Scientifically speaking? No.
Atheism's nothing but a circular logic fallacy: "There is no god because there is no god."
They'll claim there's no evidence yet where and how long did they personally spend looking?
What degrees in science did they earn to train and qualify them for that?
Because those who DO get off their lazy @sses and get to work looking always end up like these scientists:
“Those who say that the study of science makes a man an atheist must be rather silly.”
–Nobel Prize winning physicist Max Born.
“I think only an idiot can be an atheist.”
—Nobel Prize winning chemist Christian Anfinsen.
Because Science proved them right:
'It's Easy to Be an Atheist if You Ignore Science'
'Scientists investigate if atheists' brains are missing a 'God Spot'
'Atheists embarrassed: study proves atheism uses less brain function'
'Evolutionary Studies Suggest that Atheists, Whatever They Say to the Contrary, Really Do Believe in God'
Something else that destroys atheist's credibility is how they sit around denying their religion is one:
'Court rules atheism a religion'
'Atheists Score Major Win In Federal Court'
'U.S. Supreme Court Ruling: ATHEISM IS RELIGION'
When courts of law grant atheism the same legal status & protections of all other religions, it clearly is one.
No matter how hard any idiot @ssclown atheists p*ss themselves in a panic denying that incontrovertible fact.
Additional to this is how atheists in general also tend to be scientifically illiterate.
Like all the retards claiming science has somehow proved or proven there's no basis for religious belief.
Because actual, fact-based reality is that the opposite is true:
'It's a big, fat myth that all scientists are religion-hating atheists'
'Latest Study Finds Most Scientists in the World are Religious'
'Contrary to Popular Belief, Many Scientists Are Religious'
'Are Top Scientists Really So Atheistic? Look at the Data'
'The myth of scientists as atheists'
'Faith and science closely linked'
“Those who have magnified more recent controversies about the relations of science and religion, and who have projected them back into historical time, simply perpetuate a historical myth. The myth of a perennial conflict between science and religion is one to which no historian of science would subscribe.”
—Former Oxford University Professor of Science and Religion Peter Harrison.
"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.”
—Cambridge University astrophysicist and mathematician Fred Hoyle.
No less of an authority than the American Mathematical Society itself did just that:
"Here is the mother of all spoilers: The probability that the monotheistic, prayer-answering God exists is... 67%"
Link - http://www.ams.org/notices/200802/tx0802...
They're hardly the only scientists who've done some number-crunching on the subject:
'Scientists use mathematical calculations to PROVE the existence of God'
Link - http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/756870/proof-of-god-kurt-godel
Like these guys said:
“A scientific discovery is also a religious discovery. There is no conflict between science and religion. Our knowledge of God is made larger with every discovery we make about the world.”
—Nobel Prize winning physicist Joseph H. Taylor, Jr.
“The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.”
—Nobel Prize winning physicist Werner Heisenberg
“In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.”
—Albert Einstein
Atheists can whine about that till the cows come home.
But whining can't change the fact-based reality of it any.