If God's existence were proved, what would time wasters (like me) do for fun? Would there still be R&S?

Question

This is proof that the proof of God's existence would be a bad thing: it would create a void in many people's lives.

(The proof that the proof....? What am I saying? I haven't even been drinking.)

Answer 1

We could always argue about why God chose to come back as a illegal immigrant and not a rich white man. Or why mountain dew seems to be better than water. Or why there are so many starving kids when there is plenty of food that no one seems to want to share. Or why is Tom Cruise so dang on scary these days.

Answer 2

There would still be R & S as some people would refuse to believe the proof. We have photographic proof of the Holocaust and people still deny it happened.



And, you are right, it probably would be a bad thing. Now go have a drink! I am joining you!

Answer 3

if gods existence were proved most of us would carry on the same.he made us so we werent perfect.there is nothing wrong with enjoying your life and making your own choices.im sure you dont go around murdering and raping people so the only thing that would change is more people would pray and ask for forgivness of the sins you may commit.at least people would no they were going too a better place than just being dead.lol.law exists but people defy that dont they.

Answer 4

Look around proof of Gods existence is everywhere.

Answer 5

If god's existence was proved, those who chose not to worship or stay faithful to him to would do what they usually do for fun.



You've got to question yourself~ Do you believe in god because he's been proven to exist?



Or do you believe in God because you are religious and believe there is a higher authority not found on earth.

Answer 6

i've got asked the question in the previous, approximately what evidence could an atheist settle for for the existence of God, and that i are starting to be to be as many diverse solutions as responses. meaning that folk have set aside their own standards for what constitutes evidence, and could no longer settle for something that would not help their expectancies. meaning that for somebody who insists that a lifeless relative could desire to touch them in guy or woman does no longer be confident of God's existence whether God materialized because of the fact the stereotypical guy in white robes with a beard in front of them. in case you're predisposed to no longer have faith, i do no longer think of that ANY quantity of blatant evidence could do the trick. We see what we would prefer to confirm. i will inform you that i've got in my view witnessed dad and mom looking at a videotape of their baby misbehaving on a school bus, and the dad and mom have denied that the baby did what became blatantly caught on videotape. If somebody is lifeless-set against seeing or believing something, no quantity of evidence to the choice is going to alter their suggestions. And it is going the two techniques. If somebody isn't open to no longer believing in God, no quantity of evidence that one supplies you is going to convince them the two. You point out the Bible on your question. i've got in no way understood how the Bible has relevance in questions like this, if one believes the Bible to be untrue. in case you have faith the Bible to be real, then you definately suspect it particularly is the be conscious of God, then you definately suspect in God. even with the undeniable fact that, in case you have faith the Bible to be untrue, than why use it as a standards for what God "ought to be like"? i've got in no way understood that. i've got faith in God, yet i do no longer think that God is very resembling what's defined interior the Bible. yet, a theory-inspiring question in spite of the fact that. thank you! :)

Answer 7

There would be so much less arguing in the world! Mustn't let that happen. Everyone needs something to fight against.

Answer 8

I think you're pretty safe mate! God's existence aint gonna be proven!!

Answer 9

you could fill the void by becoming a christian and then spitting on other christians for not being 'real christians'