Atheists, what do you believe in?
1.)The bible doesn't exist
2.)suffocation=Evolution
3.)Things fall because of science
4.)All Atheists created mankind.
You Atheists tend to suffer from a rare, more aggressive form of unwanted self-importance. Atheists typically think they are smarted than everyone else, no matter what. Just trying to correct one of you on something, you better be prepared to be blasted away with some serious ******* logic. Many of you exhibit very serious cases of a persecution complex, believing that Secret Christian Anonymous Terrorists (SCAT) are trying to eradicate them by putting the word "God" in things.
Many of you atheists generally suffer under the delusion that religion somehow is the cause of all conflict and that it is directly responsible for every war and murder that has ever occurred in history. Yet many of you fail to realize that, with or without religion, there will always be stupid people in the world who will fervently believe anything they read.
Generally all atheists are Liberals, or Libertarians with serious superiority complexes who are often willing to argue with anyone, especially Christians. Atheists tend to gripe about how religious people say that they can't be moral. But if they don't believe in anything, why do they care about morality?
The truth is, Atheist's don't have morals. Given the chance they would rape and kill every member of your family, just because they have no morals. Atheist dictators have killed millions of people over the past century, because, you know, mass murder is the inevitable result when a community becomes too intolerant of outlandish dogmas and too fond of critical thinking.
The truth is- Atheists only get their knowledge of the Bible only by searching "bible contradictions" on Google.
Evolution has been disproven. Natural selection comes from the environment, but is not random. OK, maybe its not entirely random, but consider what information is there in the environment, there's a night, there's a day, there's an up and there is a down. A few more simple things like this. The proposal that it is possible to extract more information from the environment is absurd. Do you propose an additional source of information? If so, then you are not an evolutionist anymore, as evolutionist dogma dictates nothing but random sources of information.
If you admit that information can be destroyed through mutations (say, one codon gets replaced with all A's, producing a dysfunctional but maybe surviving organism--I hope you will not argue that mutations are impossible!), then how can it not be created by a symmetric mutation? A one-time, random event, that survives and replicates due to the mechanics of the machine (DNA, cells) itself as well as the surrounding environment.