Perhaps. At least I'm willing to approach the question of the possibility of psychic/extrasensory powers objectively.
Many people believe that no psychic could possibly be real. They're basing their conclusion upon the absolutely *terrible* track record of self-proclaimed psychics who have scammed thousands of gullible people. Fake psychics can trick the gullible by stating generalizations that could apply to virtually anybody. For example, most people have experienced the death of a family member or friend within the last several years. Most adults are either married, in a relationship or recently got out of one. These fake psychics can pick up on subtle cues (e.g. a woman wearing a wedding band, body language) to gain the information needed to deceive the client into thinking that the psychic has real abilities and get that person to come back for additional readings and fork over even more money.
However, using this to claim as a certain conclusion that extrasensory powers do not exist is ultimately a "fallacy of composition."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition
What few skeptics know is that careful experiments have been carried out under scientifically controlled conditions which have found statistically significant evidence for "anomalous" powers of the mind.
http://deanradin.com/evidence/evidence.htm
http://www.irva.org/library/articles/
But it's certainly understandable that so many bad examples of self-proclaimed "psychics" have put this entire subject into serious disrepute as a field of legitimate investigation. I think it's unfortunate that fake psychics have done so much harm, as I'd like to see the topic of possible human extrasensory powers seriously investigated through carefully controlled scientific experimentation at universities and scientific research institutes.