How come evolutionist need Christians prove that God exists?

Question

in order to justify their so-called scientific based evolution myth.

Do scientist need for Christians to prove that God exists to prove that H20 = water

You seem to forget that religion is based on faith, but science is supposed to be based on proven probability lab facts and observation.

Answer 1

Simple, Atheists get frustrated when they are faced with having to prove evolution, which is kind of dumb, because they should be able to just cite facts and proven observed studies, you know science. But, evolutionist like most scientist are dumb. I mean really, it took scientist, according to them, over 200,000 years to prove the theory of gravity. It would seem that one of these great scientist would have dropped a boulder and a tree branch along time ago and proven that theory back when allegedly only woman walked the earth, some 200,000 years ago. Obviously, evolutionist do not believe in lesbianism, because woman evolved into heterosexuality, man and woman. This stuff is just too funny.

Answer 2

. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘". . . . . . . . . .``~.,

. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."-.,

. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ":,

. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,

. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}

. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}

. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:". . . ./

. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./

. . . . . . . /__.(. . ."~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./

. . . . . . /(_. . "~,_. . . .."~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/

. . . .. .{.._$;_. . ."=,_. . . ."-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~"; /. .. .}

. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . ."=-._. . .";,,./`. . /" . . . ./. .. ../

. . . .. . .\`~,. . .."~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../

. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-"

. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\

. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__

,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,

. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\

. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`\ c



"Evolutionists" don't need anything... We have all the evidence we need...



Atheists demand that ALL THEISTS provide evidence of existence because all they have is nonsense and mental illness to back up their bigotry and attempted oppression of all others.



☰ ☮ ♥ ☯♫ ☀ ∞ ≈ ☮ ♥ ☯♫ ☀ ∞ ≈☮ ♥ ☯♫ ≈ ☀ ∞ ☰

1. You can't prove that something doesn't exist, that's illogical.

2. Therefore, the burden of proof/evidence is on the believers in god.

3. There is no proof/evidence of god.



You can decide for yourself which one of these you believe:



a) There is no evidence of god existing , but we cannot prove that he doesn't exist so we must place him on the "we don't know list", Since we cannot prove that fairies and dragons aren't real either, we must also place them on the "We don't know list". Anything that I make up off the top of my head must also be placed on this list simply because you cannot prove that it doesn't exist. Therefore there is no such thing as non-existence.



b) Fairies, dragons, unicorns, UFOs, Santa, etc. are regarded as non-existent because there is no indisputable evidence of their existence. God should be labeled non-existent for the very same reason.



You decide which is more logical.

☰ ☮ ♥ ☯♫ ☀ ∞ ≈ ☮ ♥ ☯♫ ☀ ∞ ≈☮ ♥ ☯♫ ≈ ☀ ∞ ☰

Answer 3

"in order to justify their so-called scientific based evolution myth."

LuLz... you're funny.



"If the belief in God were natural, there would be no need to teach it.

Children would possess it as well as adults, the layman as the priest, the heathen as much as the missionary.

We don't have to teach the general elements of human nature--the five senses, seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and feeling. They are universal; so would religion be if it were natural, but it is not.

On the contrary, it is an interesting and demonstrable fact, that all children are atheists, and were religion not inculcated into their minds they would remain so.

Even as it is, they are great skeptics, until made sensible of the potent weapon by which religion has ever been propagated, namely, fear--fear of the lash of public opinion here, and of a jealous, vindictive God hereafter.

No; there is no religion in human nature, nor human nature in religion.

It is purely artificial, the result of education, while atheism is natural, and, were the human mind not perverted and bewildered by the mysteries and follies of superstition, would be universal."

Ernestine Rose, in A Defense of Atheism, 1878



See that year again?

1878...



Atheism is NOT a new phenomena...

~

Answer 4

Evolution neither proves nor disproves a author/god. i'm no longer sensible that it may or that that's even a objective of evolution. in spite of the indisputable fact that creationism tries very hard to interject a author/god into it truly is hypothesis. that's between the subjects I really have with creationism. If we do no longer have a clinical explination then we merely interject a author/god into the lacking link. this does no longer artwork because at the same time as technological awareness finally does have an answer does this disprove a author/god? Or if technological awareness not in any respect has an answer does this nevertheless coach a author/god exsists? i do no longer imagine so... i imagine that Gensis shows evolution in it writings. i imagine that the early jews or maybe the different historic religions could have had this theory of evolution yet did not understand a thanks to precise it completely without using a author/god. i could say that the exsistance of a author/god merely isn't wide-spread by utilising the human inhabitants except really one of two issues happen... the first is this being is composed of us together and tells us all an identical element and there is a few style of global huge peace and acceptance of this being. Or a human dies... after we die we can all understand the reality. If we see this being and bypass to "heaven or hell" then we can do not ignore that the religions were suitable. If in spite of the indisputable fact that we glide off into nothingness .. properly we wont no something can we.

Answer 5

Nobody needs some god myth to be proven to support the fact of evolution.

Answer 6

If you stop dishonestly claiming to have proof, we'll stop asking for it. Deal?



> evolution myth



* Evolution is very much a fact.



* The theory of evolution is a theory - just like atomic theory, gravity theory, and the germ theory of disease. The word "theory" has a very specific meaning in a scientific context: THE THEORY EXPLAINS THE FACTS. See http://www.notjustatheory.com/



* Creationism is not a theory; it's an assertion with zero evidence to support it.



* Over 99.8% of biologists and geologists accept evolution.



* There are no alternative scientific theories.



* There is a huge amount of evidence in support of evolution...



* And zero evidence against it.



* The "debate" is actually educated people trying to educate others.



* The "debate" only happens in backward places like Turkey and parts of the united states.



* There are two types of creationists: professionals who make money from books, lectures and such, and knowingly make false claims - and followers who accept those claims without understanding them.



* The basics of evolution: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/



* Examples of ridiculous creationist anti-science: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=AC3481305829426D



* Examples of creationist quote mining (like quoting part of a scientists' sentence to make it sound like he's saying something completely different): http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/project.html



* Scientific American's 15 answers to creationist nonsense: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=15-answers-to-creationist



* The evolutionary tree: http://www.dhushara.com/book/evol/trevol.jpg



* Hominid species: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/species.html



* Transitional fossils: http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html



* A comprehensive list of evolution resources: http://sensuouscurmudgeon.wordpress.com/list-o-links/

Answer 7

Evolutionists don't need Christians to prove anything. Atheists need Christians to prove God exists, if Christians want their religion to receive any favor from the government (i.e. creationism being taught in public schools).

Answer 8

Really? The atmosphere on Jupiter is known from lab tests???

Answer 9

You seem to forget how idiotic it is to accept something on faith. Why aren't you a Muslim, Buddhist or Jew? How do you know your god is the right god?

Answer 10

'Cause we ain't suckers.



I separated water into hydrogen and oxygen in high school. It's pretty easy to prove. So what do you got?????

Answer 11

What are you on about?



No "evolutionist" needs a Christian myth for anything.

Answer 12

Obvious troll is obvious.

Answer 13

What...are...you...talking about? I don't even know which side you're on : I

Answer 14

What?

Answer 15

Um....try that again in English please.