Question:
SCIENCE OR RELIGION. which do you trust more?
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:39:30 UTC
SCIENCE OR RELIGION. which do you trust more?
291 answers:
ruby
2016-05-04 03:51:50 UTC
Science
Spartan
2016-05-04 04:42:22 UTC
Science
Jess
2016-05-05 14:54:47 UTC
Science
?
2016-05-04 02:51:49 UTC
Science
Nosey
2016-05-04 02:13:31 UTC
Science
Jack
2016-05-05 12:15:46 UTC
Science
Mr. Banana
2016-05-03 10:40:10 UTC
Science
?
2016-05-04 00:11:38 UTC
Science
ezgi
2016-05-07 03:23:16 UTC
Science
?
2016-05-03 21:18:26 UTC
Science
Richard
2016-05-06 15:45:27 UTC
Science
Samuel
2016-05-05 10:40:59 UTC
Science
Felix
2016-05-03 13:34:01 UTC
Science
The White Rabbit
2016-05-03 11:20:41 UTC
Science
anonymous
2016-05-05 08:20:34 UTC
Science
amin
2016-05-03 18:02:33 UTC
Science
anna
2016-05-04 12:26:18 UTC
Science
Alaura
2016-05-05 08:20:14 UTC
Science
Grayson
2016-05-05 07:46:42 UTC
Science
Brittney
2016-05-04 17:34:09 UTC
Science
anonymous
2016-05-05 16:37:57 UTC
Science.
Stan M
2016-05-06 11:52:15 UTC
Science
?
2016-05-04 12:02:02 UTC
Science
Marie
2016-05-03 16:51:43 UTC
Science
William
2016-05-04 03:15:12 UTC
Science.
anonymous
2016-05-05 13:10:52 UTC
Science.
anonymous
2016-05-04 01:25:17 UTC
Science.
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:40:25 UTC
Science!
?
2016-05-03 12:27:10 UTC
Science.
anonymous
2016-05-03 20:17:56 UTC
Science!
?
2016-05-03 11:52:03 UTC
Science.
?
2016-05-03 11:38:36 UTC
Science.
?
2016-05-04 17:49:40 UTC
Science.
libertylogic
2016-05-05 10:38:31 UTC
Science.
Tony_the_heretic
2016-05-04 14:20:35 UTC
If you broaden the scope of the question to include other religions, which your question does not state explicitly,

but I have a feeling that people are responding specifically to Christianity, then I would say there is a false dichotomy.

Science is discovering many things that what we call religion knew years ago. For example, meditation, central to Yogic and Hindu thought, is being proved to have great value.

Also, even though it doesn't fall into the notion of "trust", religion addresses a lot of issues science does not.

I have gone from being a strong atheist to someone who looks for value in religion.

I think that it is there to be found.

Even the effectiveness of science does not necessarily lead to trust. The same method that provided us with cell phones, vaccines, and the microwave fueled an economy that, owing to its excesses and greed, could destroy life as we know it on this planet
robert43041
2016-05-03 11:17:37 UTC
Science.
Drina
2016-05-06 13:32:56 UTC
Science.
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:44:05 UTC
Science.
?
2016-05-03 17:41:03 UTC
Science 100%
Ifza
2016-05-04 10:30:29 UTC
Religion
Dip! Just Dip!
2016-05-03 12:34:57 UTC
I trust my faith, which is a combination of both science and religion as explained to me by my questions towards God. Both science and religion are man-made, and mankind has proven that they cannot be trusted in virtually any level. I wouldn't even trust a doctor these days with all the fake chemicals they are giving out that is probably some sort of mind control drug.
No Name
2016-05-06 09:15:52 UTC
Religion
Andrew
2016-05-05 21:55:13 UTC
Science does not easily accept anything. The scientific process in largely based off trial and error, inputs from peer groups, and severe scrutiny before any major developments occur. Skepticism is the only way my brain will ever function, and as a educated person it's the way I prefer it. Religion has its Benfits of group worship and commonality with community, but by no means does it make they existence of God a fact. I trust process, and transparency. I have study religion excessively and always arrive at the same thought. It's unevovled and linear. To me it lacks rationale thought. They are plenty of smart religious people, but for some reason when it's comes to religious belief, rationale and systematic thinking are no longer a priority. Lastly atheism has no class, race, gender, sexual orientation, or levels. Religion and morality are mutually exclusive. Science provides me the ability to think freely, and for that I am grateful.
anonymous
2016-05-04 07:25:56 UTC
Religion
anonymous
2016-05-03 11:07:49 UTC
Let's get honest we all drive cars have electronics and utilitys .



Some people will boast oh I trust in God more than science well I'm a christian trained to speak the truth! And I say quit lieing people we all trust science and our man made dodads before god or this earth would be a paradise





Instead of a used up garbage can
?
2016-05-03 13:03:38 UTC
Religion
?
2016-05-05 17:37:34 UTC
Christians claim they trust religion more than science, but if this is true, why don't they just pray to be healed everytime they're sick instead of using modern medicine? Why does the Pope drive around in a bulletproof vehicle instead of just praying not to be shot? Why do Mormons horde away food, guns, ammunition ect? That doesn't sound like people who TRULY feel God will take care of them if they "just believe", now does it? Come on Christians and Muslims, PROVE that you trust religion more than science! Get rid of your cars, phones, medicine, electricity and computers and just pray and have faith! Show the world that you TRULY and HONESTLY belive what you say! Get rid of all the devices that you use every single day that science created and rely ONLY on the God you claim you trust more! Put your money where your mouth is, and show us!
?
2016-05-03 12:35:35 UTC
Religion
?
2016-05-04 20:00:14 UTC
Science.
?
2016-05-04 18:28:51 UTC
Science.
Argentina
2016-05-05 12:40:08 UTC
Although the Bible is not a science textbook, it is accurate when it mentions matters of science. Consider some examples showing that science and the Bible agree and that the Bible contains scientific facts that differed greatly from the beliefs of many people living at the time it was written.



The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.



The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
ratatatattie
2016-05-03 12:39:36 UTC
Religion always has an agenda - usually it's more power to the powerful.



Science - you don't ever have to trust it - you can check it out for yourself. That's the whole point of science.



If you are unable to do a particular test because the equipment would be unavailable or too expensive you can read peer reviewed publications.
Steve
2016-05-04 17:08:56 UTC
Depends on the science and the religion. Both are subject to being either true or false. I trust the truth more, I guess you could say. True religion uses the scientific method. False science uses credulity. Most people believe what they are told. You might see the conformity in the answers as being brainwashed by schools. Wonder what such a survey would reveal in other countries?
?
2016-05-04 09:44:31 UTC
BIBLE MANUAL SCRIPTS:/ RATHER THAN MANS

The Bible is a precious gift from God. It is like a letter from a loving father to his children. It tells us the truth about God—who he is and what he stands for. It explains how to cope with problems and how to find true happiness. The Bible alone tells us what we must do to please God.—Psalm 1:1-3; Isaiah 48:17, 18. The Bible was written by some 40 different men over a period of 1,600 years, beginning in 1513 B.C.E. It is made up of 66 little books. Those who wrote the Bible were inspired by God. They wrote his thoughts, not their own. So God in heaven, not any human on earth, is the Author of the Bible.—2 Timothy 3:16, 17; 2 Peter 1:20, 21. God made sure that the Bible was accurately copied and preserved. More Bibles have been printed than any other book. Your eternal future depends on your getting to know God and doing his will despite any opposition.—Matthew 5:10-12; John 17:3.



