There is greater chance to assume both might turn out false.
For the bible, it is difficult to see it as the truth as there are too many loopholes here and there.
For evolution, it is still a relatively young science, it can still changes over time.
The bible also talk about god don't lie, but how do we know lying means making a promise that would not come true is ok?
The bible also say, Thou shall not kill, but how do we know it means you are alright to butcher a whole city of it's men, boys and non-virgin women and "keep" virgin girls to yourself (some say it does not say it means "laying" with the virgin girls, I say then what is the reason then? to play chess with them? Some say it is because the girls are pure and not defiling the gods, then what says the young boys? They should be killed because god give them a prick*?) , as long as it is under god's name?
God says "Thou shall not commit adultery" but then sleeping with own daughter in law and make her pregnant is good and god are happy?
The bible also says also say a lot of funny things. Is it up to men's interpretation? Or is it for word twisting so it looks right. Is the bible revealing in it's message (if that is the case, then the book has too many contradiction to be the truth) or is the bible so hidden even the most learned will get it wrong (if that is the case, what is the use of the book which bare no meaning?)
If a book is up to own interpretation, then each person will claim his own interpretation under the sentence "God tell me so" when ask to prove god told him, he will claim you commit blasphemy because you disbelieve god's word and defiled god.
Look in this scenario :
I say I am god. Then you say, prove to me. I say "You lord should not be tested, you should be the tested one". Then you say, in that case, I committed blasphemy, so strike me down. I say "You lord is forgiving and willing to give you a chance to find the way and beg for my forgiveness".
So what? Head I win, tail you lose?
If you look around and you say evolution cannot be true because you cannot see it? How can you say god is true and you cannot see it? Isn't it double standard? At least when I think there is a possibility where evolution is true is when I see how bacteria gets more resistant to anti-biotic with abuse of anti-biotic, reason?
Two possibilities:
a. The bacteria evolved into greater resistance because from the generic code of the previous version, it has to be stronger to certain anti-biotic so it might survive.
b. God is too free after creating earth and when he saw men are able to fight bacteria, he create another one just like the previous one, except stronger, but he does not want to create one that can fully resist anti-biotic, but he create in sequence, slowly so as to torture human, since he is omnipotent and too free anyway.