There is nothing wrong with wanting to help people, but not everyone agrees with each other on what the "truth" is.
No one wants to be told what to do. It is as simple as that.
_______________
EDIT:
BURNING ROOM SCENARIO:
Honestly, I do not know what I would do in the burning room scenario. I would probably just ask you to show me the way yourself, as another answerer had suggested.
I can, however, tell you that, in such extreme circumstances, most (non-Christian/non-Catholic) people would start with the most practical approaches (i.e. searching, asking for your help, etc.) and work their way up to the more subjective methods until they eventually reached your proposed method of using Jesus.
It is common knowledge that people will do almost anything to save their lives, so, if you told someone that Jesus is the only way out after his or her spirit had broken, he or she would probably say something along the lines of, "Anything to get out of here! Just help me!", "I guess it's worth a shot if you think it will work.", or, "What choice do I have? I have nothing to lose anyway. I can either try your method or burn to a crisp."
"would you rather I let you think that "any direction" will lead you out safely? So that I would not hurt your feelings or offend you."
In that kind of situation, their feelings would not be hurt very much. They just would not listen to you until they had run out of options. Either that or they would die stubbornly defending their beliefs.
"I also would feel a strong obligation to tell you in order to save your life and protect you whether you wanted me to tell you or not."
Some would appreciate it, but most would not. You would need to either convince them somehow or wait until they had lost all hope before telling/reminding them how to get out.
_______________
MY ANSWER IN GENERAL:
"So since this is what I believe, what is wrong with me trying to help people because of the integrity I have found in the Bible?"
Like I said before, there is nothing wrong with wanting to help people because of your beliefs (and your integrity and adherence to them).
Before I continue, I must let everyone here know that I am neither a Christian, nor a Catholic, nor an atheist:
I am an agnostic who holds a position as that of a Buddhist who believes that Buddhism is more likely to be the "true" way than any other (non-) belief system. In other words, my beliefs are not set in stone: They are just inclinations. I strongly believe that it is (currently) impossible to prove or disprove any (or almost any) belief/non-belief system known to the world as it stands.
Some will listen, most will not. The main problem is that is (almost literally) hurts (I can tell you this from experience) to be told (by a stranger often times, which is even worse) that the only way you can be saved from eternal damnation is by accepting a highly debated historic individual as your savior.
There are three main reasons why this hurts "non-believers'" feelings so much:
1. We simply do not agree with what we are being told. Their isn't really a way to get around that, so the material that I have listed below can be used to soften that inevitable complication.
2. It is not being presented to us as a possibility, it is being presented to us as a certainty and as a declaritive statement. This often comes across as extremely offensive because it completely fails to acknowledge our own beliefs and non-beliefs. This is simple to overcome. All one must do is present it in a non-declaritive manner.
Example:
"I believe that Jesus really was the son of God and that we can find salvation by accepting him as our savior. What do you think?"
The question at the end is very important because it acknowledges the person that you are speaking to and gives him or her to assert his or her own opinion, allowing him or her to contribute to the conversation constructively without being nearly as offended.
3. Most of us do not like hearing about or discussing beliefs without first agreeing to do so. If we were asked if we wanted to hear a person's religious opinion we would not have the problem in the first place.
Example:
"Excuse me sir/ma'am. Would you like to discuss Christianity/the bible/the life of Jesus Christ with me?"
"No, but thank you for asking."
If you heed those three rules, I can guarantee that you will reduce the amount of people you offend by a massive amount. That is the secret to spreading your believes in the least offensive way in person.
_______________
AN OPTIMISTIC NOTE FOR ALL:
I am aware that it is the goal of Christians and Catholics to spread the word of Jesus and to get others to accept Jesus as their savior. You might say that it is the ultimate goal of Christians and Catholics to get every person on earth to accept Jesus Christ as their personal savior.
Well, people of other belief systems also have ultimate goals.
In my belief system, for example, the ultimate goal is that every being in existence eventually reaches spiritual enlightenment.
All in all, the believers in most of the various faiths share common benign goals whose fulfillment will make life for everyone/everthing more pleasant in some way.
Okay, I'll cut to the chase now.
I believe that, as the state of the world worsens, more and more people will begin to "lose their faith" and convert to different belief/non-belief systems. The end result would be that belief and non-belief systems would continue to be "eliminated" from common approval until only one would remain as the majority, which would then eventually become the universal belief/non-belief system.
Whatever that belief/non-belief system may be remains to be seen.
All of this is, of course, would be assuming that our humble little planet (or just civilization in general) survives that long.
Very much in love with God.,
You obviously believe very strongly in your faith, so, as far as I'm concerned, you will have nothing to worry about. If Christianity is somehow "proven" to be the "right" way, then the ultimate goal of you and your fellow Christians will eventually be met if the human race/the planet survives long enough.
I hope that my answer was informative and objective enough for you,
EE