Notwithstanding triumphs of science that benefit humanity, we must bear in mind that scientists are only human. They are not beyond temptation and corruption. Their motives are not always noble. Truly, science has its proper place in society, but it is not an infallible guiding light in an ever-darkening world. The journal Speculations in Science and Technology observes: “The history of science shows that however majestic the leaders of science appear, they are still fallible.” Actually, some are more than fallible. It would be unwise for Christians to get involved in scientific controversies or to promote unproven scientific theories. For example, some may become obsessed with fear of electromagnetism. Then, with the best of intentions, they could begin to encourage others to dispose of their microwave ovens, electric blankets, and the like. Of course, everyone is free to make a choice, without criticism from others. But those who choose a different option should be able to expect the same consideration. So, it is wise to avoid spreading sensationalism. Whether many unusual claims are true or not has yet to be proved. If some of these claims eventually prove unfounded or even wrong, then those championing such claims not only look foolish but may have unintentionally caused harm to others.
anonymous
2016-05-05 06:51:23 UTC
Science and Religions must come together side by side or life on Earth will be boring.



some will tell you story like this one which is normal:



Science

ruby · 1 day ago

9 Thumbs up 13 Thumbs down



and this:



Science

Spartan · 1 day ago

10 Thumbs up 11 Thumbs down
Pierce
2016-05-04 02:06:46 UTC
History
Paolo
2016-05-04 18:59:13 UTC
Religion
Cato
2016-05-03 10:42:10 UTC
Religion
Tom
2016-05-04 09:55:23 UTC
Well what you've asked have no exact answer since religions are controlled by corrupted people and science is in the hands of capitalists.

While the answer might be science, I won't go with it since science is manipulative in nature and two statements both opposite can be true at the same time,and instead of explaining firstly you have to make assumptions which is questionable in same way as we question the god.

That's all ii want to say :D
?
2016-05-04 03:48:14 UTC
SCIENCE or RELIGION which do you "TRUST" more ?



is the Real question which actually presents FACTS and the Other CLAIMS of BELIEFS ? Science .



Why because science uses a System to Obtain information and knowledge facts by a established approach called the Scientific METHOD



The Observation identification description experimental investigation and theoretical explanation of NATURAL Phenomena resulting in demonstrable consistent results



not each individuals "INTERPRETATION" of scriptures or ancient writings based on unverified perceptions of others or ancient people
?
2016-05-06 11:33:04 UTC
Religion is man made. Between the 2, I trust science. I trust God above all though.
Doubting Like Thomas
2016-05-03 11:03:41 UTC
Imagine you're on a small sailboat, on a large lake.

The sail is furled, the boat is motionless, and it's a FINE day for fishing.



You notice a HECK of a storm heading your way.



IF you trust the science of sailing, you'd know that operating the sail and the rudder in a certain manner, will move you toward shore.



IF you trust Mark 7:7 ("ASK, and it WILL be given!"), you simply ask of the Biblical God, that the storm not affect you adversely, and keep on fishing.



Or, if you trust Neptune, the God of the Deep, you pour a libation of wine over the side, and ask that the storm not affect you adversely, and keep on fishing.



Or, if you trust in Susanoo-no-mikito, the Shinto God of summer storms, you do the appropriate Shinto prayer,asking that the storm not affect you adversely, and keep on fishing.



(Let's pretend I've taken the time to list ALL the Storm Gods of ALL the other religions ever thought up, and that, by doing so, I have made my point clear.)
Pamela
2016-05-04 17:13:00 UTC
My trust is not in religion. I trust in my Savior- Jesus who is the same yesterday, today and forever.

Science is like a child- still growing up and as it learns more, it changes everyday.

Science is mankinds ongoing discovery of the universe and how things work. It does not know everything yet and the conclusions it makes today will change tomorrow.
?
2016-05-05 17:34:00 UTC
I trust science but I also trust religionit would be ignorant to say they contradict well this depends on the religion were talking about but any knowledgeable christan that isn't trying to shelter people should understand stuff such as evolution is not a threat to Christian belifs I suggest that Christians that think this look up pope pius XII's document on it
g_steed
2016-05-04 03:19:27 UTC
To place confidence - Based on population numbers, the world trusts religion more than science.
Elisabeth
2016-05-05 05:10:03 UTC
Both. Science provides us with evidence about life and how things work, however, religion and God (to me, some may disagree) is what guides us through life in the right way.

I guess maybe I trust religion a tad more.
David
2016-05-06 03:45:33 UTC
I value science, but I also value certain aspects of spirituality. There are some issues that can only be dealt with by one or the other. Both have their place, if used correctly. Religion has been bad in history, as has science. Both are constantly changing as the years progress.
Diana
2016-05-05 19:33:09 UTC
Science IS my religion.
Freethinking Liberal
2016-05-03 11:27:05 UTC
Science



All religion is a joke
imacatholic2
2016-05-04 12:34:38 UTC
I trust God, not religion.



Science is only as trustworthy as the humans who endeavor to discover God's creation through Science.



Science developed modern medicine.

Science also developed nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.



With love in Christ.
?
2016-05-04 12:16:15 UTC
Look at what science has accomplished in the last 100 years alone. wifi, smart phones, landing a rover on mars, vaccines, indoor plumbing, cars, THIS COMPUTER YOU'RE TYPING ON.



Now compare that with what religion accomplished in 2,000 years.



If you can't see that science is more beneficial to society then I got news for you, you're indoctrinated in to a belief system that contradicts the world you live in.



Your iPhone is NOT powered by the blood of Christ, it's powered by science.



Unless you're referencing that one time that Jesus eradicated Polio, no wait, that was science too.
Raja
2016-05-04 03:30:42 UTC
Science and religion are different subjects. God is trying to explain about human beings through science. He had made and is making human beings into advanced creatures of this earth. Human beings must believe that they are just robots made of flesh, bones, tissues etc.



God never bothers who believe Him. God cannot watch each and every human being at the same time. That's why He had created the spirits to watch, guide and determine the destiny of the human beings from their daily activities, talks and thoughts too. Your past determines your present and your present determines your future. God has given freewill to all creatures including human beings. According to this, all human beings have all right to live a life as they wish. But if it happens to be bad and hurts someone, they have to face the consequences. These consequences are created by spirits. It's a natural system. After death no one lives in any form. Heaven and hell are only for spirits. Spirits are separate elements. A human being is not a single spirit. A human being during his/her life time is living with many spirits which have joined one by one since birth. They are knowledge, skills, feelings, emotions, interests and everything. Even thoughts are not your own. When you want to take a decision on a subject, one after another the spirits think and you just listen, choose or reject the ideas which they transmit to your mind through your brain in the form of thoughts. A human being is just a robot made of flesh, bones, tissues etc., and a toy of the spirits for their games.
anonymous
2016-05-06 09:49:56 UTC
It's not either "science or religion" ~ only an idiot has such a narrow view.



Religion is a generic word for any regular habit ..



A RELATIONSHIP with Jesus is much more than "religion", and He is the

same God by Whom all the laws of science were made possible to happen

and by Whom we are able to comprehend them. God owns science.
True Christian
2016-05-04 06:48:05 UTC
All for Science

None for Religion horse sh*t
?
2016-05-04 01:08:06 UTC
Both Science and Religion are equally important.
Your worst nightmare
2016-05-05 06:03:17 UTC
All religions are man-made and science is based on mankind's discoveries and theories, but neither (science or religion) can save anyone from sin. Only Jesus can save us from our sins, so the question should be WHO do you trust more, Science, religion or Christ Jesus.
Jonathn
2016-05-03 11:37:53 UTC
Screw the "OR"!! People like Lex Luthor will make superheroes fight each other unnecessarily. This question is something that insecure atheism fanatics like as their way to trash religious people with their thumbs voting.

