Blood, Watchtower Flip-Flops on Blood Fractions 4 Times
In 1945 the Watchtower Society banned its members from accepting any form of blood, whether it be whole or fractional. Since then the Watchtower have managed to tie themselves up in the technicalities and changing its mind on what is acceptable to what is not acceptable only for it to be acceptable in a few years time.
Here is the Watchtower’s history on the issue of blood
# 1940 Blood transfusions are acceptable
# 1945 Blood transfusion are not acceptable
# 1956 Blood serums should be treated as blood and are banned
# 1958 Blood serums and fractions acceptable
# 1959 Storage of own blood unacceptable
# 1961 Blood fractions are not acceptable
# 1964 Blood fractions are acceptable
# 1974 Blood serums are personal choice
# 1975 Hemophilia treatments (Factor VII & IX) are not acceptable
# 1978 Hemophilia treatments (Factor VII & IX) are acceptable
# 1982 Albumin is acceptable
# 1983 Hemodilution is acceptable
# 1990 Hemodilution is not acceptable (Blood Brochure)
# 1995 Hemodilution is acceptable
Birthdays
"What caused the Bible Students to stop celebrating Christmas? Richard H. Barber gave this answer: "I was asked to give an hour talk over a [radio] hookup on the subject of Christmas. It was given December 12, 1928, and published in The Golden Age #241 and again a year later in #268. That talk pointed out the pagan origin of Christmas. After that, the brothers at Bethel never celebrated Christmas again." Yearbook 1975 p.147
"Did we mind putting those pagan things away?" asks Charles John Brandlein. "Absolutely not. This was just complying with new things learned, and we had never known before they were pagan. It was just like taking a soiled garment off and throwing it away." Next, birthday celebrations and Mother's Day were discarded-more creature worship. Sister Lilian Kammerud recalls: "How readily the brothers all dropped these holidays and admitted they were glad to be free. New truths always make us happy and . . . we felt we were privileged to know things that others were ignorant about.""
The above quote from the 1975 Yearbook makes it appear that birthdays stopped being celebrated shortly after Christmas in 1928. In reality birthdays continued being celebrated until 1951.
In 1940 the following experience shows birthdays were still considered appropriate;
"Pardon me for intruding on your precious time, but I just can't help letting you know how much I appreciate the phonograph which came to me on the morning after the 8th, which was my 80th birthday. It was indeed a birthday gift from Jehovah, to be used in proclaiming his name. May grace and strength be given me to do with my might what my hands find to do." Watchtower 1940 Jan 1 p.16
In 1951 that the Watchtower stated the Witnesses were no longer to celebrate birthdays.
"Is it proper to have or attend celebrations of birthday anniversaries?-F. K., Nevada. Such celebrations have their roots in pagan religions, and not Scriptural grounds. Some Bible commentators suggest that birthday celebrations may have had their origin in the "notion of the immortality of the soul"." Watchtower 1951 October 1 p.607 Questions from Readers
There is nothing unscriptural about celebrating birthdays, and most Witnesses struggle to explain why they can't without some embarrassment at the shallow reasoning used. Romans 14:5-6 advises not to judge others and their celebrations:
"One indeed judges a day above another; and another one judges every day alike, Let each one be fully assured in his own mind. The one minding the day, he minds it to the Lord. And the one not minding the day, he does not mind it to the Lord. The one eating, he eats to the Lord; for he give thanks to God. And the one not eating, he does not eat to the Lord, and gives thanks to God."
Once more we see that so called pagan doctrine and practices promoted in the Watchtower by the Governing Body were not replaced by new light until decades after Jesus is said to have cleansed his people. This is in sharp contrast with Christian times. How many times did the Apostles issue a decision under God's direction through the Bible letters, only to later decide that it was wrong and introduce an almost opposite viewpoint?