in their own country.

Answer 394

Completely agree. Trump did a great thing

Answer 395

.

Answer 396

michail antonio

Answer 397

yes agree

Answer 398

Yes. People already here the last 200 years have never took off running with as mush as muslims have in just the last 20 years.

Answer 399

NO

Answer 400

It's NOT a muslim ban! It's merely a PAUSE to accurately vet certain people form areas of known anti-American sentiment. I would cetainly agree with a full muslim ban, but this is not that.

Answer 401

Join the ban wagon

Answer 402

Maybe

Answer 403

of course not. imagine if a country - turkey, for example - banned all americans from entering. every single one. it doesn't matter how kind they are, how much charity work they've done, all that matters is that they were banned for their race. maybe in this scenario they were banned because its an assumption that all americans are fat. maybe here all turkish people just hate americans. banning muslims for terrorists would be like banning americans because the klu klux klan existed.



the point is that its unfair to assume that just by a group of people in one country, that everyone in that country is horrible and should be prevented from entering.

Answer 404

Disagree. Not all muslims can have the same intention. Just because they have a bad reputation doesn't mean ALL OF THEM are like what people are telling. People these days need to gain more knowledge about different things. I swear Americans are so full of themselves.

Answer 405

He never said Muslim ban... that word never came up in the act, and Obama already said the countries were dangerous so Trump just enforced the ban to/from them is all

Answer 406

Highly disagree

Answer 407

I might agree with it if there was one that existed or was proposed at least temporarily. However, the word MUSLIM is nor was ever in either executive order.

Answer 408

yea

Answer 409

There's no such thing as a "Donald Trump Muslim Ban"

Answer 410

Controversial topic. I don't agree with the ban because it doesn't make any sense. He banned countries that have never harmed America. Not only that but the "ban" influenced closeted racists to come out. For example, a guy who was an English citizen who was flying from England to America was detained during the ban because his name was a middle eastern name. Detaining the poor man was the fault of Trumps ignorant and selfish saying that influenced his small minded followers that don't understand empathy.

Answer 411

I agree with banning any that have a tendency to be a terrorist.......or part of ISIS.......why would any country allow TERRORIST to come and kill so many innocent people.........

Why wouldn't you want to make sure your parents, family, siblings, are all safe in their area?

Answer 412

No

Answer 413

agreed kick them out

Answer 414

Yes I agree! We all sang a different tune when 9/11 happened. We all of a sudden just got soft and that's when it's most dangerous. We need to protect ourselves and it might not seem fair but American people comes first.

Answer 415

No. That is discrimination to someone's beliefs.



If people would only educate themselves. Not all Muslims are bad and not all Christians are in the KKK.

Answer 416

nudz pls

Answer 417

If the USA wants to survive as a free country, President Trump's ban of Muslims traveling into the USA should be remain in place permanently. Apart from that, Islam itself and its eerie-looking mosques should also be banned from U.S. soil because "ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION!" but a seditious, subversive, deadly, misogynist and stupid "ideology" intended to gradually take over the USA Trojan Horse style. Therefore, restore and keep the ban.

Answer 418

No its unconstitional and quite frankly idiotic

Answer 419

It's not a Muslim ban. It's a ban on immigration from six countries. Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, and Iran. I think that we shouldn't be taking anywhere near the amount of immigrants we're taking in, not just from these countries but from all countries. Sure we are a nation founded on immigrants, but that was a different time. Now we have so few jobs and so many people, it doesn't make any sense to keep taking people in.

Answer 420

we should not let them all they do is come and take from the socialist system the democrats set up and don't give back and they aren't even American citizens but me a hard working citizen cant even get those same benefits MAGA

Answer 421

Yes I agree with it.

Answer 422

Absolutely not, it's disgusting and completely goes against what the U.S. stands for...

Answer 423

whatever !!!

Answer 424

the ban itself? - a stunt to please his "public"



Every country has a right to defend itself against potential enemies, but 1st you have to identify who those potential enemies actually are, NOT just assume they belong to a particular group

(if I remember correctly NONE of the hijackers in 9/11 came from the countries trump "banned" so his "bans" would not have stopped a second 9/11)



Trump didnt do this - so the "ban" he wanted was wrong



HE just put a blanket ban on everybody from a number of countries, most of the people affected probably being "friendly" towards the US (i.e not actual enemies)



doing that he probably made a lot of them a lot less "friendly" and more likely to become "enemies" (but secret enemies, possibly giving support to actual enemies when they didnt before)



And THAT means the US now probably has more "enemies" as a result of trumps actions than it did before



I say "probably" cos I dont know, the thing is - neither does trump, but Trump is playing to his "public" (his voters) while ignoring the effect of what he is doing has in the real world

Answer 425

It's not a Muslim ban and yes I agree with it

Answer 426

I strongly agree! We have to be careful with who we let in our country! 911 was not that long ago. And these crybaby sjw's are to young to remember how the country felt after that tragic morning! I remember how I felt and still feel to this day. Trump is actually doing what should of been done in the bush administration. Keep up the great work Trump!!!