There are many major Christian based hospitals and universities which operate under the principle of faith in God with respect to science.

Why did Jesus heal the sick? To show an example of compassion for us to follow. Miracles are only used to convince the witnesses of His authority being equal to God. Faith is not a call for idle wishful thinking. It's a call for actions of goodness in which the reward will not come until we are DEAD. Goodness often involves pursuing science knowledge.
anonymous
2016-05-04 07:17:55 UTC
Religion, science would not have ever come about without God. The Bible says tend times Knowledge would increase, and people would run to and fro across the earth. That is exactly what is going on today. It also says there will be many non believers that would try to turn believers away from the truth.......think about that one.
Ron
2016-05-04 23:01:28 UTC
Religion, because it can be relied upon to produce nonsensical answers to obscure and irrelevant questions.



Science, however, yields a profusion of astounding discoveries, questions, paradoxes, theories and other confusing stuff. It is obviously the only intelligent way to make structures that stand, but it's quirky, science, because it is the real world and not neat myths.
tom
2016-05-06 13:49:38 UTC
Science should be trusted by all!!! Their work actually gets published and reviewed by each new scientist coming up as well as by anyone who wants to review it, religions are only man made up stories spread often enough to just become believed the stories never change but their inculcating tactics always do!!!
Anne
2016-05-04 21:38:16 UTC
Religion.
anonymous
2016-05-03 14:05:15 UTC
Science adapts as new information is discovered. It rarely complete changes; far more often an existing theory is expanded or modified slightly.



However, anti-science creationists are very adept at telling lies about science and pretending that it "changes its story" frequently. Whenever someone posts that particular lie I know they're getting all their information about science from the propagandists.
Adullah M
2016-05-05 00:26:20 UTC
Religion then science.

Since science can not enter in to the fold of soul and spiirt,philosophy,ethic and morals ,heaven and hell.

Furthermore Science can not explain how something come from nothingness and where was the first pure energy being used for igniting the big bang come from.
G C
2016-05-03 10:55:45 UTC
I trust God who created both science and religion.
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:48:27 UTC
There is no "or" between science and religion. Science and religion answer different questions.



Science answers "why".

Religion answers "how".



"We cannot say: creation or evolution, inasmuch as these two things respond to two different realities. The story of the dust of the earth and the breath of God, which we just heard, does not in fact explain how human persons come to be but rather what they are. It explains their inmost origin and casts light on the project that they are. And, vice versa, the theory of evolution seeks to understand and describe biological developments. But in so doing it cannot explain where the 'project' of human persons comes from, nor their inner origin, nor their particular nature. To that extent we are faced here with two complementary—rather than mutually exclusive—realities."

-Pope Benedict XVI

.
francis
2016-05-04 02:15:50 UTC
Awful things are done under the name of science and religion. You'd be surprised. I believe 100% in what I see or there will always be doubts.
Alan
2016-05-04 04:17:04 UTC
For me, I trust both. Because let's not forget the famous scientist of Europe who almost became a Catholic priest. Galileo Galilei. But as he made a new discovery of the universe. And this was a heretical concept to the Catholic church. When he was on trial, he was forced to renounce of his heretical ideas of the galaxy. And he did. So I don't see science as a opposition to religion. Even one of famous doctors in early Christianity was Saint Luke. He's the patron saint of physicians and surgeons.
james
2016-05-05 21:25:11 UTC
Science is a theory that can be proved or disproved religion on the other hand is just a made up story with no substance of merit
?
2016-05-04 13:51:49 UTC
Meanwhile in Reality...



Those that claim they trust religion more then science take their kids to get medical vaccinations that rely on medical science, evolutionary biology, and engineering. Those that don't take their kids and instead pray typically end up with dead kids and imprisonment.
Zigg
2016-05-04 10:56:33 UTC
Heart says science but soul says religion. Which should I listen to?
?
2016-05-03 11:29:44 UTC
Science gave us all the marvels of modern technology and showed us a universe of infinite possibilities.

Religion gave us unfounded claims and unbelievable promises it has no way of keeping. It showed us a tiny little world full of supranational beings and magic.



Science will lead us into the future, religion will keep us locked in the past.
?
2016-05-05 20:58:57 UTC
Science. Though despite not being a very religious person, I can still respect those who answer with religion.
anonymous
2016-10-28 16:44:48 UTC
science
Ajaysing
2016-05-05 23:28:07 UTC
Off course Religion. Science is related to body and Religion is related to mind. Science is observed by five senses and Religion is observed by sixth sense. Science treats to your body and religion treats to your mind. Mind is the cause behind your satisfaction or dissatisfaction happiness or sad ness. It is the only mind that decides to believe or not to believe on something.Religion makes you to be self Reliant and Science makes us to be depend on others. Science is a sweet poison gives 10% satisfaction and becomes the cause of 90% dissatisfaction. Science makes our life easy but fails to satisfy us and Religion's work is to teach to be satisfied. Finally Human life's aim is to be happy and satisfied by mind.
محمد - نور بروق
2016-05-03 16:24:50 UTC
Hello, as you desire, the both are true and strong, but personally if I was forced to choose one, then I will take the occult -the old, the religion", where the science be science fiction and advanced and future, but although that the occult be past but it be above the future too, but the both are equal usually, you doesn't overuse usually.. may the science be the reality but the occult be the fiction.. the both try to predicate the end of evolution as supposing, but no end in the fact, where the infinity is real number in the maths...
thegreatone
2016-05-03 16:02:05 UTC
I don't trust science or religion. I trust God.
Caesar
2016-05-03 11:33:55 UTC
To get men in the moon, Apollo, raised by Saturn of course...

To stop lighting hitting the highest point of a town, usually a temple or a church, a blessed lighting rod work as fine as the unblessed lighting rod... because, electricity. For the elimination of leprosy at the global level that was a goal achieved by the end of 2000, after we use high levels of political commitment in endemic countries, as well as encouraging donor support for essential activities such as MDT supply and logistics. Regardless of religions or political views, humans working together with a human advancing common goal is what i trust.
anonymous
2016-08-24 22:03:00 UTC
science
Wellll... hello then!
2016-05-05 13:50:27 UTC
Neither! I trust the KJ bible,the ONLY book God wrote! Science follows behind,and the devil started religion! Christianity is NOT religion,never has been!
?
2016-05-06 21:23:24 UTC
God is NOT religion and God gives man knowledge



real science is from God...it is the knowledge He gives man for many things, but like everything man refuses to use that knowledge for good, most of it is used for gain and wickedness



I trust in God and the knowledge He gives...BUT without HIM you do not have real science



you have the lying pseudo science that claims evolution, big bang which is simply LIES
?
2016-05-08 10:29:06 UTC
Science. Anyone who says religion has a serious problem.
Ian
2016-05-05 16:28:17 UTC
Science. Anyone down voting science is in major denial.
kswck2
2016-05-06 02:54:04 UTC
Since science is based on fact and religion is based on theory and unprovable assumptions, I'll take science any day.
?
2016-05-03 18:19:01 UTC
Well lets compare what each has given me.



