Question:
If you were one of "The Twelve,"* who would you be?
Chichiri
2007-09-04 16:22:03 UTC
*The Twelve were Jesus' 12 chosen disciples. The apostle Paul was not part of that original group, niether was Luke. They were converted much later.
21 answers:
salamander492
2007-09-12 07:09:03 UTC
I think probably John since Revelation was given to him, that would have been an incredible vision which we still struggle today to put into modern descriptive. Plus he died of old age in exile and was not martyred that is a positive.
anonymous
2007-09-12 16:09:41 UTC
Hi..and good morning...I would have to be the odd ball even though scholars don't recognize this certain individual as one of the 'Twelve' and say Mary Magdalene. Who knows...maybe the Scholars and 'others' alike who decided what Books and Scriptures to place in the Bible deleted the idea that Mary was a disciple of Christ. Because she was a woman. Have a very blessed day!
Patti R
2007-09-04 23:37:47 UTC
I identify more with Mary or Martha (Lazarus' sisters) than the apostles who were all men. Some days I feel more like Mary - wanting just to sit at His feet and listen; some days I feel more like Martha with so much to do, there doesn't seem to be enough time to sit at His feet.



Asked to identify with one of "the twelve" - I would probably most closely identify with Thomas - he doubted, but then, when shown the miracle and the blood shed for him, he believed.



I believe. God bless.
anonymous
2007-09-11 21:14:17 UTC
Peter, he had a passion to preach the gospel and build the foundation but had a knack for messing up, - and hed be the FIRST one to cut you if you were rolling up on jesus too fast ! sounds allot like me. without the whole denying thing ofcourse, and the unmarried virgin part ! ♥

LINDA - YOU ARE WRONG ON A TRILLION DIFFERENT LEVELS !!! READ YOUR BIBLE MORE OFTEN IT MIGHT HELP YOU

nishanth - that was so not an answer to the question and it takes up the whole dern page, thumbs down dude very uncool
Linda B
2007-09-11 13:55:26 UTC
If I could choose I would be Mary, the disciple whom Christ loved the most and kissed on the lips often. Yes I know this is not a popular answer, but I can only answer as I believe.

Peace
Iconoclast
2007-09-12 13:54:17 UTC
Doubting Thomas.
alikij
2007-09-10 20:41:09 UTC
I like Peter. I'd be more likely to use a baseball bat than a sword, but I can definitely see myself putting up a fight. I can also see myself saying the wrong thing and regretting it almost immediately.
thundercatt9
2007-09-04 23:27:51 UTC
Peter ... The outgoing stuff a foot in the mouth one. Then again I hope I reach the maturity he shows later in life in his epistles. Also, I believe seeing the ups and downs and ups in Peter's life gives hope to Christians who are distressed at failure in their Christian walk. Actually the focus should be on Jesus and the way He dealt with Peter - very comforting.
airlines charge for the seat.
2007-09-12 13:14:43 UTC
God's beloved disciple, John.
anonymous
2007-09-04 23:43:33 UTC
I'd be James the brother of John. I've got a temper, I'm tellin' ya, man! Plus, I love the sea...
Elfchic
2007-09-04 23:33:08 UTC
I'm thinking .. John?



I like the fact that he really focused on loving one another. ThoughI think the others did too.



But I cant relate to him being the one who wrote teh revelation--I dont have much prophetic vision type stuff.
Emissary
2007-09-05 00:54:32 UTC
I would be Peter. As a great many of us are. True to a fault until we see our own life is in danger.
oneness_bc
2007-09-12 03:55:57 UTC
Peter...I tend to react strongly (and the Lord often has to chastize me later :o) ). I feel that there is nothing that I can not do if he Lord is in it (even walk on water if He bids me)
keri gee
2007-09-04 23:34:34 UTC
I would probably be Peter, eager and a little too impulsive, would love greatly and mess up just as bad.
anonymous
2007-09-09 09:08:53 UTC
I think you are mistaken but to answer. I'd probably be Thomas . I haven't been easy to convince.
anonymous
2007-09-04 23:36:59 UTC
I would probably be more like Thomas. I question everything.
Dethklok
2007-09-04 23:26:46 UTC
Blitzen
anonymous
2007-09-12 22:52:13 UTC
GREEN LANTERN!
anonymous
2007-09-04 23:38:48 UTC
Chocolate glazed.



