Question:
How can we deny that Prophet Muhammad was mentioned in the bible?
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:12:18 UTC
MUHAMMAD'S MIGRATION FROM MECCA TO MEDINA:
PROPHECIED IN THE BIBLE?

Habakkuk 3:3 speaks of God (God's help) coming from Te'man (an Oasis North of Medina according to J. Hasting's Dictionary of the Bible), and the holy one (coming) from Paran. That holy one who under persecution migrated from Paran (Mecca) to be received enthusiastically in Medina was none but prophet Muhammad.
Indeed the incident of the migration of the prophet and his persecuted followers is vividly described in Isaiah 21:13-17. That section foretold as well about the battle of Badr in which the few ill-armed faithful miraculously defeated the "mighty" men of Ke'dar, who sought to destroy Islam and intimidate their own folks who turned -to Islam.



THE QUR'AN (KORAN) FORETOLD IN THE BIBLE?

For twenty-three years, God's words (the Qur'an) were truely put into Muhammad's mouth. He was not the "author" of the Qur'an. The Qur'an was dictated to him by Angel Gabriel who asked Muhammad to simply repeat the words of the Qur'an as he heard them. These words were then committed to memory and to writing by those who hear them during Muhammad's life time and under his supervision.

Was it a coincidence that the prophet "like unto Moses" from the "brethren" of the Israelites (i.e. from the lshmaelites) was also described as one in whose mouth God will put his words and that he will speak in the name of God, (Deuteronomy 18:18-20). Was it also a coincidence the "Paraclete" that Jesus foretold to come after Him was described as one who "shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak (John 16:13)

Was it another coincidence that Isaiah ties between the messenger connected with Ke'dar and a new song (a scripture in a new language) to be sang unto the Lord (Isaiah 42:10-11). More explicitly, prophesies Isaiah "For with stammering lips, and another tongue, will he speak to this people" (Isaiah 28:11). This latter verse correctly describes the "stammering lips" of Prophet Muhammad reflecting the state of tension and concentration he went through at the time of revelation. Another related point is that the Qur'an was revealed in piece-meals over a span of twenty three years. It is interesting to compare this with Isaiah 28:10 whichspeaks of the same thing.



THAT PROPHET- PARACLETE- MUHAMMAD

Up to the time of Jesus (peace be upon him), the Israelites were still awaiting for that prophet like unto Moses prophecied in Deuteronomy 18:18. When John the Baptist came, they asked him if he was Christ and he said "no". They asked him if he was Elias and he said "no". Then, in apparent reference to Deuteronomy 18:18, they asked him "Art thou that Prophet" and he answered, "no". (John 1: 1 9-2 1).

In the Gospel according to John (Chapters 14, 15, 16) Jesus spoke of the "Paraclete" or comforter who will come after him, who will be sent by Father as another Paraclete, who will teach new things which the contemporaries of Jesus could not bear. While the Paraclete is described as the spirit of truth, (whose meaning resemble Muhammad's famous title Al-Amin, the trustworthy), he is identified in one verse as the Holy Ghost (John 14:26). Such a designation is however inconsistent with the profile of that Paraclete. In the words of the Dictionary of the Bible, (Ed. J. Mackenzie) "These items, it must be admitted do not give an entirely coherent picture."

Indeed history tells us that many early Christians understood the Paraclete to be a man and not a spirit. This might explain the followings who responded to some who claimed, without meeting the criteria stipulated by Jesus, to be the awaited "Paraciete".

It was Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) who was the Paraclete, Comforter, helper, admonisher sent by God after Jesus. He testified of Jesus, taught new things which could not be borne at Jesus' time, he spoke what he heard (revelation), he dwells with the believers (through his well-preserved teachings). Such teachings will remain forever because he was the last messenger of God, the only Universal Messenger to unite the whole of humanity under God and on the path of PRESERVED truth. He told of many things to come which "came to pass" in the minutest detail meeting, the criterion given by Moses to distinguish between the true prophet and the false prophets (Deuteronomy 18:22). He did reprove the world of sin, of righteousness and of judgement (John 16:8-11)



WAS THE SHIFT OF RELIGIOUS LEADERSHIP PROPHECIED?

