Could the theory of evolution be better understood by considering time lines of technological development?

Question

For instance, take the example of aircraft.
The Wright Flier suddenly appeared out of thin air, probably from an errant asteroid but some say it’s real mother was a submarine that had the wrong sort of propeller attached to it. Anyway, the Wright Flier gave birth to a Fokker E1 which in turn spawned the Fokker D7. Because of the law of survival of the fittest the superiority of the D7 in combat over the Western Front allowed it to continue breeding to eventually give birth to the Junkers Tri-Motor which in turn fathered the Junkers 52 which procreated with an early species of Heinkel to spawn the Messerschmitt BF109. Due to cataclysmic changes in the Earth’s climate brought about by Social Darwinism at that time, the BF109 begat the ME 262 which naturally selected for itself a jet engine and swept wings that led directly to the birth of its varied progeny, most notably the F86 Sabre and then several decades later, hey presto the family of Stealth aircraft left the maternity ward. Simple isn’t it? Now everybody understands evolution.

Answer 1

Nope. Try a biology book instead........or evolution for dummies,now off to the science section with you.

Answer 2

It's funny - Humans talk about the evolution of the car and the computer and the phone etc... and yet all of these evolutions have involved 'Conscious Thought' on the part of the Humans involved with their design...



But when it comes to, for example, human &animal evolution, I have never heard a theory that involved 'Thought' as to why an animal is a particular shape/design - It maybe the case that if 'Thought' was deemed to be involved it would put forward the case for an external designer (A GOD or MCP if you will) - And a lot of Scientist's wouldn't open their minds to that possibility...



But as we are consciousness given form, why is it not possible for consciousness to exist everywhere in our vast Universe; after all "only a closed mind is certain".

Answer 3

Perhaps it would be better if you actually stated at the begining i.e. with humans observing flight and telling stories for countless generations, followed by attempt after attempt to actually fly. Then as the ability to pass information developed and as we further discovered out more...



Ah you should see the problem here, over simplification of a process is disingenuous..

Answer 4

I would be inclined to say the fact that humans performed the selection here might confuse some people into thinking that intelligent selection is necessary for biological evolution, though of course this IS a good example for technological evolution.

Answer 5

Sigh.



When you can show that aeroplanes pass on their genes imperfectly through reproduction, and that they are subject to selection, then we'll talk. Until then, maybe you ought to go and actually learn something about evolution.

Answer 6

haHA! Straw guy! No, that's not a correct analogy for evolution. you would be directly to something with the transition of one sort to a distinctive, in case you have self belief relating to the huge selection of prototypes between each and every sort, and the certainty that the engineers tried a good number of stuff - protecting the constructive aspects that labored, and discarding those that did not. nonetheless, it is not an excellent occasion. Plus, there is the bit approximately Social Darwinism... Hitler's movements have been all approximately hatred and utilizing worry to manage his usa. His version of Darwinism became right into a twisted one - greater of a justification than a reason. yet in any case. a greater useful analogy could be certainly one of one million monkeys at one million typewriters. The previous saying is going that, given sufficient time, that they had at last produce Shakespeare. of direction, to be an analogy for evolution, it somewhat is lacking 0.5 of the equation. It has randomness, even nevertheless it additionally needs selection - by utilizing sheer hazard, that they had by no skill unquestionably produce Shakespeare. So, we could desire to change the placement a sprint. enable's say we've one million monkeys at one million typewriters, yet among the aisles (with mask and feces-resistant overalls) there additionally are some hundred editors. They wander up and down the aisles, and each time they see a monkey sort a word (a monkey by twist of destiny getting a word top is plenty greater achieveable than an entire sonnet), they swoop in, take the paper, shrink out the word, and paste it up on a huge board. whilst a monkey by twist of destiny varieties a word it somewhat is excellent, it gets saved and included into the greater effective artwork. it somewhat is pushed by utilizing random hazard and formed by utilizing non-random selection. it is not a suited analogy, yet even nevertheless, analogies not often are. It covers the person-friendly factors, nevertheless.

Answer 7

So, the parent was a Mother Fokker?

Answer 8

Yeah forget individual designs . . . that sounds equally as plausible as the evolution fable.

Answer 9

And where did light Ray come from?