Science: paved roads, combustion engine, electricity both wired and portable, modern housing, electric furnace, computers, flight, precision time keeping, digital media, automated labor, advanced medicine which actually gave me my life on a few occasions, use of radio frequency, electric musical instruments, better quality and more reliable food sources, fluid pumps, cosmetics and hygienic aids, quality clothing and footwear... And I could go on so I'll just end it with the joy of learning and discovery.



Religion: discrimination from people who hate me for being transgender just because their religion says to hate me even though they don't know me, some cool sounding legends...



As you can see religion is lacking and that is even if you don't count that one of those points actually makes my life harder.
Doug Freyburger
2016-05-03 12:54:22 UTC
The ones that don't conflict, I don't have to care. Thor does not care and so I don't have to.



The ones that do conflict (only a subset of the JCI family), science. Partially because among religions the decision to conflict with science is extraordinary and extraordinary stances require extraordinary support.
JoeBama
2016-05-03 12:36:37 UTC
I trust true science and true religion.



I deny false "science" and false religions.



Many believe something to be true, even though they have not personally examined the evidence (either in science or religion).



In that case, do they really believe in "science" or do they believe (the person who claims to be) "a scientist"? Do they really trust a religion or do they simply trust a preacher?



Many things once considered to be true (either in science or religion) are no linger accepted as such. We must, therefore, assume that some things accepted as truth now may be in error.



For example, about 40 years ago in a Biology class I was told that it was a fact that no advanced mammals existed in the time of the dinosaurs and the only mammals back then were very small, shrew-like creatures.



In 2005, however, a dog-size mammal fossil was found with a small dinosaur in its stomach. Thus, what I was told as a "scientific fact" in the 1970's was shown to be false.



I commend the scientific community for updating their information, however, this still demonstrates that not everything reported as "a fact" can be trusted to be true. This applies to both religion and science.



In religion, one church teaches that one doctrine is true, while another religion says it is false,; or a person believes it to be true, and then years later changes his view and believes it to be false.



Two things can't contradict and both be true at the same time.



The problem with both religions and scientific views is that people often only believe what a teacher, book, "authority", or "expert" says. Rarely do most people actually examine the evidence for themselves!
laidawestbrook2
2016-05-06 04:35:06 UTC
Neither, I trust in God the creator. Too much emphasis is put on religion rather than God. Because this people are committed to a religion rather than God. Bible clearly indicates, however, that our worship—in the sense of religious reverence and devotion—must be addressed solely to God. Moses described him as “a God exacting exclusive devotion.” And the Bible exhorts us to “worship the One who made the heaven and the earth and sea and fountains of waters.”—Deuteronomy 4:24; Revelation 14:7.



Jesus certainly occupies a pivotal role in true worship, one worthy of honor and respect. (2 Corinthians 1:20, 21; 1 Timothy 2:5) He is the only way through which we are able to approach Jehovah God. (John 14:6) Accordingly, true Christians do well to direct their worship only to Jehovah God, the Almighty.
?
2016-05-05 14:03:22 UTC
Religion is for believing, Science is for cures and knowledge
anonymous
2016-05-05 11:14:28 UTC
I believe in Science, but I put my faith in God. Science and Religion does NOT have to be at odds with each other. Even Einstein believed in God.
?
2016-05-04 13:32:14 UTC
Science for my body, religion for my soul
jpopelish
2016-05-03 11:21:40 UTC
Science isn't about unsupported claims,

like religion is,

but is about all explanations

being skeptically tested

against measurable reality,

every way anyone can imagine to test them.



So, the explanations that science offers

can be trusted

to be, at least, practically correct.



--

Regards,



John Popelish
Joseph
2016-05-04 04:41:12 UTC
Science has been changing ever since - Religion deals with our afterlife phase.

So therefore one has to have a grasp of BOTH.
DennisP
2016-05-04 09:49:45 UTC
Science.



It's not a matter of "more," I don't trust religion AT ALL, and people who do are irresponsible cowards.
sarah
2016-05-03 11:17:35 UTC
The bible not religions, is very trust worthy and I don't trust science at all.
Steve
2016-05-03 16:34:35 UTC
Science. No question. Trusting an old Jewish/Arabic book is a fool's errand.
Mercuri
2016-05-03 10:47:56 UTC
I trust science every day. I trust that my car will start and get me to work. I trust that my computer will power on and connect to the internet. I trust that my immunization shots will protect me from smallpox and measles. Etc. Faith and prayer won't get me to work. It doesn't allow me to fly in airplanes. Only science does that.
?
2016-05-03 22:24:34 UTC
Science needs empirical evidence, it has to be repeatable. so the only thing you can have faith in is Science.



watch a man shoot himself because he has faith in science, and that the bullet would not reach him.



Religion unfortunately can't be proven or disproven because most religious claims lies out of the boundaries of science therefore it cannot be tested. they lack any empirical evidence.
?
2016-05-05 05:07:15 UTC
Christianity
Khaled
2016-05-04 10:14:08 UTC
Religion is linked to God science is to matter...they are then different, no way to compare...do you then trust science to save you from hell...
Adam
2016-05-03 11:00:16 UTC
I trust science to discover how the universe works, and to thus improve it.



I trust religion to utterly **** things up.
John
2016-05-04 07:11:12 UTC
Science has evidence, so that's the one I trust.

Religion has nothing but myths, legends and guesswork. It's superstitious nonsense.
anonymous
2016-08-01 21:06:56 UTC
science
Robert S
2016-05-03 19:05:42 UTC
Science depends on human ability to reason & deduce.

Religion depends on faith, which is a gift from GOD.

Science can only deal with what can be seen or measured.

Religion goes beyond what can be sensed humanly.
Alight
2016-05-04 20:33:58 UTC
Religion hands down
Jokes
2016-05-04 00:36:35 UTC
That's a dumb question considering lot's of the smartest scientists are Christians and have plenty of scientific evidence to back up the Bible. I would much rather trust God's word than false scientific crap a bunch of those less smarter scientists believe in.
Luke
2016-05-06 08:50:14 UTC
Science because there's evidence for how the world is whereas religion is all theory
Sarah
2016-05-08 05:25:13 UTC
Religion, though I believe God uses science for plenty of things, like to heal sick people.
Hal
2016-05-05 14:18:52 UTC
I don't trust all "science", but instead I trust in the scientific method.



I don't trust all "religion", but instead I trust God.
Cornelius
2016-05-04 07:57:24 UTC
because of science i am able to read and answer this question on a network of information which travels at the speed of light globally. religion had no part in this. science gives me tangible results. religion gives me questions, and loopholes which lead to more questions.
anonymous
2016-05-04 07:33:21 UTC
Both have been corrupted and destroyed by the Illuminati, both have been used as tools for their nefarious ends.