Following the rejection of the last Israelite prophet, Jesus, it was about time that God's promise to make Ishmael a great nation be fulfilled (Genesis 21:13, 18)

In Matthew 21:19-21, Jesus spoke of the fruitless fig tree (A Biblical symbol of prophetic heritage) to be cleared after being given a last chance of three years (the duration of Jesus' ministry) to give fruit. In a later verse in the same chapter, Jesus said: "Therefore, say I unto you, The Kingdom of God shall be taken away from
Sixteen answers:
DS
2008-11-19 12:18:01 UTC
How long did you spend writing all of this? You could have been doing something productive with your life during that time, but instead you were writing an essay to spread hate.
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:27:46 UTC
Believe what you like but have you considered that the best prophets make their predictions after the events take place? Do we really know when that stuff was written? Have you considered that people read into the scriptures what they want to see?



The evidence that Muhammad was Jesus' "comforter" is pretty thin.
Suzanne: YPA
2008-11-19 12:25:52 UTC
This should be several different questions, so I'll just answer the first one.



"Teman" was a city to the south of the land of Canaan in what used to be called "Edom," which is called Jordan today; conversely, Medina is in Saudi Arabia. Confirmation that Teman is in Edom is found at Jeremiah 49:7, which reads:



"7 Against Edom.

Thus says the LORD of hosts:



“ Is wisdom no more in Teman?

Has counsel perished from the prudent?

Has their wisdom vanished?"



Secondly, when Habakkuk wrote that the Holy One came from Teman, he was referring to two different events: 1) God's accompanyment of the Jewish people during the Exodus, when the Jews passed close to Edom on their way to the Promised Land; and 2) Jesus' Second Coming, which is described at Isaiah 63:



1 Who is this who comes from Edom,

With dyed garments from Bozrah,

This One who is glorious in His apparel,

Traveling in the greatness of His strength?—



“ I who speak in righteousness, mighty to save.”



2 Why is Your apparel red,

And Your garments like one who treads in the winepress?

3 “ I have trodden the winepress alone,

And from the peoples no one was with Me.

For I have trodden them in My anger,

And trampled them in My fury;

Their blood is sprinkled upon My garments,

And I have stained all My robes.

4 For the day of vengeance is in My heart,

And the year of My redeemed has come.



These passages correspond with Revelation 19, speaking of Jesus' Second Coming:



11 Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And He who sat on him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war. 12 His eyes were like a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns. He had a name written that no one knew except Himself. 13 He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God.



Muhammad simply doesn't fulfill Habakkuk's vision.
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:33:00 UTC
You can twist words in any book around to make them try to match a later event. Doesn't mean there was any kind of "prediction" made.



First, the last bible book was written well before Mohammed was born -- so no, he's not mentioned.

Second -- who cares?



Peace.
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:17:58 UTC
It is an axiom of Bible study (and common sense) that a passage that refers to something else must still have a referent that makes sense of the passage as it is. And if that is the case, the burden is on you to make the second case as still necessary. Temporal succession is NOT causality or prediction necessarily.
Andy W
2008-11-19 12:27:05 UTC
If you believe the Bible contains the word of God then why did God change His every word in the Quran?



Take my word - everything given in the Bible is corrupted in the Quran.



Don't believe me? Listen to these ex-Muslims who know what Quran is and what Bible is. They say everything they learned from Quran was "a lie".



http://www.shoebat.com/bio.php

http://www.fromjihadtojesus.com/
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:26:55 UTC
ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ...... sorry fell asleep about a third of the way through your long, boring tedious sermon on Bronze Age nonsense. Wake me up when you have something interesting to say
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:19:21 UTC
Seems like to me Muslims are kind of trying to find things in Old Testament to try to justify what they are believing to be true when it just doesn't appear in the Hebrews Old Testament.
What?
2008-11-19 12:26:50 UTC
Sorry but your wrong. Ishmael will be a great nation yes; but Isaac's seed will inherit the earth (Israel).
steve
2008-11-19 12:17:52 UTC
If you believe in everything people say then I have a bridge to sell you. Interested?
origen_1999
2008-11-19 12:19:35 UTC
That's a big yawn.

Sorry. Loading this page was a waste of bandwidth.
Waiting and Wishing
2008-11-19 12:37:03 UTC
Makes sense to me. But I'm a Muslim.
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:17:52 UTC
how can you deny that jesus took part in The Sabbath and when he blinded a man who insulted Josephand of course when he pushed a kid of a roof and killed him?
Sam
2008-11-19 12:54:11 UTC
These are clear proofs yet they still reject the truth.
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:18:16 UTC
mohammed took shits and farted at least once a day
anonymous
2008-11-19 12:16:32 UTC
u guys are brainwashed......



what a waste of space & time


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...