Evolution is both fact and theory.
"How is there not one case of evolution happening in today?"
There are. Evolution is a continuous process, nothing stops evolving. It is an extremely slow process though.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
"Not even any mutants (as any proponent of evolution can tell you, for what to happen to us there must of been 1,000,000 "mutants" to every 1 where the evolution process actually went right)"
There have been plenty of mutants. Mutation is not the prime mechanism for evolution, natural selection is. Your ratio was probably pulled from someones ***.
EDIT: I have to address these points...
"To the poster below me that pulled this fact out of his hat.
* Over 99.8% of biologists and geologists accept evolution.
Where on earth did you get this figure? I have known one Bio Prof. at college (not a Christian College either) and a geologist who works at my local museum who don't believe in evolution whatsoever. They feel it requires more faith than most religions."
That percentage was probably exaggerated, but the point still stands. You will find more physicists that reject the theory of gravitation than biologists that reject the theory of evolution. Evolution is the basis of all modern biology. There is no faith needed to accept it, and all the evidence discovered so far has been in favor of it.
"* There are no alternative scientific theories.
Then he says that. There are plenty."
No there are none. ID and creationism are not scientific theories.
"* And zero evidence against it.
....Zero evidence against it? Really?
Even Charles Darwin purportedly denounced the theory of evolution as hogwash before he died. Even if its just purportedly there goes your "Zero" evidence. And there are many other things."
That is correct, there is no evidence against evolution. Darwin denouncing evolution is a lie made up by a creationist who wasn't at his deathbed. I can't remember her name, but you could probably find it with a 5 sec google search. Care to name some of those other things? Even if the point was valid, evolution stands on its own merit. Had Robert Koch renounced the germ theory of disease, would that mean that germs didn't exist and didn't cause diseases?