Question:
do creationist know what homo habilis is?
Zachary
2011-06-02 14:50:34 UTC
rephrase of an earlier question. i ask because i have yet to see a creationist that does not think evolution claims that we have evolved from monkeys or chimps
Ten answers:
coolguy
2011-06-02 15:37:34 UTC
It's a common ancestor, not necessarily monkeys or chimps. Also, it's a hominid. Now, i understand that, i researched it, do i accept it? not necessarily.
anonymous
2011-06-02 15:00:49 UTC
Homo Habilis is a hominid discovered in Tanzania by Louis Leaky, a famous Physical Anthropologist/Archeologists who is known for hiring females on his major studies (he hired Jane Goodall)



This Hominid is supposed to have existed around 1.5 million years ago, and is known for making some of the first stone tools (as is Homo Erectus).



Those are some of the main points about this hominid. Homo Habilis is a fairly recent discovery (discovered in the year 2000) and not much is known about it. At least not yet anyways.



Either way, homo erectus is my favorite hominid.
?
2011-06-02 14:55:12 UTC
Homo habilis is a well-known, but poorly defined species. The specimen that led to the naming of this species (OH 7) was discovered in 1960, by the Leakey team in Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.
Gabby Little Angel
2011-06-02 15:02:02 UTC
I had to Google it. I would like to know who had that camera 2,000,000 years ago to get the photos of it. Apparently you guys are so good that you even know what color its fur/hair was and how long it was!



Should we go over the difference between evidence and interpretation one more time?





Do evolutionist know that before the global catastrophic flood that brought judgment on the earth, that man lived to be hundreds of years old? Given the fact that the skull of a child is different than that of a twenty year old, and a twenty year old is different than that of an eighty year old, have you considered what the skull of a man might look like that lived to be 800 or 900 years old? The brow bone would continue to grow.....

Oh, too much info all at once.



The earth, being less than 6000 years old, could not have supported homo habilis 2,000,000 years ago. Therefore, we don't believe your dating methods, or your theories.



Jesus Christ is Lord!
latz
2016-11-19 08:57:26 UTC
Why do you ***** and make contact with call those have not got faith in evolution, yet you your self instruct little or no tolerance for their ideals? Evolution has no longer been shown to have occured the form you need us to have faith, thats a certainty. The Christians can counter with one thousand's of testamonials, written in stone, in case you will, on the existence, loss of existence, and ressurection of Christ. you would be able to do the holiday, or study your self in case you like. you're able to quit attempting to be one in all those bully which comprise your ideals, in spite of everything you in uncomplicated terms have historic bones to talk to your theories, and the Christians have written eyewitness bills and a few exceedingly precise prophesies , like it or no longer. quit being so condecendent and take a check out being extra open on your thinking, human beings would be extra apt to pay attention. technology demands a thoroughly open strategies on all fronts no count if that's to discover the reality by using study. australopithecines shouldn't additionally be on your argument, as any scientist assist you to comprehend that that's an ape (historic) and is basically used as a comparitive against the Homo in study. As as much as now no direct info of a species "bounce" could be substantiated, there is not any info, era. i might somewhat ask that we attempt and notice the link between if any, creation and evolution, in my view i think of that's the place the massive solutions would lie. That being reported if evolution could learn in colleges then creationism could learn too. To the only above me, lacking information. made frequently,- A certainty is definitive , conclusions have been made. you recognize thinking the artwork being completed in physics( quantum) why might a Theorem in technology be any much less valid then Theorem of say, an "smart layout" . quit being so indignant approximately somebody elses ideals and take a check out listening and discovering as much as you are able to approximately each others ideals. detect ALL opportunities, and enable others do a similar, what do you're able to lose, cutting-edge all aspects. TED : WHY do no longer you prefer to cutting-edge the two aspects at school?
Kuma Ninotori
2011-06-02 15:06:20 UTC
No, but I really don't care either. I have yet to come across any "evidence" or theories, or hypothesis, or any thing of the kind that suddenly destroys my faith in God.



Don't waste your short lives trying to convince us friends, by the time any of us really know the truth, we'll be dead, and wont be able to tell anyone anyway.
anonymous
2011-06-02 14:52:47 UTC
It's probably best not to use the word homo around creationists.
Hal Roach
2011-06-02 14:52:00 UTC
Heck, most creationists don't even know basic stuff like the difference between the terms "hypothesis" and "theory". People should at least know science at the middle-school level before they tackle hominid fossil study.



Regardless, creationists dismiss all hominid fossils as being either "just ape" fossils, "deformed human" fossils, or non-existent.
mike
2011-06-02 15:15:57 UTC
Us stupid creationists are soooo lucky we have you genius evolutionists to straighten us out. If you didn't know everything, I don't know what we'd do.
ozarkcabin
2011-06-02 15:19:53 UTC
do evolutionist know what homo habilis is? they still argue over it.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...