For all those answering that SIN is the cause of all errors in DNA replication ...
I had a goldfish once with a tumor. What SIN did my goldfish (or its ancestors) commit? Or is it also being punished for the SINs of Adam?
How about a redwood tree?
Or orchids, or aphids, or sea anemones, or earthworms, or tardigrades or parrots, or shitake mushrooms or giant squids. They are all subject to mutations. They all have as much as 98% of their DNA full of accumulated non-coding DNA.
Why is a giant squid or a South American parrot or an aphid being punished for the Fall of Man?
Or when a bacterium in a waste pond in Japan undergoes a frameshift mutation that allows it to digest *nylon* ... is that mutation a result of SIN also?
I'm not just being facetious ... but you guys are MISSING THE POINT OF THE QUESTION.
When something like "Intelligent Design" claims to be a "science" ... but has to resort to answering question in terms of the wages of "SIN" ... that only shows how laughable it is to call it a "science."