It is impossible to choose between the two, but I choose religion, because many religious leaders have offered a greater defense against the NWO, than so-called 'scientists', who are usually just shills.
no1home2day
2016-05-05 11:49:27 UTC
What you need to understand is that Christians don’t deny Science, they deny bad science. It’s not religion vs science, but good science vs bad science. Christians don’t deny the evidence, they deny the atheist’s “interpretation” of the evidence.
eclectichomeschoolmom
2016-05-04 17:15:09 UTC
Religion. Even though we are "sold" that science is true. Most science is really just based on theory and not irrefutable fact.
?
2016-05-05 14:33:50 UTC
Both are true and easily go together. God doesn't prohibit science so if there is a scientific fact I can stay faithful to him while agreeing with the fact.
Cayla
2016-05-05 19:25:29 UTC
I trust science for more of my facts and my own personal philosophies for morals and values...but you can never truly know what is until you find out first hand for your self I suppose.....
?
2016-05-03 21:25:53 UTC
science
Sweetdaddy Rex
2016-05-03 12:39:18 UTC
WHICH religion; There are about 1400 different ones ! ( And not ONE of them tells how many dinosaurs were on Noah's Ark ) ! That HAD to be more than 75 million years ago !
anonymous
2016-05-05 19:13:07 UTC
science of course. because science give the man to go to the moon. religion just pure hate.
nur
2016-05-04 01:55:34 UTC
religion is science so we should believe religion not science
Pancho
2016-05-04 23:37:14 UTC
Your question reveals enormous ignorance. You've implied that science and religion are opposites. They are not. And your post has attracted people like yourself who also do not understand this very important point. Part of the problem is modern-day Christianity and all of the overemotional people who represent it here on the internet. They've become a laughingstock and so of course, based on that, the popculture people decide that religion itself must be at fault. Wrong. Not one of the people who answered you with the word "science" would be able to say what religion is. Therefore their responses are unscientific. How can they make the choice they did if they don't even understand the question? Niccolo Machievalli pointed out that very few people are capable of reason, and the "xerox"-style responses you received here only testify to that fact. And of course, your own ignorance is colossal. How did you ever manage to arrive at the conclusion that science and religion are opposites?? I would bet a large sum of money that you would not be able to define religion, yet you feel free to comment on it publicly. As for science - you're speaking of the physical sciences, the study of the physical world and all that it entails. But what about metaphysical science? You didn't even mention that. In the ancient religious traditions, these things were known of. Science and religion were not separate. Those who knew of spiritual things also knew of the intricate study of physical things. And those who specialized in the study of the physical world also knew (not "believed in") of the spiritual realms. I will tell you one more thing: The xerox-minded individuals who ALL answered your post with the one word, "science" are part of a chilling phenomenon known as "groupthink." Not one of them has a mind of his or her own. They simply repeat what they've been programmed to say since they were children. They speak in soundbytes and rather than think things out, rather than ponder, rather than search, they simply repeat preprogrammed data. The ability to delve into profound issues is beyond them and, quite frankly, that does not bode well for humanity. Billions of people now actively participate in groupthink, they all walk in lockstep based on how they've been programmed. What is frightening is that countless so-called "religious" (Christian) people as well as diploma'd "scientists" also have found themselves unable to break away from their original programming. They think, speak, and behave according to their original conditioning. "Science or religion?" That's ridiculous. Religion is itself a science, but of course I'm not speaking of Christianity or any other false expression of religion. You would have to look back far in history in order to appreciate what I'm talking about here. But I would say this: Next time, think before you post ...
MELONS
2016-05-03 18:02:07 UTC
science
anonymous
2016-05-06 12:45:25 UTC
Although science is usually definitive only about 20 percent of all knowledge can be readily gathered from the scientific method.
leen
2016-05-03 19:18:03 UTC
Neither. I trust in God and his word. Too many differences in religion and too many theories in science.
Nick
2016-05-04 13:26:05 UTC
100% Science... Science creates the way to kill people, religion makes up the reason
anonymous
2016-05-04 06:37:07 UTC
Is the Bible Scientifically Accurate?



He stretches out the northern sky over empty space, suspending the earth upon nothing.”



Job 26:7



“All the streams flow into the sea, yet the sea is not full. To the place from which the streams flow, there they return so as to flow again.”



Ecclesiastes 1:7



“There is One who dwells above the circle of the earth.”



Isaiah 40:22
The Goat Nose
2016-05-03 15:25:48 UTC
Both!

Religion and science are complementary and ask and answer different questions.

I don't know why this question is asked all the time.
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:50:33 UTC
Science is the only way to find out what is true.

Without science, we'd still be chasing rodents...for dinner.
Godsproblemchild
2016-05-04 18:59:28 UTC
I trust Jesus everything he does and everything he said. If science and God disagree, Science is wrong.
?
2016-05-03 23:36:26 UTC
"See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ." (Colossians 2:8)



Yeah, I will trust the Bible (and not religion, per se) before I will trust science.
Paulie HHD260
2016-05-07 06:05:12 UTC
Earthing mortals are spiritual beings trapped in their biological units.. They only have little pion little brains, and can only be aware of the tiny little pinhole of information that comes through their senses. They don't know their butts from a hole in the ground.. Hey, but I'm having fun.... NOW, this is the group that scientists come from.. I guarantee, scientists don't know their butts from a hole in the ground either. Hey, but their having fun.. - I should probably not comment on organized religions. Hey, but they are having fun too...
?
2016-05-03 15:25:13 UTC
The fact of the matter, I trust God word the holy Bible, because God is truth, and mankind which is science is a lie, that is why they said that the world was flat, in the beginning when you look in God word the bible God says that the earth is round, it is a sphere, and a sphere is round, not flat, read Isaiah 40:22, I put my faith in God because I know that God is truth, and when you put your faith in God anything is possible with God, because man is a liar, just like Satan the father of lies, when we fell from grace of God then we became slaves to Satan and sin, because as it is written in God word the bible only, Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death: but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
anonymous
2016-05-03 19:26:36 UTC
Science



"Most of the religions have exhibited a perverse talent for taking the wrong side on the most important concepts in the material universe, from the structure of the solar system to the origin of man."



Science flies you to the moon... Religion flies you into buildings.
kian
2016-05-04 08:44:23 UTC
science
anonymous
2016-05-03 16:20:32 UTC
First off Religion is not spirituality



Religion is the man made churches that worship some type of deity.
anonymous
2016-05-04 12:54:08 UTC
This is a dumb question; Religion is personal spiritual faith. Science is discovered theories, They do not belong together.
?
2016-05-05 00:35:45 UTC
Science, although you can always count on religion to be predictable.
Megi
2016-05-05 06:26:22 UTC
Religion because our holy book Quran filled with every science everything. so I believe my religioua ISLAM.
Tyler
2016-05-06 12:15:00 UTC
Science. I only believe what I can see.
Wundt
2016-05-04 09:10:01 UTC
I usually phrase this question using the following analogy, "if your child was badly injured or greviously ill, and you only had enough battery on your phone to call one person, who would you call? Your clergyman or your doctor?"



When faced with the consequences, most people will put aside faith for the surety of science.
lucie
2016-05-03 15:08:15 UTC
I only believe in science. Religion is so stupid.
Peter
2016-05-04 19:31:43 UTC
science
Akshita
2016-05-04 05:28:21 UTC
Science and relegion both as religion helped us to understand science.... And science encouraged us to go deeply through our relegion and understand it more logically..
Jim V
2016-05-03 11:10:30 UTC
Both



There is no contradiction between science and theology,

just between the world-views of some scientists and some preachers.
?
2016-05-04 17:32:36 UTC
Let's see, educated people following the scientific method, or lies and delusions from uneducated men of thousands of years ago.

Of course science!
?
2016-05-04 12:06:14 UTC
science
anonymous
2016-05-06 09:30:28 UTC
science
anonymous
2016-05-04 06:07:59 UTC
Religion.



As science cannot tell you rape or murder is "wrong". Also, if you pay enough, you can get a scientist to say anything you want.
?
2016-05-03 22:17:00 UTC
No scientific theory is without flaw.

No man fully understands the Word of GOD.



I trust that in which I can find no flaw.



Have a nice day.
Alan H
2016-05-03 13:18:22 UTC
Totally meaningless question.

Which do you trust more, a mathemstic teacher or a tourist guide?