Answer 427

The Ban is necessary for national security..

Answer 428

Doesn't go far enough. Deport all muslims under the penalty of death.

Answer 429

No. The countries he banned were countries originally placed on that list by the Obama administration. There is no evidence that those countries harbor anymore terrorism than the middle eastern countries whom weren't placed on said list. Additionally, if we are going to ban countries based on terrorism, than why wasn't Saudi Arabia on that list 📝? Wasn't Osama from that country? This ban was just the first in a long list of dumb ideas we will be hearing 👂 from the idiot and chief.

Answer 430

He ain't banning muslims cuz of there religion, he banning ILLEGAL immigrants.

Answer 431

I WISH Trump would ban muslims. They're a menace to the West.

Answer 432

Disagree

Answer 433

no, and i never will agree with it. it's like saying all white people are racist. in fact, muslims being terrorists isn't even a stereotype. it's the actions of a few, probably only 10 of them. more white people have killed, attacked, and discriminated, and they will never be banned. if they won't be banned, why are muslims banned? because they were born into a family they couldn't control? because they have a tainted reputation because of a few people? because they're part of a different culture? i feel strongly about this, dislike this as much as you want :)

Answer 434

To me.. "blanket banning" is like when someone asks you to do something for them and you don't want to ever be expected to do it again, so you muck it up intentionally.. in that, I mean the government doesn't want to be responsible for being the discriminating force that determines who specifically will stay and who will go. Instead, they say "if you insist on making us do something that we don't want to or don't feel should be our responsibility (as 'supposedly' voted in officials), we'll just put some overly general regulation in place to remind you of why you shouldn't expect us to help with said issue"



In all, it's not the job of the citizenry to pass judgment on the suitability of another citizen's status. It should, however, be the responsibility of law enforcement- to make recommendations regarding the revocation of citizenship from any citizen, born here or abroad, who violates or conspires to violate the human rights of other citizens. The power should be in the hand of the law. The law should be just and that justice should be swift.



In all, there is a lack of specificity. It's not an "all are bad" nor "all are good" situation, yet making it into a racial debate removes responsibility from the officials and keeps people thinking there's no clear path for justice.

Answer 435

yes

Answer 436

Yes... If you've read the Koran, you'd realize that a 'true muslim' will not assimilate into the American culture. The ones who are ideological to the Muslim faith want to destroy Christianity. Refer back to what they did to Christians in their own countries these past few years....beheading is one method to rid of Christians men and taking the women without consent is another, worse is taking young girls just entering puberty and making them wives to 20 or 30 year old men is disgusting, yet it happens to girls 9 and older... Nope, let them keep their religion in their own country but not in the United States...!!!

Answer 437

Yes I agree with it 100% because the muslims take stuff for granted. They dont give us support whatso ever. The muslims are trying to turn our culture to their culture. Their demanding that we should speak their language, etc. They should do it the proper way. They should learn our langauge and our culture before they come here.

Answer 438

i dont agree

Answer 439

First of all, it's not a Muslim ban. Though, even if it was, the president has every right to do so. It is stated in official documents. (I am not able to search for the link at the moment, but I'd suggest to look it up) I do agree with it, though, even if I didn't, it is not my place to tell the government what they can and cannot do.

Answer 440

I largely disagree. 2 things this country was built on stand in the way of this. Freedom of religion was one of the main reasons this country s founders worked so damn hard to get here and win freedom. Unfortunately for the whiny *** majority that doesn t only apply when you re a christian yelling at school teachers. That applies to muslims too, in fact if you sat a muslim down and a christian down to talk about religion you d find out that there are a massive amount of similarities between the two religions. Pray the gay away, man is the unquestioned leader of the household, masculine deities, age old books to tell you what you can and cannot do. I could go on.



The other thing is immigration. Immigration is literally how america was founded. At least the USA bit. If you re a white person sorry to say but you re technically an immigrant. In the same way you consider mexican or muslim kids to be immigrants no matter how many generations they ve been citizens. literally everyone and anyone who isn t of native american descent are immigrants.



So why is it suddenly ok to say "nah it s not ok to be an immigrant anymore, it s not ok to be of another religion anymore"?

Simple entitled arrogance, privilege if you will. Something a lot of people are overlooking is that most of the countries he s banning ARE muslim majority, but of the terrorist attacks we ve suffered few of the culprits were from these countries. Yet the countries he s not trying to ban have commited terrorist attacks against us.

Thinking on that note it sounds a lot more like he s just a racist pig who doesn t like muslims and less of a man trying to protect our country. Especially since he keeps making up attacks that never happened, for media coverage or smth i dont understand?



