Question:
Missing link .................?
ʞı˥˥∩WıN∀┴ı
2012-02-19 03:41:35 UTC
In tracing the alleged evolution of humans from primate ancestors, palaeoanthropologists have been frustrated by the existence of two extensive gaps In the fossil record. The first gap, known as the hominoid gap, goes from 32 to 22 million years ago on the evolutionary time-scale. This period is important because it is during this period that evolutionists believe that the ancestors of apes and humans were splitting off from the tine leading to the monkeys. Yet, with one possible exception, [1] this time-frame is devoid of hominoid fossil evidence to document this alleged divergence.

The second gap, known as the hominid gap, extends from 14 to 4.5 million years ago. This second period is equally critical for evolutionary theory because it is the time when the ancestors of the australopithecine and human group were allegedly diverging from the ancestors of the African apes, especially the chimpanzees. This period is also devoid of any relevant fossil material, except for a few fossil scraps too fragmentary for diagnosis. Thus, the recent news that the hominid 'missing link' has been discovered was greeted with great exuberance by the evolutionist community.

THE “MISSING LINK”

What is claimed to be one of the most sensational fossil discoveries involving human origins was made by Tim D. White (University of California, Berkeley), Gem Suwa (University of Tokyo), and Berhane Asfaw (Ethiopian Ministry of Culture), Known first as Australopithecus ramidus [2] and later changed to Ardipithecus ramidus, [3] these fossils were found in sedimentary Pliocene deposits at Aramis, Middle Awash, northern Ethiopia between December 1992 and December 1993.

The fossil discovery is made up of associated and isolated adult teeth, a child's mandible fragment, two partial cranial bases, and seven fragments from a left arm. These 17 fragments were found in association with other primate and vertebrate fossils, Radioisotopic dating, geochemical analysis, and biochronological considerations are said to suggest a date of 4.4 million years ago. [4] (In late December 1994 a mandible and partial postcranial skeleton were found of what is thought to be the same type of individual. Details of this discovery have yet to be published.


smithsonianmag.com
Six answers:
lilAngel
2012-02-19 07:34:55 UTC
Java man: Discovered by Eugene Dubois in 1891, all that was found was a skullcap, three teeth and a femur. The femur was found 50 feet away from the skullcap a year later.



Orce man: Found in the Spanish town of Orce in 1982, hailed as the oldest fossilized human remains in Europe. A year later officials admitted the skull fragment was not human but came from a 4 month old donkey. (Knoxville News-Sentinel, 1983)



Neanderthal: The first remains were found in France in 1908. Considered to be ignorant, ape-like, stooped and knuckle-dragging, the evidence now suggests that Neanderthal was human. His stooped appearance was because of arthritis and rickets. They are now recognized as skilled hunters, believers in an after-life, and one skeleton's right arm had been amputated above the elbow.



'Embryonic Recapitulation' asserts that the human fetus goes through stages of evolutionary history as it develops. Ernst Haeckel proposed this theory in the late 1860's. He made detailed drawings of embryonic development of eight different embryos in three stages of development. His drawings and data were shown to have been fabricated. He blamed the artist without admitting that he was the artist.



Brontosaurus never existed. The skeleton was found with the head missing. A skull found three miles away was added. The body actually belonged to a Diplodocus; the head was from an Apatosaurus.



Piltdown Man:

In 1912, doctor and amateur paleoanthropologist Charles Dawson said that he had found a jawbone and a cranial fragment in Piltdown, England. The jawbone was ape-like, the teeth and skull were like man's. Allegedly 500,000 years old, they were displayed as proof of human evolution. For more than 40 years, scientific articles were written on "Piltdown man", many interpretations and drawings were made, and the fossil was presented as evidence for human evolution. More than 500 doctoral theses were written on the subject.



In 1949, Kenneth Oakley from the British Museum's Paleontology Department used fluorine testing to date the fossils. A test on the fossil proved that the jawbone did not contain any fluorine. It had been buried only a few years. The skull contained a small amount of fluorine showing that it was not older than a few thousand years.