It depends on what you are rusting them for.

Many top scientists are, and always have been, people of faith.
viable v
2016-05-05 22:38:33 UTC
Religion is something formed by the human mentality under Satan's instigation and inspiration in order to oppose God's economy. Apparently, religion is for God, but in actuality, it is fully against Him. Religion is something for God and for the benefit of people, yet it is apart from Christ and without the Spirit of Christ. As long as Christ is not in something, no matter how good it may be, it is only religion. Satan's goal is to keep man away from the fulfillment of God's eternal purpose. The heavens are for the earth, the earth is for man's existence, and man with his spirit is for God. Many in Christianity honor only its outward traditions and holidays without being truly for Christ in a pure way. By this we can see that religion is versus Christ. Today we still need to be delivered from the present evil age of religion.

In John 5:1 to 19 we see the Judaism (religion) try to kill Jesus, but Jesus said to them: 39 You search the Scriptures, because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is these that testify concerning Me. 40 Yet you are not willing to come to Me that you may have life.” As how the Judaism stop people come to Christ and received life then, same as Christianity stop true believer come to received Christ. Today Christians everywhere read the Bible and study it. But is the standard

of their enjoyment up to the standard of God’s testimony? In the vast majority

of cases it is not up to God’s standard. Along with the study of the Bible, some

Christian groups use worldly music. The use of such music lowers the standard to

a very great degree. On the one hand, these Christians have the Bible; on the other

hand, they have things which lower the standard.

For more Information.

http://www.lsmradio.com/

http://www.lifestudy.com/

http://biblesforamerica.org/
leftcoastliz
2016-05-04 17:56:17 UTC
Science is a process by which we derive truth. Religion claims to already have it, but fails miserably.
A
2016-05-04 01:18:10 UTC
Obviously science. Why is this a question?
anonymous
2016-05-04 06:10:18 UTC
Neither. All are under Satan's power.



Only by putting your faith (trust) into Jesus can he open your mind so that you too, may grasp this.



If you don't agree, it is evident God hasn't given you your share of wisdom. You are kept in the dark because of your ego.
anonymous
2016-05-05 05:49:54 UTC
Science i kind of go with facts over fabricated fiction
raj
2016-05-04 10:13:22 UTC
science
Leonard malcolm
2016-05-05 07:04:32 UTC
They confirm each other if you study the Bible. All that science is discovering today was there to be found at the time of Creation. Even evolution was pre-ordained.
DanRSN
2016-05-06 00:26:25 UTC
Science. True even if you don't believe in it.
Denisowator
2016-05-03 22:49:23 UTC
Are you asking us? I don't know you, so how am I supposed to know which you trust more. You should really sharpen up your English before going on Yahoo Answers.
Judy
2016-05-06 05:38:05 UTC
I trust both. They don't disagree. It's only interpretation which varies, and that is very subjective. The objective evidence is compatible with both views.
Hannah
2016-05-03 13:36:37 UTC
Science, every time!
anonymous
2016-05-06 23:57:07 UTC
Religion. Because my holy book has answers about the world and this was long before scientists came up with their facts.
nikki1234
2016-05-07 00:42:29 UTC
don't get me wrong; i trust MY science and MY religion.
wombatfreaks
2016-05-04 07:09:16 UTC
I trust in the scientific method to determine facts and to predict results. That is not the function of religion, so in that regard, they are not comparable.
musa
2016-05-03 20:16:16 UTC
'Religion (Belief in a God) without science is 'blind' and science without religion (Belief in a God) is lame'. (Albert Einstein)



You cannot separate God an science. Both are complimentary to each other.
anonymous
2016-05-06 12:19:11 UTC
God always for the truth



Psa 118:8 It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.



ALL men lie. God never has cause to.
Chloe
2016-05-04 07:57:12 UTC
I only trust religion. I don't go to the doctors or the hospital when i am ill as i have faith.
vikas
2016-05-04 08:01:19 UTC
Science because it is ready to update itself. It gives importance to evidence & not who produced it. But religions rarely want to change themselves & give importance to WHO more than to WHY HOW WHEN WHERE.
jatin
2016-05-04 11:36:04 UTC
I am a person of today's generation.so off course i trust science.not that religious books which were written hundreds of years ago and went out of date hundreds of years ago .
anonymous
2016-05-03 23:25:43 UTC
No question about it: science!
Prism
2016-05-06 02:18:57 UTC
Emphatically the God of Science is The Lord God,Creator of mankind .Praise His name forever.I love Him because He lives in my Heart bringing creativity, peace, forgiveness and joy ..but not only in the glorious encodement through d.n.a . prescriptive things but in a marvellously engineered cosmology .
anonymous
2016-05-03 12:10:22 UTC
Most of the sciences were fathered by Muslims so Muslims do not reject science. They would be rejecting something that is part of their history if they did. Muslims also knew about a lot of things in science before scientists even made discoveries of and had proofs of. Take the shape of the earth which is spheroid-oblate. Muslims knew this was the shape of the earth even before scientists had proof of it from satellites, advanced geometry, and so forth. It is in the Qur'an and written about in the writings of Alhazen and others. In other words, Muslims don't choose one over the other.



Aziz Sancar, Turkish biochemist, the first Muslim biologist awarded the Nobel Prize

Al-Kindi (Alkindus), pioneer of psychotherapy and music therapy

Ali ibn Sahl Rabban al-Tabari, pioneer of psychiatry, clinical psychiatry and clinical psychology

Ahmed ibn Sahl al-Balkhi, pioneer of mental health, medical psychology, cognitive psychology, cognitive therapy, psychophysiology and psychosomatic medicine

Abu al-Qasim al-Zahrawi (Abulcasis), pioneer of neurosurgery

Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen), founder of experimental psychology, psychophysics, phenomenology and visual perception

Muhammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī (Algorismi) - father of algebra and algorithms.

Abū al-Hasan ibn Alī al-Qalasādī (1412–1482), pioneer of symbolic algebra.

Ibn al-Haytham (Alhacen), 11th century Iraqi scientist, father of optics, and experimental physics, considered by some to be the "first scientist"

Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī, 11th century, pioneer of experimental mechanics

Al-Jazari, 13th century civil engineer, father of robotics

Cumrun Vafa, Iranian theoretical physicist and string theorist

Jābir ibn Hayyān (721-815) (Geber), father of chemistry

Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī, father of geodesy, considered the first geologist and "first anthropologist"



Note: Don't strawman my answer. I made NO explicit claims or statements pertaining to God, the Qur'an being a science textbook, the existence of God, superstition, etc.



edit:



As a Muslim I personally would never limit myself to choosing one or the other. Doing such would be illogical. It would be an either-or fallacy.
Nunu
2016-05-03 16:09:44 UTC
no and no. unfortunately in the prisine lovely beautiful cosmic skies somehow this is an angst circle... not 2^7 12^7 902Beverly^7 virtuous. I'm so sorry. #NelsonMandela #IllaBConvincement
greta
2016-05-06 13:04:36 UTC
I'm blinded by the truth of science.
bill
2016-05-03 17:39:04 UTC
sciencings
GuantanamoGeorge
2016-05-03 17:45:13 UTC
Religion. Religion has shown it works by inventing airplanes, automobiles, computers, television and telephones. Science is just a bunch of fairy tales for morons.
?
2016-05-04 12:31:22 UTC
Religion. I work in science and it is bullshit. To the person above, the bible does not claim the earth to be flat. In fact, it claims (correctly) it is round.
anonymous
2016-05-04 12:53:13 UTC
science of course. well I don't really have a choice, I mean that's like asking ''Who do you trust to go get you water, yourself or the air?''
myant
2016-05-05 15:14:38 UTC
Christianity... Religion is a man made method to attempt to get to heaven... Christianity is accepting the way God provided for us to qualify for eternity with Him...Jesus.
riley
2016-05-03 18:54:01 UTC
Science



Here's why:



A man falls into the ocean and it turns out he can't swim. A boat passes by and the captain of the ship asks the man drowning in the ocean "Do you need help, sir?" The man replies, "NO, God will save me?" Later on another boat passes by and the captain of the ship asks the man "Do you need help, sir" the man replies, "No, God will save me." Eventually the man drowns and goes to heaven(Fictional) and he asks God "Why didn't you save me?" God replies, "Idiot, I sent you two boats".