Tl;dr- Immigration and freedom of religion are important. he wants to ban muslim majority countries but doesn t bother to acknowledge countries who have actually committed terrorist attacks against us. it s not about safety, its about racism.

Answer 441

he should not ban all muslims because thats bs

Answer 442

i agree .. only against muslims .

Answer 443

Remeber the Alamo... Do,t forget that a huge part of the U.S, was Mexican ! And it became American by the force of arms ! !

Anybody who supports Trump is an asshole !

Answer 444

Disagree. I agree with stronger security and being sure who we let in. But it's wrong to ban people from entire countries. Not a Mulsim ban, as 96% of the world's Muslims can still come here

Answer 445

Agree and disagree

Answer 446

To be honest, I have no clue. If I a disagree, I'm gonna get dislikes because I would supposedly be supporting terrorists. If I do agree, I'm gonna get dislikes for sounding like a racist. What a messed up world we live in :(

Answer 447

It's not a muslim ban. But hey think whatever you want.

Answer 448

A-GREE!!!!!



I don't agree with HIV either, but some of you here will cuddle up to it!

Answer 449

Muslims are banned from the USA? That's news to me as I know of Indonesians and Nigerians visiting or moving to the States who are Muslim.

Answer 450

It's not a "Moose-limb ban." It's a ban against incoming travel by people from nations that sponsor terrorism, or have shown that terrs work out of and hide in such nations. If you want dangerous people in your country, why don't you go down to the city jail and take into your home a few violent prisoners? Tell us in the morning how good was your night's sleep...

Answer 451

first he said radical islam ic terrorists

second there were founding fathers that didnt want to extend religious freedom to Muslims because they were too intolerant

Answer 452

Lol

Answer 453

Hi

Answer 454

I think only people who can be documented to be not dangerous, and desiring to assimilate them selves into the American culture, not exporting their own culture should be admitted to the USA. We are or at least strive to be a law abiding country. Anyone that enters the USA illegally is not willing to be assimilated and should be denied access.

Answer 455

muslim banned ? are just a ban anyways whats wrong with wanting safety plus we already have to much bs to deal with to add more i prefer my gay friends to be alive an my woman to be free plus the way they live you think you were back in Aladdin times

Answer 456

I'm Surprised a lot of people said No. First of all you never hear about the good ones you only hear about the bad ones killing people and terrorizing the world. so do I agree with trumps muslim ban YES. until I hear about the good ones my answer will stay at YES.

Answer 457

YES I agree. The evil media has silenced the situation that have in England .The muslims have no regard for authority and act like thugs in England since the police are outnumbered

Answer 458

Strongly Agree... IT SHOULD BE IN EVERY COUNTRY

Answer 459

Yes and No. It is a double edged sword in my opinion.



There are more liberal Muslims, who are peaceful and want live in peace with other religions, and want to come over to the United States for a new opportunity at life without the extremist "Allah Akbar" totalitarian theocratic bullshit like what you see in the Middle East. They don't want to be in a restrictive, ultra-conservative theocratic society based on a prophet whose ways were violent, misogynistic, uncompromising, and intolerant.



And then you have the nutjobs over in the Middle East, particularly ultra-conservative theocratic governments like Iran, Afghanistan, and other places who are intolerant religious bigots, and some people over in the Middle East, who have no business coming to the United States.



Keep in mind that Muslim ban is only 90 days, but even so, I don't like the idea behind it, because "good" peace loving Muslims who want to come over here get banned as well as potential nutjobs. It is a classic case of "throwing the baby out with the bath water".



But I do think we need to do something to tell these Muslim countries "Don't screw with the United States". But I question whether the Muslim ban was the right way of doing things. So it is 50/50 with me.

Answer 460

I do not agree with it. Just because the terrorists were Muslim, doesn't mean you should ban all Muslims.

Answer 461

Yes

Answer 462

Donald Trump is loved by many Americans and also hated by other many Americans.Europe here.

Answer 463

I voted Trump but this wasn't right considering they were not problematic countries

Answer 464

Not a Muslim ban. I know Muslims that voted for him and are happy he is in office. You poor choice of words makes you look like moron. Keep filling peoples heads with false ideas. Hopefully people aren't as dumb as you think and can see through all the shenanigans.

Answer 465

Get them out of here!

Answer 466

Trumps muslim ban is a complete waste of time.

Answer 467

Yes i agree with it

Answer 468

Ban those towel heads!

Answer 469

Why doesn't he just order the army to shoot the bastards?

Answer 470

Whether or not I happen to "agree" with it does not change the fact that it is a prima facie violation of the US Constitution!



Trump will go down over this, mark my words!