The teeth belonged to an orangutan, had been worn down artificially. The "primitive" tools discovered with the fossils were imitations that had been sharpened with steel tools. The skull belonged to a 500-year-old man, the jaw belonged to a recently deceased ape! Teeth had been added, molar surfaces were filed to resemble man's. These pieces were stained with potassium dichromate to make them look old. The stains disappeared when dipped in acid. Evidence of artificial abrasion immediately sprang to the eye. "Piltdown man" had been displayed for more than 40 years.





Nebraska Man: One Pig Tooth

In 1922 the director of the American Museum of Natural History declared that he had found a fossil molar tooth belonging to the Pliocene period in Nebraska. This tooth allegedly bore characteristics of both man and ape. A debate began over this fossil. Some interpreted this tooth as belonging to Pithecanthropus erectus, others claimed it was human. It was given a "scientific name".



A picture drawn on the basis of the tooth was published in the Illustrated London News magazine on July 24, 1922. Evolutionists were disappointed when it was revealed that this tooth belonged neither to an ape or a man, but to an extinct pig. The Nebraska man's head and body were drawn. He was pictured with his wife and children.



In 1927, other parts of the skeleton were found. According to these newly discovered pieces, the tooth belonged neither to man or ape. William Gregory announced the truth, "Hesperopithecus: Not an Ape or Man." The drawings of Hesperopithecus haroldcooki and his "family" were removed from evolutionary literature.





The African Native In a Cage

Some evolutionists believed that "half-man half-ape" creatures were alive in parts of the world. Pursuits for "living transitional links" led to unfortunate incidents. Ota Benga was captured in 1904 by an evolutionist in the Congo. His name meant "friend". He had a wife and two children. Chained and caged, taken to the US, evolutionists displayed him to the public at the St Louis World Fair as "the closest transitional link to man". They took him to the Bronx Zoo and exhibited him as "ancient ancestor of man" along with chimpanzees, a gorilla and an orangutan. Dr William T. Hornaday, the zoo's evolutionist director gave speeches on how proud he was to have this "transitional form" in his zoo. He caged Ota Benga as if he were an animal. Ota Benga eventually committed suicide.
Maurog IV
2012-02-19 03:45:42 UTC
The phrase "missing link" has been used extensively in popular writings on human evolution to refer to a perceived gap in the hominid evolutionary record. It is most commonly used to refer to any new transitional fossil finds. Scientists, however, do not use the term as it is misleading and inaccurate.



In 1859, when Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species was first published, the fossil record was poorly known, and Darwin described the lack of transitional fossils as "the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory", but explained it by relating it to the extreme imperfection of the geological record.[1] He noted the limited collections available at that time, but described the available information as showing patterns which followed from his theory of descent with modification through natural selection.[2] Indeed, Archaeopteryx was discovered just two years later, in 1861, and represents a classic transitional form between dinosaurs and birds. Many more transitional fossils have been discovered since then and it is now considered that there is abundant evidence of how all the classes of vertebrates are related, much of it in the form of transitional fossils.[3] Specific examples include humans and other primates, tetrapods and fish, and birds and dinosaurs.
anonymous
2016-12-05 01:18:42 UTC
No, you're incorrect. a medical concept could desire to be testable and disprovable. Creationism is neither, so this is not any longer an theory. Evolution is consistent with shown info, besides the reality that if new info got here to mild conflicting with it, then Evolution might now no longer be smart. because of the fact that Darwin proposed his concept in 1859, advances in genetics, zoology and paleantology have bolstered evolutionary concept. over the final 148 years, hundreds of thousands of fossils have been stumbled on, which comprise 1000's of fossils of hominids and early human beings. Genetic discoveries have shown that human beings proportion almost ninety 9% of their genes with different primate species, development the case for our origins. .
JohnsHopkins
2012-02-19 13:39:29 UTC
Pauly Shore.
Matthew
2012-02-19 03:43:29 UTC
Watch scientist Professor Walter Veith disprove the evolution theory

on "amazingdiscoveries.tv"
?
2012-02-19 03:42:37 UTC
So uh,what's the question?

"What is the missing link?'

Science section is that way->


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...