Oh, I thought you meant donuts.
222 Sexy
2007-09-04 23:26:49 UTC
I'm torn between "Doc" and "Sleepy".
anonymous
2007-09-11 13:09:05 UTC
The Twelve Apostles (Ἀπόστολος, apostolos) were men who, according to the Synoptic Gospels and Christian tradition, were chosen from among the disciples (students) of Jesus for a mission. According to the Bauer lexicon, Walter Bauer's Greek-English Lexicon of the NT: "...Judaism had an office known as apostle (שליח)". In Islam, the Qur'an called The Twelve Apostles "الحواريون".



The Gospel of Mark states that Jesus initially sent out these twelve in pairs (Mark 6:7-13, cf. Matthew 10:5-42,Luke 9:1-6), to towns in Galilee. Literal readings of the text state that their initial instructions were to heal the sick and drive out demons, and in the Gospel of Matthew to raise the dead, but some scholars read this more metaphorically as instructions to heal the spiritually sick and thus to drive away wicked behaviour. They are also instructed to: "take nothing for their journey, except a mere staff — no bread, no bag, no money in their belt — but to wear sandals; and He added, "Do not put on two tunics." (NASB), and that if any town rejects them they ought to shake the dust off their feet as they leave, a gesture which some scholars think was meant as a contemptuous threat (Miller 26). Their carrying of just a staff (Matthew and Luke say not even a staff) is sometimes given as the reason for the use by Christian Bishops of a staff of office, in those denominations that believe they maintain an apostolic succession.



Later in the Gospel narratives the Twelve Apostles are described as having been commissioned to preach the Gospel to the world, regardless of whether Jew or Gentile. Although the Apostles are portrayed as having been Galilean Jews, and 10 of their names are Aramaic, the other 4 names are Greek[1], suggesting a more metropolitan background. That the Twelve Apostles and others closest to Jesus were all Jewish Christians is clearly implied by Jesus’ statement that his mission is directed only to those of the house of Israel (Matthew 15:24) and by the fact that only after the death of Jesus did the apostles agree with Paul that the teaching of the gospel could be extended to uncircumcised Gentiles (Acts 15:1-31, Galatians 2:7-9, Acts 1:4-8, Acts 10:1-11:18).



According to the list occurring in each Synoptic Gospels (Mark 3:13-19, Matthew 10:1-4, Luke 6:12-16), the Twelve chosen by Jesus near the beginning of his ministry, those whom also He named Apostles, were:

Simon: called Peter (Grk. petros, petra; Aram. kēf; Engl. rock) by Jesus, also known as Simon bar Jonah and Simon bar Jochanan (Aram.) and earlier (Pauline Epistles were written first) Cephas (Aram.) by Paul of Tarsus and Simon Peter, a fisherman from Bethsaida "of Galilee" (John 1:44; cf. 12:21)

Andrew: brother of Peter, a Bethsaida fisherman and disciple of John the Baptist, and also the First-Called Apostle

James and

John: sons of Zebedee, called by Jesus Boanerges (an Aramaic name explained in Mk 3:17 as "Sons of Thunder")

Philip: from Bethsaida "of Galilee" (John 1:44, 12:21)

Bartholomew: in Aramaic "bar-Talemai?", "son of Talemai" or from Ptolemais, sometimes identified with the Nathanael of John 1:45-1:51.

Thomas: also known as Judas Thomas Didymus - Aramaic T'oma' = twin, and Greek Didymous = twin

James, son of Alphaeus: commonly identified with James the Less. Sometimes also identified with James the Just[2]

Matthew: the tax collector, some identify with Levi son of Alphaeus

Simon the Canaanite: called in Luke and Acts "Simon the Zealot", some identify with Simeon of Jerusalem, which others dispute on the grounds that Simeon was described at the time of Jesus' birth some thirty years before, as an old man not far from death. [3]

Judas Iscariot: the name Iscariot may refer to the Judaean towns of Kerioth or to the sicarii (Jewish nationalist insurrectionists), or to Issachar. Also referred to (e.g. at John 6:71 and 13:26) as "Judas, the son of Simon". He was replaced as an apostle in Acts by Matthias.

The identity of the other apostle of the twelve, traditionally called St. Jude, varies between the Synoptic Gospels and also between ancient manuscripts of each gospel: Mark names him as Thaddaeus; Different manuscripts of Matthew identify him as either Thaddeus or Lebbaeus (some later Latin manuscripts name him "Judas the Zealot", but this is regarded as an unlikely reading); Luke names him as Judas, son of James (translated in the KJV as: "Judas the brother of James" Luke 6:16).