Answer 471

Terrorists are averaging about .006% . THat's one in 6000. Furthermore, all the terrorists in the US were recruited to commit acts right here, so no one after 9/11 has traveled here to commit these acts. Laws have been enacted to keep them out, like if you miss the lessons on how to take off in a plane, you can't attend the lessons on how to fly it, and the schools have to report anyone who shows up in the middle of the semester--stuff like that. So, no, a Muslim ban will not make us safer and will only alienate the rest of the world from us.

Answer 472

Nah. Kinda shitty.

Answer 473

I STRONGLY DISAGREE with the ban.

Answer 474

it looks like most of you dont know what the "muslim ban" even is, and yes i agree with it.

Answer 475

It is reprehensible and beyond contempt. Prejudice does not yield to logic of any form. The notion of My God s better than Your God, or ideas that muslims are not-godly is patently false. If anything, they challenge the Christian notion that there can be 3 persons in one God. There are 1.2Billion Muslims in the world so attempting to categorize the belief of any one is misguided. Normally, one would turn to the Intelligence community to find out what is the best way to protect America. Trump attempted that but when he did not get the result he wanted, he rejected the report. The report claimed that nationality is not a good predictor of violent extremism.



I am a Christian married to a Muslim so I have a particular love for my wife and respect for her. We respect each other s faith. At times, I feel guilt over not praying enough, as she does. Neither of us support violence or extremism in any group, religious, national, or otherwise. Living in America, as a white man, I have loved, as a friend, various African American friends. My lifelong contempt and hate for groups such as the KKK, neo-nazis, and other hate groups has always been strong. As a Christian I am to love my enemy but I do not love the hatred, violence and racism of such groups or anything they represent.



Talk to the group you fear, such as Muslims. There is a difference, nazis, the KKK, and white supremacists declare themselves to be against certain people. These groups could claim that they share the same religion with me, the same race, and so on. That does not mean there is any similarity or empathy that I share with the KKK or white supremacists. Instead I feel I have more similarity to those groups opposed by the KKK and white supremacists than I do with them.

Bruce

Answer 476

No

Answer 477

No, the U.S. is a land of diversity and he is ending with that. We are the land of the people and he is making everyone be against each other. That is not what the U.S. is...

Answer 478

FINE WITH ME..

Answer 479

Very difficult to answer simply because there are so variables associated such a prevasive ban. We are a free country and free speech is at the forefront of our communications network. To ban an entire religion is very much like banning an entire race. Americans are extremely race conscienous; we don't ban races and we welcome freedom of speech. The DOD,however, was forced to separate Japanese during WWII. It was necessary because of the radical group known (I think) as the "Young Dragons", the war was raging and they represented a real threat to domestic security, they wanted to kill Americans. The DOD didn't know who they were. Perhaps looking at Muslim case by case would help to identify anyone from any apart of the world who supports hatred of Americans and advocates the violent overthrow of America.

Answer 480

The Muslim ban can go for. It is unnecessary

Answer 481

It's upto to the people and him..

Answer 482

Would-be and deemed terrorist [not just muslims]

Answer 483

Disagree

Answer 484

Donald Trump needs to be banned from every country in the world. Send him to space were he cannot spread his hate.

Answer 485

Don't agree. He's punishing the majority for the minority.

Answer 486

It's not a Muslim ban. But I agree with the policy. You can't invade and bomb countries and then bring in the refugees. Did the US bring in refugees from Italy, Germany or Japan during WWII. Plus you ought to see the statistics of the opinions and lifestyle of people from these countries.

Answer 487

I agree with it!! It is not a " Muslim Ban", as it bans ALL people from 6 counties regardless of their religion. The 6 countries were previously identified by the Obama Administration because their governments are in shambles, infiltrated with ISIS and documents are not readily available or proper vetting.

Answer 488

it,s a good idea that make stop entrance of terrorists to usa but i don,t understand how much trump is illetrate that cannot write a law order that not be against usa constitution and i think for writting that he get,s help from jimmy carter because all of world except jimmy carter know all of pakistanish arenot terrorist but all of terrorist,s are pakistanish that have been eduacated from school terror that have made by arabic money in pakistan .now according this law pakistanish terrorist can come to usa even benladin family can get samba dance on hawaii beach.

Answer 489

I'm surprised Trump isn't trying to ban people from France. That last attack at the airport was a muslim. He was born in France,



Oh but wait. Trump does business with France...See how that works?

Answer 490

Disagree because its only for 90 days, should be permanant

Answer 491

maybe

Answer 492

YES

Answer 493

Anyone who does is a smooth brain, and they probably think thats a compliment.

Answer 494

What Muslim band?? Hey libtards there's over 50 countries that have a bulk of Muslims!

He banned the same ones Barack Hussein did! You liberal nutjobs are so easily deceived by your puppet masters!

Answer 495

NO! I am a strong supporter of the First Amendment.

Answer 496

Did he not withdraw this promise?