A lawyer presents the evidence for the afterlife?

Question

Has anyone heard about this?

Victor Zammit, retired attorney outlines the objective and repeatable evidence for the afterlife

See it here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCTvpoiqbKA

Read about it here

http://www.victorzammit.com/evidence/


He even has a million dollar challenge for those who think the evidence is not valid, so far James Randi has refused the challenge


http://www.victorzammit.com/skeptics/challenge.html

Answer 1

You also have the US government spending 20 million dollars on remote viewing research (out of body experiences that show the soul can live outside the body).



And this is what the United States government even concludes.



http://deanradin.blogspot.com/2009/09/skeptic-agrees-that-remote-viewing-is.html



In 1995, the US Congress asked two independent scientists to assess whether the $20 million that the government had spent on psychic research had produced anything of value. And the conclusions proved to be somewhat unexpected.



Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, discovered that remote viewers were correct 34 per cent of the time, a figure way beyond what chance guessing would allow.



She says: "Using the standards applied to any other area of science, you have to conclude that certain psychic phenomena, such as remote viewing, have been well established.



"The results are not due to chance or flaws in the experiments."



Atheists are to arrogant to admit what all normal people have known , that the evidence for the afterlife is too hard to ignore so they just stick to their retarded materialistic views despite science telling them its wrong. They are the chroma gonna of the modern age lol.

Answer 2

The challenge is BS because it s not possible to refute evidence when that evidence is something that happened in the past and we cannot go back in time to be present at the said manifestation of paranormal.



I will give you one example. Your website mentions the Scole report. I don t believe the Scole experiments were valid. But How can I prove the trickery without going back in time. Tell me how I can do that without a time machine ? All I can do is point to mistakes in the METHODOLOGY used by the investigators and that s it.



For example, do you think it was correct methodology that the experiments were done in the basement of the house of one of the mediums ?



For a correct setting, it was the INVESTIGATORS who should have chosen the setting. By accepting the medium s house, the mediums had FULL CONTROL of it if they used tricks.



Was it normal that the mediums refused to allow any video ? Refused any night vision goggles while the experiment was done in complete darkness ?



The mediums wore phosphorescent bracelets so that " You can see our hands stay in one place " Was it normal that the bracelets were supplied by the mediums and not by the investigators ?



The report says they made photographic images appear on film that was in a closed box. Was it normal that the mediums supplied that box and not the investigators ?



One investigator found that box was very easy to open even when padlocked. Where is his comment about that ? Buried somewhere.



Etc etc. I can point to those mistakes of methodology



But I cannot prove TRICKERY without being THERE at that time in the PAST



So there is not a chance in hell to win the million dollars and it s BS.

Answer 3

from the Link>>Finally we had the amazing good fortune of being able to talk directly to people who had died many years ago who came back in fully materialized form. These included our loved ones- my sister and my wife’s father. We were able to hear and record their voices touch them and shake their hands. We were able to talk to them about things that had happened while they were alive.





Ok..Now This PROVES Beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Guy Is LOONY TOON INSANE!



I hope his Previous legal clients sue him for Incompetence'

Answer 4

I'd be a little more impressed if a scientist presented such "evidence".



Lawyers aren't renowned for their respect of the truth.

Answer 5

If it's objective and repeatable, why isn't it in peer-reviewed journals backed up by people who repeated the experiments and got the same objective results?



Pointing to his own video and website is just wanking.

Answer 6

I found this page interesting, as I had an NDE when I was very young. http://www.victorzammit.com/evidence/nde.htm However, nothing of what is on that page happened to me!



When I was a toddler I was concussed, breaking my collar-bone, and was taken to hospital. I was too young to remember anything after hitting the ground (though I have a clear memory of the events leading up to the fall). But one of my earliest memories was of looking down on planet earth from being way out in the universe. The blackness of the universe contrasted sharply with the colour of earth and I was a great distance away from it. Linking me was a thin silvery thread or cord that curved from my left side down, down, down, back to earth. That dream-like snap-shot memory didn't make any sense. Until I was much older.



Despite parental teaching that there is nothing after death - no soul, no awareness - I noticed what Ecclesiastes chapter 12 says about the silver cord being broken at death, and our spirits returning to God, who gave them. I now realise that I was on my way back to God - my spirit had left my toddler body in the hospital. But it clearly wasn't my time, so I was brought back. Don't forget - this was when I was no more than a toddler - in the early 1950s, decades before out-of-body experiences were of popular interest, before satellites were orbiting earth sending back photos in November 1959, before we even had a black and white TV in our home. How could a toddler know she lived on a planet that looked like that, from outer space? And where in all creation would she 'know' about that silver cord?



In Dr. Raymond Moody's documentary, Life After Life, he interviewed a Russian scientist named Rev. George Rodonaiaa, who had a near-death experience during which he observed an infant crying in a nearby room. George observed that no one could figure out why the infant was crying so persistently. But George learned while out of his body that the infant had a broken arm. When George returned to life, he told the infant's parents about the broken arm. An x-ray revealed that the infant's arm was indeed broken. This is also documented in Dr. Melvin Morse's book (along with Paul Perry), Transformed by the Light. The first link from "Transformed by the Light" describes George's observation of this infant while he was out of his body. Note that in Dr. Morse's book, he refers to George by his Russian name "Yuri".



In conclusion, I think it is intellectual snobbery for people to disdain anyone speaking on this subject just because they are in the legal profession and not the scientific one. It is the job of lawyers to investigate evidence and to find holes in what is presented as fact. So, all you science-supporters - what are the 'holes' in my personal experience? Do tell me.

Answer 7

Hi Liam!



Yes, I have heard about this before - you have posted references to it many times.



I refer the honourable Liam to the answers I gave earlier...

Answer 8

I stopped watching after he said about hearing voices in tape recorders.

Answer 9

It's only evidence if it agrees with my preexisting worldview. I spit on your scholarly reviews by non-skeptics.

Answer 10

I have no doubts about an after-life. I lived in a haunted house. I do not believe in god. I believe that we are all eternal creatures and that WE are that which many call God