The question assumes that the questioner knows that Mormons are hated. I wonder if this knowledge was provided by "personal revelation" or "witness". This should be evidence enough that one should not rely on these emotional physiological sensations for acquiring knowledge or confirming ideas.
Mormons are not hated. The Mormon church is not held in high esteem by others than those who are blinded by their commitment to defend and promote the church.
I was an active Mormon for 21 years. A guilt ridden fearful "Jack Mormon" for another 35 years or so. I was so intimidated by the fear and guilt tactics of the church that , even after having serious doubts about church teachings for decades, I refused to trust my own thoughts and I would not research any independent sources of information about church history.
After 9/11, I decided that blindly supporting a questionable belief system was irresponsible. I was as capable of being manipulated by my religion as were the unfortunate Muslim hijackers who were influenced by their unquestioned support of radical Islam to murder thousands of innocent people. I felt that it was my duty to inform myself. I made a decision to find out for myself all the facts I could about the LDS church and resolve the conflicts between my own personal experience and the teachings of the church.
I have found information that enables me to conclude, with great peace of mind, that the Mormon church was just another fraud perpetrated by an ambitious man. It has enticed people to join by use of incomplete, and in some cases falsified, information. It has supplied (and continues to provide) a greatly sanitized (altered) version of it's own history to potential converts. When I consider that the church requires great financial contributions from it's members, and uses false information and high pressure emotional cooertion to encourage members to contribute, I must conclude that morality in the church organization is severely lacking.
No, I don't hate Mormons. I understand Mormons. For many years I was a Mormon. I thought as they do and was influenced to support the church, just as they still are. A large part of my family still suffers under the oppression of the church, so I don't have much respect for the institution.
The interesting thing about Motmonism is the extent it has changed from the days of it's founder, Joseph Smith. If he were alive today, he would be excommunicated if he chose to practice his version of Mormonism. He claimed to have restored Christs church in it's "correct" form. Now the current temple rituals resemble less the rituals JS "restored" than do the original rituals of the Masons (the apparent source of Smith's rituals)
Smith clearly taught, in the "King Follet Discourse", that God, himself, was once a man on a planet similar to ours, who was faithful and has progressed to become a god over his own worlds. However, present day faithful members took no notice when Gordon Hinkley, their beloved "Prophet Seer and Revelator", admitted on National television that he didn't know if we teach that God was once a man, that he didn't know much about that. Such is the influence the church has on the minds of it devotees. Do not question the words of the leaders. Do not compare their conflicting teachings. If something seems amiss, assume that it must be your own flawed understanding, and simply "put the matter on the shelf" and assume that the conflict will be resolved, eventually in favor of the Church's position. I am embarrassed to realize that as devoted Mormons, we are capable of functioning with half our brains switched "off".
NO, I don't hate Mormons. I do, however, hope for their liberation from the mind control organization that I view the LDS church to be.