I trust science more because the deal with religion is they lack common sense. Religious people focus So much on who will save them instead of saving themselves. They had a perfect opportunity to fix and say No, God will save me". He did, dumbass. No will save you it's you who would save themselves. Smart intelligent people would get on the boat when stupid religious people trust someone to save them when they are blind when it's right in front of them.
Jan C
2016-05-04 21:48:44 UTC
I don't see how anyone can deny either. You don't have to be anti Godly if you do or don't believe in Science. We have both and God keeps it all together.
?
2016-05-06 17:02:41 UTC
Science has increase but we still dying on the same age avg.
anonymous
2016-05-05 08:04:12 UTC
Ccnnnn
UFOs
2016-05-04 09:15:16 UTC
Relationship over religion as told in the Bible. God has given us science to understand the world around us.



http://www.ufosarereal.simplesite.com





http://www.joel2army.simplesite.com





https://prophecywatchers.com/videos/l-marzulli-biblical-seed-war Marzulli and Genetics
?
2016-05-05 15:38:00 UTC
Science. I don't understand god
anonymous
2016-05-04 01:42:05 UTC
Science. It is knowledge with proof. Religion is untruth so has to be believed in blindly, i.e. "faith".
?
2016-05-05 15:04:42 UTC
Science. Religious people are stupid.
Jack
2016-05-06 08:02:08 UTC
Peanut butter
?
2016-05-04 19:06:09 UTC
Facts VS Beliefs, which do you trust? Facts.
RadiantRarity
2016-05-03 10:43:02 UTC
Both a little bit. I'm like 50/50 in either side.
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:40:12 UTC
I trust the truth, and it's a mixture of the 2
Mark
2016-05-04 09:37:37 UTC
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Albert Einsten
g
2016-05-04 02:06:14 UTC
science because I feel that, generally, people who believe it are a lot more open minded and rational
?
2016-05-03 15:10:22 UTC
We Christians trust in the true RELIGION and True SCIENCE !





Bible & jw.org
Jack
2016-05-04 08:33:50 UTC
I'm an Atheist so Scientology according to my mum lol
?
2016-05-03 11:27:20 UTC
SINCE PRAYING doesn't actually make my answer post, I'm putting my faith in science and the submit button.
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:51:45 UTC
Science.



Science took us to the Moon, cured diseases, and connected the world.



Religion gave us holy wars and the dark ages.



I understand science. I don't understand religion.
SaifAdl
2016-05-05 05:04:26 UTC
Science but I prefer them to co-exist. Something you can't see doesn't mean it don't exist and vice versa.
wesley
2016-05-03 13:56:07 UTC
Science taught me how to dissect a frog, God taught me how to climb from the grave.
Fort Erudite
2016-05-04 14:12:24 UTC
Neither. I trust myself.
Lola
2016-05-04 08:34:27 UTC
science by far
Max
2016-05-04 02:02:26 UTC
science and partially religion..
Ian
2016-05-03 15:58:34 UTC
Its yahoo filled with athiest pieces of **** who bash on religion , and hate on gods how can u hate on something that in ur mind doesnt exsist?? But overall RELIGIONNNN RULESSS
JJ
2016-05-03 11:50:23 UTC
I trust in God and The Lord Jesus
?
2016-05-06 13:47:09 UTC
Science, because it can be tested, proven (mostly) and makes sense.
ranon
2016-05-03 13:25:38 UTC
Both
Black Sabbath
2016-05-03 10:52:16 UTC
science everytime
jake
2016-05-03 17:56:40 UTC
Religion. There's just more answer believe it or not. We have a whole book dedicated to it. You just have theory's that thousands of scientists have spent thousands of years trying to find
?
2016-05-03 11:53:57 UTC
Star Trek, TOS
MimkeD234
2016-05-03 20:29:43 UTC
I don't compare the two, as they are in entirely different categories. Each has their uses and neither one completely offsets the other.
An
2016-05-04 05:31:13 UTC
Both
danish
2016-05-06 11:00:26 UTC
Both
?
2016-05-03 18:09:16 UTC
i am more analytical as like being a scientist.

but true and undefiled religion, the restored church and living prophets, i trust them more than an evolutionist. the peer review is said to be totally corrupted by the conspiracy of men.
Martin the baby
2016-05-07 01:56:22 UTC
Brain.
?
2016-05-03 14:37:58 UTC
This question commits both a category error and bifurcation fallacy.
anonymous
2016-05-07 20:54:04 UTC
Science, always, always.
?
2016-05-03 13:11:08 UTC
I trust both.
Belinda
2016-05-04 11:34:41 UTC
Religion, because it answers every question that we have.
Jeancommunicates
2016-05-04 09:31:28 UTC
I only trust God and His Word, the Holy Bible. IN GOD I TRUST
Elena
2016-05-06 10:27:49 UTC
Religion. (wouldn't consider myself the most religious person but still, I do value the values of it.)
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:52:13 UTC
I trust God above everything.
?
2016-05-03 10:40:16 UTC
science. we can surely research and validate everything
anonymous
2016-05-04 16:35:18 UTC
You're comparing apples and oranges.
garaj
2016-05-03 19:25:24 UTC
SIKHISM IS MORE SCIENTIFIC RELIGION ...... one can research it practically........acco.to it There Is Not A Single Earth , Moon, sun In Universe Or Multiverse But An INFINIT No. Of Them exists....
Jaye16
2016-05-04 21:52:30 UTC
Ummm... judging the history on retractions and changes to both, do you have a third choice?
Maria
2016-05-04 13:04:23 UTC
I trust neither.
Suzy
2016-05-03 12:36:16 UTC
Neither, I put my trust in Jehovah God only. jw.org
nobudE
2016-05-04 22:13:07 UTC
They cover different areas. It's like saying "which is better, soap or kayaks?"
Sabina
2016-05-03 18:51:54 UTC
SCIENCE.
Mitchell
2016-05-05 19:46:06 UTC
2 thes 2....the great falling away. I am a witness.
sugarbee
2016-05-04 13:12:11 UTC
I trust Almighty GOD and his word !
?
2016-05-05 05:54:15 UTC
Neither
anonymous
2016-05-04 10:25:49 UTC
Neither
?
2016-05-04 06:24:27 UTC
both at different times
Micah
2016-05-03 14:51:20 UTC
SCIENCE, easily.
?
2016-05-03 12:02:23 UTC
SCIENCE!!!
Naguru
2016-05-03 23:36:00 UTC
I trust R&S.
?
2016-05-05 18:35:30 UTC
Don't really care, doesn't matter to me
Krysta
2016-05-03 20:05:51 UTC
I put my trust in God.
James
2016-05-06 09:58:01 UTC
The God of the Bible, and the religion that He established.
anonymous
2016-05-05 07:45:34 UTC
Both.
kaganate
2016-05-05 06:19:29 UTC
This is a false dychotomy.
anonymous
2016-05-04 02:45:41 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykXtmBtPnpw



Source(s):

"Youtube"
jennifer
2016-05-03 10:40:47 UTC
neither, both are man-made and prone to substantial errors
anonymous
2016-05-04 11:15:55 UTC
Neither.
Jose
2016-05-04 12:32:45 UTC
Bill nye the SCIENCE guy.
?
2016-05-03 20:13:32 UTC
God over all things Jesus Christ is Lord
?
2016-05-05 10:40:09 UTC
both, on a case by case basis.
hank
2016-05-06 06:03:34 UTC
RELIGION
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:41:44 UTC
neither. have many deep flaws and errors
Littlest
2016-05-04 09:33:12 UTC
The most reasonable one.
JOHN
2016-05-06 05:27:15 UTC
None of the above!
Sweet
2016-05-06 20:47:53 UTC
The voices in my head.
?
2016-05-05 17:11:38 UTC
Jesus Christ, the Lord of heaven and earth!!!
?
2016-05-05 02:21:07 UTC
What has science and religion got to do with *who to trust more*? Duh???
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:48:10 UTC
science and the bible
anonymous
2016-05-07 05:27:04 UTC
The second things.
anonymous
2016-05-04 08:19:44 UTC
alchemy
jos
2016-05-04 14:34:33 UTC
both
Freedom Soars
2016-05-05 02:25:54 UTC
neither. time is simultaneous, how about that?
?
2016-05-03 21:40:53 UTC
Jesus <3
anonymous
2016-05-04 11:28:36 UTC
I do not know okay?
?
2016-05-03 10:57:24 UTC
Both !!
anonymous
2016-05-03 16:29:20 UTC
Nort "religion" but "THE BIBLE"!!!!!
Rising Dove
2016-05-04 18:09:25 UTC
Jesus. The only way.
anonymous
2016-05-04 11:22:50 UTC
Genuine religion and the direct natural genius known as 'faith.'



Reasons to distrust science:



1) Getting itself trapped inside of an inescapable arms race that has shed more blood and wasted more treasure than any other human endeavor;



2) Producing and failing to secure machines of mechanized death leading to world wars and cycles of genocide;



3) Presiding over the advent and use of weapons of mass destruction upon civilian populations;



4) Constructing a global system of pervasive poisoning called 'mega-industry' that has taken us from a pristine natural world to massive environmental destruction and hopeless economic addictions to poisonous industrial substances;



5) Squandering the bulk of the world resources immediately on comic book nonsense before anyone even has a chance to consider how to distribute them more equitably in the interest of world peace. This now includes 'spider god' cults and space travel scams into the Biblical 'abyss,' (Luke 8:31, Luke 16:26, Matthew 8:12, Revelation 9), constructing 'world-wide webs' and 'social networks' using global infrastructures of lines and fine threads pulsing with artificially produced images, sounds, and simulated realities, (even measured in 'bytes'), all meant to intoxicate and disseminate public spin and lies, leading to the abandonment of ethics, morality and otherwise obvious naturally installed divine processes and Laws. Using this mass intoxication, (with obvious effectiveness given the number of 'science' respondents to your question), to trick people into believing in absurd narratives of cosmic meaninglessness, historical revisionism ironically, presented through the same grand and unmatched institutions of academia and social models, (including the original 'university' system), that were invented and defined by religion, (not atheistic science), which unjustifiably castigates religious thought and contributions, (why are we still attending 'universities' at all if science is 'superior?' Shouldn't we have something new and better by now?).



6) Using public spin once again to cover up waves of lineage deaths and irreversible genetic damage being caused by poor and constantly shifting understandings of chemicals and drugs. Included in this nightmare are inescapable addictions, waves of fatal overdoses, gender confusion, psycho-sexual sterility, physical sterility, widespread negligence and needless accidents, sudden inexplicable violence, exponentially expanding asymmetrical violence, 'fringe science' being conducted in the streets of lawless sprawling government sanctioned ghettos supported by oppressive government taxation under threat of deviant rape, torture or other high felonies being used to maintain massive incarceration systems routinely employed to forcibly recruit new members into criminal gangs representing modern slavery, in addition to other disguises like 'human trafficking,' 'state wards,' and 'illegal immigrants,' all while proclaiming slavery to be 'officially abolished' and blaming religion for having 'enslaved' us so mercilessly in the past.



Under religious authorities and agencies of direct natural genius:



1) Human authorities presided over a pristine natural environment rather than a pervasively poisoned one;



2) An acknowledged social duty to protect women and children through the vigorous defense of maidenhood and absolute monogamy, holding back the tide of tens of millions of needless and torturous deaths from unprecedented diseases with no cures and only economically inaccessible torture treatments as 'remedies.' Trust in nature's capabilities, cycles and grander purposes even during outbreaks of disease, containing the damage to one generation of early deaths while receiving multi-generational gifts of immunity, natural moral behavioral reinforcements, generational lessons and perennial wisdom, rather than only wild experimentation with dangerous substances leading to lineage deaths, lessened immunity and irreversible genetic damage.



3) The undeniable and continuing world standard of artistic and social genius, not remotely approached since, (mostly because the exhibition of personal genius does not happen during states of perpetual war and the ongoing prosecution of arms races, which have been happening since the inception and adoption of atheistic science);



4) The proper securement of all weapons from the hands of fools, rather than the unrestricted sale of death on the open market to the highest bidder;



5) The highly restricted and very public use of extreme violence directed at a handful of public insurrectionists and evil agitators, rather than the public legislation of 'tolerance' and the pervasive spread of evil, violence and death, even the ceaseless and needless deaths of infants and toddlers by the thousands, (including being horribly crushed and burned alive), all excused by the word 'progress.'



6) The formation of all grand and worthwhile institutions, (including the first 'university' system), never replaced or emulated since, only infiltrated and co-opted by atheistic secularists;



Science is responsible for every unnatural death and drop of spilled blood on the earth. There is no such thing as a 'religious' deadly weapon or process. Without the contributions of science and its explorations into forbidden knowledge, (including its hypocritical quasi-religious precursors), even in its most extreme form, religion only engages in vigorous public debates, ignites inspired social movements, inspires ingenious commerce and art, competes in the exhibition of personal genius, breathtaking architecture, superlative dynamic education, the protection of time-honored human virtues, the preservation of meaningful and purposeful narratives of existence, holding back the tides of existential dread, pervasive hopelessness, suicides, murders and all other social ills.



There really isn't any debate which one should be trusted more. The only reason science continues to earn anyone's trust at all is because it also happens to be the source of a mass psychological drunkenness that makes it seem impressive, constructive, promising and powerful---but only to those properly spun into a web of lies and all-pervasive Hollywood hokum to be exsanguinated in due course along with all of the other hapless victims of the doomed spider god named 'progress.'
?
2016-05-06 13:17:50 UTC
Jesus
marcus w
2016-05-05 11:00:29 UTC
Jesus
anonymous
2016-05-03 10:48:35 UTC
Jesus
?
2016-05-04 13:14:15 UTC
Jesus.
?
2016-05-03 15:05:28 UTC
Only ALLAH...
anonymous
2016-05-03 11:02:10 UTC
God.
sadie
2016-05-05 13:16:51 UTC
Science

(Duh)


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...