The Gospel of John, unlike the Synoptic Gospels, does not offer a formal list of apostles, but does refer to the Twelve in 6:67, 6:70, and 6:71. The following ten apostles are identified by name:

Peter

Andrew (identified as Peter's brother)

the sons of Zebedee (plural form implies at least two apostles)

Philip

Nathanael

Thomas (also called Didymus (11:16, 20:24, 21:2))

Judas Iscariot

Judas (not Iscariot) (14:22)



The individual that the Gospel of John names as Nathanael is traditionally identified as the same person that the Synoptic Gospels call Bartholomew, and most would agree that the sons of Zebedee is likely to be a reference to James the Great and John, while Judas (not Iscariot) probably refers to Thaddaeus, also known as St. Jude. Noticeably missing from the Gospel of John are James, son of Alphaeus, Matthew, and Simon the Canaanite/Zealot. James the Just was, according to the Book of Acts, the leader of the Jerusalem church, and Matthew is noticeably the most Jewish of the Gospels, and it may be the case that the author of John deliberately left out these two figures for a motive opposed to Jewish Christianity. By the second century, the presence of two Simons in the list of the Synoptic Gospels allowed a case to be made for Simon Magus being the other of the Simons, and hence one of the twelve apostles; and it may have been for this reason that John left the other Simon out. The second Simon may also have been Simeon of Jerusalem, the second leader of the Jerusalem church, after James.



The three Synoptic Gospels record the circumstances in which some of the disciples were recruited, Matthew only describing the recruitment of Simon & Andrew and James & John. All three Synoptic Gospels state that these four were recruited fairly soon after Jesus returned from being tempted by the devil.



Simon and Andrew are, according to Matthew, the first two Apostles to be appointed, and Matthew identifies them as fishermen. Mark does not identify Simon as also being called Peter until a long time after Simon is introduced in the narrative, but Matthew immediately makes the connection as soon as he is first mentioned. This has the effect of changing the later passage where Jesus names Simon as Peter from one where Jesus bestows the name onto Simon into one where Jesus merely starts using a long held nickname. Both Andrew and Peter are names of Greek origins, which France sees as a reflection on the multicultural nature of Galilee at this time, although evidence exists that Andrew was used by Jews as a name since at least 169 BC in the early period of Hellenic influence. (It is also notable that Peter is identified by Paul in his letters as Cephas, which is the Aramaic equivalent of the Greek Peter, both words meaning "rock"). Simon however is the Greek form of the Hebrew name Shimeon, a common Jewish name found referring to several other individuals in contemporary works such as Josephus as well as in the Old Testament.



Despite Jesus only briefly requesting that they join him, the two are described as immediately consenting, and abandoning their nets to do so. Traditionally the immediacy of their consent was viewed as an example of divine power, although this statement isn't made in the text itself. The alternative and much more ordinary solution is that Jesus was simply friends with the individuals beforehand, as implied by the Gospel of John, which states that Andrew and an unnamed other had been a disciple of John the Baptist, and started following Jesus as soon as Jesus had been baptized. As a carpenter (Mark 6:3), it is eminently plausible for Jesus to have been employed to build and repair fishing vessels, thus having many opportunities to interact with and befriend such fishermen.



Albright and Mann extrapolate from Simon and Andrew abandonment's of their nets, that Matthew is emphasizing the importance of renunciation by converting to Christianity, since fishing was profitable, though required large start-up costs, and abandoning everything would have been an important sacrifice. Regardless, Simon and Andrew's abandonment of what were effectively their most important worldly possessions was taken as a model by later Christian ascetics.



Matthew describes Jesus meeting James and John, also fishermen and brothers, very shortly after recruiting Simon and Andrew. While Matthew identifies James and John as sons of Zebedee, who is also present in their ship, Mark makes no such proclamation (Mark does in Mark 1:19). Luke adds to Matthew and Mark that James and John worked as a team with Simon and Andrew. Matthew states that at the time of the encounter, James and John were repairing their nets, but readily joined Jesus without hesitation. This parallels the accounts of Mark and Luke, but Matthew implies that the men have also abandoned their father (since he is present in the ship they abandon behind them), and Carter feels this should be interpreted to mean that Matthew's view of Jesus is one of a figure rejecting the traditional patriarchal structure of society, where the father had command over his children; most scholars, however, just interpret it to mean that Matthew intended these two to be seen as even more devoted than the other pair.



The synoptics go on to describe that much later, after Jesus had later begun his ministry, Jesus noticed, while teaching, a tax collector in his booth. The tax collector, Levi according to some Gospels, Matthew according to others, is asked by Jesus to become one of his disciples. Matthew/Levi is stated to have accepted and then invited Jesus for a meal with his friends. Tax collectors were seen as villains in Jewish society, and the Pharisees are described by the synoptics as asking Jesus why he is having a meal with such disreputable people. The reply Jesus gives to this is now well known: it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners (Mark 2:17).


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...