Defending the truth
2008-12-21 23:18:38 UTC
It is funny, every-time you guys try to make an analogy to the Christian God, it always fails. Even your, oh so loved, FSM has been refuted. But we are talking about the invisible pink unicorns. Like seriously, you guys always stick up for science and then you make a major physics error in saying INVISIBLE PINK unicorns...
I am just being a friendly Christian, and trying to help you stop embarrassing yourself. So please stop using the invisible pink unicorn argument because it is just fallacious from the outset.
Are you still going to use invisible pink unicorn argument after this, or are you going to drop the pink part, so it makes a little more sense?